web analytics

Menu

Skip to content
Shades of Knife
  • Home
  • True Colors of a Vile Wife
  • Need Inspiration?
  • Blog Updates
  • SOK Gallery
  • Vile News Reporter
  • About Me
  • Contact Me

Shades of Knife

True Colors of a Vile Wife

Tag: HM Act Sec 24 – Interim Maintenance Granted

H P Komala Vs N Ravikumar on 29 Jul 2024

Posted on October 6, 2024 by ShadesOfKnife

A single judge bench of Karnataka High Court held as follows, when a husband filed for divorce and did not pay the interim maintenance.

From Para 10,

10. This court is coming across several cases where the husband will not pay the maintenance as ordered by the court and which attains finality but he insists for proceeding with the main case. The CPC provides for execution of the orders passed by the court. No doubt there is mechanism provided for execution of the orders. In these pending matrimonial matters, when the order is passed for maintenance pendent-lite, the party who is contesting the matter cannot tell the opposite party that I will proceed with the case and you can go before the executing court for recovery of money. In matrimonial cases thousands of execution petitions are pending. In some cases the parties are not in a position to meet their basic necessities and the opposite parties inspite of not obeying the orders of the court are enjoying the further orders passed by the court. In these matrimonial proceedings, the court while exercising the jurisdiction under Section 151 of CPC and under Order 6 Rule 16 of CPC should either stay the proceedings or strike off the pleadings. This to some extent will subserve the ends of justice. It will also send a message to the concerned that they cannot get away with non-compliance of the orders of the court and deprive other party from the fruits of the order.

Tip: Pay the money and get the divorce (your freedom!)

H P Komala Vs N Ravikumar on 29 Jul 2024

Index of Divorce Judgments is here and Maintenance Judgments is here.

Posted in High Court of Karnataka Judgment or Order or Notification | Tagged 1-Judge Bench Decision Abuse Or Misuse of Process of Court CPC 151 - Saving of inherent powers of Court H P Komala Vs N Ravikumar HM Act 24 - Maintenance From Date of Application Or Petition HM Act Sec 24 - Interim Maintenance Granted Reportable Judgement or Order | Leave a comment

Rajkumar Amruthrao Guddadigi Vs Shilaja Rajkumar Guddadigi on 04 Jan 2024

Posted on March 12, 2024 by ShadesOfKnife

A single (Dr) judge of the Bombay High Court held as follows,

From Para 10, (Enjoy the perversity)

10. The perusal of the order impugned indicates that the trial Judge has taken into account all the facts necessary to be considered for fair adjudication and determination of quantum of interim maintenance. The trial Judge has applied all the settled parameters while doing so. The Petitioner/husband is a qualified Engineer and is suitably employed. His standard of living is fairly modest. The Respondent/wife is also a qualified MBA but unable to hold down a permanent job as she is single handedly looking after a ten years old. The mere fact that she is residing in the matrimonial home is not a pretext to disentitle her to a reasonable amount of maintenance. She still needs some amount towards food, medicine, clothes and educational expenses for the child. Thus, considering the status of the parties, reasonable needs of the wife and minor son are parameters to be considered while determining the sufficiency and the reasonableness of the quantum of interim maintenance to be adjudged so that the wife is able to maintain herself and the minor son in reasonable comfort. The quantum of maintenance awarded by the trial Judge is neither oppressive nor is it unendurable for the Petitioner/husband and there is no hardship caused to him. The amount of Rs.3,000/- is also reasonable for litigation expenses and barely sufficient for her to defend herself in the divorce Petition initiated by her husband. In view of the same, no interference is required in the order impugned herein. The quantum of interim maintenance, as adjudged by the trial Court, is reasonable and does not suffer from any infirmity. The Petition is, thus, dismissed.

Rajkumar Amruthrao Guddadigi Vs Shilaja Rajkumar Guddadigi on 04 Jan 2024

Index of HMA judgments here.

Posted in High Court of Bombay Judgment or Order or Notification | Tagged 1-Judge Bench Decision Baseless or Convoluted Judgment HM Act Sec 24 - Interim Maintenance Granted Rajkumar Amruthrao Guddadigi Vs Shilaja Rajkumar Guddadigi | Leave a comment

Chetram Mali Vs Karishma Saini on 21 Nov 2023

Posted on November 23, 2023 by ShadesOfKnife

A division bench of Delhi High Court held as follows:

From Para 6,

6. XX
…
It may be noticed that though respondent claims to have no independent source of income but has reasonable educational background being a graduate from Delhi University. She appears to have voluntarily undertaken social work as claimed despite there being no impediment for undertaking a meaningful employment. The spouse having a reasonable capacity of earning but who chooses to remain unemployed and idle without any sufficient explanation or indicating sincere efforts to gain employment should not be permitted to saddle the other party with one sided responsibility of meeting out the expenses. The equivalence does not have to be with mathematical precision but with the objective to provide relief to the spouse by way of maintenance pendente lite and litigation expenses, who is unable to maintain and support during the pendency of proceedings and to ensure that party should not suffer due to paucity of source of income. The provision is gender neutral and the provisions of Section 24 & 25 of HMA provide for the rights, liabilities and obligations arising from marriage between the parties under HMA.

