Viral Dhulia Vs Virag Dhulia on 25 July 2013

Posted on June 15 by ShadesOfKnife

Because of the allegation of Dowry giving are made by married women, husbands are resorting to these kind of hyperbolic tricks which fall flat on their face. Instead of hitting at the root cause, peripheral aspects are stroked only to be later quashed like this.

Citations: [2013 KCCR 4 3137], [2013 AKR 4 454], [2014 ILR KAR 199], [2013 SCC ONLINE KAR 5387], [2013 AIR KANT R 4 45]

Harikumar Vs State of Karnataka on 22 October 1993

Posted on May 19 by ShadesOfKnife

The 3-judge bench of Karnataka High Court held that Section 8A of Dowry Prohibition Act 1961 is constitutionally valid and the burden of proof laid on the accused in offences under this Act carry onus on the Prosecution to discharge their duty to establish their case based on foundational facts relevant and only then the proof of burden shifts to accused.

Harikumar Vs State of Karnataka on 22 October 1993

Citations: [1995 ALT CRI 1 25], [1993 ILR KAR 3035], [1994 DMC 1 356], [1995 CRIMES 1 573], [1994 KARLJ 3 335], [1994 KANTLJ 3 335], [1993 SCC ONLINE KAR 240], [1994 KANT LJ 3 335], [1993 HLR 2 672]

Other Source links: https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1973279/ or https://www.casemine.com/judgement/in/56093aeee4b0149711228334 or https://498anlr.wordpress.com/2018/08/03/2899/

Sri Gunavenkataramane Gowda Vs Sri N S Vijayakumar on 28 March 2019

Posted on April 20 by ShadesOfKnife

Karnataka High Court held that, an application for recalling of NBW has to be disposed of on same day of filing same.

Sri Gunavenkataramane Gowda Vs Sri N S Vijayakumar on 28 March 2019

Citations: [2019 SCC ONLINE KAR 473]

Other Source links: https://indiankanoon.org/doc/95097297/ or https://www.casemine.com/judgement/in/5c9e48a29eff430a019b99ba

https://bangaloremirror.indiatimes.com/bangalore/others/recall-applications-should-be-heard-and-disposed-of-same-day/articleshow/68678246.cms

Disclaimer:

Reproduced in accordance with Section 52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from main.sci.gov.in/judgments, judis.nic.in, lobis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court and District Court Websites such as ecourts.gov.in

I have no control to remove copies of this document(s) that may be available on websites of High Courts or Supreme Court of India or any of the many other sites, law journal or reporters which carry the same judgment in it’s entirety, not I can remove references/links to this document(s) from the results of Search Engines such as Google.com.

Shyamlal Devda and Ors Vs Parimala on 02 April 2019

Posted on January 23 by ShadesOfKnife

Karnataka High Court has quashed this 498A IPC case on 11 of the accused relatives of the Husband since the complaint is fill of junk vague and non-specific allegations.

Shyamlal Devda and Ors Vs Parimala on 02 April 2019

The Supreme Court had crushed another false DV case by this liar and quashed it on 11 of the accused relatives of the Husband here.

Citations: [

Other Source links: https://www.casemine.com/judgement/in/5d4be4364a9326071f285522

Shyamlal Devda and Ors Vs Parimala on 18 February 2019

Posted on January 23 by ShadesOfKnife

In this false DV case, Justice JOHN MICHAEL CUNHA, discussed two contentions but adjudicated only on one aspect.

Vague and General Allegations
No jurisdiction to Karnataka Courts

Shyamlal Devda and Ors Vs Parimala on 18 February 2019

The Supreme Court crushed this judgment here and quashed the false DV case on 11 of the accused relatives of the Husband.

Citations: [

Other Source links: https://www.casemine.com/judgement/in/5cc473859eff43397d6ab68f

Dayanand Rao Rangadal Vs Suresh and Ors on 14 August, 2008

Posted on January 14 by ShadesOfKnife

Based on landmark judgments here, here and here, Karnataka High Court held that,

a written statement is a public document
a criminal proceeding can be initiated when a civil proceeding is ongoing

Dayanand Rao Rangadal Vs Suresh and Ors on 14 August, 2008

Citations: [2011 KCCR 1 230], [2008 SCC ONLINE KAR 758]

Indiankanoon.org or Casemine link: https://www.casemine.com/judgement/in/56093e42e4b0149711231bf9

The Index for Defamation Judgments is here.

NS Leelavathi Vs R Shilpa Brunda on 11 December, 2019

Posted on December 17, 2019 by ShadesOfKnife

No Shared household. DVC is not maintainable.

NS Leelavathi Vs R Shilpa Brunda on 11 December, 2019

Citation:

Indiankanoon.org or Casemine link: https://indiankanoon.org/doc/70402378/

The index page is here.

Santosh Kumar Vs State of Karnataka on 09 October, 2019

Posted on November 9, 2019 by ShadesOfKnife

This judgment from High Court of Karnataka says,

“it is incumbent on the Court to state reasons with reference to the material on record on which reliance is placed by the Court to formulate an opinion, to reject the application for discharge”.

Santosh Kumar Vs State of Karnataka on 09 October, 2019

Citations:

Indiankanoon.org link:

Earlier Judgment is available here.

Reproduced in accordance with Section 52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, lobis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court and District Court Websites such as ecourts.gov.in

Patil Vijaykumar and Ors Vs Union of India and Anr on 10 August, 1984

Posted on October 5, 2019 by ShadesOfKnife

This in the judgment of Karnataka High Court on a Tax matter.

Key passage is this one:

But we wish to add that although a decision of another High Court is not binding on this court, we see no reason for not accepting, with respectful caution, any help they can give in the elucidation of questions which arise before this court.

Patil Vijaykumar and Ors Vs Union of India and Anr on 10 August, 1984

Citation: [(1985) 151 ITR 48 (KAR)]

External Link: https://www.legalcrystal.com/case/375809/patil-vijaykumar-vs-union-india

Preetam A Eklaspur Vs Vanishree on 08 January, 2019

Posted on January 16, 2019 by ShadesOfKnife

Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka held that needs and aspirations of Children are to be taken into consideration while deciding custody of the child. Custody given to father as the child wants to stay in India and live with her father.

Preetam A Eklaspur Vs Vanishree on 08 January, 2019

[related_posts_by_tax title=”5 Recently Updated Posts, Similar or Related To Above Post” orderby=”post_modified” posts_per_page=”5″ show_date=”true”]

Shades of Knife

True Colors of a Vile Wife

Category: High Court of Karnataka Judgment or Order or Notification

Viral Dhulia Vs Virag Dhulia on 25 July 2013

Harikumar Vs State of Karnataka on 22 October 1993

Sri Gunavenkataramane Gowda Vs Sri N S Vijayakumar on 28 March 2019

Shyamlal Devda and Ors Vs Parimala on 02 April 2019

Shyamlal Devda and Ors Vs Parimala on 18 February 2019

Dayanand Rao Rangadal Vs Suresh and Ors on 14 August, 2008

NS Leelavathi Vs R Shilpa Brunda on 11 December, 2019

Santosh Kumar Vs State of Karnataka on 09 October, 2019

Patil Vijaykumar and Ors Vs Union of India and Anr on 10 August, 1984

Preetam A Eklaspur Vs Vanishree on 08 January, 2019