web analytics

Menu

Skip to content
Shades of Knife
  • Home
  • True Colors of a Vile Wife
  • Need Inspiration?
  • Blog Updates
  • SOK Gallery
  • Vile News Reporter
  • About Me
  • Contact Me

Shades of Knife

True Colors of a Vile Wife

Tag: Sandeep Pamarati

Kiran Dhar Vs Alok Berman on 14 May, 2014

Posted on May 26, 2018 by ShadesOfKnife

This Allahabad High Court judgment also clarifies established below legal point in Maintenance case under section 125 of CrPC. It relies on Deoki here.

In the absence of any custom and in absence of any decree for divorce, it cannot be said that marriage between Alok Berman and Smt. Rani was dissolved, which goes to show that Alok Berman was still legally married husband of Smt. Rani, who was, admittedly, alive at the time of marriage of Smt. Kiran Dhar with Alok Berman, and the marriage between them was not annulled as per law.

Further,

26. Section 13 of Hindu Marriage Act clearly requires a petition either by the husband or the wife for dissolving the marriage by decree or divorce on the ground mentioned in Section 13 of Hindu Marriage Act. No other form of divorce has been recognized by Hindu Marriage Act. Annexure 5 is an agreement between Alok Berman and his earlier wife – Smt. Rani in which parties had signed a divorced deed in which they have stated that they are dissolving the marriage by this deed on the conditions mentioned in the deed. Condition no.6 is also very relevant in which she has stated that if either of the parties filed a divorce case in the Court, then another party will give consent to the divorce without making any objection.

27. It is not on record as to whether any suit for divorce was filed by Smt. Rani or not. In absence of any document and decree of divorce by the court, it can safely be presumed that no such application was moved by either of parties before the competent court for dissolution of marriage. In view of this, the only evidence of divorce is the document Annexure 5. This document has not seen the light of day during any divorce proceeding. Hindu Marriage Act does not recognize any divorce of such type. It has also not been averred and proved that there was such custom in the society of parties to recognize such type of divorce.

28. In the absence of any custom and in absence of any decree for divorce, it cannot be said that marriage between Alok Berman and Smt. Rani was dissolved, which goes to show that Alok Berman was still legally married husband of Smt. Rani, who was, admittedly, alive at the time of marriage of Smt. Kiran Dhar with Alok Berman, and the marriage between them was not annulled as per law.

29. In view of Sections 5 (1) and 11 of Hindu Marriage Act and also in view of decision of Apex Court in Yamunabai Anantrao Adhav v. Anantrao Shivram Adhav and another (supra) the marriage between Smt. Kiran Dhar and Alok Berman is void ab initio, and she is not entitled to maintenance.

30. It is also clear from the decision of Yamunabai Anantrao Adhav v. Anantrao Shivram Adhav and another (supra) that even if the second wife (Smt. Kiran Dhar) was not aware of first marriage of her husband with another woman, she is not entitled to any maintenance.

Smt.Kiran Dhar vs Alok Berman on 14 May, 2014

Citations: [2015 DMC ALL 2 357], [2014 ALLCC 86 807], [2015 ACR 1 945], [2014 ALR 106 405], [2015 CRIMES ALL 1 607], [2014 SCC ONLINE ALL 15005], [2015 ALL LJ 1 391], [2014 AIC 142 877], [2015 HLR 2 522]

Other Sources:

https://indiankanoon.org/doc/187951850/

https://www.casemine.com/judgement/in/56b492ff607dba348f003b0a

https://www.courtkutchehry.com/Judgement/Search/AdvancedV2?docid=158933

Posted in High Court of Allahabad Judgment or Order or Notification | Tagged 1-Judge Bench Decision Catena of Landmark Judgments Referred/Cited to CrPC 125 or BNSS 144 - Maintenance Denied CrPC 125 or BNSS 144 - Maintenance denied in a Null and Void ab Initio Marriage HM Act 11 - Void marriages Kiran Dhar Vs Alok Berman Maintenance denied in a Null and Void ab Initio Marriage No Domestic Relationship Exists Reportable Judgement or Order Sandeep Pamarati | Leave a comment

Jayantilal Kanji Nagda Vs State of Maharashtra and anr. on 8 May, 2015

Posted on May 26, 2018 by ShadesOfKnife

This is a Bombay High Court judgment clarifying that when there is no domestic relationship, no domestic violence can happen.

 

Jayantilal Kanji Nagda Vs State of Maharashtra and anr. on 8 May, 2015
Posted in High Court of Bombay Judgment or Order or Notification | Tagged Jayantilal Kanji Nagda Vs State of Maharashtra and anr No Domestic Relationship Exists PWDV Act Sec 20 - Maintenance Denied Sandeep Pamarati | Leave a comment

My Law Journey…

Posted on May 14, 2018 by ShadesOfKnife

In continuation from the About Me page… here are the interesting events… as usual… this will be updated regularly/weekly/monthly (currently on need basis)…