Chetram Mali Vs Karishma Saini on 21 Nov 2023

Citations:

Other Sources:

 

Posted in High Court of Delhi Judgment or Order or Notification | Tagged 2-Judge (Division) Bench Decision Chetram Mali Vs Karishma Saini HM Act Sec 24 - Interim Maintenance Granted PWDV Act Sec 20 - Maintenance Granted | Leave a comment

Sameer Datta Kadam Vs Supriya Sameer Kadam

Posted on June 30, 2021 by ShadesOfKnife

Interim Maintenance of 5 lakhs per month was granted by Trial Court which was challenged at Bombay High Court. High Court did not find any error in the Interim Order of the trial Court. It held that the Trial Court rightly gave reasons for granting the interim maintenance from the date of application instead of from the date of Order.

Sameer Datta Kadam Vs Supriya Sameer Kadam on 10 Jan 2019

Citations :

Other Sources :

https://indiankanoon.org/doc/42033330/

https://www.legitquest.com/case/sameer-datta-kadam-v-supriya-sameer-kadam/1E27A6


Supreme Court also denied to interfere into the Interlocutory Order but extended the time to settle the arrears from 4 weeks to 8 weeks.

Sameer Datta Kadam Vs Supriya Sameer Kadam on 08 Feb 2019

Source:

https://indiankanoon.org/doc/83077908/

Posted in High Court of Bombay Judgment or Order or Notification | Tagged HM Act Sec 24 - Interim Maintenance Granted Sameer Datta Kadam Vs Supriya Sameer Kadam Sensational Or Peculiar Cases | Leave a comment

Sujit Kumar Vs Vandana on 08 Aug 2016

Posted on January 19, 2021 by ShadesOfKnife

Delhi High Court said the follow about HMA 24…

11. The object behind Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 is to provide for maintenance, pendente-lite, to a spouse in matrimonial proceedings so that during the pendency of the proceedings the spouse can maintain herself/himself and also have sufficient funds to carry on the litigation so that the spouse does not unduly suffer in the conduct of the case for want of funds.
12. A spouse unable to maintain himself/herself is entitled to maintenance on the principle of equi-status and respect that the spouse would have enjoyed if he/she continued to live with other spouse.
13. The provisions of Section 24 are beneficent in nature and the power is exercised by the Court not only out of compassion but also by way of judicial duty so that the indigent spouse may not suffer at the instance of the affluent spouse. The legislature, in its discretion, has not fixed any guideline regarding ceiling limit of maintenance, pendente-lite, as in the case of Divorce Act or Parsi Marriage Act. The word ‘support’ in Section 24 is not to be narrowly interpreted. It does not mean bare existence. It means that the claimant spouse should have the same comfort as the other. Of course, the Section is not intended to bring about arithmetical equality between the two.
14. The Court while considering the merits of an application for grant of an interim maintenance under Section 24 has to necessarily arrive at prima-facie determination about the earning capacity of the rival claimants. The determination cannot be made with exactitude; it is essentially interim in nature. The Court is called upon to make a summary consideration of amount which the applicant is to be awarded by way of maintenance pendente-lite and litigation expenses in accordance with the financial resources of the parties. Capacity of the other party to earn cannot be taken into consideration – it is only the actual earning of the opposite party on the basis of which relief can be granted. Permanent income and not casual income is relevant. For example if a husband brings on record that the non-applicant wife earns some amount by taking coaching classes for children, this cannot be termed as her permanent income or that the wife has independent permanent source of income. The proceedings being summary, the matter has to be decided on the basis of pleadings supported by affidavits and the documents that may be filed by the parties in support of their case.
15. Where there was sufficient means in the family of the husband on the strength of which the husband got married he has to share the burden to support his wife during the course of annulment of such marriage.

Sujit Kumar Vs Vandana on 08 Aug 2016

Citations : [2016 SCC ONLINE DEL 4397]

Other Sources :

https://indiankanoon.org/doc/182704867/

https://www.casemine.com/judgement/in/581180f42713e179479e391b

https://indiajusticefoundation.org/sujit-kumar-vs-vandana-delhi-high-court-08-08-2016/

 

Posted in High Court of Delhi Judgment or Order or Notification | Tagged 2-Judge (Division) Bench Decision HM Act Sec 24 - Interim Maintenance Granted Sujit Kumar Vs Vandana | Leave a comment

Maintenance Judgments

Posted on October 21, 2019 by ShadesOfKnife

Maintenance judgments by Enactment

Maintenance and Alimony Judgments under Hindu Marriage Act 1955 here.


Maintenance Judgments under Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act 1956 here.


Maintenance Judgments under Section 125 CrPC [Section 144 BNSS] here.


