web analytics

Menu

Skip to content
Shades of Knife
  • Home
  • True Colors of a Vile Wife
  • Need Inspiration?
  • Blog Updates
  • SOK Gallery
  • Vile News Reporter
  • About Me
  • Contact Me

Shades of Knife

True Colors of a Vile Wife

Category: LLB Study Material

Comparison between Government of India Act 1935 and Constitution of India 1950

Posted on April 14, 2021 by ShadesOfKnife
Posted in LLB Study Material | Tagged Comparison between Government of India Act 1935 and Constitution of India 1950 Work-In-Progress Article | Leave a comment

Remedies against Malicious Prosecution in India

Posted on March 3, 2021 by ShadesOfKnife

After a long and exhausting prosecution for false allegations and claims in Indian Courts (making good use of remedies available against/with Police and Courts) resulting in favorable decisions, you may want to make good of the following remedies available in law across various forums.


Civil-side Remedies (SEEKING COMPENSATION from the malicious prosecutor)

 


Criminal-side Remedies

SEEKING COMPENSATION from the malicious prosecutor:

  1. Those (accused persons) who were maliciously prosecuted for alleged criminal offences, can seek Compensation for accusation without reasonable cause u/s 250 CrPC.
  2. Those (accused persons) who were maliciously arrested for alleged criminal offences, can seek Compensation (maximum of Rs.1000/-) for accusation without reasonable cause u/s 358 CrPC.
  3. Those who were forced to litigate frivolous Transfer petitions at Supreme Court, can seek Compensation (maximum of Rs.1000/-) u/s 406(3) CrPC.
  4. Those who were forced to litigate frivolous Transfer petitions at High Court, can seek Compensation (maximum of Rs.1000/-) u/s 407(7) CrPC.
  5. Those who were forced to litigate frivolous Transfer petitions at Sessions Court, can seek Compensation (maximum of Rs.1000/-) u/s 408(3) CrPC.

 

SEEKING PUNISHMENT for the malicious prosecutor:

  1. Those who were put to disadvantage by taking of bribes by public servants (including Police, Magistrates and Judges), can get a FIR registered under CHAPTER III Offences of Prevention of Corruption Act 1988
  2. Police Officers can be proceeded against under section 167 IPC for registering a false FIR or Charge sheet. Punishment is same as 498A IPC. 🙂
  3. Police Officers have to register a complaint against those who gave them false information, when the police file a charge sheet wherein from their investigation, either persons were removed/not charged in Charge sheet or certain sections were removed under section 182 or 211 IPC. Section 340 CrPC applies to these sections so the person who was listed in the FIR cannot himself file the complaint with Court but he can ask (via a simple letter to IO, then local SP/CP, then DGP; followed by couple of RTIs seeking progress/action taken at each stage). Since there is a time limit imposed on filing such complaint by Police (as per section 468 CrPC), it is better to act fast once the IO makes any removals from charge sheet. Of course, in appropriate case, sec 5 of Limitation Act can also be invoked
  4. Judicial Officers can be proceeded against under sections 217, 218, 219, 220 of IPC.  No need of any 340 CrPC application for these offences. Direct Police complaint.
  5. Defamation u/s 499/500 IPC case laws here.

 


Remedies under Writ Jurisdiction of a Constitutional Court

  1. Under Writ of Mandamus, the affected person can claim compensation against the offender, over and above what is granted by statutory provisions.
    • Classic case of Sri Nambi Narayanan here.

 

Posted in LLB Study Material | Tagged Remedies against Malicious Prosecution in India | Leave a comment

PIL Drafting Competition on Constitution Day 2020 by NLIU LAC

Posted on November 27, 2020 by ShadesOfKnife

After Ex Gratia Law Journal’s 1st Judgement Writing Competition 2020 here, I participated in this Judgement Writing Competition here with my partners Yashika Bhartia [idea of 46(3) Cr.P.C. and initial discussions] and Swathi Pudipeddi [Drafting, Research and multiple reviews of the Draft PIL Petition] and here is the problem statement.

