web analytics

Menu

Skip to content
Shades of Knife
  • Home
  • True Colors of a Vile Wife
  • Need Inspiration?
  • Blog Updates
  • SOK Gallery
  • Vile News Reporter
  • About Me
  • Contact Me

Shades of Knife

True Colors of a Vile Wife

Month: November 2020

In Re To issues certain guidelines regarding inadequacies and deficiencies in criminal trials

Posted on November 30, 2020 by ShadesOfKnife

 

These are the recommendations prepared by Amicus curie in March 2020.

In Re To issues certain guidelines regarding inadequacies and deficiencies in criminal trials

Supreme Court issued notices to all HCs and State Administrations to hear them and then pass Draft Rules.

Inadequacies and deficiencies in criminal trials on 27 Oct 2020

Next Hearing on 11-Dec-2020,

 

Posted in Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification | Tagged In Re To issues certain guidelines regarding inadequacies and deficiencies in criminal trials Recommended Guidelines or Directions Work-In-Progress Article | Leave a comment

Jugal Vs State of Rajasthan on 25 Nov 2020

Posted on November 28, 2020 by ShadesOfKnife

Rajasthan High Court passed a direction to all trial Courts in Rajasthan that, in all Bail matters u/s 437/438,  a detailed report on antecedents of the accused is t be filed along with judgment.

There is no mention regarding the status of criminal antecedents of the present petitioner in the impugned order. It is often seen by this Court that the learned courts below are not specific in regard to antecedents of the accused persons, which causes delay in the disposal of the bail applications, as, if the person is not having antecedents and his antecedents are called, receiving of such antecedents reports takes quite some time. Though the antecedent alone is not a ground of rejecting or accepting a bail, but it is must that the Hon’ble High Court should have the antecedent report to check the applicability of Section 437 (1) of Cr.P.C. as well as to weigh the case of the accused person with overall perspective of the allegations levelled.

Thus, this Court directs that all learned trial courts shall, while allowing or disallowing any regular/anticipatory bail application of any accused person,give the complete details of the antecedents, if any, and also record that there are no antecedents of the accused person in case of none being there. If there are antecedents of the accused, then the complete details of the antecedents i.e. FIR Number(s) & Case Number(s), Section(s), date(s), status and date of arrest & release on any previous occasion, if any, in the chart form shall be prepared and incorporated in the learned trial courts’ order, while granting or dismissing the bail application.
This order shall be conveyed by the Registry of this Court to all learned District & Sessions Judges of the State, who shall ensure the immediate implementation of this order amongst all the judicial officers and all courts in their respective jurisdiction, which are hearing the bail applications. The detailed antecedents report in aforesaid format so provided in the trial courts’ order shall be the requirement of disposal of any bail application in State of Rajasthan. It is also directed that the learned Public Prosecutors all over the State shall call for the antecedents report well in advance in every case of bail, so as to enable the courts to have a definite and correct information regarding previous criminal antecedents of the accused. A certified copy of this order be also sent by the Registry to the Director of the Prosecution Department of the State for necessary compliance, amongst the learned Public Prosecutors all over the State of Rajasthan.
The Registry of this Hon’ble Court shall ensure compliance of this order, in its letter and spirit, and submit such compliance before this Court on 05.01.2021.

Jugal Vs State of Rajasthan on 25 Nov 2020
Posted in High Court of Rajasthan Judgment or Order or Notification | Tagged 1-Judge Bench Decision CrPC 439 - Special powers of High Court or Court of Session regarding bail Directions Issued to be followed Jugal Vs State of Rajasthan Work-In-Progress Article | Leave a comment

Pradeepkumar Vs State of Kerala on 23 Nov 2020

Posted on November 27, 2020 by ShadesOfKnife

A consensual sexual act is given a color of a rape in this case and the accused got bail u/s 439 CrPC on his third attempt, as this very same judge was not inclined to grant bail in earlier two instance and hence the bail applications were withdrawn.

