web analytics

Menu

Skip to content
Shades of Knife
  • Home
  • True Colors of a Vile Wife
  • Need Inspiration?
  • Blog Updates
  • SOK Gallery
  • Vile News Reporter
  • About Me
  • Contact Me

Shades of Knife

True Colors of a Vile Wife

Month: October 2019

Movies for Law Students and…

Posted on October 27, 2019 by ShadesOfKnife

Telugu

Sudigundaalu

Ashwathama

Srava Sandhya

 

 

Tamil

Manithan

 

 

 

Hindi

Pink
Jolly LLB
Jolly LLB 2
Aitraaz
Shourya
Mulk

https://www.primevideo.com/detail/Dhananjoy/0OWLNAT6SAFOS2BPIC0KCNO7J1

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dhananjoy_Chatterjee

 

 

 

English

Clock work orange
12 angry men
My cousine Vinny ( extemly funny & creative)
Philadelphia ( Tom Hanks & denzil – Jo lost due to HIV )
To kill a mockingbird ( child role )

 

 

Movie Lists

https://m.imdb.com/list/ls026258815/

https://www.filmykeeday.com/best-movies-on-courtroom-drama/

 

 

Posted in General Study Material | Tagged Movies

Maintenance Judgments

Posted on October 21, 2019 by ShadesOfKnife

Maintenance judgments by Enactment

Maintenance and Alimony Judgments under Hindu Marriage Act 1955 here.


Maintenance Judgments under Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act 1956 here.


Maintenance Judgments under Section 125 CrPC [Section 144 BNSS] here.


Maintenance Judgments under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 here.


Maintenance for Limited Time Period here.


Maintenance after Mutual Consent Divorce here.


Agreements against Public Policy are Void here.


A SPECIAL FOCUS ON IMPLEMENTATION OF Rajnesh Vs Neha AFFIDAVIT

A 2-judge bench of Supreme Court passed guidelines in Rajnesh Vs Neha on how to handle multiple maintenance litigation here.

  • Telangana High Court gave a wonderful order here, confirming that any order passed by Trial Courts, without calling for the Income affidavits is void ab initio and therefore is liable to set aside and matters will be remanded back to the same Trial Courts for fresh adjudication.
  • Then another 2-judge bench of Apex Court has to Order re-circulation of above judgment in Aditi Sharma Vs Jitesh Sharma, because the Trial Court Judges stopped following Supreme Court judgement here. Exactly after 3 long years!!!
  • There are other High Courts which set aside the trial Court orders for the singular reason that they did not follow Rajnesh Vs Neha. Check them out here.
    • Calcutta HC in Nripendra Chandra Mahanta Vs Pramila Mahanta on 08 Feb 2023
    • Allahabad HC in Parul Tyagi Vs Gaurav Tyagi on 04 Aug 2023
    • Telangana HC in Chinta Vamshi Vs State of Telangana and Anr on 16 Oct 2023
    • Kerala HC in Rijas MT Vs Hafseena M on 15 Nov 2023
    • Patna HC in Gitanjali Devi Vs State of Bihar and Anr on 02 Dec 2023
    • Karnataka HC in Darshanik M M Vs Poornima A on 04 Dec 2023
    • MP HC in Balram Dixit Vs Kiran Dixit and Anr on 17 Jan 2024
      • It seems AP High Court is hell bent not to follow Rajnesh Vs Neha… and passed this perverse order here with a trivial reason. Karma!
    • AP HC following my success story in Sreekanth Vs Nalini in Meegada Venu Gopala Rao Vs Meegada Usha Rani and Ors on 10 Jul 2024. Happy!!!
    • AP HC in Kalavakuru Srinivas Kumar Reddy Vs Kalavakuru @ Revuru Sujatha and Ors on 05 Feb 2025 [My client’s case]
    • Orissa HC in Nabaghana Sahoo Vs Smruti Prava Sahoo and Anr on 11 Feb 2025 [neither of the parties has filed the disclosure affidavit as mandated in Rajnesh]
    • Kerala HC in Ratheesh Vs Sreelakshmi and Ors on 14 Mar 2025 (Even to dispose Interim Maintenance Applications, call for affidavits)
    • Patna HC in Ravi Prakash Saxena Vs Priyanka Rani on 04 Sep 2025 [Remanded case back to the same Trial Courts for fresh adjudication]
    • Madras HC in N.Santhosh Kumar Vs S.Priyadarshini on 25 Oct 2025 [Lied on the Income Affidavit, so interim maintenance reduced]

A 2-judge bench of Supreme Court recorded the various observations of the Delhi High Court in Parvin Kumar Jain Vs Anju Jain here, where by Delhi High Court flagged the following tendencies of parties in filing their Income Affidavits.

