web analytics

Menu

Skip to content
Shades of Knife
  • Home
  • True Colors of a Vile Wife
  • Need Inspiration?
  • Blog Updates
  • SOK Gallery
  • Vile News Reporter
  • About Me
  • Contact Me

Shades of Knife

True Colors of a Vile Wife

Tag: CrPC 125 – Order for Maintenance of Wives Children and Parents

Bai Tahira A Vs Ali Hussain Fissalli Chothia and Anr on 06 Oct 1978

Posted on May 29, 2022 by ShadesOfKnife

A full bench of Apex Court held that, a statutory right created as a projection of public policy can not be negated by a contract.

The last defence, based on mehar payment, merits more serious attention. The contractual limb of the contention must easily fail. The consent decree of 1962 resolved all disputes and settled all claims then available But here is a new statutory right created as a projection of public policy by the Code of 1973, which could not have been in the contemplation of the parties when in 1962, they entered into a contract to adjust their then mutual rights. No settlement of claims which does not have the special statutory right of the divorcee under s. 125 can operate to negate that claim.

Bai Tahira A Vs Ali Hussain Fissalli Chothia and Anr on 06 Oct 1978

Citations : [1979 SCC CRI 473], [1979 SCR 2 75], [1979 AIR SC 362], [1979 MPLJ SC 132], [1979 CRLJ SC 151], [1979 SCC 2 316]

Other Sources :

https://indiankanoon.org/doc/359354/

https://www.casemine.com/judgement/in/575fd27f607dba63d7e69d57


Index is here.

Posted in Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification | Tagged 3-Judge (Full) Bench Decision Against Public Policy Bai Tahira A Vs Ali Hussain Fissalli Chothia and Anr CrPC 125 - Order for Maintenance of Wives Children and Parents Landmark Case | Leave a comment

Lifecycle Stages of a Maintenance Case under Section 125 CrPC

Posted on December 10, 2021 by ShadesOfKnife

Listed below are a reasonably laid out sequence of events in a Maintenance Case filed under Section 125 of CrPC.


Other Life Cycles: 498A IPC Case Lifecycle || DV Case Lifecycle. Index of all life cycles is here. Looking for Maintenance case-laws? go here!


Initial signs of facing a Maintenance case u/s 125 CrPC

This is the 3rd false case after the 498A IPC and Domestic Violence cases, that you may face. This case completes what is colloquially called as Full package. First a criminal case is filed so that Police power can be misused and when that does not break you, Civil reliefs are prayed for through Domestic Violence case. When even that plot fails and you don’t budge, the final attack comes in the form of this maintenance case, in which they think there is a sure shot success in extracting money from you. How comical bozos these are… hahahaha

The COMPLAINT

The petition/application u/s 125 CrPC containing the facts of the case, stating the circumstances under which the wife (as per the law, parents or children can also seek maintenance in cases of neglect) seeks to claim maintenance, all personal relevant details is filed before the Family Court (or jurisdictional Junior Civil Judge Court if Family Court is not available).

Issue of Notice to the Respondent

The Family Court scrutinizes the petition and issues notice to the husband against whom the petition has been filed by the wife. Petitioner copy may be sent along with notice.

Reference to Reconciliation/Mediation

The parties may be directed to appear before the court for reconciliation or may be directed to mediation and efforts are made to reconcile them first in an effort to avoid litigation.

Reconciliation Proceedings

If the reconciliation proceedings after being conducted by the family court are successful, then the matter stands settled. If they lead to failure, then the Court proceeds with the petition to decide it on merits.

Written Statement (of objections)

After giving a copy of the petition to the Respondent, the Family Court directs the opposite part to file a reply/WS/Counter to the maintenance petition stating the facts which he/she accepts or denies. Both the parties are also asked to file their detailed Income Affidavit (as per Rajnesh Vs Neha Case) so that it can infer the capabilities and liabilities. Petitioner must be given a copy of reply.