  • Been providing legal counseling from Jan 2018 on wards to distressed husbands and their families in dealing with the false cases
  • Wrote the AP LAWCET 2018 exam on 19-04-2018 (Thursday)
  • Got 293 rank in AP LAWCET 2018 exam on 14-05-2018 (Monday)
  • Wrote the TS LAWCET 2018 exam on 25-05-2018 (Friday)
  • Got 636 rank in TS LAWCET 2018 exam on 14-06-2018 (Thursday)
  • Got admitted to a local college, Sri Vijayanagar Law College, Anantapur into 3 years LLB (General) course on 17-10-2018 (Wednesday) Durgaashtami
  • Week #1 (Wk Ending 03 Nov 2018)
    • First week of college started on 29-10-2018; It felt funny to be among classmates who are 10+ years younger to me.
    • First week ended with a good note on 03-11-2018. I am adjudicated at First place in a ‘Pick (a topic) and Speak’ competition at College along with a woman classmate.
      • I wanted to participate in this event for one single objective: Folks of my college should know me with this. I have achieved that objective. No need to participate in it again. Set and Reach new objectives now.
  • Week #2 (Wk Ending 10 Nov 2018)
    • This week, I learnt about ‘Para-Legal Volunteer’ scheme from NALSA and gave my name to register as PLV. Am excited and looking forward for the paralegal work to begin soon.
  • Weeks #3 and #4 (Wk Ending 24 Nov 2018)
    • These two weeks were turning point, so to speak. Tried to introduce legal news into class whatsapp group and got myself kicked out. LOL. I pity their ignorance & childishness (by forming their own groups and ‘gangs’, idiots, haha) and as the saying goes, Ignorance of Law is not excusable. Hope they will realize this after beginning their law practice, which I highly doubt, considering their histrionics in class.
  • Week #5 (Wk Ending 01 Dec 2018)
    • Noon classes began and stopped as fast as they started, as the faculty got over-burdened. College re-opens for my batch on Dec 12th, literally.
    • Got RR series Quick Reference guides for all 5 subjects. Started with Essay-type question answer in IPC subject.
  • Week #6 (Wk Ending 08 Dec 2018)
    • Have targeted to read essay type questions from IPC, Torts and Constitution Law from previous exam papers. Listed them here.
    • Have Setup a WhatsApp group for people who are fighting their cases on their own, Party-in-person (PIPs). Contact me here, if you are a PIP, operating anywhere in India, and want to join this group.
  • Week #7 (Wk Ending 15 Dec 2018)
    • Per target last week, did complete studying few large answer questions.
    • College started on the prescribed date this week.
    • Bought the Internship Diary. Now only thing pending to complete the circuit is a Senior Advocate. Hahaha
  • Week #8 (Wk Ending 22 Dec 2018)
    • Writ material is gathering a shape. Happy about it that got inputs from a dear friend. Thanks 498aNlr
    • Even faculty when heard about the writ’s objective were dismissive about the writ. Have to face much more negativity.
  • Week #9 (Wk Ending 29 Dec 2018)
    • Got one more book for 2nd semester. Cancelled the remaining order and requested refund for remaining books. Bought the Contracts-1 book (Rega Surya Rao, no option left)
    • Got busy with judgments upload and neglected studies.
    • Preparing for the debate program on Jan 11th 2019 on the topic of, ‘Abolishment of Capital Punishment’. Have some solid points ready.
  • Week #10 (Wk Ending 05 Jan 2019)
    • Attended the Fresher’s party function at College on 31 Dec 2018, organized by the 2017 batch seniors. It was a very-well planned and conducted event. Appreciated by one and all.
    • Lecturers informed that first semester exams are fast approaching and positively will be conducted by 3rd week of February. Started explaining the ways to write various types of questions. Still folks in class are dumb.
  • Week #11 (Wk Ending 12 Jan 2019)
    • All students getting ready for impending examinations. Folks making photocopies of text books, altogether. HAHA
    • Extra classes also being scheduled this week for one subject. Soo much subject and soo little time to study. Law student life!!
  • Week #12 (Wk Ending 19 Jan 2019)
  • Week #13 (Wk Ending 26 Jan 2019)
  • Week #14 (Wk Ending 02 Feb 2019)
  • Week #15 (Wk Ending 09 Feb 2019)
  • Week #16 (Wk Ending 16 Feb 2019)
  • Week #17 (Wk Ending 23 Feb 2019)
  • Week #18 (Wk Ending 02 Mar 2019)
    • Few students in the class resisted to go down the route of copying from micro-xerox photocopy ‘booklets’; I was one of them.
    • Wrote exams well to the best of the efforts of my brain cell !! LOL
  • Week #19 (Wk Ending 09 Mar 2019)
    • Began writing notes for all subjects
    • Got ‘Harassed Husbands’ delivered.
  • Week #20 (Wk Ending 16 Mar 2019)
  • July 2019
    • Came to know the results of first Semester. All Pass. 49.1% Aggregate score. Happy. No backlog
    • Participated in my first Moot Court competition at GITAM School of Law. Details here.
  • August 2019
    • Serious preparation for 2nd Semester examination… sort of.
    • Drafted post related to 2nd PIL here.
  • September 2019
    • Getting ready for 2 upcoming Moot Court competitions. With a novice and learning team. Challenging? Let’s see
    • Unfortunately, this got cancelled, for now, with a promise that they will reschedule the event on a later date. Details here.
    • 3rd Semester began. As if nothing new happened, Quietly.
    • Got hold of all necessary study guides in one bunch at Library itself for a reasonable price.
  • October 2019
    • Attended college regularly.
    • Prepared a draft policy document with necessary changes to various aspect of College ecosystem and presented to Principal. He promised to take action on few of them at least.
  • November 2019
    • Went to Vizag to seek Expert Legal opinion on my first PIL here.
    • Then went to Amaravathi and filed the PIL. It got reviewed and a SR issued [WP(PIL)SR 29833/2019]. Awaiting numbering of PIL, after an Interview by a team of Registrars.
  • December 2019
    • Preparing for 3rd Semester Examination… again, sort of.
    • Came to know the results of second Semester. All Pass. 51% Aggregate score. Happy. Again no backlog
    • Got a call to appear before the Committee of Registrars regd the PIL I filed last month.
  • January 2020
    • Finished off the exams. I told myself, you did well; will clear all this semester too. I hope I told myself correct.
    • Received an Order from the Committee of Registrars. They rejected my request to appear PIP. Reason: I never appeared before any Court as PIP. They lied. Good that I have electronic evidence to prove them wrong, if required in a Court hearing. I will keep that option open. My Trump card.
  • February 2020
    • Went to High Court and took back my petition (all sets). As will everything first time with me, this too failed. Won’t be failing next time though. Not sure when is the next time.
    • Supposed to appear for the judgment pronouncement in the Discharge Petition I filed. Not sure why, but I didn’t appear in the Court. Also something called as epidemic was said to have started causing panic.
  • March-June 2020
    • The epidemic was declared pandemic n-COVID19.
    • Entire 4th semester classes (except for a couple of weeks), went online mode.
    • Due to COVID-19, the final exams for 4th semester got scrapped. So I am deemed to have passed the 4th Semester. Kind of… Yippeeee… 2nd Year too cleared. All Pass and some washout. FINAL YEARRRRR, here I come. 1 year closer to my immediate goal of getting LL.B. degree
  • July 2020
    • Came to know the results of third Semester. Collected marks-list for 3rd Semester.
    • All Pass. 47.2% Aggregate score. Happy. No backlog. I was a good motivator for myself.
  • August 2020
    • Paid Fee for final year LL.B. Ufff… no more BIG payments for academic purposes. Promise to myself. Naa meedottu.
    • Some painful conversations and decisions taken later
    • Online classes for 5th semester started. Am I attending regularly?
  • 14-August-2021
    • That day came, wherein all activities at one’s Law college will end for you. Today I submitted the last record (incidentally my favorite topic: Public Interest Litigation) and my Internship diary at college; No questions were asked.
    • Quietly ended the day with plans for next day, 15-Aug-2021 (74th Independence Day)
    • Motivated myself to change my lifestyle gradually.
    • No more updates to this page.
  • 17-March-2022
    • Enrolled with Bar Council of Andhra Pradesh, as an Advocate…
    • Parents were present at the venue and were ecstatic… Joy clearly visible on their faces…
  • 14-August-2022 (Exactly one year later…)
    • One WP filed (Questioning Dowry giver is a criminal or not) and is next listed on 30-Sep-2022
    • One IA filed (Seeking release of my passport) in a earlier closed Crl.P.
    • Opened Vijayawada Office at Machavaram Down from Jan 2022
    • Worked out an understanding with Suprajaa Rajan to open Bengaluru officer as well. WIP. Not yet there.
    • Earned Rs.1,21,500/- from the date of enrolment 17-Mar-2022.
    • 104 goals setup for myself (and my team, if it ever materializes) here.
  • 14-November-2022 
    • Closed down the office/home at Vijayawada permanently. My plans failed and I had to do course-correction.
    • Relocated to Ongole to take advantage of the early disposal order obtained from APHC here.
  • 21-April-2023
    • Relocated to Mangalagiri