Maintenance Judgments under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 here.


Maintenance for Limited Time Period here.


Maintenance after Mutual Consent Divorce here.


Agreements against Public Policy are Void here.


A SPECIAL FOCUS ON IMPLEMENTATION OF Rajnesh Vs Neha AFFIDAVIT

A 2-judge bench of Supreme Court passed guidelines in Rajnesh Vs Neha on how to handle multiple maintenance litigation here.

  • Telangana High Court gave a wonderful order here, confirming that any order passed by Trial Courts, without calling for the Income affidavits is void ab initio and therefore is liable to set aside and matters will be remanded back to the same Trial Courts for fresh adjudication.
  • Then another 2-judge bench of Apex Court has to Order re-circulation of above judgment in Aditi Sharma Vs Jitesh Sharma, because the Trial Court Judges stopped following Supreme Court judgement here. Exactly after 3 long years!!!
  • There are other High Courts which set aside the trial Court orders for the singular reason that they did not follow Rajnesh Vs Neha. Check them out here.
    • Calcutta HC in Nripendra Chandra Mahanta Vs Pramila Mahanta on 08 Feb 2023
    • Allahabad HC in Parul Tyagi Vs Gaurav Tyagi on 04 Aug 2023
    • Telangana HC in Chinta Vamshi Vs State of Telangana and Anr on 16 Oct 2023
    • Kerala HC in Rijas MT Vs Hafseena M on 15 Nov 2023
    • Patna HC in Gitanjali Devi Vs State of Bihar and Anr on 02 Dec 2023
    • Karnataka HC in Darshanik M M Vs Poornima A on 04 Dec 2023
    • MP HC in Balram Dixit Vs Kiran Dixit and Anr on 17 Jan 2024
      • It seems AP High Court is hell bent not to follow Rajnesh Vs Neha… and passed this perverse order here with a trivial reason. Karma!
    • AP HC following my success story in Sreekanth Vs Nalini in Meegada Venu Gopala Rao Vs Meegada Usha Rani and Ors on 10 Jul 2024. Happy!!!
    • AP HC in Kalavakuru Srinivas Kumar Reddy Vs Kalavakuru @ Revuru Sujatha and Ors on 05 Feb 2025 [My client’s case]
    • Orissa HC in Nabaghana Sahoo Vs Smruti Prava Sahoo and Anr on 11 Feb 2025 [neither of the parties has filed the disclosure affidavit as mandated in Rajnesh]
    • Kerala HC in Ratheesh Vs Sreelakshmi and Ors on 14 Mar 2025 (Even to dispose Interim Maintenance Applications, call for affidavits)
    • Patna HC in Ravi Prakash Saxena Vs Priyanka Rani on 04 Sep 2025 [Remanded case back to the same Trial Courts for fresh adjudication]
    • Madras HC in N.Santhosh Kumar Vs S.Priyadarshini on 25 Oct 2025 [Lied on the Income Affidavit, so interim maintenance reduced]

A 2-judge bench of Supreme Court recorded the various observations of the Delhi High Court in Parvin Kumar Jain Vs Anju Jain here, where by Delhi High Court flagged the following tendencies of parties in filing their Income Affidavits.

  1. Instances of the appellant’s deliberate attempts to mislead the judicial process
  2. Withheld critical financial documents
  3. Selectively disclosed information to conceal the full extent of his wealth
  4. False representations by the appellant regarding his property and income
  5. Demonstrated a pattern of deliberate suppression of material facts and assets
  • Allahabad HC in Atul Kumar Bajpai Vs State of UP and Anr on 17 Sep 2025 held that Perjury applications alleging false evidence/affidavit must be first Disposed

MASTER SITEMAP here.


Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) – Maintenance Law & Judgments in India

Maintenance refers to financial support provided by one person to another who is unable to maintain themselves, typically in matrimonial or family relationships. Under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC), courts can order a person with sufficient means to provide maintenance to his wife, children, or parents if he neglects or refuses to support them.

The following persons can seek maintenance under the law:

  • Wife, including a divorced woman who has not remarried
  • Minor children unable to maintain themselves
  • Adult children suffering from disability or illness
  • Parents who cannot support themselves

The objective of the provision is to prevent destitution and vagrancy by ensuring financial support for dependents.

To claim maintenance, the applicant generally needs to show:

  1. A valid marital or legal relationship
  2. Neglect or refusal to maintain by the respondent
  3. The applicant is unable to maintain themselves
  4. The respondent has sufficient financial means

Courts evaluate these factors based on evidence and circumstances of each case.

Yes. Courts have clarified that mere qualification or ability to earn is not enough to deny maintenance. What matters is whether the person is actually earning enough to maintain a reasonable standard of living comparable to that enjoyed during the marriage.

Courts determine the quantum of maintenance based on several factors, including:

  • Income and financial capacity of the respondent
  • Lifestyle and standard of living during marriage
  • Needs of the claimant and dependents
  • Educational and employment status of the parties
  • Reasonable expenses for food, clothing, and shelter

The goal is to ensure the dependent spouse can maintain a dignified standard of living.