Rejoinder/Rebuttal

The petitioner is directed to file a rejoinder/rebuttal to reply filed by the opposite party. The application for interim maintenance, if any filed by the petitioner, is decided by the court at this stage of the case, based on pleadings and affidavits alone. No evidence will be entertained to decide Interim applications. Respondent must be given a copy.

Framing of Issues

The court then proceeds further and frames issues for adjudication and the matter is posted for evidence of the parties.

Petitioner’s Evidence

The petitioner is directed to lead its evidence by way of filing the relevant documents, papers, etc. and by summoning all its witnesses. List of witnesses must be given to other side before examining the first prosecution witness. Once prosecution witness examination completes by way of Chief Examination Affidavit, the witness will face Cross Examination from the Counsel of opposite party and the deposition of each witness is recorded, up on oath.

Respondent’s Evidence

The respondent is directed to lead its evidence by way of filing the relevant documents, papers, etc. and by summoning all its witnesses. This is optional and the Respondent may forego examination/ evidence, if they think that the prosecution failed to support their case.

FINAL ARGUMENTS –

The final arguments in the matter are held and the matter is decided by the court. Written Arguments may also be submitted to the Family Court, as a best practice.

Order/Judgment

The Court finally passes the final order/judgement where it may either dismiss the petition or allow the petition and direct the other party to pay an amount as directed by the court monthly.


Key Contributor:

Ms. Suprajaa Rajan (B.Com., LL.B.)
Cell:
Posted in Legal Procedure | Tagged CrPC 125 - Order for Maintenance of Wives Children and Parents Lifecycle Stages of a Maintenance Case under 125 CrPC Work-In-Progress Article | Leave a comment

Pritilata Majumder Vs Krishnapada Majumder on 23 Apr 2021

Posted on May 13, 2021 by ShadesOfKnife

Based on Apex Court decision here, Single Judge of High Court of Tripura held that the evidence of a dumb witness is a competent witness as per section 119 of Evidence Act.

[14] Evidently the petitioner was produced in court and an expert trained in sign language was also engaged by the court to interpret her evidence. As observed by the court, since the petitioner did not understand sign language she could not communicate her evidence to the interpreter and as a result the interpreter could not interpret her evidence to court. However, the petitioner was able to communicate to the court by her signs and gestures that everything of her life was known to her mother.

[15] In this emerged situation, mother [PW-2] of the petitioner is the best witness on her side. She had intimate knowledge of the signs and gestures and meaning of all expressions of her daughter who was brought up by her since her birth. None on earth other than her could better understand her daughter. The mother categorically stated at the trial that marriage of her daughter with the respondent was solemnized in a temple at Kumarghat and after marriage a daughter was born to her and thereafter the respondent left the area. Her evidence was supported by PW-3, a 70 years old man, unrelated to the petitioner who had no reason to tell lie. Moreover, the husband managed to escape. He never appeared either at the trial court or before this Court to discharge his burden. It was not unknown to him that legal proceedings were initiated by his wife against him because he was arrested in one of the cases instituted by his petitioner wife.

[16] A bare perusal of section 119 of the Evidence Act would show that a deaf and dumb witness who is unable to speak may give his evidence in any other manner intelligible to the court. It may be by writing or by signs in open court. It is evident that the mother [PW-2] and her petitioner daughter [PW-1] came to the court on the same day for giving deposition in the case. It also appears from the record that the petitioner was a literate person. She was able to read and write. Therefore, in case of any doubt, the court could have asked her to communicate her words in writing. The court could have also cleared its doubts from the mother of the petitioner by putting the questions to her in exercise of its power under section 165 of the Evidence Act. Without taking recourse to such means, the Family Court rejected the petition declining to grant maintenance allowance to the petitioner and her daughter which is unacceptable.