Pradeepkumar Vs State of Kerala on 23 Nov 2020
Posted in High Court of Kerala Judgment or Order or Notification | Tagged CrPC 439 - Special powers of High Court or Court of Session regarding bail False Incest Or Rape Or Sexual Or Sexual Harassment Allegations Legal Terrorism Misuse of Women-Centric Laws Pradeepkumar Vs State of Kerala | Leave a comment

PIL Drafting Competition on Constitution Day 2020 by NLIU LAC

Posted on November 27, 2020 by ShadesOfKnife

After Ex Gratia Law Journal’s 1st Judgement Writing Competition 2020 here, I participated in this Judgement Writing Competition here with my partners Yashika Bhartia [idea of 46(3) Cr.P.C. and initial discussions] and Swathi Pudipeddi [Drafting, Research and multiple reviews of the Draft PIL Petition] and here is the problem statement.

Guildelines, PIL drafting competition


Here is the PIL I wrote. It is password-protected to prevent misuse like plagiarism. If you want to read it, contact me for password.

PIL Draft, Team Code _ T-60 for Sharing purpose

I couldn’t make my Team win any prizes this time around. The winners are declared on official social media handles here and here.


Getting ready for next competition here.

Posted in LLB Study Material | Tagged PIL Writing Competition | Leave a comment

Government Guesthouse at Kapuluppada, Visakhapatnam

Posted on November 26, 2020 by ShadesOfKnife

Government Guesthouse at Kapuluppada, Visakhapatnam

Posted in High Court of Andhra Pradesh Judgment or Order or Notification | Tagged Reprimands or Setbacks to YCP Govt of Andhra Pradesh | Leave a comment

K.C. Kanniyappa Vs K.C. Lalitha and Anr on 26 Sep 2005

Posted on November 26, 2020 by ShadesOfKnife

Single-judge bench of Andhra Pradesh held that, cross-examination need not be confined to the facts to which the witness testified on his examination-in-chief.

From Para 3,

3. Since O.S. No. 1141 of 2000, later renumbered as O.S. No. 20 of 2003, was ordered to be tried along with O.S. No. 47 of 1998, obviously common evidence is being recorded in both the suits. When two suits are clubbed and tried together, all the parties to the suits have a right to cross-examine the witness examined by the adversary, because Section 138 of the Evidence Act, 1872 (‘the Act’) confers such right on them. As per that Section 138 of the Act the witness called by a party shall first be examined-in-chief and if the adverse party so desires he can cross-examine him and then if the party calling him so desires, can re-examine him. That section specifically lays down that Chief examination and cross-examination must relate to relevant facts, but cross-examination need not be confined to the facts to which the witness testified on his examination-in-chief.

Casemine copy:

K.C. Kanniyappa Vs K.C. Lalitha and Anr on 26 Sep 2005 (casemine)

Legal Crystal copy:

K.C. Kanniyappa Vs K.C. Lalitha and Anr on 26 Sep 2005 (legalcrystal)

Citations : [2006 ALD 1 370], legalcrystal.com/442436

Other Sources :

https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1166172/

https://www.casemine.com/judgement/in/5608f85de4b01497111422e0

https://www.legalcrystal.com/case/442436/k-c-kanniyappa-vs-lalitha-anr

Posted in High Court of Andhra Pradesh Judgment or Order or Notification | Tagged 1-Judge Bench Decision Evidence Act Sec 138 - Cross-examination need not be confined to the facts to which the witness testified on his Examination-in-chief Evidence Act Sec 138 - Order of Examinations K.C. Kanniyappa Vs K.C. Lalitha and Anr Reportable Judgement Work-In-Progress Article | Leave a comment

Sources to the Constitution of India

Posted on November 26, 2020 by ShadesOfKnife
Posted in LLB Study Material | Leave a comment

In Re Cognizance for Extension of Limitation

Posted on November 26, 2020 by ShadesOfKnife

Supreme Court in this Suo moto Civil Writ Petition, had extended the limitation period from 15 March 2020 until further orders, due to the situation created by COVID-19

In Re Cognizance for Extension of Limitation on 23 Mar 2020

The limitation was extended for all periods of limitation prescribed under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act 1881 shall be extended with effect from 15.03.2020 till further orders.