  1. Instances of the appellant’s deliberate attempts to mislead the judicial process
  2. Withheld critical financial documents
  3. Selectively disclosed information to conceal the full extent of his wealth
  4. False representations by the appellant regarding his property and income
  5. Demonstrated a pattern of deliberate suppression of material facts and assets
  • Allahabad HC in Atul Kumar Bajpai Vs State of UP and Anr on 17 Sep 2025 held that Perjury applications alleging false evidence/affidavit must be first Disposed

MASTER SITEMAP here.


Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) – Maintenance Law & Judgments in India

Maintenance refers to financial support provided by one person to another who is unable to maintain themselves, typically in matrimonial or family relationships. Under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC), courts can order a person with sufficient means to provide maintenance to his wife, children, or parents if he neglects or refuses to support them.

The following persons can seek maintenance under the law:

  • Wife, including a divorced woman who has not remarried
  • Minor children unable to maintain themselves
  • Adult children suffering from disability or illness
  • Parents who cannot support themselves

The objective of the provision is to prevent destitution and vagrancy by ensuring financial support for dependents.

To claim maintenance, the applicant generally needs to show:

  1. A valid marital or legal relationship
  2. Neglect or refusal to maintain by the respondent
  3. The applicant is unable to maintain themselves
  4. The respondent has sufficient financial means

Courts evaluate these factors based on evidence and circumstances of each case.

Yes. Courts have clarified that mere qualification or ability to earn is not enough to deny maintenance. What matters is whether the person is actually earning enough to maintain a reasonable standard of living comparable to that enjoyed during the marriage.

Courts determine the quantum of maintenance based on several factors, including:

  • Income and financial capacity of the respondent
  • Lifestyle and standard of living during marriage
  • Needs of the claimant and dependents
  • Educational and employment status of the parties
  • Reasonable expenses for food, clothing, and shelter

The goal is to ensure the dependent spouse can maintain a dignified standard of living.

Yes. Courts can grant interim maintenance to provide immediate financial support during ongoing proceedings. Applications for interim maintenance are expected to be decided expeditiously, ensuring the claimant is not left without support while the case continues.

Maintenance may be refused if the wife:

  • Is living in adultery
  • Refuses to live with her husband without sufficient reason
  • Lives separately by mutual consent
  • Has sufficient independent income to maintain herself

These exceptions are provided under Section 125(4) CrPC.

Yes. Under Section 125 CrPC, parents who are unable to maintain themselves have the legal right to claim maintenance from their children. Courts treat this obligation as a moral and legal duty of children toward their parents.

Yes. A divorced wife who has not remarried can claim maintenance if she cannot support herself. Courts have repeatedly recognized that divorce does not extinguish the right to maintenance where financial dependence continues.

Courts increasingly require both parties to file affidavits disclosing income, assets, and liabilities, including bank statements, tax returns, and property details. This ensures fair determination of maintenance and prevents concealment of income.

Maintenance provisions are social welfare measures intended to prevent financial hardship and ensure that dependents such as spouses, children, and parents are not left destitute due to neglect or abandonment.

Yes. With the enactment of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, the provision corresponding to Section 125 CrPC has been incorporated as Section 144 BNSS, while retaining the same core principles governing maintenance claims.

Posted in Assorted Court Judgments or Orders or Notifications | Tagged Catena of Landmark Judgments Referred/Cited to CrPC 125 or BNSS 144 - Maintenance Denied CrPC 125 or BNSS 144 - Maintenance Granted CrPC Sec 125 or BNSS Sec 144 - Interim Maintenance Denied CrPC Sec 125 or BNSS Sec 144 - Interim Maintenance Granted HM Act Sec 24 - Interim Maintenance Denied HM Act Sec 24 - Interim Maintenance Granted Not followed Guidelines in Rajnesh Vs Neha Judgment PWDV Act Sec 20 - Maintenance Denied PWDV Act Sec 20 - Maintenance Granted Summary Post

Neeta Rakesh Jain Vs Rakesh Jeetmal Jain on 20 July, 2010

Posted on October 21, 2019 by ShadesOfKnife

Apex Court held in this decision u/s 23 of Hindu Marriage Act that, Court has to consider the petitioner’s own income and the income of the respondent before granting Interim Maintenance to application.