Yes. Courts can grant interim maintenance to provide immediate financial support during ongoing proceedings. Applications for interim maintenance are expected to be decided expeditiously, ensuring the claimant is not left without support while the case continues.

Maintenance may be refused if the wife:

  • Is living in adultery
  • Refuses to live with her husband without sufficient reason
  • Lives separately by mutual consent
  • Has sufficient independent income to maintain herself

These exceptions are provided under Section 125(4) CrPC.

Yes. Under Section 125 CrPC, parents who are unable to maintain themselves have the legal right to claim maintenance from their children. Courts treat this obligation as a moral and legal duty of children toward their parents.

Yes. A divorced wife who has not remarried can claim maintenance if she cannot support herself. Courts have repeatedly recognized that divorce does not extinguish the right to maintenance where financial dependence continues.

Courts increasingly require both parties to file affidavits disclosing income, assets, and liabilities, including bank statements, tax returns, and property details. This ensures fair determination of maintenance and prevents concealment of income.

Maintenance provisions are social welfare measures intended to prevent financial hardship and ensure that dependents such as spouses, children, and parents are not left destitute due to neglect or abandonment.

Yes. With the enactment of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, the provision corresponding to Section 125 CrPC has been incorporated as Section 144 BNSS, while retaining the same core principles governing maintenance claims.

Posted in Assorted Court Judgments or Orders or Notifications | Tagged Catena of Landmark Judgments Referred/Cited to CrPC 125 or BNSS 144 - Maintenance Denied CrPC 125 or BNSS 144 - Maintenance Granted CrPC Sec 125 or BNSS Sec 144 - Interim Maintenance Denied CrPC Sec 125 or BNSS Sec 144 - Interim Maintenance Granted HM Act Sec 24 - Interim Maintenance Denied HM Act Sec 24 - Interim Maintenance Granted Not followed Guidelines in Rajnesh Vs Neha Judgment PWDV Act Sec 20 - Maintenance Denied PWDV Act Sec 20 - Maintenance Granted Summary Post

Dr. Deepak K S Vs Dr. Sowmya Sharath on 23 March, 2018

Posted on May 28, 2018 by ShadesOfKnife

This is a funny judgment where by a highly qualified wife is granted maintenance under Section 24 of HMA.

Don’t miss to read the para 12

Dr. Deepak K S Vs Dr. Sowmya Sharath on 23 March, 2018

 

Posted in High Court of Karnataka Judgment or Order or Notification | Tagged Dr. Deepak K S Vs Dr. Sowmya Sharath HM Act Sec 24 - Interim Maintenance Granted | 4 Comments

XXX Vs YYY on 27 Jul 2017

Posted on May 20, 2018 by ShadesOfKnife

This Maintenance order, under section 24 of Hindu Marriage Act, is modified ‘from the date of order’ to ‘from date of application’ by Karnataka High Court, thereby enormously enhancing the overall interim maintenance to be paid by husband.

XXX-Vs-YYY-on-27-Jul-2017-Parties-names-addresses-redacted

Index of Maintenance Orders under Hindu Marriage Act are here.


Note: Name and Address of the Petitioner and her family members are redacted upon her request emails dt: 05 Jul 2023 and 25 Apr 2025.

Also received another email Dt: 22-Jul-2025 from the Petitioner, annexed with two Orders from Karnataka High Court (in WP 15781 of 2024), which is mentioned here for transparency sake. These Orders were duly complied on 24-Jul-2025

 

Posted in High Court of Karnataka Judgment or Order or Notification | Tagged Article 226 - Power of High Courts to issue certain writs Article 227 - Power of superintendence over all courts by the High Court HM Act 24 - Maintenance From Date of Application Or Petition HM Act Sec 24 - Interim Maintenance Enhanced HM Act Sec 24 - Interim Maintenance Granted PWDV Act Sec 20 - Maintenance From Date of Order PWDV Act Sec 29 - Interim Maintenance Enhanced XXX Vs YYY | Leave a comment

Pradeep Kumar Vs Ratna Sharma on 3 July, 2009

Posted on May 12, 2018 by ShadesOfKnife

In this Judgment from Hon’ble Delhi High Court, it was help non-working Knife has to be given maintenance.

 

Pradeep Kumar Vs. Ratna Sharma on 3 July, 2009
Posted in High Court of Delhi Judgment or Order or Notification | Tagged HM Act Sec 24 - Interim Maintenance Granted Pay Maintenance to Wife Pradeep Kumar Vs Ratna Sharma Wife Never Working Wife Not Qualified | Leave a comment

Bharat Hegde Vs Saroj Hegde on 24 Apr 2007

Posted on April 20, 2018 by ShadesOfKnife

Another Key Judgement from Delhi High Court elucidating the judicial principles required to be applied while deciding an Interim Maintenance application under Section 24 of Hindu Marriage Act 1955.