Guildelines, PIL drafting competition


Here is the PIL I wrote. It is password-protected to prevent misuse like plagiarism. If you want to read it, contact me for password.

PIL Draft, Team Code _ T-60 for Sharing purpose

I couldn’t make my Team win any prizes this time around. The winners are declared on official social media handles here and here.


Getting ready for next competition here.

Posted in LLB Study Material | Tagged PIL Writing Competition | Leave a comment

Sources to the Constitution of India

Posted on November 26, 2020 by ShadesOfKnife
Posted in LLB Study Material | Leave a comment

Ex Gratia Law Journal’s 1st Judgement Writing Competition 2020

Posted on November 24, 2020 by ShadesOfKnife

After GITAM Moot competition here, I participated in this Judgement Writing Competition here with my partner Yashika Bhartia and here is the problem statement.

1st-Judgement-Writing-Competition-Proposition

My Team won First place. The results announcement is here.

In case the page is kaput, below is the screenshot from that page.


Here is the Judgment I wrote. It is password-protected to prevent misuse like plagiarism. If you want to read it, contact me for password.

Team JW04 for Sharing purpose (PW Protected)

Next, I participated in PIL Drafting Competition on Constitution Day 2020 by NLIU LAC here.

Posted in LLB Study Material | Tagged Judgment Writing Competition | Leave a comment

Withdrawing ‘General Consent’ Granted To CBI To Investigate Cases In The State

Posted on November 5, 2020 by ShadesOfKnife

The following is a table listing granting and withdrawing of their ‘General Consent’ Granted To CBI To Investigate Cases In The State.

Some State governments innocently think by withdrawing ‘General Consent’ Granted To CBI To Investigate Cases In The State, they can stop CBI. Fools !!! Here why.

State / Union Territory Consent Granted on Consent Withdrawn on
Andhra Pradesh 3 Aug 2018

6 Jun 2019

16 Nov 2018 (Confidential GO)

—

Arunachal Pradesh
Assam
Bihar
Chhattisgarh 2001 10 Jan 2019
Goa
Gujarat
Haryana
Himachal Pradesh
Jharkhand
5 Nov 2020
Karnataka
Kerala 4 Nov 2020
Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra 21 Oct 2020
Manipur
Meghalaya
Mizoram
Nagaland
Odisha
Punjab 6 Nov 2020
Rajasthan 19 Sep 2020
Sikkim
Tamil Nadu
Telangana
Tripura
Uttar Pradesh
Uttarakhand
West Bengal
Andaman and Nicobar Islands
Chandigarh
Dadra Nagar Haveli and Daman Diu
Delhi
Jammu and Kashmir
Ladakh
Lakshadweep
Puducherry

 


On 6 Jun 2019, Andhra Pradesh granted General Consent.

03082018HO_MS109

*****

On 16 Nov 2018, Andhra Pradesh withdrew General Consent.

(Via Confidential GO and a Gazette notification)

2018-11-20 Withdrawal of General consent given to the members of CBI Gaz

*****

On 3 Aug 2018, Andhra Pradesh granted General Consent.

2018-08-03 03082018HO_MS109 General consent given to the members of CBI

 

 

 

*****

On 5 Dec 2017, Andhra Pradesh granted General Consent.

2017-12-05 2017HO_MS184 General consent given to the members of CBI

On 10 Jan 2019, Chattisgarh withdrew General Consent.

2019-01-10 Chattishgarh withdraws General Consent

 

On 5 Nov 2020, Jharkhand withdrew General Consent.

Jharkhand withdraws General Consent

On 4 Nov 2020, Kerala withdrew General Consent.

2020-11-04 Kerala withdraws General Consent

On 21 Oct 2020, Maharashtra withdrew General Consent.