From Para 8,

8. Section 24 thus provides that in any proceeding under the Act, the spouse who has no independent income sufficient for her or his support may apply to the court to direct the respondent to pay the monthly maintenance as the court may think reasonable, regard being had to the petitioner’s own income and the income of the respondent. The very language in which Section is couched indicates that wide discretion has been conferred on the court in the matter of an order for interim maintenance. Although the discretion conferred on the court is wide, the Section provides guideline inasmuch as while fixing the interim maintenance the court has to give due regard to the income of the respondent and the petitioner’s own income. In other words, in the matter of making an order for interim maintenance, the discretion of the court must be guided by the criterion provided in the Section, namely, the means of the parties and also after taking into account incidental and other relevant factors like social status; the background from which both the parties come from and the economical dependence of the petitioner. Since an order for interim maintenance by its very nature is temporary, a detailed and elaborate exercise by the court may not be necessary, but, at the same time, the court has got to take all the relevant factors into account and arrive at a proper amount having regard to the factors which are mentioned in the statute.

Final Straw:

The cost of the appeal is burdened at Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand) on the husband to be paid to the appellant within one month from today.


Neeta Rakesh Jain Vs Rakesh Jeetmal Jain on 20 July, 2010

Citations: 2010 SCR 8 505, 2010 AIR SC 3540, 2010 SCC 12 242, 2010 SCALE 7 201,

Indiankanoon.org link: https://indiankanoon.org/doc/9474/


Reproduced in accordance with Section 52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, lobis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court and District Court Websites such as ecourts.gov.in

Posted in Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification | Tagged HM Act 24 - Consider Means or Education of Wife HM Act Sec 24 - Interim Maintenance Enhanced Legal Procedure Explained - Interpretation of Statutes Neeta Rakesh Jain Vs Rakesh Jeetmal Jain

Bilal Hajar @ Abdul Hameed Vs State Rep by the Inspector of Police on 10 October, 2018

Posted on October 20, 2019 by ShadesOfKnife

Supreme Court of India laid the explanation for the definition of conspiracy as prescribed u/s  120A IPC (and punishment u/s 120B IPC).

From Para 32,

32. Therefore, in order to constitute a conspiracy, meeting of mind of two or more persons to do an illegal act or an act by illegal means is a must. In
other words, it is sine qua non for invoking the plea of conspiracy against the accused. However, it is not necessary that all the conspirators must  know each and every detail of the conspiracy, which is being hatched and nor it is necessary to prove their active part/role in such meeting.

 

Bilal Hajar @ Abdul Hameed Vs State Rep by the Inspector of Police on 10 October, 2018

Citations: 2018 SCC OnLine SC 1865

Indiankanoon.org link: https://indiankanoon.org/doc/31194569/


Reproduced in accordance with Section 52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, lobis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court and District Court Websites such as ecourts.gov.in

Posted in Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification | Tagged Bilal Hajar @ Abdul Hameed Vs State Rep by the Inspector of Police IPC 120A - Definition of criminal conspiracy IPC 120B - Punishment of criminal conspiracy

IPC 120B – Punishment of criminal conspiracy

Posted on October 20, 2019 by ShadesOfKnife

120B. Punishment of criminal conspiracy.—

(1) Whoever is a party to a criminal conspiracy to commit an offence punishable with death, imprisonment for life or rigorous imprisonment for a term of two years or upwards, shall, where no express provision is made in this Code for the punishment of such a conspiracy, be punished in the same manner as if he had abetted such offence.
(2) Whoever is a party to a criminal conspiracy other than a criminal conspiracy to commit an offence punishable as aforesaid shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term not exceeding six months, or with fine or with both.

Posted in Bare Acts or State Amendments or Statutes or GOs or Notifications issued by Central or State Governments | Tagged IPC 120B - Punishment of criminal conspiracy

IPC 120A – Definition of criminal conspiracy

Posted on October 20, 2019 by ShadesOfKnife

120A. Definition of criminal conspiracy.—When two or more persons agree to do, or cause to be done,—
(1) an illegal act, or

(2) an act which is not illegal by illegal means, such an agreement is designated a criminal conspiracy:

Provided that no agreement except an agreement to commit an offence shall amount to a criminal conspiracy unless some act besides the agreement is done by one or more parties to such agreement in pursuance thereof.
Explanation.—It is immaterial whether the illegal act is the ultimate object of such agreement, or is merely incidental to that object.