 

 

Posted in Sandeep Pamarati | Tagged AP LAWCET Sandeep Pamarati TS LAWCET Work-In-Progress Article | 2 Comments

K.Srinivas Vs K.Sunita on 19 November, 2014

Posted on May 4, 2018 by ShadesOfKnife

Wonderful judgment from the Hon’ble Supreme Court whereby it is declared that filing a false complaint by Knife on husband and his family constitutes cruelty and this is sufficient ground a marriage can be dissolved.

The prosecution tried these tactics to counter the appeal from Husband

  • if a specific finding regarding the falsity of the criminal complaint was returned
  • if the Complainant or a witness on her behalf had committed perjury or had recorded a contradictory or incredible testimony
  • it is not possible to label the wife’s criminal complaint detailed above as a false or a vindictive action. In other words, the acquittal of the Appellant and his family members in the criminal complaint does not by itself, automatically and justifiably, lead to the conclusion that the complaint was false
  • the investigation may have been faulty
  • the prosecution may have been so careless as to lead to the acquittal, but the acquittal would not always indicate that the Complainant had intentionally filed a false case

Hon’ble two-judge bench has destroyed this angle in Para 5.

The Respondent-Wife has admitted in her cross-examination that she did not mention all the incidents on which her Complaint is predicated, in her statement under Section 161 of the Cr.P.C. It is not her case that she had actually narrated all these facts to the Investigating Officer, but that he had neglected to mention them. This, it seems to us, is clearly indicative of the fact that the criminal complaint was a contrived afterthought. We affirm the view of the High Court that the criminal complaint was “ill advised”.

Final nail in the coffin:

Prosecution: the filing of the criminal complaint has not been pleaded in the petition itself by Husband

Supreme Court: the criminal complaint was filed by the wife after filing of the husband’s divorce petition, and being subsequent events could have been looked into by the Court.

This is also called as Counter blast.

In Para 7,

We unequivocally find that the Respondent-Wife had filed a false criminal complaint, and even one such complaint is sufficient to constitute matrimonial cruelty.

 

K. Srinivas vs K. Sunita on 19 November, 2014

Citations: [2014 SUPREME 8 36], [2015 JLJR SC 1 114], [2014 JT 13 8], [2015 SCC CRI 3 400], [2015 RCR CIVIL SC 1 38], [2014 AIOL 702], [2015 ALLCC 90 808], [2015 ALLMR SC 2 435], [2015 ALR 108 742], [2015 AWC SC 1 80], [2015 SCSUPPL CHN 1 233], [2015 LW 4 671], [2015 OLR 1 267], [2015 PLJR 1 126], [2015 PLR 179 435], [2014 SCC 16 34], [2015 SCC CIV 3 415], [2014 SCC ONLINE SC 915], [2015 AIC 146 107]

Other Source links: https://indiankanoon.org/doc/175889126/ and https://www.casemine.com/judgement/in/5767b12be691cb22da6d57e4


Reproduced in accordance with Section 52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from main.sci.gov.in/judgments, judis.nic.in, lobis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court and District Court Websites such as ecourts.gov.in

Posted in Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification | Tagged Divorce granted on Cruelty ground Filing False Criminal Complaints causes Mental Cruelty HM Act 13 - Divorce Granted to Husband K.Srinivas Vs K.Sunita Legal Procedure Explained - Interpretation of Statutes Mental Cruelty Reportable Judgement or Order Sandeep Pamarati Work-In-Progress Article | Leave a comment

Supriya Subhash Bhatmare Vs Shivanand Babaso Swami on 27th April, 2018

Posted on May 2, 2018 by ShadesOfKnife

Bombay High Court ordered a marriage be null and void and decreed as such based on the ground on non consummation of marriage between the Knife and husband. Both parties started fighting the litigation right from the day of their marriage !!