Pritilata Majumder Vs Krishnapada Majumder on 23 Apr 2021

Citations :

Other Sources :

https://indiankanoon.org/doc/50658253/

Posted in High Court of Tripura Judgment or Order or Notification | Tagged 1-Judge Bench Decision CrPC 125 - Order for Maintenance of Wives Children and Parents Dwarika Prasad Satpathy Vs Bidyut Prava Dixit and Anr Evidence Act 119 - Dumb Witnesses Pritilata Majumder Vs Krishnapada Majumder | Leave a comment

Dwarika Prasad Satpathy Vs Bidyut Prava Dixit and Anr on 14 Oct 1999

Posted on May 13, 2021 by ShadesOfKnife

A Division bench of the Supreme Court held as follows,

“6………………In our view, validity of the marriage for the purpose of summary proceeding under Section 125 Cr.P.C. is to be determined on the basis of the evidence brought on record by the parties. The standard of proof of marriage in such proceeding is not as strict as is required in a trial of offence under section 494 of the I.P.C. If the claimant in proceedings under Section 125 of the Code succeeds in showing that she and the respondent have lived together as husband and wife, the Court can presume that they are legally wedded spouses, and in such a situation, the party who denies the marital status can rebut the presumption………………”

Dwarika Prasad Satpathy Vs Bidyut Prava Dixit and Anr on 14 Oct 1999

Citations : [1999 ACR SC 3 2547], [1999 AIR SC 3348], [1999 ALD CRI 2 955], [1999 ALR 37 733], [2000 ALT CRI 1 29], [1999 CALLT SC 3 61], [2000 CLT SC 89 167], [1999 GLH 2 1037], [1999 JT SC 8 329], [2000 LW CRL 1 218], [2000 PLJR 1 61], [2000 RLW SC 1 23], [1999 SCALE 6 579], [1999 SCC 7 675], [1999 SUPP SCR 3 684], [1999 SCC CRI 1345], [1999 SUPREME 8 602], [2000 CRLJ 0 1], [1999 RCR CRIMINAL 4 577], [2000 CRI LJ 0 1], [2000 OCR SC 18 348], [1999 AIR SC 3844], [2000 BOMCR CRI SC 731], [1999 CRIMES SC 3 206], [2000 LW CRL 1 217], [2000 CRLJ SC 1], [1999 AIR SCW 3844]

Other Sources :

https://indiankanoon.org/doc/305700/

https://www.casemine.com/judgement/in/5609ad5ee4b0149711411339

Posted in Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification | Tagged 2-Judge (Division) Bench Decision CrPC 125 - Order for Maintenance of Wives Children and Parents CrPC 125 - Women In Live-In Relationships Entitled To Maintenance Dwarika Prasad Satpathy Vs Bidyut Prava Dixit and Anr IPC 494 - Marrying again during life-time of husband or wife Landmark Case Legal Procedure Explained - Interpretation of Statutes Reportable Judgement or Order | Leave a comment

R D Vs B D on 31 July, 2019

Posted on August 21, 2019 by ShadesOfKnife

Another dirty judgment, this time from High Court of Delhi.

R D Vs B D on 31 July, 2019
Posted in High Court of Delhi Judgment or Order or Notification | Tagged Baseless or Convoluted Judgment CrPC 125 - Maintenance Granted CrPC 125 - Order for Maintenance of Wives Children and Parents Maintenance under both 125 CrPC and HMA is Maintainable Multiple Maintenances Orders PIL - CrPC 125 Must Go From Statute Book R D Vs B D

Ajay Bhardwaj Vs Jyotsana and others on 23 November, 2016

Posted on January 6, 2019 by ShadesOfKnife

Just read this judgment from P&H HC which held that, even thought when there is a subsisting marriage under HMA, living-together with another man or giving birth to twins with him, can be termed as marriage-like relationship.

Ajay Bhardwaj Vs Jyotsana and others on 23 November, 2016

 

Posted in High Court of Punjab & Haryana Judgment or Order or Notification | Tagged Ajay Bhardwaj Vs Jyotsana and others CrPC 125 - No Strict Proof of Marriage Required CrPC 125 - Order for Maintenance of Wives Children and Parents CrPC 125 - Women In Live-In Relationships Entitled To Maintenance | Leave a comment

Journey through the years – Section 125 CrPC

Posted on December 31, 2018 by ShadesOfKnife

This is to chronicle the journey of the Section 125 CrPC through the years from its enactment.