Posted in Bare Acts or State Amendments or Statutes or GOs or Notifications issued by Central or State Governments | Tagged IPC 120A - Definition of criminal conspiracy

Hooghly Mills Company Ltd Vs State of West Bengal on 17 October, 2019

Posted on October 20, 2019 by ShadesOfKnife

Apex Court held that, a High Court can quash even an interlocutory order under section 482 CrPC.

From Para 11,

11. Coming to the final issue, Section 397(2) of the Cr.P.C. provides that the High Court’s powers of revision shall not be exercised in relation to any interlocutory order passed in any appeal, inquiry, trial or other proceeding. Whereas Section 482 of the Cr.P.C provides that nothing in the Cr.P.C will limit the High Court’s inherent powers to prevent abuse of process or to secure the ends of justice. Hence the High Court may exercise its inherent powers under Section 482 to set aside an interlocutory order, notwithstanding the bar under Section 397(2). However it is settled law that this can only be done in exceptional cases. This is, for example, where a criminal proceeding has been initiated illegally, vexatiously or without jurisdiction (See Madhu Limaye v. State of Maharashtra, (1977) 4 SCC 551).

Hooghly Mills Company Ltd Vs State of West Bengal on 17 October, 2019

Citations:

Indiankanoon.org link:


Reproduced in accordance with Section 52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, lobis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court and District Court Websites such as ecourts.gov.in

Posted in Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification | Tagged CrPC 482 - Interlocutory Order can be Quashed CrPC 482 - Saving of inherent powers of High Court Hooghly Mills Company Ltd Vs State of West Bengal Legal Procedure Explained - Interpretation of Statutes Reportable Judgement or Order

Sameer Garg and Anr Vs State and Anr on 25 September, 2019

Posted on October 13, 2019 by ShadesOfKnife

Honorable Delhi High Court held that, “if any of the allegations are found to be patently false, the trial court shall take necessary steps to prosecute the concerned complainant to the full extent of law”

Sameer Garg and Anr Vs State and Anr on 25 September, 2019

Citations:

Indiankanoon.org link:


Reproduced in accordance with Section 52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, lobis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court and District Court Websites such as ecourts.gov.in

Posted in High Court of Delhi Judgment or Order or Notification | Tagged Judgment Sameer Garg and Anr Vs State and Anr Work-In-Progress Article

Khatri and Ors Vs State of Bihar and Ors

Posted on October 13, 2019 by ShadesOfKnife

Few other Orders passed by the Supreme Court in the Khatri and Ors Vs State of Bihar and Ors case (available here)are listed below for reference.

  • Khatri and Others Vs State of Bihar and Ors on 19 December, 1980
    1. This is decision from Apex Court of India which held that right to free legal services is inalienable from Article 21.
    2. Khatri and Others Vs State of Bihar and Ors on 19 December, 1980

  • Khatri and Ors Vs State of Bihar and Ors on 14 January, 1981
    1. Khatri and Ors Vs State of Bihar and Ors on 14 January, 1981

  • Khatri and Ors Vs State of Bihar and Ors on 25 November, 1982
    1. Khatri and Ors Vs State of Bihar and Ors on 25 November, 1982
Posted in Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification | Tagged Khatri and Ors Vs State of Bihar and Ors Not Authentic copy hence to be replaced Summary Post

CrPC 162 – Statements to police not to be signed: Use of statements in evidence

Posted on October 12, 2019 by ShadesOfKnife

(1) No statement made by any person to a police officer in the course of an investigation under this Chapter, shall, if reduced to writing, be signed by the person making it; nor shall any such statement or any record thereof, whether in a police diary or otherwise, or any part of such statement or record, be used for any purpose, save as hereinafter provided, at any inquiry or trial
in respect of any offence under investigation at the time when such statement was made:
Provided that when any witness is called for the prosecution in such inquiry or trial whose statement has been reduced into writing as aforesaid, any part of his statement, if duly proved, may be used by the accused, and with the permission of the Court, by the prosecution, to contradict such witness in the manner provided by section 145 of the Indian Evidence Act , 1872 (1 of 1872); and when any part of such statement is so used, any part thereof may also be used in the re-examination of such witness, but for the purpose only of explaining any matter referred to in his cross-examination.
(2) Nothing in this section shall be deemed to apply to any statement falling within the provisions of clause (1) of section 32 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (1 of 1872); or to affect the provisions of section 27 of that Act.
Explanation.—An omission to state a fact or circumstance in the statement referred to in sub-section (1) may amount to contradiction if the same appears to be significant and otherwise relevant having regard to the context in which such omission occurs and whether any omission amounts to a contradiction in the particular context shall be a question of fact.