This is a case involving the son of Ex CM of Karnataka State of India, Mr. Rama Krishna Hegde.

Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act goes a step further inasmuch as it permits maintenance to be claimed by the husband even against the wife.

It should not expose the non applicant to unjust contempt or other coercive proceedings. On the other hand, maintenance should not be so low so as to make the order meaningless.

Tax avoidance is the norm. Tax compliance is the exception in this country. Therefore, in determining interim maintenance, there cannot be mathematical exactitude.

The 11 factors for consideration are:

1. Status of the parties.
2. Reasonable wants of the claimant.
3. The independent income and property of the claimant.
4. The number of persons, the non applicant has to maintain.
5. The amount should aid the applicant to live in a similar life style as he/she enjoyed in the matrimonial home.
6. Non-applicant’s liabilities, if any.
7. Provisions for food, clothing, shelter, education, medical attendance and treatment etc. of the applicant.
8. Payment capacity of the non applicant.
9. Some guess work is not ruled out while estimating the income of the non applicant when all the sources or correct sources are not disclosed.
10. The non applicant to defray the cost of litigation.
11. The amount awarded u/s. 125 Cr.PC is adjustable against the amount awarded u/s. 24 of the Act.”

If the capital asset is an industrial property, a coffee plantation, an orchard or any other agricultural holding, there would be a presumption that the said capital asset is yielding some income. It is not presumed to be a dead asset.

But where the law requires a Judge to form an opinion based on a host of primary data, a Judge can formulate an opinion pertaining to the likely income from the capital assets of the husband.

It is a well recognized principle of law that where a person withholds vital information, a presumption arises against him that had he disclosed the information, the same would have been adverse to him.

Sh. Bharat Hegde vs Smt. Saroj Hegde on 24 April, 2007

Citations : 140 (2007) DLT 16

Other Sources :

https://indiankanoon.org/doc/260066/

Posted in High Court of Delhi Judgment or Order or Notification | Tagged 1-Judge Bench Decision Bharat Hegde vs Saroj Hegde HM Act Sec 24 - Interim Maintenance Granted Issued or Recommended Guidelines or Directions or Protocols to be followed Legal Procedure Explained - Interpretation of Statutes Reportable Judgement or Order Withhold Vital Information | Leave a comment

Post navigation

  • Older posts

Search within entire Content of “Shades of Knife”

My Legal X Timeline

Advocate Sandeep Pamarati ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ’ช๐Ÿ‘จ๐Ÿปโ€๐ŸŽ“ Follow

AP High Court Advocate with M Tech (CS) || 12 years in 'Software Industry' as Solution Architect || Blogs at https://t.co/29CB9BzK4w || #TDPTwitter

SandeepPamarati
Retweet on Twitter Advocate Sandeep Pamarati ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ’ช๐Ÿ‘จ๐Ÿปโ€๐ŸŽ“ Retweeted
futurestacked Future Stacked @futurestacked ·
20h

Your Gmail account is not an email account.

It is the master key to your bank, your crypto, your Apple ID, your PayPal, and every password you have ever saved.

One breach and all your passwords are gone.

Lock it down with these 7 easy steps ๐Ÿ‘‡

Reply on Twitter 2069354786743374317 Retweet on Twitter 2069354786743374317 104 Like on Twitter 2069354786743374317 260 X 2069354786743374317
Retweet on Twitter Advocate Sandeep Pamarati ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ’ช๐Ÿ‘จ๐Ÿปโ€๐ŸŽ“ Retweeted
thisguyknowsai Brady Long @thisguyknowsai ·
22 Jun

A German psychologist proved in 1885 that cramming erases what you learned within 48 hours. He published the fix in the same book. Almost no school on Earth has adopted it in 140 years.

His name was Hermann Ebbinghaus.

He had no lab. No funding. No colleagues.

He worked alone

Reply on Twitter 2068965021514891696 Retweet on Twitter 2068965021514891696 958 Like on Twitter 2068965021514891696 2820 X 2068965021514891696
Retweet on Twitter Advocate Sandeep Pamarati ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ’ช๐Ÿ‘จ๐Ÿปโ€๐ŸŽ“ Retweeted
factcheckapgov FactCheck.AP.Gov.in @factcheckapgov ·
22 Jun