 


 

Posted in Assorted Court Judgments or Orders or Notifications | Tagged CrPC 125 - Order for Maintenance of Wives Children and Parents Summary Post Work-In-Progress Article | Leave a comment

All Amendments to Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) of India

Posted on December 18, 2018 by ShadesOfKnife

Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) is the general procedural law of India and below are the amendments made to this law over the period.

 

S. No. Short title of amending legislation Act No. Act Year Modification or Addition Brought In Leader and Party in Central/State Government
1 The Repealing and Amending Act, 1974 56 1974 Nothing useful in particular. Indira Gandhi (Indian National Congress)
2 The Code of Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Act, 1978 45 1978 Amendment to 468 CrPC: Period of limitation for related offences which may be tried together Morarji Desai (Janata Party)
3 The Code of Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Act, 1980 63 1980 All proceedings under sections 108, 109 and 110 of CrPC, pending before any Judicial Magistrate of the first class immediately before the commencement of this Act shall, notwithstanding anything contained in this Act, be dealt with as if this Act had not been enacted Indira Gandhi (Indian National Congress)
4 The Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 1983, wiki 43 1983 In the backdrop of Mathura Custodial rape case, sections to prevent/tackle such abuse are brought in. Indira Gandhi (Indian National Congress)
5 The Criminal Law (Second Amendment) Act, 1983 46 1983 Introduction of Sec 498A IPC, Sec 198A CrPC and Sec 113A of Evidence Act
Amendment to Sections 174 and 176 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Indira Gandhi (Indian National Congress)
6 The Code of Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Act, 1988 32 1988 Nothing useful in particular. Rajiv Gandhi (Indian National Congress)
7 The Code of Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Act, 1990 10 1990 Insertion of 166A: Letter of request to competent authority for investigation in a country or place outside India

Insertion of 166B: Letter of request from a country or place outside India to a
Court or an authority for investigation in India.

Vishwanath Pratap Singh (Indian National Congress)
8 The Code of Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Act, 1991 43 1991 Nothing useful in particular. P.V. Narasimha Rao (Indian National Congress)
9 The Code of Criminal Procedure (Andhra Pradesh Second Amendment) Act, 1992 03 1992 Sections 494, 495 IPC are made Cognizable and non-bailable within the State of Andhra Pradesh/Telangana. N. Janardhana Reddy (Indian National Congress)
9 The Code of Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Act, 1993 40 1993 New chapter VVIA introduced with provisions (150A-150L) relating to bringing back proceeds of crime from outside India. P.V. Narasimha Rao (Indian National Congress)
10 The Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 1993 42 1993 Kidnapping for Ransom P.V. Narasimha Rao (Indian National Congress)
11 The Code of Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Act, 2001 50 2001
  • Ceiling of Rs.500/- was removed.
  • Introduction of interim maintenance along with expenses of proceedings
  • Disposal of interim maintenance application within sixty days
Atal Bihari Vajpayee (Bharatiya Janata Party)
12 Code of Criminal Procedure (Andhra Pradesh Amendment) Act, 2003 11 2003
  • Sections 494 and 498A of IPC are added to the list of Compoundable offence u/s 320 Cr.P.C.
N. Chandrababu Naidu (Telugu Desam Party)
13 The Code of Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Act, 2005 25 2005
  • No woman shall be arrested after sunset and before sunrise
  • Sec 50A(1): Every police officer or other person making an arrest under this code shall forthwith give the information regarding such arrest and place where the arrested person is held to any of his friends, relatives or such persons as may be disclosed or nominated by the arrested person for the purpose of giving such information.
  • Examination includes DNA-profiling
  • Sec 144A: Power to prohibit carrying arms in possession or mass drill or mass training with arms.
  • Sec 164A: Medical examination of the victim of rape
  • Sec 291A: Identification report of Magistrate
  • Sec 311A: Power of Magistrate to order a person to give specimen signatures or handwriting
  • Sec 436A: Maximum period for which as undertrial prisoner can be detained
  • Sec 441A: Declaration by sureties
  • Increase of fines across many sections
Dr. Manmohan Singh (Indian National Congress)
14 The Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2005 2 2006
  • Sec 195A: Threatening or inducing any person to give false evidence
  • Introduction of new chapter XXIA: Plea bargaining, (265A-265L CrPC)
  • Amendment to 340 CrPC
Dr. Manmohan Singh (Indian National Congress)
15 The Code of Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Amending Act, 2006 25 2006 Different dates for effectiveness for different provisions of CrPC (Amendment) Act 2005 Dr. Manmohan Singh (Indian National Congress)
16 Code of Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Act, 2008 5 2009
  • Introduction of Sec 41A-41D CrPC: Notice of appearance before police officer
  • Introduction of recording statements/confessions in audio-video electronic means via provisos u/s 161, 164 and 275 CrPC
  • Sec 195A CrPC: Procedure for witnesses in case of threatening etc
  • A witness of any other person may file a complaint in relation to an offence under section 195A of Indian Penal Code.
  • No adjournment should be granted at the request of a party, except where the circumstances are beyond the control of that party
  • Filing of WS under 313 CrPC
  • Sec 357A CrPC: Victim Compensation Scheme
Dr. Manmohan Singh (Indian National Congress)
17 Code of Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Act, 2010 41 2010 Powers of Police without warrant Dr. Manmohan Singh (Indian National Congress)
18 Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013, wiki 13 2013 In the aftermath of Nirbhaya gang rape case,

