A list of decisions where maintenance was granted for only a limited time.
Category: Assorted Court Judgments or Orders or Notifications
Kanumuri Raghurama Krishnam Raju Vs State of AP and Ors
On his birthday 14 May 2021, Member of Parliament Sri Kanumuri Raghurama Krishnam Raju was arrested from his home at Hyderabad by the AP CID Police and brought to CID office at Guntur. On the intervening night between 14th and 15th May 2021, he was subjected to the 3rd degree police torcher by the AP CID Police on the instruction of their Higher up who may be boot-licking their political masters. Then a slew of legal actions were put to motion…
On 19 May 2021,
The Police officials who tried to act smart and favor their pay-master Chief Minister of AP by not implementing the Order of High Court, got served with Contempt of Court notices. The High Court also showcased the shenanigans of the Superintendent of the Government General Hospital, Guntur who is also the wife of the head of the ruling party’s IT Cell also, who did not finish the examination of accused in time and made the High Court wait until 6PM, finally issuing a notice why action should not be taken under the provisions of Contempt of Court Act.
The AAG got rap on his butt from Justice Lalitha Kanneganti by saying that he could be referred to Bar Council for taking appropriate action, which may involve immediate suspension from Bar Association which will render him a non-advocate during suspension period and eventually getting kicked out of the Legal profession itself, all for the chamchagiri he intended to do to the Chief Minister of AP.
Hilarious stuff!!
HC-DB-Kanumuri Raghurama Krishnam Raju Vs State of AP and Ors on 19 May 2021On 21 May 2021,
Supreme Court granted bail with usual conditions.
SC-Kanumuri Raghurama Krishnam Raju Vs State of AP and Ors on 21 May 2021In our view, considering the injuries as reported by the Medical Board of the Army Hospital, we can prima facie form an opinion that the appellant may have been ill-treated while in police custody. Further, we are of the opinion that the charges against the appellant are not such in which custodial interrogation would be required as all the statements made by the appellant are on record and the FIR has been lodged only after a detailed enquiry by the State CID. Considering the totality of the circumstances and also the health position of the appellant, specially that the appellant has undergone heart bypass surgery in December 2020, which is not denied by the respondent and has also been noted in the report of the Medical Board of the Army Hospital, we deem it just and proper that the appellant be enlarged on bail
On 17 Jun 2021,
On the request of the petitioner’s advocate, AP High Court disposed of this petition as no further action is required.
HC-DB-Kanumuri Raghurama Krishnam Raju Vs State of AP and Ors on 17 Jun 2021Change the Advocate
Here are few case laws to support your effort in changing an advocate who is already on record of a Court in your cases.
- R.D. Saxena Vs Balram Prasad Sharma on 22 August, 2000
- New India Assurance Co Ltd Vs A.K.Saxena on 7 Nov 2003 [SC]
- C.V. Sudhindra and Ors. Vs Divine Light School For Blind [KarHC]
- Karnataka Power Distribution Vs M RajaShekar on 2 Dec 2016 [NOC not required to engage new advocate, if the advocate was discharged by client, following the procedure established by law]
Decisions of High Courts to be made applicable in Other High Courts under Article 227 of the Constitution of India
This page lists case laws from different High Courts in which good directions were passed, that I want to be passed by other High Courts also, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Article 227 of the Constitution of India. This is important because, decision of a High Court, being a Constitutional Court having jurisdiction only within the territory of the State of Union Territory for which it is High Court, has only persuasive value in a Court outside that State of Union Territory. (Some goals are here)
Allahabad High Court
- Mohd Farman Vs State of UP on 12 Aug 2021 [Police person not to have beards against Circulars and Article 25 does not help]
Andhra Pradesh High Court
- Kudari Chandrasekhar Vs State of AP on 08 Mar 2021 [Give number to 340 CrPC application and dispose it according to law]
Calcutta High Court
- In re UTP Dipak Joshi, lodged in Dum Dum Central Correctional Home [UTPs unfit (under CPC and CrPC) to stand trial to be released]
Karnataka High Court
- Karnataka Power Distribution Vs M RajaShekar on 2 Dec 2016 [NOC not required to engage new advocate, if the advocate was discharged by client, following the procedure established by law]
Kerala High Court
Madras High Court
- Dr.P.Pathmanathan and Ors Vs V.Monica and Anr on 18 Jan 2021 [Wonderful Guidelines for PWDVA cases]
Case laws or Judgments under SC and ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act 1989
A compilation of judgments from various Courts of India in relation to SC and ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act 1989
- Shelbin Vs State of Kerala on 16 February, 2018 (AB in a SC and ST Act case)
- Pardeep Kumar Vs State of Haryana and Anr on 14 May 2020 (Charge sheet Quashed; insult not in public view but over a phone call)
- Jaisingh Agarwal and Anr Vs State of Chhattisgarh and Anr on 27 Oct 2020 (A complaint u.s 156(3) is maintainable in the Special SC/ST Court)
- Hitesh Verma Vs State of Uttarakhand and Anr on 05 Nov 2020
Zero FIR Case Laws/ Judgments
Here is a list of judgments from Supreme Court and various High Courts and Legislative/Police Circulars, which talk about a concept called as Zero FIR, meaning register FIR first and then transfer it to appropriate Police Station in which territorial limits the alleged offence occurred. If FIR is not registered, IPC 166A proceedings can be initiated against the Police officers. More actions available here.