เฐŽเฐ‚เฐคเฑ‹ เฐชเฑเฐฐเฐคเฐฟเฐทเฑเฐŸเฐพเฐคเฑเฐฎเฐ•เฐ‚เฐ—เฐพ เฐจเฐฟเฐฐเฑเฐตเฐนเฐฟเฐ‚เฐšเฐฟ เฐชเฑเฐฐเฐœเฐฒ เฐ†เฐฐเฑ‹เฐ—เฑเฐฏเฐ‚ เฐชเฐŸเฑเฐฒ เฐ…เฐตเฐ—เฐพเฐนเฐจ เฐ•เฐฒเฑเฐชเฐฟเฐ‚เฐšเฐฟเฐจ เฐ…เฐ‚เฐคเฐฐเฑเฐœเฐพเฐคเฑ€เฐฏ เฐฏเฑ‹เฐ—เฐพ เฐฆเฐฟเฐจเฑ‹เฐคเฑเฐธเฐตเฐ‚ เฐธเฐ‚เฐฆเฐฐเฑเฐญเฐ‚เฐ—เฐพ เฐฐเฐพเฐทเฑเฐŸเฑเฐฐเฐ‚ เฐฒเฑ‹ เฐชเฐฒเฑเฐšเฑ‹เฐŸเฑเฐฒ เฐจเฐฟเฐฐเฑเฐตเฐนเฐฟเฐ‚เฐšเฐฟเฐจ เฐฏเฑ‹เฐ—เฐพ เฐ•เฐพเฐฐเฑเฐฏเฐ•เฑเฐฐเฐฎเฐ‚ เฐชเฑˆ เฐ•เฑŠเฐ‚เฐฆเฐฐเฑ เฐคเฐชเฑเฐชเฑเฐกเฑ เฐชเฑเฐฐเฐšเฐพเฐฐเฐ‚ เฐšเฑ‡เฐธเฑเฐคเฑเฐจเฑเฐจเฐพเฐฐเฑ. เฐˆ เฐ•เฐพเฐฐเฑเฐฏเฐ•เฑเฐฐเฐฎเฐ‚ เฐ•เฑ‹เฐธเฐ‚ เฐฐเฑ‚. 600 เฐ•เฑ‹เฐŸเฑเฐฒเฑ เฐ–เฐฐเฑเฐšเฑ เฐ…เฐฏเฐฟเฐจเฐŸเฑเฐฒเฑ เฐšเฑ†เฐชเฑเฐชเฐกเฐ‚ เฐชเฑ‚เฐฐเฑเฐคเฐฟเฐ—เฐพ เฐ…เฐธเฐคเฑเฐฏเฐ‚. เฐฐเฐพเฐทเฑเฐŸเฑเฐฐเฐ‚เฐฒเฑ‹

Reply on Twitter 2068972932827869255 Retweet on Twitter 2068972932827869255 38 Like on Twitter 2068972932827869255 85 X 2068972932827869255
Retweet on Twitter Advocate Sandeep Pamarati ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ’ช๐Ÿ‘จ๐Ÿปโ€๐ŸŽ“ Retweeted
jaitdp Telugu Desam Party @jaitdp ·
22 Jun

เฐšเฑ€เฐซเฑ เฐฎเฐฟเฐจเฐฟเฐธเฑเฐŸเฐฐเฑ.. เฐŸเฑ€เฐšเฐฐเฑ เฐ…เฐฏเฐฟเฐจ เฐตเฑ‡เฐณ

เฐ…เฐ‚เฐ—เฐจเฑเฐตเฐพเฐกเฑ€ เฐ•เฑ‡เฐ‚เฐฆเฑเฐฐเฐพเฐจเฑเฐจเฐฟ เฐธเฐ‚เฐฆเฐฐเฑเฐถเฐฟเฐ‚เฐšเฐฟเฐจ เฐธเฑ€เฐŽเฐ‚ เฐšเฐ‚เฐฆเฑเฐฐเฐฌเฐพเฐฌเฑ เฐ•เฐพเฐธเฑ‡เฐชเฑ เฐŸเฑ€เฐšเฐฐเฑโ€Œเฐ—เฐพ เฐฎเฐพเฐฐเฐฟ, เฐชเฐฟเฐฒเฑเฐฒเฐฒ เฐ…เฐญเฑเฐฏเฐธเฐจเฐ‚ เฐŽเฐฒเฐพ เฐ‰เฐ‚เฐฆเฑ‹ เฐคเฑ†เฐฒเฑเฐธเฑเฐ•เฑเฐจเฑเฐจเฐพเฐฐเฑ. เฐ‡เฐ‚เฐ—เฑเฐฒเฑ€เฐทเฑ เฐ†เฐฒเฑเฐซเฐพเฐฌเฑ†เฐŸเฑเฐธเฑ เฐšเฑ†เฐชเฑเฐชเฐฎเฐจเฐฟ เฐธเฑ€เฐŽเฐ‚ เฐ…เฐกเฐฟเฐ—เฑ‡เฐธเฐฐเฐฟเฐ•เฐฟ เฐชเฐฟเฐฒเฑเฐฒเฐฒเฑ เฐšเฐ•เฑเฐ•เฐ—เฐพ เฐšเฑ†เฐชเฑเฐชเฐพเฐฐเฑ.
#ChandrababuNaidu
#AndhraPradesh

Reply on Twitter 2068873963246399922 Retweet on Twitter 2068873963246399922 73 Like on Twitter 2068873963246399922 310 X 2068873963246399922
Load More