  • New sections for Sexual harassment, 354A-354D
  • Sec 357B and 357C CrPC: Rape Victim Compensation Scheme
  • New sections for Trafficking of persons, 370 and 370A
  • Bulk of sections for rape u/s 376 IPC, (376A-376E)
  • New offence u/s 166A was inserted into IPC which can be invoke against police if they violate laws.
  • Per the new Explanation given to sec 197 CrPC, no sanction is required to prosecute the police.
Dr. Manmohan Singh (Indian National Congress)
19 Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2018, wiki 22 2018 In the aftermath of the Kathua gang rape and murder case, key Acts are amended. Highlights are

(a) punishment for the offence of rape from the minimum imprisonment of seven years to ten years, which is extendable to imprisonment for life;
(b) punishment for the offence of rape on a woman under sixteen years of age shall be rigorous imprisonment for a term not less than twenty years but may extend to imprisonment for life, which shall mean imprisonment for the remainder of that person’s natural life and shall also be liable to fine;
(c) punishment for the offence of rape on a woman under twelve years of age shall be rigorous imprisonment for a term not less than twenty years but may extend to imprisonment for life, which shall mean imprisonment for the remainder of that person’s natural life and with fine or with death;
(d) punishment for the offence of gang rape on a woman under sixteen years of age shall be imprisonment for life, which shall mean imprisonment for the remainder of that person’s natural life and with fine;
(e) punishment for the offence of gang rape on a woman under twelve years of age shall be imprisonment for life, which shall mean imprisonment for the remainder of that person’s natural life and with fine or with death;
(f) investigation in relation to all rape cases shall be completed within a period of two months from the date on which the information recorded by the officer- in-charge of the police station;
(g) completion of inquiry or trial relating to the offence of rape, within a period of two months;
(h) dispose of an appeal against a conviction or acquittal in rape cases within a period of six months from the date of filing of the appeal;
(i) the provisions of anticipatory bail shall not be applicable in cases of rape or gang rape of woman under sixteen and twelve years of age;
(j) consequential amendments in the Indian Penal Code, Indian Evidence Act, 1872, the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 relating to the cases of rape, gang rape of the woman below the age of sixteen years, twelve years, repeat offenders, to extend the applicability of compulsory registration of FIRs, fine imposed to be paid to victim, facilitate better recording of evidence and protect the dignity of rape survivor and treatment free of cost in hospitals.

