<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sudha Vs State (Nct Of Delhi) Archives - Shades of Knife</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/tag/sudha-vs-state-nct-of-delhi/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/tag/sudha-vs-state-nct-of-delhi/</link>
	<description>True Colors of a Vile Wife</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2020 10:21:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Sudha Vs State (NCT of Delhi) on 4 January 2016</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/sudha-vs-state-nct-of-delhi-on-4-january-2016/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/sudha-vs-state-nct-of-delhi-on-4-january-2016/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2018 12:02:02 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[District or Sessions or Magistrate Court Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Absurd Or After Thought Or Baseless Or False Or General Or Inherently Improbable Or Improved Or UnSpecific Or Omnibus Or Vague Allegations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Catena of Landmark Judgments Referred/Cited to]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 239 - Discharged]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DP Act 4 - Dowry Demand Not Proved]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DP Act 4 - Not Made Out]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPC 498A - Cruelty Not Proved]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPC 498A - Cruelty Without Dowry Demand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPC 498a - Not Made Out]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sudha Vs State (Nct Of Delhi)]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=3893</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In this revision filed by knife against the discharge of husband&#8217;s relatives, District Court of Delhi, held that not every cruelty attracts IPC 498A especially in the absence of a harassment/demand for same. From Para 5, Perusal of the file reveals that case was registered on the complaint given by the <a class="glossaryLink"  aria-describedby="tt"  data-cmtooltip="&#60;div class=glossaryItemTitle&#62;Petitioner&#60;/div&#62;&#60;div class=glossaryItemBody&#62;A person who files a petition in court.&#60;/div&#62;"  href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/glossary/petitioner/"  data-gt-translate-attributes='[{"attribute":"data-cmtooltip", "format":"html"}]'  tabindex='0' role='link'>petitioner</a> to the Joint [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/sudha-vs-state-nct-of-delhi-on-4-january-2016/">Sudha Vs State (NCT of Delhi) on 4 January 2016</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/sudha-vs-state-nct-of-delhi-on-4-january-2016/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 
Lazy Loading (feed)
Minified using Disk

Served from: www.shadesofknife.in @ 2026-06-24 19:41:12 by W3 Total Cache
-->