Supriya Subhash Bhatmare Vs Shivanand Babaso Swami on 27th April, 2018

Reproduced in accordance with Section 52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, lobis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court and District Court Websites such as ecourts.gov.in


 

Posted in High Court of Bombay Judgment or Order or Notification | Tagged HM Act 13 - Divorce Granted to Husband No Consummation of Marriage Sandeep Pamarati Supriya Subhash Bhatmare Vs Shivanand Babaso Swami | Leave a comment

Jagbir Singh vs Nisha on 11 March, 2015

Posted on May 1, 2018 by ShadesOfKnife

This is a case of a Knife, named Nisha, who filed false criminal cases (498A, 406 and DV Case) on the Husband and his family that got dismissed as prosecution failed to prove the cruelty allegation. The trial court found them to be totally unfounded and baseless. Moreover, The father of the appellant at the ripe old age is facing a charge under Section 354-A IPC.

After all this nonsense, also filed RCR under Section 9 of HMA !!

Unsubstantiated and unfounded allegations made by a spouse as against the other spouse would amount to cruelty.

Jagbir Singh vs Nisha on 11 March, 2015

 

Posted in High Court of Punjab & Haryana Judgment or Order or Notification | Tagged Filing False Criminal Complaints causes Mental Cruelty IPC 406 Dismissed IPC 498A Dismissed Jagbir Singh vs Nisha Mental Cruelty Sandeep Pamarati | Leave a comment

Divorce Judgments

Posted on April 30, 2018 by ShadesOfKnife

Here is the listing of divorce grant judgments on various grounds as per the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955

NOTE: This will be a running document, meaning, it will be frequently updated with judgments as and when I find them.

Supreme Court Judgments

  1. Bipin Chander Jaisinghbhai Shah Vs Prabhawati on 19 Oct 1956 [Definition of Desertion]
  2. Dr.N.G.Dastane Vs. Mrs.S.Dastane (1975) 2 SCC 326
  3. Sureshta Devi Vs Om Prakash on 7 February, 1991 [MCD set-aside as consent was obtained fraudulently]
  4. V. Bhagat vs D. Bhagat on 19 November, 1993 [contours of “mental cruelty” defined such that parties cannot reasonably be expected to live together]
  5. Savitri Pandey Vs Prem Chandra Pandey on 8 Jan 2002 [Cruelty defined; Recommended a Time limit of 90 days to file appeal against judgments in cases under HMA resulting in amendment: Act 50 of 2003 The Marriage Laws (Amendment) Act, 2003 on 2003-10-23, whereby Time limit to file appeal against judgments of FC is increased from 30 days to 90 days, passed under HMA and SMA only]
  6. Vijay Kumar Ramachandra Bhate Vs Neela Vijay Kumar Bhate on 16 April, 2003 [Divorce set-aside for Mental Cruelty and character assassination of husband reasons]
  7. Naveen Kohli Vs Neelu Kohli on 21 March, 2006
  8. Samar Ghosh vs Jaya Ghosh on 26 March, 2007 [deprived of each other’s company and denial of conjugal relationship by the other spouse, with no effort by the respondent/wife to resume matrimonial relationship, is an act of cruelty]
  9. Hitesh Bhatnagar Vs Deepa Bhatnagar on 18 Apr 2011 [Mutual consent must continue till decree under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act and either party can withdraw consent before divorce is granted.]
  10. Pankaj Mahajan vs Dimple @ Kajal on 30 September, 2011 [constantly giving threats of suicide is cruelty]
  11. Vishwanath Vs Sau. Sarla Vishwanath Agrawal on 4 July, 2012
  12. U.Sree Vs U.Srinivas on 11 December, 2012 [False and baseless allegation cause mental cruelty]
  13. K. Srinivas Rao vs D.A. Deepa on 22 February, 2013
  14. Vidhya Viswanathan vs Kartik Balakrishnan on 22 September, 2014
  15. K. Srinivas Vs K. Sunita on 19 November, 2014 [filing of the false complaint against the husband and his family members ‘regarding unsubstantiated allegations of dowry demand’ also constitutes mental cruelty for the purpose of Section 13 (1) (ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act]
  16. Narendra Vs K.Meena on 6 October, 2016 [Separating husband from Parents is ground]
  17. Amardeep Singh Vs Harveen Kaur on 12 Sep 2017 [Guidelines to waive off cooling period of 6 months in MCD cases; The statutory period (of 6 months – 18 months) contemplated under Section 13-B(2) of the Act is directory and that it is open to the Court to exercise discretion]
  18. Harjinder Singh Vs Rajpal on 17 January, 2018 [MCD with 22 lakhs settlement]
  19. Rani Narasimha Sastry Vs Rani Suneela Rani on 19 November, 2019 [Filing false cases solid ground for Divorce on the ground of Cruelty]
  20. Mangayarkarasi Vs M Yuvraj on 03 March 2020 []
  21. Amit Kumar Vs Suman Beniwal on 11 Dec 2021 [Further Guidelines to waive off cooling period of 6 months in MCD cases]
  22. N.Rajendran Vs S.Valli on 03 Feb 2022 [Dead Marriage dissolved under power of Article 142 of the Constitution]
  23. Shilpa Sailesh Vs Varun Sreenivasan on 01 May 2023 [Landmark Judgment on Dead Marriages]
  24. Roopa Soni Vs Kamal Narayan Soni on 06 Sep 2023 [Landmark Judgment on Dead Marriages]
  25. Kiran Jyot Maini Vs Anish Pramod Patel on 15 Jul 2024 [Interim Maintenance granted in DVC; Marriage terminated under Article 142; Alimony of 2 Crore granted]
  26. Vishal Shah Vs Monalisha Gupta and Ors on 20 Feb 2025 [SC: Landmark Judgment on Dead Marriages, since the couple lived together only for 80 days and have lived separately since, multiple litigations against each other and no child, the marriage is dead; Rs.25 Lakhs alimony granted]
  27. Vibhor Garg Vs Neha on 14 Jul 2025 [Electronic recording is evidence and no violation of right to privacy]
  28. Pradeep Bhardwaj Vs Priya on 15 July 2025 [ Divorce granted under Article 142 citing irretrievable breakdown after 16 years of separation and enhanced maintenance]
  29. Vishnu Dutt Sharma Vs Manju Sharma on 27 Feb 2009
  30. Ann Saurabh Dutt Vs Lieutenant Colonel Saurabh Iqbal Bahadur Dutt on 12 May 2026 [SC : A wife pursuing her career and prioritising her child’s welfare cannot be accused of cruelty or desertion.]