In Re Cognizance for Extension of Limitation on 06 May 2020

RBI was allowed to decide on the extension of any limitation that may be available under Banking Regulation Act,1949.

With reference to the prayer, that the period of validity of a cheque be extended, we find that the said period has not been prescribed by any Statute but it is a period prescribed by the Reserve Bank of India under Section 35-A of the Banking Regulation Act,1949. We do not consider it appropriate to interfere with the period prescribed by the Reserve Bank of India, particularly, since the entire banking system functions on the basis of the period so prescribed.
The Reserve Bank of India may in its discretion, alter such period as it thinks fit. Ordered accordingly.

In Re Cognizance for Extension of Limitation on 10 Jul 2020

Supreme Court heard arguments and reserved it’s orders. Related news here.

In Re Cognizance for Extension of Limitation on 04 Mar 2021

Awaiting order…

Posted in Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification | Tagged Article 141 of The Constitution of India Article 142 of The Constitution of India COVID-19 induced Limitation extension | Leave a comment

Society for Un-aided Private Schools of Rajasthan Vs UOI and Anr on 12 Apr 2012

Posted on November 25, 2020 by ShadesOfKnife

Constitutional Validity of provisions of ‘Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 (for short “the 2009 Act”) with respect to the unaided non-minority schools is decided in affirmative in this judgment by a 3-judge bench with a 2-1 majority.

Society for Un-aided Private Schools of Rajasthan Vs UOI and Anr on 12 Apr 2012

Citations : [2012 AIOL 168], [2012 SUPREME 3 305], [2012 AIR SC 3445], [2012 SCC 6 102], [2012 SCALE 4 272], [2012 SCC 6 1], [2012 SLT 3 370], [2012 AIR SC 3400], [2012 RCR CIVIL SC 2 775], [2012 BOMCR SC 6 711], [2012 JT 4 137], [2012 SCC ONLINE SC 340], [2012 CUTLT 114 862], [2012 AWC SC 4 4260], [2012 MLJ SC 3 993], [2012 CLT 114 862], [2012 KARLJ 3 177], [2012 JLJR 2 324], [2012 CUT LT 114 862], [2012 AIR SCW 3400]

Other Sources :

https://indiankanoon.org/doc/154958944/

https://www.casemine.com/judgement/in/5609af1ee4b0149711415aa3

Society for Un-aided Private Schools of Rajasthan v. Union of India and Anr.

Posted in Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification | Tagged 3-Judge Bench Decision Article 21A of The Constitution of India - Right to Education Constitutional Validity Society for Un-aided Private Schools of Rajasthan Vs UOI and Anr | Leave a comment

Dr Gaurav Paul Vs Dr Deepali Arora on 07 May 2016

Posted on November 25, 2020 by ShadesOfKnife

All the members of the family accused of 498A IPC offence were discharged as there was no material to prosecute them.

Dr Gaurav Paul Vs Dr Deepali Arora on 07 May 2016

There was once a time when copy of complaint in a 498A IPC case was not given to accused, to exercise FIR Quash etc. Had to file RTI application to Police CPIO !!!