2020-10-21 Maharashtra withdraws General Consent

On 19 Sep 2020, Rajasthan withdrew General Consent.

2020-07-19 Rajasthan withdraws General Consent

 

 


On 6 Nov 2020, Punjab withdrew General Consent.

Final_Gazette_Report
Posted in LLB Study Material | Tagged Withdrawing 'General Consent' Granted To CBI To Investigate Cases In The State Work-In-Progress Article | Leave a comment

Various Doctrines in Law

Posted on October 12, 2020 by ShadesOfKnife

 

 

Public Trust Doctrine:

Public Trust Doctrine primarily rests on the principle that certain resources like air sea, waters and the forests have such a great importance to the people as a whole that it would be wholly unjust to make them a subject of private ownership. The said resources being a gift of nature, they should be made freely available to everyone irrespective of the status in life. The doctrine enjoins upon the Government to protect the resources for the enjoyment of the general public rather than to permit their use for private ownership or commercial purposes.

Posted in LLB Study Material | Tagged Doctrines in Law | Leave a comment

Amicable working with Advocate

Posted on August 27, 2020 by ShadesOfKnife

The following are my learnings while working with advocates. Some taught me Dos and some Don’ts. Take it as you like.

 

  • Start using eCourts app and learn to find more information from High Court websites, if not found on eCourts platform (app and website)
  • Discuss your priorities and expectations from the case, in clear terms. Better safe than sorry.
  • Ask/find and record/save alternate means of communicating with your Advocate. Office Address, Alternate contact numbers, Colleague in his Chambers, Email etc.,
  • Learn the Law and the court procedure involved in the instant case thoroughly. It helps pacify unwarranted fears to some extent.
  • Most petitions are available in/near Court premises and sold at retail price. No need to shell out 1000’s for these forms.
  • Ensure ALL your payments to Advocate are made digitally. This is solid evidence against unpleasant disputes
  • In Criminal Trials, Electronic Evidences in their Original devices need not be shared with advocates at the beginning itself. A set of copies will do for perusal and any drafting. There is stage later on when Evidence needs to be brought on record of Court supported by a certificate u/s 65B of Indian Evidence Act.
  • Ask them to read (a) All Protection from Police here and (b) All Reliefs from Judiciary here. hehe
  • Above tip not working? Want to discontinue the services of current advocate? Communicate on email, phone clearly your intent and ask for NOC (No Objection Certificate). This is NOT a rule but a unwritten practice, so avoid complications between advocates due to clients. NOC is nothing but Vakalath/Vakalathnama on the sleeve/side of which Advocate writes, ‘No objection to engage another advocate’, along with Name, Signature, Enrollment number and date. Simple!

 

 

Posted in LLB Study Material | Leave a comment

Exemption from Personal Appearance (u/s 205 CrPC) in Court Judgments

Posted on August 16, 2020 by ShadesOfKnife

The following are list of judgments that you can cite while seeking Exemption from Personal Appearance in Court proceedings.