Andhra Pradesh High Court

  1. Jelakara Chandra Sekhar Vs Nil on 16 Jun 2022 [MCD within 1 year from date of marriage, if there are Pleadings about Exceptional Hardship u/s 14 HMA]
  2.  

Allahabad High Court

  1. Layak Singh Vs Ekta Kumari on 21 Mar 2024 [MCD within 1 year from date of marriage, if there are Pleadings about Exceptional Hardship u/s 14 HMA]

Bombay High Court

  1. Devendra Vs Trupti Devendra on 27 Sep 2022 [Seeking maintenance for daughter after MCD]
  2. Sneha Akshay Garg and Anr Vs Nil on 25 Jul 2024 [Waiting of cooling off period; if conditions in Amardeep Singh Vs Harveen Kaur on 12 Sep 2017 are met]
  3.  

Calcutta High Court

  1. Subhash Chandra Das Chowdhury Vs Sandhya Das Chowdhury on 18 July 2008

Chhattisgarh High Court

  1. Resham Lal Dewangan Vs Suman Dewangan on 09 May 2025 [Once a divorce decree is granted on the ground that wife is living in adultery then, wife suffers from the disqualification to claim maintenance from her ex-husband]

Delhi High Court

  1. Jiten Bhalla Vs Gaytri Bajaj on 08 Sep 2008 [MCD obtained; 3 years later disputed]
  2. Shalu Ojha Vs Prashant Ojha on 28 Ferbuary, 2019 [Divorce set-aside]
  3. Kulvinder Singh Gehlot Vs Parmila on 22 Aug 2023 [Long continuous separation; false allegations;Irretrievable Breakdown of Marriage]
  4. Mamta Vs Pradeep Kumar on 05 Sep 2023 [Irretrievable Breakdown of Marriage]
  5. Pallavi Mohan Vs Raghu Menon on 12 Sep 2023 [Time limit to file appeal against judgments of FC is increased from 30 days to 90 days, passed under HMA and SMA only. For any other cases like Maintenance cases u/s 125 Cr.P.C. the time limit is 30 days only because Parliament did not amend the FC Act yet!]
  6. Deepti Vs Anil Kumar on 19 Sep 2023 [Family Courts cannot grant divorce on ground of Irretrievable Breakdown of Marriage]
  7. Gaurav Nighawan Vs Shweta on 05 Jan 2024 [Cruelty not established but desertion is implicitly established]
  8. Payal Sethi Vs Rohit Sethi on 09 Jan 2024 [repeated threats to commit suicide and the attempt to commit suicide was held to be an action amounting to cruelty; relies on decisions of Apex Court in Mangayarkarasi, K Srinivas, Pankaj Mahajan]
  9. Nikhil Wadhawan Vs Priti Wadhawan on 05 Feb 2024 [Unwarranted interference of the parents and the family members of the respondent in the matrimonial life of the appellant]
  10. Kanwal Kishore Girdhar Vs Seema Girdhar on 28 Feb 2024 [Alleging false adultery and igniting animosity in children towards father is cruelty, valid ground for divorce]
  11. Pramod Vs Umesh at Poonam on 01 Mar 2024 [False and baseless allegation cause mental cruelty]
  12. Shivi Bansal Vs Gaurav Bansal on 16 Jul 2024 [Impleadment of Paramour is not necessary to decide divorce petition on adultery ground]

Jharkhand High Court

  1. Dr. Pankaj Kumar Vs Prerna on 16 Dec 2020 [Time limit to file appeal against judgments in cases under HMA, SMA is 90 days but not 30 days as prescribed under FC Act]

Karnataka High Court

  1. Divya Ganesh Nallur Vs Ganesh Nallur Shivu on 08 Jun 2023 (MCD after settlement)
  2. Sushil Daddimani and Anr Vs Nil on 27 Mar 2024 [MCD within 1 year from date of marriage, if there are Pleadings about Exceptional Hardship u/s 14 HMA]
  3. H P Komala Vs N Ravikumar on 29 Jul 2024 (Stay of divorce proceedings until arrears of interim maintenance is paid)

Kerala High Court

  1. Vishnudas H. and Anr Vs Nil on 27 Jul 2020 [MCD within 1 year from date of marriage, if there are Pleadings about Exceptional Hardship u/s 14 HMA]
  2. Arun K.R Vs Arunima T.S on 24 Mar 2025 [Husband Doesn’t Show Interest In Sex, Prefers Only Spiritual Pursuits]
  3. Anup Disalva and Anr Vs Union of India on 09 Dec 2022 [Cooling off period is optional]
  4. Emilda Varghese @ Rajani Vs Varghese P Kuriakose on 6 Oct 2025 [Divorce upheld on cruelty ground]

Madras High Court

  1. R.Natarajan Vs. Sujatha Vasudevan on August 29, 2011
  2. V.Rajesh Vs S.Anupriya on 04 Jun 2025 [Unestablished allegations of sexual harassment is cruelty]
  3. Shivkarthik G.S and Anr Vs Nil on 04 Sep 2025 [Waiving of cooling off period in a Christian Divorce by Mutual consent]

Madhya Pradesh High Court

  1. Smt. Sangita Nigam Vs Saurabh Nigam on 22 November, 2017 (Also Desertion ground)
  2. Aarti Vs Kishan Meena on 22 Aug 2024 (Cruelty and Desertion grounds)
  3. Anjali Sharma Vs Raman Upadhyay on 16 Jun 2025 [Illegally obtained WhatsApp chat is admissible as evidence in a Family Court]

Patna High Court

  1. Rekha Devi Vs Mahesh Kumar on 16 January, 2018
  2. Sanjay Kumar Shaw Vs Anjali Kumari Shaw on 07 Apr 2025 [No evidence for mental disorder (schizophrenia) so divorce denied]

Punjab and Haryana High Court

  1. Shashi Vs Sunny Bhumbla on 9 January, 2012 (MCD with 1.25 lakhs settlement)
  2. Pratham Singh vs Rajesh on 3 December, 2014 (Also Desertion ground)
  3. Jagbir Singh vs Nisha on 11 March, 2015

Telangana High Court

  1. Dandamudi Phani Krishna Vs Boyapati Lakshmi Aparna on 22 Mar 2024 [MCD within 1 year from date of marriage, if there are Pleadings about Exceptional Hardship u/s 14 HMA]
  2. Mudireddy Divya Vs Sulkti Sivarama Reddy on 26 Mar 2025 [Evidence for Divorce in first Marriage, impleadment of a co-respondent, Desertion and status of previous marriage]

MASTER SITEMAP here.


Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) – Divorce Law in India

The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (Section 13) provides several grounds for divorce, including:

  • Cruelty (mental or physical)
  • Desertion for a continuous period
  • Adultery
  • Mental disorder
  • Conversion to another religion
  • Venereal disease
  • Renunciation of the world
  • Presumption of death

Many judicial decisions interpret these grounds and clarify what conduct qualifies as cruelty or desertion.

Mental cruelty refers to conduct that causes severe emotional suffering or mental distress to a spouse, making it impossible to continue marital life. Courts have held that false criminal complaints, humiliation, threats, or persistent harassment can constitute mental cruelty.

Desertion occurs when one spouse abandons the other without reasonable cause and without consent, with the intention of ending marital cohabitation. Courts evaluate both physical separation and intention to desert while deciding such cases.

Divorce by mutual consent under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act allows spouses to dissolve their marriage by agreement. Both parties must jointly state that they have been living separately and cannot live together anymore.

The Supreme Court has clarified that the six-month cooling-off period under Section 13-B(2) is not mandatory and can be waived by courts if the marriage has irretrievably broken down and reconciliation is not possible.

The Supreme Court of India, using its powers under Article 142 of the Constitution, can dissolve a marriage when it finds that the relationship has irretrievably broken down and there is no possibility of reconciliation.

However, ordinary family courts cannot grant divorce solely on this ground unless recognised under law

Yes. Courts have repeatedly held that false accusations of adultery, dowry harassment, or criminal misconduct against a spouse may amount to mental cruelty, which is a valid ground for divorce.

Yes. Judicial decisions have held that continuous threats or attempts of suicide by a spouse can amount to mental cruelty, as it causes severe emotional distress and makes matrimonial life intolerable.

Under Section 14 of the Hindu Marriage Act, a divorce petition cannot ordinarily be filed within one year of marriage. However, courts may allow it earlier if there are exceptional circumstances or extreme hardship.

Yes. Courts may grant permanent alimony or maintenance under Section 25 of the Hindu Marriage Act depending on factors such as income, financial condition, and needs of the spouse.

Courts have increasingly accepted electronic evidence such as recordings, messages, and digital communications if they are relevant and admissible under the Indian Evidence Act.

Yes. A divorce decree can be challenged by filing an appeal before a higher court within the statutory time limit. Courts can set aside divorce orders if they find procedural errors, fraud, or lack of evidence.

Posted in Assorted Court Judgments or Orders or Notifications | Tagged Catena of Landmark Judgments Referred/Cited to Consent For MCD Disputed HM Act 13 - Divorce Granted to Husband HM Act 13(B) - MCD Granted After Settlement Sandeep Pamarati Summary Post Work-In-Progress Article | Leave a comment

Mahesh Tiwari Vs State Of U.P. And Another on 24 August, 2016

Posted on April 21, 2018 by ShadesOfKnife

This is a Quash Judgment of Allahabad High Court in which it was held that an Affidavit can be considered as a evidence, in regards to a Perjury petition under Section 340 Cr.P.C. for an offense punishable under Section 193 IPC.

The salient features of giving false evidence under Section 191 IPC are:-

(i) intentionally making a false statement, or
(ii) declaration by a person who is under a legal obligation to speak the truth.

But it must be remembered that the very essence of crimes of this kind is not how such statements may injure this or that party to litigation but how they may deceive and mislead the courts and thus produce mischievous consequences to the administration of justice.

Consequently, there cannot be any doubt that if a statement or averment in a pleading is false, it falls within the definition of offence under Section 191 IPC. It is not necessary that a person should have appeared in the witness box. The offence stands committed and completed by the filing of such pleading.

An affidavit is ‘evidence’ within the meaning of Section 191 IPC and a person swearing to a false affidavit is guilty of perjury. The definition of the offence of giving false evidence applies to the affidavits.

 

Mahesh Tiwari vs State Of U.P. And Another on 24 August, 2016

 

Read Baban Singh and another vs. Jagdish Singh and others here.

Read Ranjeet Singh vs. State of Pepsu AIR 1959 SC 843 here.

Read S.P.Kohli (Dr.) vs. High Court of Punjab and Haryana AIR 1978 SC 1753 here.

Read Asgar Ali Mulla Ibrahimji vs. Emperor AIR 1943 Nag 17(18) here.

Read Emperor vs. Padam Singh AIR 1930 All 490 here.

Read Parag Dutt vs Emperor AIR 1930 Oudh 62 (63) here.

Posted in High Court of Allahabad Judgment or Order or Notification | Tagged CrPC 340 read with CrPC 195 CrPC 482 - Saving of inherent powers of High Court IPC 191 - Giving false evidence IPC 192 - Fabricating false evidence IPC 193 - Punishment for false evidence Mahesh Tiwari Vs State Of U.P. Perjury Under 340 CrPC Quash Sandeep Pamarati | Leave a comment

Sandeep Pamarati Vs Ungrateful Knife (IPC 498A Case)

Posted on April 7, 2018 by ShadesOfKnife

Hi Folks, Sharing with you all, how I dealt with the false 498A IPC case put on me and my innocent parents, along with timelines. I have also shared samples/templates made out of my petitions (obviously, totally redacted) along with below timelines, in PDF format.