Narendra Damodardas Modi (Bharatiya Janata Party)

Any new amendments will be updated as and when available.


Posted in Bare Acts or State Amendments or Statutes or GOs or Notifications issued by Central or State Governments | Tagged Amendment To Criminal Procedure Code CrPC 125 - Dispose Interim Maintenance Application In 60 Days CrPC 125 - Order for Maintenance of Wives Children and Parents | Leave a comment

The Code of Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Act, 2001

Posted on December 18, 2018 by ShadesOfKnife

This is the amendment to CrPC that removed the ceiling of Rs.500/- under the 125 CrPC. And this is the amendment that brought in ‘interim maintenance and expenses of proceeding’. A proviso is introduced which talk about disposal of interim maintenance application under 125 CrPC within 60 days. Of course, 127 CrPC is similarly screwed. And 128 CrPC is altered.

The Code of Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Act, 2001

All the amendments made to the CrPC are available here.

Posted in Bare Acts or State Amendments or Statutes or GOs or Notifications issued by Central or State Governments | Tagged CrPC 125 - Dispose Interim Maintenance Application In 60 Days CrPC 125 - Order for Maintenance of Wives Children and Parents CrPC 127 - Alteration in allowance CrPC 128 - Enforcement of Order of Maintenance | Leave a comment

Rachna Kathuria Vs Ramesh Kathuria on 30 August, 2010

Posted on December 8, 2018 by ShadesOfKnife

In this judgment from Hon’ble Delhi High Court, it was held that “If a woman living separate from her husband had already filed a suit claiming maintenance and after adjudication maintenance has been determined by a competent court either in Civil Suit or by Court of MM in an application under Section 125 Cr.P.C. she does not have a right to claim additional maintenance under the

Act. The Court of MM under the Act has power to grant maintenance and monetary reliefs on an interim basis in a fast track manner only in those cases where woman has not exercised her right of claiming maintenance either under Civil Court or under Section 125 Cr.P.C.”

Why PWDV Act?

Also held “It must be understood that the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 does not create any additional right to claim maintenance on the part of the aggrieved person. It only puts the enforcement of existing right of maintenance available to an aggrieved person on fast track.”

Rachana Khaturia Vs Ramesh Kathuria on 30 August, 2010

 

Posted in High Court of Delhi Judgment or Order or Notification | Tagged CrPC 125 - Order for Maintenance of Wives Children and Parents HAM Act 18 - Interim Maintenance Granted HAM Act 23 - Interim Maintenance Granted PIL - CrPC 125 Must Go From Statute Book PWDV Act 20 - Maintenance Granted PWDV Act Sec 29 - Interim Maintenance Enhanced Rachna Kathuria Vs Ramesh Kathuria | Leave a comment

Post navigation

  • Older posts

Search within entire Content of “Shades of Knife”

My Legal Twitter Timeline

Tweets by @SandeepPamarati

My MRA Twitter Timeline

Tweets by @Shadesofknife

Recent Posts

  • State of Maharashtra Vs Dnyaneshwar Laxman Rao Wankhede on 29 Jul 2009 January 26, 2023
  • Sabiya Begum Malka Vs State of U.P. and Ors on 18 May 2016 January 24, 2023
  • Y.Narasimha Rao and Ors Vs Y.Venkata Lakshmi and Anr on 9 Jul 1991 January 19, 2023
  • Messers S.J.S. Business Enterprises Vs State of Bihar and Ors on 17 Mar 2004 January 17, 2023
  • Ramjas Foundation and Ors vs Union of India and Ors on 9 Nov 2010 January 17, 2023