Posted in Bare Acts or State Amendments or Statutes or GOs or Notifications issued by Central or State Governments | Tagged CrPC 162 - Statements To Police Not To Be Signed - Use Of Statements In Evidence

Post navigation

  • Older posts

Search within entire Content of “Shades of Knife”

My Legal X Timeline

Advocate Sandeep Pamarati ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ’ช๐Ÿ‘จ๐Ÿปโ€๐ŸŽ“ Follow

AP High Court Advocate with M Tech (CS) || 12 years in 'Software Industry' as Solution Architect || Blogs at https://t.co/29CB9BzK4w || #TDPTwitter

SandeepPamarati
Retweet on Twitter Advocate Sandeep Pamarati ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ’ช๐Ÿ‘จ๐Ÿปโ€๐ŸŽ“ Retweeted
futurestacked Future Stacked @futurestacked ·
23 Jun

Your Gmail account is not an email account.

It is the master key to your bank, your crypto, your Apple ID, your PayPal, and every password you have ever saved.

One breach and all your passwords are gone.

Lock it down with these 7 easy steps ๐Ÿ‘‡

Reply on Twitter 2069354786743374317 Retweet on Twitter 2069354786743374317 104 Like on Twitter 2069354786743374317 260 X 2069354786743374317
Retweet on Twitter Advocate Sandeep Pamarati ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ’ช๐Ÿ‘จ๐Ÿปโ€๐ŸŽ“ Retweeted
thisguyknowsai Brady Long @thisguyknowsai ·
22 Jun

A German psychologist proved in 1885 that cramming erases what you learned within 48 hours. He published the fix in the same book. Almost no school on Earth has adopted it in 140 years.

His name was Hermann Ebbinghaus.

He had no lab. No funding. No colleagues.

He worked alone

Reply on Twitter 2068965021514891696 Retweet on Twitter 2068965021514891696 958 Like on Twitter 2068965021514891696 2820 X 2068965021514891696
Retweet on Twitter Advocate Sandeep Pamarati ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ’ช๐Ÿ‘จ๐Ÿปโ€๐ŸŽ“ Retweeted
factcheckapgov FactCheck.AP.Gov.in @factcheckapgov ·
22 Jun

เฐŽเฐ‚เฐคเฑ‹ เฐชเฑเฐฐเฐคเฐฟเฐทเฑเฐŸเฐพเฐคเฑเฐฎเฐ•เฐ‚เฐ—เฐพ เฐจเฐฟเฐฐเฑเฐตเฐนเฐฟเฐ‚เฐšเฐฟ เฐชเฑเฐฐเฐœเฐฒ เฐ†เฐฐเฑ‹เฐ—เฑเฐฏเฐ‚ เฐชเฐŸเฑเฐฒ เฐ…เฐตเฐ—เฐพเฐนเฐจ เฐ•เฐฒเฑเฐชเฐฟเฐ‚เฐšเฐฟเฐจ เฐ…เฐ‚เฐคเฐฐเฑเฐœเฐพเฐคเฑ€เฐฏ เฐฏเฑ‹เฐ—เฐพ เฐฆเฐฟเฐจเฑ‹เฐคเฑเฐธเฐตเฐ‚ เฐธเฐ‚เฐฆเฐฐเฑเฐญเฐ‚เฐ—เฐพ เฐฐเฐพเฐทเฑเฐŸเฑเฐฐเฐ‚ เฐฒเฑ‹ เฐชเฐฒเฑเฐšเฑ‹เฐŸเฑเฐฒ เฐจเฐฟเฐฐเฑเฐตเฐนเฐฟเฐ‚เฐšเฐฟเฐจ เฐฏเฑ‹เฐ—เฐพ เฐ•เฐพเฐฐเฑเฐฏเฐ•เฑเฐฐเฐฎเฐ‚ เฐชเฑˆ เฐ•เฑŠเฐ‚เฐฆเฐฐเฑ เฐคเฐชเฑเฐชเฑเฐกเฑ เฐชเฑเฐฐเฐšเฐพเฐฐเฐ‚ เฐšเฑ‡เฐธเฑเฐคเฑเฐจเฑเฐจเฐพเฐฐเฑ. เฐˆ เฐ•เฐพเฐฐเฑเฐฏเฐ•เฑเฐฐเฐฎเฐ‚ เฐ•เฑ‹เฐธเฐ‚ เฐฐเฑ‚. 600 เฐ•เฑ‹เฐŸเฑเฐฒเฑ เฐ–เฐฐเฑเฐšเฑ เฐ…เฐฏเฐฟเฐจเฐŸเฑเฐฒเฑ เฐšเฑ†เฐชเฑเฐชเฐกเฐ‚ เฐชเฑ‚เฐฐเฑเฐคเฐฟเฐ—เฐพ เฐ…เฐธเฐคเฑเฐฏเฐ‚. เฐฐเฐพเฐทเฑเฐŸเฑเฐฐเฐ‚เฐฒเฑ‹