Take little pains to have them drafted for your cases. Do NOT ask me word versions. Even if you ask, I will NOT give 😉

NOTE: If you become my client, all these samples and templates will be customized for your case requirements.


All credit primarily goes to one Mens’ Rights Organization, named and styled as MyNation Foundation. Hundreds of exceptionally knowledgeable members have spend thousands of hours selflessly just to guide, motivate, support another of their brother from another mother (that is myself) who has been facing a false matrimonial case in India.

Thank you Rudy, for giving us MyNation.net.

NOTE: My DV case is available here. Index of all cases filed against my and my parents is here and my defence/counter attacks.


Detailed Timeline of the case under IPC 498A


On 07-April-2017,

Compliant filed with Women Police Station, Ongole;
Same day FIR is also registered under IPC 498A and u/s 3 and 4 of D.P.Act

On 08-April-2017,

FIR sent to 3rd Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Ongole

On 01-May-2017,

Regular Bail granted by 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Ongole to Parents

On 01-June-2017,

Application filed for Anticipatory Bail with High Court of AP u/s 438 of Cr.P.C

On 18-July-2017,

High Court of AP granted Anticipatory Bail

On 31-October-2017,

Charge sheet filed with 3rd Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Ongole

On 20-September-2018,

First appearance in the Court along with parents. Collected accused copies of all prosecution documents, 1 set per accused person. We were three, we got 3 copies of below documents.

  1. Complaint
  2. FIR
  3. Printed Charge sheet
  4. 161 CrPC statements of all witnesses
  5. Rough sketch of scene of offence
  6. and few more documents/evidences

On 02-April-2019,

Filed Party-in-person petition in 498A IPC case. All three accused (myself, my daddy and my maa) are PIP !!!

Sample Petition below

Application to go PIP in IPC 498A Case (Without Auth)

Sample Affidavit below

Affidavit - Petition to go PIP in IPC 498A Case (Without Auth)

Sample Docket below

Docket Sheet for 498A Case PIP Petition

On 02-April-2019,

Parents filed 205 CrPC petition praying for exemption from personal appearance during this false case proceedings.

Sample Petition below

Exemption from Personal Appearance under CrPC 205 in IPC 498A Case

Sample Affidavit below

Affidavit - Exemption from Personal Appearance under CrPC 205 in IPC 498A Case

Sample Docket below

Docket Sheet for 205 CrPC Petition in 498A Case

 

Authorization under Rule 37 filed in the case proceedings.

Sample Authorization below

Authorization from one PIP in IPC 498A Case (under Rule 37 CRP and CO of AP HC) SAMPLE

No sample form or format is available anywhere on the Internet or High Court of AP website. Hence prepared the template myself. You may copy it. 😉

 

IMPORTANT ASPECT: If you and your parents wanna go PIP, file separate PIP petitions for each accused and separate Rule 37 authorization. Do NOT file 205 CrPC in such case. During the proceedings, one accused can file absent petition or any other petition for other accused. So PIP+Rule 37 is the combination to utilize. Not 205 CrPC, as 205 CrPC mandates, in the absense of accused, their advocate should represent them. In PIP, there is no advocate at all.

Obviously, I filed another memo, seeking permission to withdraw my 205 CrPC petition filed on behalf of my parents. Now, I am free to file any number of absent petitions for them in Court. I also attach any medical certificate or prescriptions in support of the absent petitions. Magistrate cannot deny them.

 

On 02-April-2019,

Filed Discharge petition in 498A IPC case for all three accused myself, my daddy and my maa

Sample Petition below

Discharge Petition under Sec 239 CrPC in Sec 498A case

Sample Affidavit below

Affidavit - Discharge Petition under Sec 239 CrPC in Sec 498A case

Sample Docket below

Docket Sheet for 239 CrPC Petition in 498A Case

On 22-April-2019, 25-April-2019 and 09-May-2019,

APP sought more time to file Counter to the Discharge petition

On 30-May-2019,

APP finally filed a 1-pager Counter to the Discharge petition

zCounter of APP against Discharge Petition

Take time to laugh at it. Contact me to know why APP has filed such worthless Counter and the back story.

 

On 14-June-2019,

Court allows the absent petitions sent via Registered Post with Acknowledgement due. Interesting !!!

Sample covering letter to be sent to the Superintendent of the Filing Section of the Court where the Case is pending, along with duly filled and stamped absent petitions.

Covering Letter - SAMPLE

Absent Petition for absence from a Court hearing date is filed under section 317 Cr.P.C. Sample available here.

 

From July 2019 to December 2019, Magistrate goes on training!!! 6 Months of training…

 

On 12-February-2020,

Hearing in the Discharge Petition

Hearing in the Discharge Petition happened. This is otherwise called as Hearing Before Charge framing (HBC)

I introduced the genesis of the case and then the discharge petition and swiftly moved onto the 8 grounds, one by one. Magistrate kept interrupting me by way of clarifications. Took around 15 mins to finish. APP was asked if she got anything to say to the 8 grounds (Note: Magistrate noted down 4 grounds only in her notes). As expected, APP denied the grounds as invalid and not applicable at this stage of case. APP amused me with 1-page Counter earlier (scroll up and read above) and now said very funny and weird reasonings to invalidate my grounds.

After this ruckus, Magistrate asked me for Judgments that I cited in the Discharge Petition. I said, all the judgments are reported judgments and are picked from Law reporters. Still Magistrate and APP also insisted that I produce judgments. I said, I will bring them in the next date. Finally, Magistrate said, she is moving the proceeding, For Orders.

I am glad, at last, I will have a Judicial order soon, that I can go against for Revision in Sessions Court u/s 397 Cr.P.C read with 399 Cr.P.C. with an additional prayer to stay the Trail Court proceedings and for this I have 90 Days of time.

 

On 24-February-2020,

Order in the Discharge Petition was not passed.

 

On 02-March-2020,

Order in the Discharge Petition was passed. I was absent.

