Here is a wonderful resource from BankExamsToday.com
Recent Constitutional Amendments from 1951 to 2019Month: April 2019
Sangita Saha Vs Abhijit Saha and Ors on 28 January, 2019
Apex Court has upheld the Kolkata High Court judgment wherein it has affirmed that, when there is no DV, no reliefs flow from the case.
Sangita Saha Vs Abhijit Saha and Ors on 28 January, 2019The High Court of Kolkata judgment is here.
Reproduced in accordance with Section 52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, lobis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court and District Court Websites such as ecourts.gov.in
Abhijit Saha and Ors Vs Sangita Saha on 17 September, 2015
Another good judgment from High Court of Kolkata wherein it was held that,
Abhijit Saha and Ors Vs Sangita Saha on 17 September, 2015“Unless it is satisfactorily established that domestic violence has taken place neither any protection order under Section 18 nor any residence order under Section 19 nor any order for monetary relief under Section 20 nor any compensation order under Section 22 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 should be passed.”
Reproduced in accordance with Section 52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, lobis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court and District Court Websites such as ecourts.gov.in
G.Ramesh Babu vs Radhika on 19 December, 2018
Another judgment from Madras High Court, wherein a false DV case on parents was quashed due to generic and non-specific allegation.
G.Ramesh Babu Vs Radhika on 19 December, 2018Indiankanoon.org link: https://indiankanoon.org/doc/11203719/
Reproduced in accordance with Section 52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, lobis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court and District Court Websites such as ecourts.gov.in
Perumal Vs Janaki on 20 January, 2014
Another landmark judgment from Justice Jasti Chalameswar on the Supervisory Authority of High Courts on Lower Courts in a state and how and why it should have been invoked in this case gainfully. If not under 193 IPC, invocation of 211 IPC was very much desirable in this case.
Another observation is that one can file Perjury under section 340 CrPC even after getting acquittal.
Perumal Vs Janaki on 20 January, 2014Reproduced in accordance with Section 52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, lobis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court and District Court Websites such as ecourts.gov.in
Restatement of Values of Judicial Life (Ethics for Judiciary) and In-House Procedure
Here is the list of ethics for High Judiciary (this is what judges of High Court and Supreme Court call themselves)
Restatement of Values of Judicial LifeAnd the revised In-House Procedure, for taking suitable remedial action against judges who, by their acts of omission or commission, do not follow universally accepted values of Judicial Life including those included in the Restatement of Values of Judicial Life.
In-house Procedure 2014-12-31P.Trivikrama Prasad Vs State Of A.P. on 29 January, 2016
This is another judgment from AP High Court which talks about Rule 37 of CRP and CO, 1990.
P.Trivikrama Prasad Vs State Of A.P. on 29 January, 2016 crlp_4854_2015The bulk of the Criminal Rules of Practice, 1990 is available here.
T.Vinil SO Srinivasulu Vs State Of A.P. on 22 September, 2015
This is another judgment from AP High Court which talks about Rule 37 of CRP and CO, 1990.
T.Vinil SO Srinivasulu Vs State Of A.P. on 22 September, 2015 crlp_8193_2015The bulk of the Criminal Rules of Practice, 1990 is available here.
Gadu Narayanarao and Anr Vs State Of A.P. and Anr on 3 June, 2015
This is one of the earliest judgments from Justice Shri B Siva Shankar Rao, where in he mentioned about Rule 37 of the Criminal Rule of Practice and Circular Order, 1990
Gadu Narayanarao and Anr Vs State Of A.P. and Anr on 3 June, 2015 crlp_3823_2015The bulk of the Criminal Rules of Practice, 1990 is available here.
The Criminal Rules of Practice and Circular Orders, 1990 (High Court of A.P.)
Here is the 1990 edition of the Criminal Rules of Practice and Circular Orders, 1990 (High Court of A.P.).
THE CRIMINAL RULES OF PRACTICE AND CIRCULAR ORDERS, 1990Four judgments of AP High Court that I court find related to Rule 37, are the following:
- Gadu Narayanarao and Anr Vs State Of A.P. and Anr on 3 June, 2015
- Gaddameedi Nagamani Vs The State Of Telangana on 17 July, 2015
- T.Vinil S/O Srinivasulu Vs State Of A.P. on 22 September, 2015
- P.Trivikrama Prasad Vs State Of A.P. on 29 January, 2016
You can take a look at my 498A case here, where I have used Rule 37 successfully and am filing (absent) petitions via Registered Post – Acknowledge Due to the filing section.
Find the Civil Rules of Practice of AP High Court here.
Reproduced in accordance with Section 52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, lobis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court and District Court Websites such as ecourts.gov.in