Reply on Twitter 2068972932827869255 Retweet on Twitter 2068972932827869255 38 Like on Twitter 2068972932827869255 85 X 2068972932827869255
Retweet on Twitter Advocate Sandeep Pamarati ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ’ช๐Ÿ‘จ๐Ÿปโ€๐ŸŽ“ Retweeted
jaitdp Telugu Desam Party @jaitdp ·
22 Jun

เฐšเฑ€เฐซเฑ เฐฎเฐฟเฐจเฐฟเฐธเฑเฐŸเฐฐเฑ.. เฐŸเฑ€เฐšเฐฐเฑ เฐ…เฐฏเฐฟเฐจ เฐตเฑ‡เฐณ

เฐ…เฐ‚เฐ—เฐจเฑเฐตเฐพเฐกเฑ€ เฐ•เฑ‡เฐ‚เฐฆเฑเฐฐเฐพเฐจเฑเฐจเฐฟ เฐธเฐ‚เฐฆเฐฐเฑเฐถเฐฟเฐ‚เฐšเฐฟเฐจ เฐธเฑ€เฐŽเฐ‚ เฐšเฐ‚เฐฆเฑเฐฐเฐฌเฐพเฐฌเฑ เฐ•เฐพเฐธเฑ‡เฐชเฑ เฐŸเฑ€เฐšเฐฐเฑโ€Œเฐ—เฐพ เฐฎเฐพเฐฐเฐฟ, เฐชเฐฟเฐฒเฑเฐฒเฐฒ เฐ…เฐญเฑเฐฏเฐธเฐจเฐ‚ เฐŽเฐฒเฐพ เฐ‰เฐ‚เฐฆเฑ‹ เฐคเฑ†เฐฒเฑเฐธเฑเฐ•เฑเฐจเฑเฐจเฐพเฐฐเฑ. เฐ‡เฐ‚เฐ—เฑเฐฒเฑ€เฐทเฑ เฐ†เฐฒเฑเฐซเฐพเฐฌเฑ†เฐŸเฑเฐธเฑ เฐšเฑ†เฐชเฑเฐชเฐฎเฐจเฐฟ เฐธเฑ€เฐŽเฐ‚ เฐ…เฐกเฐฟเฐ—เฑ‡เฐธเฐฐเฐฟเฐ•เฐฟ เฐชเฐฟเฐฒเฑเฐฒเฐฒเฑ เฐšเฐ•เฑเฐ•เฐ—เฐพ เฐšเฑ†เฐชเฑเฐชเฐพเฐฐเฑ.
#ChandrababuNaidu
#AndhraPradesh

Reply on Twitter 2068873963246399922 Retweet on Twitter 2068873963246399922 73 Like on Twitter 2068873963246399922 310 X 2068873963246399922
Load More

Recent Posts

  • Pavul Yesu Dhasan Vs Registrar SHRC of TN and Ors on 30 Apr 2025 June 18, 2026
  • Manoj Kumar Vs Nita Bharti on 17 Mar 2026 June 17, 2026
  • Cruelty as a Criminal Offence Explained June 12, 2026
  • Bail Compliance Undertaking Format โ€“ Draft, Legal Requirements & Sample Template June 12, 2026
  • Warning Signs of Escalating Matrimonial Litigation โ€“ Early Red Flags Every Spouse Should Recognize June 12, 2026