  1. In Sukla Mukherjee Vs State on 13 Dec 1994, Calcutta High Court said 205 CrPC applies to warrants cases also like 498A IPC.
  2. In MS. Bhaskar Industries Ltd Vs MS. Bhiwani Denim and Apparels Ltd and Ors on 27 August 2001, Supreme Court says,
    • 17. Thus, in appropriate cases the magistrate can allow an accused to make even the first appearance through a counsel. The magistrate is empowered to record the plea of the accused even when his counsel makes such plea on behalf of the accused in a case where the personal appearance of the accused is dispensed with. Section 317 of the Code has to be viewed in the above perspective as it empowers the court to dispense with the personal attendance of the accused (provided he is represented by a counsel in that case) even for proceeding with the further steps in the case. However, one precaution which the court should take in such a situation is that the said benefit need be granted only to an accused who gives an undertaking to the satisfaction of the court that he would not dispute his identity as the particular accused in the case, and that a counsel on his behalf would be present in court and that he has no objection in taking evidence in his absence. This precaution is necessary for the further progress of the proceedings including examination of the witnesses.
  3. In Sri Pritam Sen Vs The State Of West Bengal on 18 October, 2001, Calcutta High Court says, “the learned Magistrate, in the fitness of the things, should not have Issued warrant against the petitioner at the first Instance without assigning any reason in compliance with provisions laid down in Clauses (a) and (b) of Section 87 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.”
  4. In Md. Naim @ Md. Naimuddin Vs. State of Bihar and Ors on 08 Dec 2006, Patna High Court said 205 CrPC applies to warrants cases also like 498A IPC.
  5. In the landmark Rajesh Sharma & ors. Vs State of UP and Anr on 27 July 2017 judgment, Supreme Court held that personal exemption to be granted to accused who are residing in outstation locations.
  6. In Sri Rameshwar Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar on 16 March, 2018, Supreme Court granted Exemption from Personal Appearance to parents of Arnesh kumar.
  7. In Ajay Kumar Bisnoi and Anr Vs MS KEI Industries Limited on 25 September 2015, Madras High Court says, “a Magistrate can dispense with appearance of accused in a criminal case on first appearance itself, if accused is represented by an Advocate and supported by reasonable excuse.”
  8. In Ajay Kumar Saboo Vs State of Bihar on 30 Jun 2017
  9. Puneet Dalmia Vs CBI Hyderabad on 16 December 2019
Posted in LLB Study Material | Tagged CrPC 205 – Magistrate may dispense with personal attendance of accused | Leave a comment

Websites of Police Department of Various States and Union Territories

Posted on August 16, 2020 by ShadesOfKnife

Here are the websites of Police Departments belonging to various States and Union Territories in India. You will find option on these sites to view/download FIRs. In some sites, you have facility to lodge online complaint/FIR too.

  1. Andhra Pradesh Police
  2. Arunachal Pradesh Police
  3. Assam Police
  4. Bihar Police
  5. Chhattisgarh Police
    • Twitter
  6. Goa Police
  7. Gujarat Police
  8. Haryana Police
  9. Himachal Pradesh Police
    • Twitter
  10. Jharkhand Police
    • Twitter
  11. Karnataka Police
  12. Kerala Police
    • Twitter
  13. Madhya Pradesh Police
  14. Maharashtra Police
    • DGP
  15. Manipur Police
  16. Meghalaya Police
    • Twitter
  17. Mizoram Police
  18. Nagaland Police
  19. Odisha Police
  20. Punjab Police
  21. Rajasthan Police
    • Twitter
  22. Sikkim Police
  23. Tamil Nadu Police
  24. Telangana Police
  25. Tripura Police
    • Twitter
  26. Uttar Pradesh Police
    • Twitter
  27. Uttarakhand Police
  28. West Bengal Police
    • Twitter
  29.  Andaman and Nicobar Islands
  30. Chandigarh Police
  31. Dadra and Nagar Haveli and Daman and Diu
  32. Delhi Police
    • Twitter
  33. Jammu and Kashmir Police
    • Twitter
  34. Ladakh
  35. Lakshadweep Police
  36. Puducherry Police

 

Posted in LLB Study Material | Leave a comment

Post navigation

  • Older posts

Search within entire Content of “Shades of Knife”

My Legal Twitter Timeline

Tweets by @SandeepPamarati

My MRA Twitter Timeline

Tweets by @Shadesofknife

Recent Posts

  • MS Knit Pro International Vs State of NCT Delhi and Anr on 20 May 2022 May 23, 2022
  • Prabha Tyagi Vs Kamlesh Devi on 12 May 2022 May 20, 2022
  • Doongar Singh and Ors Vs The State Of Rajasthan on 28 Nov 2017 May 20, 2022
  • Anurag Saxena Vs Union of India on 17 May 2022 May 19, 2022
  • Sumer Singh Salkan Vs Asstt Director and Ors on 11 Aug 2010 May 15, 2022