Most Read Posts

  • Do you know that there is time limit of 60 days to dispose of a Domestic Violence case in India under sec 12(5) of PWDV Act? (9,055 views)
  • XXX Vs State of Kerala and Ors on 05 July 2022 (2,815 views)
  • Ratandeep Singh Ahuja Vs Harpreet Kaur on 11 Oct 2022 (873 views)
  • State Bank of India and Anr Vs Ajay Kumar Sood on 16 Aug 2022 (849 views)
  • Abbas Hatimbhai Kagalwala Vs The State of Maharashtra and Anr on 23 Aug 2022 (822 views)
  • Bar Council of India Vs Bonnie Foi Law College and Ors (716 views)
  • P Parvathi Vs Pathloth Mangamma on 7 Jul 2022 (674 views)
  • Sandeep Pamarati Vs State of AP and Anr on 29 Sep 2022 (Disposal of DVC in 60 days) (674 views)
  • Mukesh Singh versus State of Uttar Pradesh on 30 Sep 2022 (588 views)
  • Joginder Singh Vs Rajwinder Kaur on 29 Oct 2022 (558 views)

Tags

Legal Procedure Explained - Interpretation of Statutes (323)Reportable Judgement or Order (319)Landmark Case (310)2-Judge (Division) Bench Decision (259)Work-In-Progress Article (218)Catena of Landmark Judgments Referred/Cited to (210)1-Judge Bench Decision (145)Sandeep Pamarati (88)3-Judge (Full) Bench Decision (79)Article 21 - Protection of life and personal liberty (74)Perjury Under 340 CrPC (53)Issued or Recommended Guidelines or Directions or Protocols to be followed (52)Absurd Or After Thought Or Baseless Or False Or General Or Inherently Improbable Or Improved Or UnSpecific Or Omnibus Or Vague Allegations (51)Reprimands or Setbacks to YCP Govt of Andhra Pradesh (49)Summary Post (46)CrPC 482 - Quash (38)Not Authentic copy hence to be replaced (34)Advocate Antics (34)Rules of the Act/Ordinance/Notification/Circular (33)IPC 498a - Not Made Out (32)

Categories

Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification (629)Bare Acts or State Amendments or Statutes or GOs or Notifications issued by Central or State Governments (297)High Court of Andhra Pradesh Judgment or Order or Notification (159)High Court of Delhi Judgment or Order or Notification (108)High Court of Bombay Judgment or Order or Notification (91)High Court of Karnataka Judgment or Order or Notification (66)General Study Material (55)High Court of Madras Judgment or Order or Notification (53)Assorted Court Judgments or Orders or Notifications (48)Prakasam DV Cases (46)LLB Study Material (45)High Court of Punjab & Haryana Judgment or Order or Notification (45)Judicial Activism (for Public Benefit) (40)High Court of Allahabad Judgment or Order or Notification (39)District or Sessions or Magistrate Court Judgment or Order or Notification (38)High Court of Kerala Judgment or Order or Notification (30)High Court of Gujarat Judgment or Order or Notification (25)High Court of Madhya Pradesh Judgment or Order or Notification (25)High Court of Calcutta Judgment or Order or Notification (18)High Court of Patna Judgment or Order or Notification (17)

Recent Comments

  • ShadesOfKnife on Beena MS Vs Shino G Babu on 04 Feb 2022
  • Vincent on Beena MS Vs Shino G Babu on 04 Feb 2022
  • ShadesOfKnife on Syed Nazim Husain Vs Additional Principal Judge Family Court & Anr on 9 January, 2003
  • Ravi on Syed Nazim Husain Vs Additional Principal Judge Family Court & Anr on 9 January, 2003
  • ShadesOfKnife on Beena MS Vs Shino G Babu on 04 Feb 2022