Case Laws or Judgments of Courts
- State of Andhra Pradesh Vs Punati Ramulu and Ors on 19 Feb 1993
- Satvinder Kaur vs State (Govt. Of N.C.T. Of Delhi) on 5 October, 1999
- Ramesh Kumari Vs State (N.C.T. Of Delhi) And Ors on 21 February, 2006
- Bimla Rawal Vs. State on 1 January, 2008
- Manju Dutta Vs The State & Ors. on 29 January, 2013
- Lalita Kumari Vs Govt. of U.P. and Ors on 12 November, 2013
- Umapathi S Vs State of Karnataka on 19 Sep 2019
- Kirti Vashisht Vs State and Ors on 29 Nov 2019
Legislative / Police Circulars
- Ministry of Home Affairs Dt: 2013-05-10 : 2013-05-10 Registration of FIR irrespective of territorial jurisdiction and Zero FIR
- Ministry of Home Affairs Dt: 2015-10-12 : 2015-10-12 Advisory Compulsory Registration FIRs
- DGP Office, Karnataka, Dt: 2019-11-26 : 2019-11-26 Registration of FIR (Zero FIR)
All Compensation Judgments for Motor Vehicle Accidents or other mishaps
Here is a list of case laws (includes decisions from Supreme Court, High Courts, District Court and other bodies such as Consumer forums) regarding compensation in cases of accidental death or disability or other mishap which entitles compensation for the aggrieved. This is done under provisions under CrPC or Schemes setup by Courts/Government or under Article 21 of Constitution. Can be used to seek compensation in cases of loss of life, part/full disability, loss of reputation, loss of companionship etc.
- Khatri and Ors Vs State of Bihar and Ors on 10 March, 1981
- Hari Kishan & Anr Vs Sukhbir Singh & Ors on 25 August, 1988
- Mary Angel & Ors Vs State Of Tamil Nadu on 13 May, 1999
- The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd Vs Meena Variyal and Ors on 2 April 2007
- Vimalben Ajitbhai Patel Vs Vatslabeen Ashokbhai Patel And others on 14 March, 2008
- In Re Ramlila Maidan Incident Dt. 4.06.2011 Vs UOI and Ors on 23 February 2012
- A.Shanmugam Vs Ariya K.R.K.M.N.P.Sangam on 27 April, 2012
- Md.Ajmal Md.Amir Kasab @Abu Mujahid Vs State Of Maharashtra on 29 August, 2012
- Ajay Kumar Bisnoi and Anr Vs MS KEI Industries Limited on 25 September 2015
- Mukesh & Anr Vs State For Nct Of Delhi & Ors on 5 May, 2017
- Sulochana Vs Thiru. R.Sivasamy on Pronounced on 24 May, 2017
- Babloo Chauhan @ Dabloo Vs State Govt. of NCT of Delhi on 30 November, 2017
- Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs Pawan Balram Mulchandani On 25 September, 2018
- Rajeev Singhal & Anr Vs MCD (East Delhi Municipal Corporation) & Anr On 27 September, 2018
- The State of Maharastra Vs Chandrabhan Sudam Snap on 20 December, 2018
- Kadek Dwi Ani Rasmini Vs Inspector of Police on 02 January, 2019
- MS Royal Sundaram Alliance Vs Mandala Yadagari Goud and Ors on 9 April, 2019
- Joginder Singh and Anr Vs ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company on 14 August, 2019
- Muppa Venkateswara Rao Vs State of AP on 10 March 2020
- Gas leak at LG Polymers on 06 May 2020
- Arun Sharma Vs State of M.P. on 02 Nov 2020
Index of MASTER sitemap here.
Kirti Nagpal Vs Rohit Girdhar Case
Set of cases filed by the ex-Couple, Kirti Nagpal Vs Rohit Girdhar
- Kirti Nagpal Vs Rohit Girdhar on 12 February, 2019 [Interim Maintenance u/s 24 of HMA was denied]
- Kirti Nagpal Vs Rohit Girdhar on 20 Nov 2020 [Appeal on Divorce was dismissed]
Kunapureddy Swarna Kumari Vs Kunapureddy @ Nookala Shanka Balaji Naidu Case
Here is the list of the cases fought by this couple. It is just a hilarious case that there are 11 Respondents arraigned in this case. Go figure!
- Kunapareddy @ Nookala Shanka Balaji Vs Kunapareddy Swarna Kumari On 18 April, 2016 : (SC says, amendments in petitions can be allowed, before Court takes cognizance of the case)
- Kunapureddy Swarna Kumari Vs Kunapureddy @ Nookala Shanka Balaji Naidu on 12 August, 2016 : (Trial Court doles of relief after relief supported by BS)
- Kunapureddy @ Nookala Shankar Vs Kunapureddy Swarna Kumari on 5 January, 2018 : (Husband files appeal at Sessions; return of dowry amount of Rs.3.00 Lakhs and compensation amount of Rs.15.00 Lakhs set aside; despite no evidence for DV, but Monthly maintenance of Rs.10,000/- is confirmed anyways)
- Kunapureddy Swarna Kumari Vs Kunapureddy @ Nookala Shankar on 5 January, 2018 : (Wife files appeal at Sessions seeking enhancement in monthly maintenance; Dismissed)
Love Jihad marriages in India
The following is a small compilation (State-wise) of Love Jihad marriages in India, wherein the bride had converted to Islam from other religions, before performing marriage, which is loosely called as Love Jihad, as it is popularly held that Muslims do such thing, to propagate their religion. Such marriages are held to be unacceptable by Supreme Court here and by Allahabad High Court here.
Uttar Pradesh:
On 2020-09-23:
Priyanshi @ Km Shamreen and Anr Vs State of UP and 3 Ors on 23 Sep 2020On 2020-10-08:
Pooja @ Zoya Vs State of UP and 3 Ors on 08 Oct 2020