Most Read Posts

  • Reply to Section 41A CrPC Notice โ€“ Format with Legal Explanation (4,945 views)
  • Anu Aggarwal Vs Sushant Aggarwal on 20 Jan 2026 (3,487 views)
  • Umme Farva Vs State of U.P. and Anr on 14 Jan 2026 (3,373 views)
  • Charge Sheet and Final Report Explained (2,818 views)
  • Regular Bail Application Format (Section 437/439 CrPC) (2,195 views)
  • Neha Lal Vs Abhishek Kumar on 20 Jan 2026 (2,002 views)
  • Arrest Procedure in 498A cases after Arnesh Kumar (1,936 views)
  • Discharge Application Format in 498A Case โ€“ Draft, Procedure & Sample Template (1,777 views)
  • Can You Travel Abroad After an FIR Is Registered? โ€“ Legal Position Explained (1,696 views)
  • Atul Kumar Bajpai Vs State of UP and Anr on 17 Sep 2025 (1,540 views)

Tags

Reportable Judgement or Order (433)2-Judge (Division) Bench Decision (413)Legal Procedure Explained - Interpretation of Statutes (382)Landmark Case (381)1-Judge Bench Decision (362)Catena of Landmark Judgments Referred/Cited to (293)Work-In-Progress Article (215)3-Judge (Full) Bench Decision (101)Sandeep Pamarati (92)Article 21 - Protection of life and personal liberty (80)Issued or Recommended Guidelines or Directions or Protocols to be followed (71)Perjury Under 340 CrPC (66)Absurd Or After Thought Or Baseless Or False Or General Or Inherently Improbable Or Improved Or UnSpecific Or Omnibus Or Vague Allegations (61)Reprimands or Setbacks to YCP Govt of Andhra Pradesh (49)Summary Post (47)CrPC 482 - Quash (43)HM Act 13 - Divorce Granted to Husband (42)Legal Terrorism (41)Divorce granted on Cruelty ground (41)Not Authentic copy hence to be replaced (40)

Categories

Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification (753)Bare Acts or State Amendments or Statutes or GOs or Notifications issued by Central or State Governments (328)High Court of Andhra Pradesh Judgment or Order or Notification (186)High Court of Delhi Judgment or Order or Notification (164)High Court of Bombay Judgment or Order or Notification (112)High Court of Karnataka Judgment or Order or Notification (93)Legal Procedure (77)High Court of Madras Judgment or Order or Notification (70)High Court of Allahabad Judgment or Order or Notification (61)LLB Study Material (59)General Study Material (56)High Court of Punjab & Haryana Judgment or Order or Notification (52)Assorted Court Judgments or Orders or Notifications (50)High Court of Kerala Judgment or Order or Notification (46)Prakasam DV Cases (46)Judicial Activism (for Public Benefit) (45)District or Sessions or Magistrate Court Judgment or Order or Notification (44)High Court of Madhya Pradesh Judgment or Order or Notification (38)High Court of Gujarat Judgment or Order or Notification (28)High Court of Calcutta Judgment or Order or Notification (27)

Recent Comments

  • eCourts India on Compromise-Based Quashing in Matrimonial Cases โ€“ Complete Legal Strategy
  • The Divorce Law Firm on Life Cycle Stages of a Divorce case
  • The Divorce Law Firm on Life Cycle Stages of a Divorce case
  • ShadesOfKnife on Sandeep Pamarati Vs Ungrateful Knife (IPC 498A Case)
  • KONURU VINAYKUMAR on Sandeep Pamarati Vs Ungrateful Knife (IPC 498A Case)