CIC_SS_A_2011_002037_M_77848
Posted in District or Sessions or Magistrate Court Judgment or Order or Notification | Tagged Absurd Or After Thought Or Baseless Or False Or General Or Inherently Improbable Or Improved Or UnSpecific Or Omnibus Or Vague Allegations CrPC 239 - Discharged Discourage Roping In All Relatives Of In-Laws Or Distant Relatives Dr Gaurav Paul Vs Dr Deepali Arora No Grave Suspicion Against Accused Two Views Possible - Supicion Vs Grave Suspicion | Leave a comment

Post navigation

  • Older posts

Search within entire Content of “Shades of Knife”

My Twitter Timeline

Tweets by @Shadesofknife

Recent Posts

  • Anil Kumar and 2 Ors Vs State of A.P. and Anr on 3 Apr 2019 March 9, 2021
  • U.Surekha Vs State of AP on 04 Mar 2021 March 6, 2021
  • CrPC 406 – Power of Supreme Court to transfer cases and appeals March 5, 2021
  • CrPC 358 – Compensation to persons groundlessly arrested March 5, 2021
  • CrPC 250 – Compensation for accusation without reasonable cause March 5, 2021

Most Read Posts

  • Satish Chander Ahuja Vs Sneha Ahuja on 15 Oct 2020 (610 views)
  • Rani Narasimha Sastry Vs Rani Suneela Rani on 05 Jan 2017 (419 views)
  • Government Guesthouse at Kapuluppada, Visakhapatnam (335 views)
  • Dr Nallapareddy Sridhar Reddy Vs State of AP and Ors (308 views)
  • Kapil Gupta Vs State on 23 Sep 2020 (280 views)
  • In Re To issues certain guidelines regarding inadequacies and deficiencies in criminal trials (265 views)
  • Prof. S. K. Bhalla Vs State of JnK and Ors on 09 Oct 2020 (262 views)
  • Rajnesh Pal Naidu Vs Neha Naidu Joshi and Anr on 04 Nov 2020 (251 views)
  • CrPC 309 - Power to Postpone or Adjourn Proceedings (246 views)
  • IPC 498A is a Compoundable Case in Andhra Pradesh (237 views)

Tags

Landmark Case (219)Legal Procedure Explained (218)Work-In-Progress Article (190)Reportable Judgement (171)Catena of Landmark Judgments (129)2-Judge (Division) Bench Decision (108)Sandeep Pamarati (81)Article 21 of The Constitution of India (62)Absurd Or After Thought Or Baseless Or False Or General Or Inherently Improbable Or Improved Or UnSpecific Or Omnibus Or Vague Allegations (47)Perjury Under 340 CrPC (46)Summary Post (46)Reprimands or Setbacks to YCP Govt of Andhra Pradesh (44)3-Judge Bench Decision (39)1-Judge Bench Decision (37)IPC 498a Not Made Out (32)CrPC 482 - Quash (32)Rules of the Act/Ordinance/Notification/Circular (32)PWDV Act 20 - Maintenance Granted (31)PIL - CrPC 125 Must Go From Statute Book (28)LLB Subjects and Previous Year Exam Papers and Answers (27)

Categories

Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification (501)Bare Acts or State Amendments or Statutes or GOs or Notifications issued by Central or State Governments (253)High Court of Andhra Pradesh Judgment or Order or Notification (132)High Court of Delhi Judgment or Order or Notification (82)High Court of Bombay Judgment or Order or Notification (77)General Study Material (53)Prakasam DV Cases (46)High Court of Karnataka Judgment or Order or Notification (45)LLB Study Material (45)Assorted Court Judgments or Orders or Notifications (40)High Court of Madras Judgment or Order or Notification (37)Judicial Activism (for Public Benefit) (35)High Court of Punjab & Haryana Judgment or Order or Notification (33)District or Sessions or Magistrate Court Judgment or Order or Notification (27)High Court of Allahabad Judgment or Order or Notification (27)High Court of Gujarat Judgment or Order or Notification (21)High Court of Madhya Pradesh Judgment or Order or Notification (18)High Court of Kerala Judgment or Order or Notification (13)High Court of Calcutta Judgment or Order or Notification (11)Chittor DV Cases (11)