Archives of SoK

  • January 2023 (12)
  • December 2022 (12)
  • November 2022 (8)
  • October 2022 (13)
  • September 2022 (17)
  • August 2022 (10)
  • July 2022 (21)
  • June 2022 (27)
  • May 2022 (23)
  • April 2022 (32)
  • March 2022 (17)
  • February 2022 (6)
  • January 2022 (2)
  • December 2021 (7)
  • November 2021 (7)
  • October 2021 (6)
  • September 2021 (10)
  • August 2021 (31)
  • July 2021 (45)
  • June 2021 (17)
  • May 2021 (17)
  • April 2021 (18)
  • March 2021 (58)
  • February 2021 (14)
  • January 2021 (50)
  • December 2020 (35)
  • November 2020 (68)
  • October 2020 (67)
  • September 2020 (29)
  • August 2020 (41)
  • July 2020 (20)
  • June 2020 (36)
  • May 2020 (40)
  • April 2020 (38)
  • March 2020 (26)
  • February 2020 (43)
  • January 2020 (35)
  • December 2019 (35)
  • November 2019 (4)
  • October 2019 (18)
  • September 2019 (58)
  • August 2019 (33)
  • July 2019 (12)
  • June 2019 (19)
  • May 2019 (5)
  • April 2019 (19)
  • March 2019 (58)
  • February 2019 (11)
  • January 2019 (90)
  • December 2018 (97)
  • November 2018 (43)
  • October 2018 (31)
  • September 2018 (73)
  • August 2018 (47)
  • July 2018 (143)
  • June 2018 (92)
  • May 2018 (102)
  • April 2018 (59)
  • March 2018 (8)

Blogroll

  • Daaman Promoting Harmony 0
  • Fight against Legal Terrorism Fight against Legal Terrorism along with MyNation Foundation 0
  • Good Morning Good Morning News 0
  • Insaaf India Insaaf Awareness Movement 0
  • MyNation Hope Foundation Wiki 0
  • MyNation.net Equality, Justice and Harmony 0
  • Sarvepalli Legal 0
  • Save Indian Family Save Indian Family Movement 0
  • SIF Chandigarh SIF Chandigarh 0
  • The Male Factor The Male Factor 0
  • Vaastav Foundation The Social Reality 0
  • Voice4india Indian Laws, Non-profits, Environment 0
  • Writing Law Writing Law by Ankur 0

RSS Cloudflare Status

  • Maintenance impacting SSL API availability and certificate issuance February 14, 2023
    THIS IS A SCHEDULED EVENT Feb 14, 14:00 - 16:00 UTCJan 26, 10:38 UTCScheduled - On February 14th, 2023, Cloudflare will be doing database maintenance that will impact SSL API availability and may result in certificate issuance delays. The scheduled maintenance will be on February 14, 2023, 14:00 - 16:00 UTC.During the maintenance window, SSL-related […]
  • FRA (Frankfurt) on 2023-02-07 February 7, 2023
    THIS IS A SCHEDULED EVENT Feb 7, 01:30 - 03:30 UTCFeb 2, 06:40 UTCScheduled - We will be performing scheduled maintenance in FRA (Frankfurt) datacenter on 2023-02-07 between 01:30 and 03:30 UTC. Traffic might be re-routed from this location, hence there is a possibility of a slight increase in latency during this maintenance window for […]
  • ICN (Seoul) on 2023-02-06 February 6, 2023
    THIS IS A SCHEDULED EVENT Feb 6, 17:00 - 23:00 UTCFeb 1, 06:20 UTCScheduled - We will be performing scheduled maintenance in ICN (Seoul) datacenter on 2023-02-06 between 17:00 and 23:00 UTC. Traffic might be re-routed from this location, hence there is a possibility of a slight increase in latency during this maintenance window for […]

RSS List of Spam Server IPs from Project Honeypot

  • 192.142.21.117 | S February 1, 2023
    Event: Bad Event | Total: 408 | First: 2023-01-11 | Last: 2023-02-01
  • 192.142.21.82 | S February 1, 2023
    Event: Bad Event | Total: 212 | First: 2023-01-11 | Last: 2023-02-01
  • 103.20.11.159 | SD February 1, 2023
    Event: Bad Event | Total: 4,199 | First: 2017-01-12 | Last: 2023-02-01
Proudly powered by WordPress
Theme: Flint by Star Verte LLC

Bad Behavior has blocked 467 access attempts in the last 7 days.

pixel