Archives of SoK

  • June 2026 (9)
  • May 2026 (24)
  • April 2026 (33)
  • March 2026 (42)
  • February 2026 (30)
  • January 2026 (21)
  • December 2025 (2)
  • November 2025 (3)
  • October 2025 (17)
  • September 2025 (12)
  • August 2025 (5)
  • July 2025 (10)
  • June 2025 (15)
  • May 2025 (3)
  • April 2025 (10)
  • March 2025 (7)
  • February 2025 (8)
  • January 2025 (1)
  • December 2024 (3)
  • November 2024 (4)
  • October 2024 (16)
  • September 2024 (15)
  • August 2024 (14)
  • July 2024 (11)
  • June 2024 (18)
  • May 2024 (13)
  • April 2024 (9)
  • March 2024 (23)
  • February 2024 (15)
  • January 2024 (11)
  • December 2023 (11)
  • November 2023 (9)
  • October 2023 (13)
  • September 2023 (12)
  • August 2023 (15)
  • July 2023 (17)
  • June 2023 (11)
  • May 2023 (6)
  • April 2023 (5)
  • March 2023 (10)
  • February 2023 (9)
  • January 2023 (12)
  • December 2022 (12)
  • November 2022 (8)
  • October 2022 (13)
  • September 2022 (17)
  • August 2022 (10)
  • July 2022 (21)
  • June 2022 (27)
  • May 2022 (23)
  • April 2022 (32)
  • March 2022 (17)
  • February 2022 (6)
  • January 2022 (2)
  • December 2021 (7)
  • November 2021 (7)
  • October 2021 (6)
  • September 2021 (10)
  • August 2021 (31)
  • July 2021 (45)
  • June 2021 (17)
  • May 2021 (17)
  • April 2021 (18)
  • March 2021 (58)
  • February 2021 (14)
  • January 2021 (50)
  • December 2020 (35)
  • November 2020 (68)
  • October 2020 (67)
  • September 2020 (28)
  • August 2020 (41)
  • July 2020 (20)
  • June 2020 (36)
  • May 2020 (40)
  • April 2020 (38)
  • March 2020 (26)
  • February 2020 (43)
  • January 2020 (35)
  • December 2019 (34)
  • November 2019 (4)
  • October 2019 (18)
  • September 2019 (57)
  • August 2019 (33)
  • July 2019 (12)
  • June 2019 (18)
  • May 2019 (5)
  • April 2019 (19)
  • March 2019 (58)
  • February 2019 (11)
  • January 2019 (90)
  • December 2018 (97)
  • November 2018 (43)
  • October 2018 (31)
  • September 2018 (73)
  • August 2018 (47)
  • July 2018 (143)
  • June 2018 (92)
  • May 2018 (97)
  • April 2018 (59)
  • March 2018 (8)

Blogroll

  • Daaman Promoting Harmony 0
  • Fight against Legal Terrorism Fight against Legal Terrorism along with MyNation Foundation 0
  • Good Morning Good Morning News 0
  • Insaaf India Insaaf Awareness Movement 0
  • MyNation Hope Foundation Wiki 0
  • MyNation.net Equality, Justice and Harmony 0
  • Sarvepalli Legal 0
  • Save Indian Family Save Indian Family Movement 0
  • SIF Chandigarh SIF Chandigarh 0
  • The Male Factor The Male Factor 0
  • Unitedmen Foundation a dedicated community forged with the mission to unite men facing legal challenges in marital disputes. 0
  • Vaastav Foundation The Social Reality 0
  • Vinayak my2centsworth – This blog is for honest law abiding men, married or planning to get married 0
  • Voice4india Indian Laws, Non-profits, Environment 0
  • Writing Law Writing Law by Ankur 0

RSS Cloudflare Status

  • ARN (Stockholm) on 2026-06-25 June 25, 2026
    THIS IS A SCHEDULED EVENT Jun 25, 00:00 - 05:00 UTC Jun 19, 14:18 UTC Scheduled - We will be performing scheduled maintenance in ARN (Stockholm) datacenter on 2026-06-25 between 00:00 and 05:00 UTC.Traffic might be re-routed from this location, hence there is a possibility of a slight increase in latency during this maintenance window […]
  • ARN (Stockholm) on 2026-06-24 June 24, 2026
    Jun 24, 05:00 UTC Completed - The scheduled maintenance has been completed. Jun 24, 00:00 UTC In progress - Scheduled maintenance is currently in progress. We will provide updates as necessary. Jun 19, 13:08 UTC Scheduled - We will be performing scheduled maintenance in ARN (Stockholm) datacenter on 2026-06-24 between 00:00 and 05:00 UTC.Traffic might […]
  • Network Performance Issues - Increased HTTP 5XX Errors in Ashburn, US June 23, 2026
    Jun 23, 16:00 UTC Resolved - Between 17:07 and 17:45 UTC, Cloudflare experienced network performance issues in the Ashburn, US region, resulting in an elevated rate of 5xx errors for a subset of traffic. During this time, impacted users may have encountered intermittent connectivity issues or unexpected server responses. The underlying issue was successfully mitigated, […]

RSS List of Spam Server IPs from Project Honeypot

  • 34.106.192.29 | SD June 23, 2026
    Event: Bad Event | Total: 6 | First: 2026-06-23 | Last: 2026-06-23
  • 182.161.69.73 | S June 23, 2026
    Event: Bad Event | Total: 16 | First: 2011-01-28 | Last: 2026-06-23
  • 34.80.202.241 | SD June 23, 2026
    Event: Bad Event | Total: 6 | First: 2026-06-23 | Last: 2026-06-23
Owned and Operated by Advocate Sandeep Pamarati
Proudly powered by WordPress
Theme: Flint by Star Verte LLC

Bad Behavior has blocked 1438 access attempts in the last 7 days.

pixel