Recent Posts

  • Pavul Yesu Dhasan Vs Registrar SHRC of TN and Ors on 30 Apr 2025 June 18, 2026
  • Manoj Kumar Vs Nita Bharti on 17 Mar 2026 June 17, 2026
  • Cruelty as a Criminal Offence Explained June 12, 2026
  • Bail Compliance Undertaking Format โ€“ Draft, Legal Requirements & Sample Template June 12, 2026
  • Warning Signs of Escalating Matrimonial Litigation โ€“ Early Red Flags Every Spouse Should Recognize June 12, 2026

Most Read Posts

  • Reply to Section 41A CrPC Notice โ€“ Format with Legal Explanation (4,944 views)
  • Anu Aggarwal Vs Sushant Aggarwal on 20 Jan 2026 (3,483 views)
  • Umme Farva Vs State of U.P. and Anr on 14 Jan 2026 (3,373 views)
  • Charge Sheet and Final Report Explained (2,816 views)
  • Regular Bail Application Format (Section 437/439 CrPC) (2,193 views)
  • Neha Lal Vs Abhishek Kumar on 20 Jan 2026 (2,002 views)
  • Arrest Procedure in 498A cases after Arnesh Kumar (1,934 views)
  • Discharge Application Format in 498A Case โ€“ Draft, Procedure & Sample Template (1,775 views)
  • Can You Travel Abroad After an FIR Is Registered? โ€“ Legal Position Explained (1,694 views)
  • Atul Kumar Bajpai Vs State of UP and Anr on 17 Sep 2025 (1,540 views)

Tags

Reportable Judgement or Order (433)2-Judge (Division) Bench Decision (413)Legal Procedure Explained - Interpretation of Statutes (382)Landmark Case (381)1-Judge Bench Decision (362)Catena of Landmark Judgments Referred/Cited to (293)Work-In-Progress Article (215)3-Judge (Full) Bench Decision (101)Sandeep Pamarati (92)Article 21 - Protection of life and personal liberty (80)Issued or Recommended Guidelines or Directions or Protocols to be followed (71)Perjury Under 340 CrPC (66)Absurd Or After Thought Or Baseless Or False Or General Or Inherently Improbable Or Improved Or UnSpecific Or Omnibus Or Vague Allegations (61)Reprimands or Setbacks to YCP Govt of Andhra Pradesh (49)Summary Post (47)CrPC 482 - Quash (43)HM Act 13 - Divorce Granted to Husband (42)Legal Terrorism (41)Divorce granted on Cruelty ground (41)Not Authentic copy hence to be replaced (40)

Categories

Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification (753)Bare Acts or State Amendments or Statutes or GOs or Notifications issued by Central or State Governments (328)High Court of Andhra Pradesh Judgment or Order or Notification (186)High Court of Delhi Judgment or Order or Notification (164)High Court of Bombay Judgment or Order or Notification (112)High Court of Karnataka Judgment or Order or Notification (93)Legal Procedure (77)High Court of Madras Judgment or Order or Notification (70)High Court of Allahabad Judgment or Order or Notification (61)LLB Study Material (59)General Study Material (56)High Court of Punjab & Haryana Judgment or Order or Notification (52)Assorted Court Judgments or Orders or Notifications (50)High Court of Kerala Judgment or Order or Notification (46)Prakasam DV Cases (46)Judicial Activism (for Public Benefit) (45)District or Sessions or Magistrate Court Judgment or Order or Notification (44)High Court of Madhya Pradesh Judgment or Order or Notification (38)High Court of Gujarat Judgment or Order or Notification (28)High Court of Calcutta Judgment or Order or Notification (27)

Recent Comments

  • eCourts India on Compromise-Based Quashing in Matrimonial Cases โ€“ Complete Legal Strategy
  • The Divorce Law Firm on Life Cycle Stages of a Divorce case
  • The Divorce Law Firm on Life Cycle Stages of a Divorce case
  • ShadesOfKnife on Sandeep Pamarati Vs Ungrateful Knife (IPC 498A Case)
  • KONURU VINAYKUMAR on Sandeep Pamarati Vs Ungrateful Knife (IPC 498A Case)