Recent Comments

  • ShadesOfKnife on Sirangai Shoba @ Shoba Munnuri Vs Sirangi Muralidhar Rao on 19 October, 2016
  • muralidhar Rao Sirangi on Sirangai Shoba @ Shoba Munnuri Vs Sirangi Muralidhar Rao on 19 October, 2016
  • ShadesOfKnife on J.Shyam Babu Vs The State Of Telangana on 9 February, 2017
  • anuj on J.Shyam Babu Vs The State Of Telangana on 9 February, 2017
  • ShadesOfKnife on Syed Nazim Husain Vs Additional Principal Judge Family Court & Anr on 9 January, 2003

Archives of SoK

  • March 2021 (7)
  • February 2021 (14)
  • January 2021 (50)
  • December 2020 (35)
  • November 2020 (68)
  • October 2020 (67)
  • September 2020 (29)
  • August 2020 (42)
  • July 2020 (20)
  • June 2020 (36)
  • May 2020 (40)
  • April 2020 (38)
  • March 2020 (26)
  • February 2020 (43)
  • January 2020 (36)
  • December 2019 (35)
  • November 2019 (4)
  • October 2019 (18)
  • September 2019 (58)
  • August 2019 (33)
  • July 2019 (12)
  • June 2019 (19)
  • May 2019 (5)
  • April 2019 (19)
  • March 2019 (58)
  • February 2019 (11)
  • January 2019 (90)
  • December 2018 (97)
  • November 2018 (43)
  • October 2018 (31)
  • September 2018 (74)
  • August 2018 (47)
  • July 2018 (143)
  • June 2018 (92)
  • May 2018 (102)
  • April 2018 (59)
  • March 2018 (8)

Blogroll

  • Daaman Promoting Harmony 0
  • Fight against Legal Terrorism Fight against Legal Terrorism along with MyNation Foundation 0
  • Good Morning Good Morning News 0
  • Insaaf India Insaaf Awareness Movement 0
  • MyNation Hope Foundation Wiki 0
  • MyNation.net Equality, Justice and Harmony 0
  • Sarvepalli Legal 0
  • Save Indian Family Save Indian Family Movement 0
  • SIF Chandigarh SIF Chandigarh 0
  • The Male Factor The Male Factor 0
  • Vaastav Foundation The Social Reality 0
  • Voice4india Indian Laws, Non-profits, Environment 0
  • Writing Law Writing Law by Ankur 0

RSS Cloudflare Status

  • Cloudflare Billing Issues March 6, 2021
    Mar 6, 17:52 UTCResolved - The Billing issue was identified and has been resolved.Mar 6, 17:16 UTCIdentified - The Billing issue has been identified and resolution is in progress.Mar 6, 16:09 UTCInvestigating - Cloudflare is experiencing problems in processing changes through our billing subscription service with credit-card or paypal. Purchasing might be affected with these […]
  • Wrong WAF nomenclature March 5, 2021
    Mar 5, 23:32 UTCResolved - This incident has been resolved.Mar 5, 23:02 UTCMonitoring - A fix has been implemented and we are monitoring the results.Mar 5, 19:19 UTCIdentified - WAF actions will appear incorrectly as 'Unknown' for some events.No customer traffic is affected and the WAF is still functioning properly.
  • Elevated number of 403/1000 errors March 5, 2021
    Mar 5, 17:17 UTCResolved - This incident has been resolved.Mar 5, 16:32 UTCIdentified - Cloudflare is investigating an increased level of HTTP 403 /1000 errors for customers using the Orange to Orange feature.We are working to analyse and mitigate this problem. More updates to follow shortly.

RSS List of Spam Server IPs from Project Honeypot

  • 103.7.155.8 | SD March 7, 2021
    Event: Bad Event | Total: 2,737 | First: 2021-02-14 | Last: 2021-03-07
  • 103.50.85.131 | SD March 7, 2021
    Event: Bad Event | Total: 1,508 | First: 2017-12-19 | Last: 2021-03-07
  • 103.7.155.6 | SD March 7, 2021
    Event: Bad Event | Total: 2,785 | First: 2021-02-14 | Last: 2021-03-07
Proudly powered by WordPress
Theme: Flint by Star Verte LLC
pixel