<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Surinder Mohan Vikal Vs Ascharaj Lal Chopra Archives - Shades of Knife</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/tag/surinder-mohan-vikal-vs-ascharaj-lal-chopra/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/tag/surinder-mohan-vikal-vs-ascharaj-lal-chopra/</link>
	<description>True Colors of a Vile Wife</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2022 04:42:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Rabindra Nath Pal Vs Ratikanta Paul and Ors on 6 Mar 2020</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/rabindra-nath-pal-vs-ratikanta-paul-and-ors-on-6-mar-2020/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/rabindra-nath-pal-vs-ratikanta-paul-and-ors-on-6-mar-2020/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2022 04:39:32 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[High Court of Calcutta Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1-Judge Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 468 - Bar to taking cognizance after lapse of the period of limitation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPC 499 - Defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPC 500 - Punishment For Defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Non-Reportable Judgement or Order]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rabindra Nath Pal Vs Ratikanta Paul and Ors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surinder Mohan Vikal Vs Ascharaj Lal Chopra]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=15086</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Relying on Apex Court&#8217;s Surinder Mohan Vikal decision, Calcutta High Court held as follows: In the instant case, the cause of action arose from the date when First Information Report was registered and not from the date on which the complainant was acquitted from the charge. Citations : Other Sources : https://indiankanoon.org/doc/50050401/ https://www.casemine.com/<a class="glossaryLink"  aria-describedby="tt"  data-cmtooltip="&#60;div class=glossaryItemTitle&#62;Judgement&#60;/div&#62;&#60;div class=glossaryItemBody&#62;The final decision of a court&#60;/div&#62;"  href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/glossary/judgement/"  data-gt-translate-attributes='[{"attribute":"data-cmtooltip", "format":"html"}]'  tabindex='0' role='link'>judgement</a>/in/5faa5a1c4653d02a0b1309ab</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/rabindra-nath-pal-vs-ratikanta-paul-and-ors-on-6-mar-2020/">Rabindra Nath Pal Vs Ratikanta Paul and Ors on 6 Mar 2020</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/rabindra-nath-pal-vs-ratikanta-paul-and-ors-on-6-mar-2020/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ms.Romy Khanna Vs State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) on 4 Jul 2011</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/ms-romy-khanna-vs-state-govt-of-nct-of-delhi-on-4-jul-2011/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/ms-romy-khanna-vs-state-govt-of-nct-of-delhi-on-4-jul-2011/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2022 04:24:21 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[High Court of Delhi Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1-Judge Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 468 - Bar to taking cognizance after lapse of the period of limitation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPC 499 - Defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPC 500 - Punishment For Defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ms.Romy Khanna Vs State (Govt of NCT of Delhi)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reportable Judgement or Order]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surinder Mohan Vikal Vs Ascharaj Lal Chopra]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=15079</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Relying on Apex Court&#8217;s Surinder Mohan Vikal decision, Delhi High Court held that if any offence is made out in a complaint under Section 500 IPC for defamation, Section 468(2) Cr.P.C. is attracted and cognizance of offence should be taken within a period of three years from the date of occurrence. Citations : [2011 DLT [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/ms-romy-khanna-vs-state-govt-of-nct-of-delhi-on-4-jul-2011/">Ms.Romy Khanna Vs State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) on 4 Jul 2011</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/ms-romy-khanna-vs-state-govt-of-nct-of-delhi-on-4-jul-2011/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Surinder Mohan Vikal Vs Ascharaj Lal Chopra on 28 Feb 1978</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/surinder-mohan-vikal-vs-ascharaj-lal-chopra-on-28-feb-1978/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/surinder-mohan-vikal-vs-ascharaj-lal-chopra-on-28-feb-1978/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Oct 2021 12:36:26 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2-Judge (Division) Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 468 - Bar to taking cognizance after lapse of the period of limitation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 469 - Commencement of the period of limitation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 470 - Exclusion of time in certain cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPC 499 - Defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPC 500 - Punishment For Defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Landmark Case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surinder Mohan Vikal Vs Ascharaj Lal Chopra]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=14700</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A division bench of Supreme Court held that, the defamation has to be filed with in time limitation while also referring to 468, 469 and 470 CrPC. It would thus appear that the appellant was entitled to the benefit of sub-section (1) of section 468 which prohibits every Court from taking cognizance of an offence [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/surinder-mohan-vikal-vs-ascharaj-lal-chopra-on-28-feb-1978/">Surinder Mohan Vikal Vs Ascharaj Lal Chopra on 28 Feb 1978</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/surinder-mohan-vikal-vs-ascharaj-lal-chopra-on-28-feb-1978/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 
Lazy Loading (feed)
Minified using Disk

Served from: www.shadesofknife.in @ 2026-09-12 19:28:53 by W3 Total Cache
-->