Archives of SoK

  • June 2026 (9)
  • May 2026 (24)
  • April 2026 (33)
  • March 2026 (42)
  • February 2026 (30)
  • January 2026 (21)
  • December 2025 (2)
  • November 2025 (3)
  • October 2025 (17)
  • September 2025 (12)
  • August 2025 (5)
  • July 2025 (10)
  • June 2025 (15)
  • May 2025 (3)
  • April 2025 (10)
  • March 2025 (7)
  • February 2025 (8)
  • January 2025 (1)
  • December 2024 (3)
  • November 2024 (4)
  • October 2024 (16)
  • September 2024 (15)
  • August 2024 (14)
  • July 2024 (11)
  • June 2024 (18)
  • May 2024 (13)
  • April 2024 (9)
  • March 2024 (23)
  • February 2024 (15)
  • January 2024 (11)
  • December 2023 (11)
  • November 2023 (9)
  • October 2023 (13)
  • September 2023 (12)
  • August 2023 (15)
  • July 2023 (17)
  • June 2023 (11)
  • May 2023 (6)
  • April 2023 (5)
  • March 2023 (10)
  • February 2023 (9)
  • January 2023 (12)
  • December 2022 (12)
  • November 2022 (8)
  • October 2022 (13)
  • September 2022 (17)
  • August 2022 (10)
  • July 2022 (21)
  • June 2022 (27)
  • May 2022 (23)
  • April 2022 (32)
  • March 2022 (17)
  • February 2022 (6)
  • January 2022 (2)
  • December 2021 (7)
  • November 2021 (7)
  • October 2021 (6)
  • September 2021 (10)
  • August 2021 (31)
  • July 2021 (45)
  • June 2021 (17)
  • May 2021 (17)
  • April 2021 (18)
  • March 2021 (58)
  • February 2021 (14)
  • January 2021 (50)
  • December 2020 (35)
  • November 2020 (68)
  • October 2020 (67)
  • September 2020 (28)
  • August 2020 (41)
  • July 2020 (20)
  • June 2020 (36)
  • May 2020 (40)
  • April 2020 (38)
  • March 2020 (26)
  • February 2020 (43)
  • January 2020 (35)
  • December 2019 (34)
  • November 2019 (4)
  • October 2019 (18)
  • September 2019 (57)
  • August 2019 (33)
  • July 2019 (12)
  • June 2019 (18)
  • May 2019 (5)
  • April 2019 (19)
  • March 2019 (58)
  • February 2019 (11)
  • January 2019 (90)
  • December 2018 (97)
  • November 2018 (43)
  • October 2018 (31)
  • September 2018 (73)
  • August 2018 (47)
  • July 2018 (143)
  • June 2018 (92)
  • May 2018 (97)
  • April 2018 (59)
  • March 2018 (8)

Blogroll

  • Daaman Promoting Harmony 0
  • Fight against Legal Terrorism Fight against Legal Terrorism along with MyNation Foundation 0
  • Good Morning Good Morning News 0
  • Insaaf India Insaaf Awareness Movement 0
  • MyNation Hope Foundation Wiki 0
  • MyNation.net Equality, Justice and Harmony 0
  • Sarvepalli Legal 0
  • Save Indian Family Save Indian Family Movement 0
  • SIF Chandigarh SIF Chandigarh 0
  • The Male Factor The Male Factor 0
  • Unitedmen Foundation a dedicated community forged with the mission to unite men facing legal challenges in marital disputes. 0
  • Vaastav Foundation The Social Reality 0
  • Vinayak my2centsworth – This blog is for honest law abiding men, married or planning to get married 0
  • Voice4india Indian Laws, Non-profits, Environment 0
  • Writing Law Writing Law by Ankur 0

RSS Cloudflare Status

  • ARN (Stockholm) on 2026-06-25 June 25, 2026
    THIS IS A SCHEDULED EVENT Jun 25, 00:00 - 05:00 UTC Jun 19, 14:18 UTC Scheduled - We will be performing scheduled maintenance in ARN (Stockholm) datacenter on 2026-06-25 between 00:00 and 05:00 UTC.Traffic might be re-routed from this location, hence there is a possibility of a slight increase in latency during this maintenance window […]
  • ARN (Stockholm) on 2026-06-24 June 24, 2026
    THIS IS A SCHEDULED EVENT Jun 24, 00:00 - 05:00 UTC Jun 19, 13:08 UTC Scheduled - We will be performing scheduled maintenance in ARN (Stockholm) datacenter on 2026-06-24 between 00:00 and 05:00 UTC.Traffic might be re-routed from this location, hence there is a possibility of a slight increase in latency during this maintenance window […]
  • Network Performance Issues - Increased HTTP 5XX Errors in Ashburn, US June 23, 2026
    Jun 23, 16:00 UTC Resolved - Between 17:07 and 17:45 UTC, Cloudflare experienced network performance issues in the Ashburn, US region, resulting in an elevated rate of 5xx errors for a subset of traffic. During this time, impacted users may have encountered intermittent connectivity issues or unexpected server responses. The underlying issue was successfully mitigated, […]

RSS List of Spam Server IPs from Project Honeypot

  • 34.106.192.29 | SD June 23, 2026
    Event: Bad Event | Total: 6 | First: 2026-06-23 | Last: 2026-06-23
  • 182.161.69.73 | S June 23, 2026
    Event: Bad Event | Total: 16 | First: 2011-01-28 | Last: 2026-06-23
  • 34.80.202.241 | SD June 23, 2026
    Event: Bad Event | Total: 6 | First: 2026-06-23 | Last: 2026-06-23
Owned and Operated by Advocate Sandeep Pamarati
Proudly powered by WordPress
Theme: Flint by Star Verte LLC

Bad Behavior has blocked 1417 access attempts in the last 7 days.

pixel