Most Read Posts

  • Lifecycle Stages of a Maintenance Case under 125 CrPC (3,472 views)
  • Arunkumar N Chaturvedi Vs The State of Maharashtra and Anr on 24 Dec 2013 (2,694 views)
  • Neha Vs Vibhor Garg on 12 Nov 2021 (1,891 views)
  • Bhagyashri Jagdish Jaiswal Vs Jagdish Sajjanlala Jaiswal and Anr on 26 Feb 2022 (1,108 views)
  • Jagdish Shrivastava Vs State of Maharashtra on 11 Mar 2022 (998 views)
  • Deepak Sharma Vs State of Haryana on 12 Jan 2022 (668 views)
  • NBW Judgments (620 views)
  • Life Cycles of Various case types (560 views)
  • Busarapu Satya Yesu Babu Vs State of AP and Sake Roja on 05 Nov 2021 (517 views)
  • Rajendra Bhagat Vs State of Jharkhand on 03 Jan 2022 (513 views)

Tags

Legal Procedure Explained - Interpretation of Statutes (299)Reportable Judgement or Order (285)Landmark Case (282)Work-In-Progress Article (213)2-Judge (Division) Bench Decision (206)Catena of Landmark Judgments (184)1-Judge Bench Decision (100)Sandeep Pamarati (85)3-Judge (Full) Bench Decision (70)Article 21 - Protection of life and personal liberty (70)Absurd Or After Thought Or Baseless Or False Or General Or Inherently Improbable Or Improved Or UnSpecific Or Omnibus Or Vague Allegations (50)Reprimands or Setbacks to YCP Govt of Andhra Pradesh (49)Perjury Under 340 CrPC (48)Summary Post (46)CrPC 482 - Quash (37)Recommended Guidelines or Directions (33)Advocate Antics (33)Rules of the Act/Ordinance/Notification/Circular (32)IPC 498a - Not Made Out (32)PWDV Act 20 - Maintenance Granted (31)

Categories

Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification (588)Bare Acts or State Amendments or Statutes or GOs or Notifications issued by Central or State Governments (292)High Court of Andhra Pradesh Judgment or Order or Notification (151)High Court of Delhi Judgment or Order or Notification (103)High Court of Bombay Judgment or Order or Notification (86)High Court of Karnataka Judgment or Order or Notification (55)General Study Material (55)High Court of Madras Judgment or Order or Notification (47)LLB Study Material (46)Prakasam DV Cases (46)Assorted Court Judgments or Orders or Notifications (45)Judicial Activism (for Public Benefit) (38)High Court of Punjab & Haryana Judgment or Order or Notification (38)High Court of Allahabad Judgment or Order or Notification (34)District or Sessions or Magistrate Court Judgment or Order or Notification (32)High Court of Kerala Judgment or Order or Notification (25)High Court of Madhya Pradesh Judgment or Order or Notification (24)High Court of Gujarat Judgment or Order or Notification (24)High Court of Calcutta Judgment or Order or Notification (17)High Court of Patna Judgment or Order or Notification (14)

Recent Comments

  • ShadesOfKnife on Sirangai Shoba @ Shoba Munnuri Vs Sirangi Muralidhar Rao on 19 October, 2016
  • muralidhar Rao Sirangi on Sirangai Shoba @ Shoba Munnuri Vs Sirangi Muralidhar Rao on 19 October, 2016
  • ShadesOfKnife on J.Shyam Babu Vs The State Of Telangana on 9 February, 2017
  • anuj on J.Shyam Babu Vs The State Of Telangana on 9 February, 2017
  • ShadesOfKnife on Syed Nazim Husain Vs Additional Principal Judge Family Court & Anr on 9 January, 2003

Archives of SoK

  • May 2022 (10)
  • April 2022 (32)
  • March 2022 (17)
  • February 2022 (6)
  • January 2022 (2)
  • December 2021 (7)
  • November 2021 (7)
  • October 2021 (6)
  • September 2021 (10)
  • August 2021 (31)
  • July 2021 (45)
  • June 2021 (17)
  • May 2021 (17)
  • April 2021 (18)
  • March 2021 (58)
  • February 2021 (14)
  • January 2021 (50)
  • December 2020 (35)
  • November 2020 (68)
  • October 2020 (67)
  • September 2020 (29)
  • August 2020 (41)
  • July 2020 (20)
  • June 2020 (36)
  • May 2020 (40)
  • April 2020 (38)
  • March 2020 (26)
  • February 2020 (43)
  • January 2020 (36)
  • December 2019 (35)
  • November 2019 (4)
  • October 2019 (18)
  • September 2019 (58)
  • August 2019 (33)
  • July 2019 (12)
  • June 2019 (19)
  • May 2019 (5)
  • April 2019 (19)
  • March 2019 (58)
  • February 2019 (11)
  • January 2019 (90)
  • December 2018 (97)
  • November 2018 (43)
  • October 2018 (31)
  • September 2018 (73)
  • August 2018 (47)
  • July 2018 (143)
  • June 2018 (92)
  • May 2018 (102)
  • April 2018 (59)
  • March 2018 (8)

Blogroll

  • Daaman Promoting Harmony 0
  • Fight against Legal Terrorism Fight against Legal Terrorism along with MyNation Foundation 0
  • Good Morning Good Morning News 0
  • Insaaf India Insaaf Awareness Movement 0
  • MyNation Hope Foundation Wiki 0
  • MyNation.net Equality, Justice and Harmony 0
  • Sarvepalli Legal 0
  • Save Indian Family Save Indian Family Movement 0
  • SIF Chandigarh SIF Chandigarh 0
  • The Male Factor The Male Factor 0
  • Vaastav Foundation The Social Reality 0
  • Voice4india Indian Laws, Non-profits, Environment 0
  • Writing Law Writing Law by Ankur 0

RSS Cloudflare Status

  • Cloudflare Workers Analytics Issues May 23, 2022
    May 23, 21:51 UTCInvestigating - Some customers might experience errors accessing Cloudflare Workers Analytics data in the Cloudflare dashboard and APIs.
  • Network Performance Issues in the Czech Republic May 23, 2022
    May 23, 17:24 UTCResolved - This incident has been resolved.May 23, 15:57 UTCIdentified - The issue has been identified and a fix is being implemented.May 23, 15:54 UTCInvestigating - Cloudflare is investigating issues with network performance in the Czech Republic. We are working to analyze and mitigate this problem. More updates to follow shortly.
  • Cloudflare Community Maintenance May 23, 2022
    May 23, 15:00 UTCCompleted - The scheduled maintenance has been completed.May 23, 13:00 UTCIn progress - Scheduled maintenance is currently in progress. We will provide updates as necessary.May 19, 21:24 UTCScheduled - Our vendor will be conducting a planned maintenance on the Cloudflare Community site (https://community.cloudflare.com).The Community may observe a short (1 - 2 minutes) […]

RSS List of Spam Server IPs from Project Honeypot

  • 103.243.242.25 | SD May 22, 2022
    Event: Bad Event | Total: 1,224 | First: 2021-07-31 | Last: 2022-05-22
  • 106.13.128.148 | S May 22, 2022
    Event: Bad Event | Total: 8 | First: 2022-05-22 | Last: 2022-05-22
  • 192.3.198.24 | S May 22, 2022
    Event: Bad Event | Total: 21 | First: 2022-04-03 | Last: 2022-05-22
Proudly powered by WordPress
Theme: Flint by Star Verte LLC

Bad Behavior has blocked 622 access attempts in the last 7 days.

pixel