On 12-March-2020,

I got a CA filed via a advocate friend (yes, i made friends with advocates)

Dismissal Order in Discharge petition

Now working on Criminal Revision Petition to file against above dismissal order at Sessions Court, at the earliest, along with PIP petitions at Sessions Court.

On 08-October-2020,

I got the Criminal Revision filed via the advocate friend; Awaiting numbering and subsequent initial hearing

Revision petition against Discharge Dismissal in IPC 498A Case (SAMPLE)

On 10-February-2021,

The Criminal Revision is numbered and notices sent to Respondent. Call on 12 March 2021

On 12-March-2021,

Nothing actually happen on the Bluejeans session. Since Notice to R2 had returned as party not available’, Court allowed serving of Notice to correct/alternative address. If this too fails, next step is to go for Newspaper publication.

On 12-April-2021,

Awaiting hearing…

On 07-August-2022,

Just updating developments…

  1. Stopped pursuing the Criminal Revision at Sessions Court, till date. But will proceed with newspaper publication.
  2. Initiated a IA (IA 1/2022 on 10/02/2022), in the long-disposed matter of Crl.P. No. 3886/2017 which was filed seeking Anticipatory Bail from AP HC), seeking release of my passport from the custody of Ongole Trial Court, where my newly renewed passport has been locked up from 2017 July… i.e., just over 5 years! Half the time for which the passport was renewed went in Court itself.
    • The SO of criminal section (B Satyanarayana) says, this 2017 file is not here at Amaravathi but may be at Hyderabad for which his office sent a requisition note to Telangana High Court in February itself but surprisingly the staff at TS HC says they never received any such note!! Interesting!
    • Also went to the New Filing section counter asking why my NOC was not reflecting on the Case Status portal. It is revealed that it was never taken up for processing because the person was on leave. My NOC-Vakalatnama was just lying there in a bundle of to-do items, for 4 full weeks!


On 10-October-2022,

Came to know that Requisition Note was sent to TS HC from AP HC but there is no response on my case bundle. More details here.


On 14-October-2022,

Appeared before the Magistrate for Charge-framing circus and Millions Thanks to God, THAT happened.


On 16-November-2022, 07-December-2022 and 12-December-2022,

Business: The Complainant must turn into Prosecution Witness-1 and file her Chief Examination/Evidence Affidavit and serve a copy to me. As I expected this did not happen.


On 13-December-2022,

First Listed Witness LW-1 turned First Prosecution Witness PW-1 and sat for Chief Examination by Assistant Public Prosecutor. Finished the drama on same day.

I cross examined the PW-1, in part and sought adjournment for continuation of Cross on NDOH.


On 19-December-2022 and 20-December-2022,

Nothing happened.


On 21-December-2022 and 22-December-2022,

I cross examined the PW-1, in part on 21-Dec-2021 and sought adjournment for continuation of Cross on NDOH. Finished the Cross examination of PW-1 on 22-Dec-2022.


On 04-January-2023,

APP finished Chief Examination of PW-2 (mother of complainant and LW-3 from Charge sheet).


On 11-January-2023,

Prepared detailed set of Questions (as with PW-1 above in Excel) to ask the PW-2. Asked them in a pre-organized manner so as to hit the key allegations of dowry and counter allegation of bigamy. Got as many favourable as I needed to dismantle the allegations of PW-2. She eventually became a hearsay witness.


On 03-February-2023,

Prepared detailed set of Questions to ask the PW-3 (the Investigating Officer/LW-8). Asked the witness questions beginning from the fundamentals like names of parties and went ahead in a pre-organized manner so as to hit the lapses in the procedural steps in a dowry case. Could ask around 40-45 questions from my prepared set of 100+ questions. 3 documents are marked as exhibits (FIR, Charge sheet and sketch of scene of offence at Hyderabad) but none incriminating me or other accused to the case.

Since there is nothing incriminating accused was brought on record of the Court, the Court may dispense with proceedings under 313 CrPC. Let’s see.


On 16-February-2023,

After facing a loss in the DV case yesterday, today I found out, on the eCourts app of course, that the Criminal Revision filed in 2021 was dismissed. Here is the 1-page Order. Double Whammy for me… on back to back dates.

Sandeep Bhavan Pamarati and Ors Vs State of AP and Anr on 14 Dec 2022

On 27-March-2023,

Decided to file Written Arguments u/s 314 Cr.P.C. into Court, instead of waiting for APP to argue the case.

2023-03-18 Memo of Written Arguments u-s 314 CrPC in 498A IPC Case v0.2

On 08-December-2023,

Decided to trim the timeline entries on this page and jump straight to Judgment date.


On 07 Dec 2023,

I and my parents are acquitted from the false 498A IPC case, on merits. Not settled, not quashed. Acquitted on merits. This is a big deal, for me.

 

On judgment date, I have with me Dr. Parasar Sarvepalli and Rama Krishna garu to support me. The moment came at about 2PM, when we were called into the Court. As usual, we were called last after all litigants and advocates left Court hall. It was a tense 2 mins, when I faintly heard that A1-A3 are found NOT guilty and therefore they are acquitted… We came out of the Court hall and the emotions started to flood the dam/eyes. For out 15 mins, it was a mixed feeling of joy, exhaustion, despair, hope and angst… We regains our balance, finished formalities (signing of bonds u/s 437A CrPC) and left the Court premises, Happy.

My Advocate friends Pokala Venkateswarlu and Bandaru Dhanalakshmi garu helped me with filing the Surety bonds and necessary affidavit and preparing the documents in prescribed fashion. Thanks to them, for their timely help.

State of AP Vs Pamarati Sandeep Bhavan and 2 Ors on 07 Dec 2023

LEGAL PROCEDURE TO FILE PETITIONS IN TRIAL COURTS and COMMON PITFALLS TO AVOID:

  • One petition per accused to be filed those that are going to defend their cases as Party-in-person. If you file one petition for 3 accused’s party-in-person, some idiots at Court will ask for rule which states that 3 accused can file one petition seeking party-in-person. Be aware of this.
  • All petitions (along with it’s affidavit and covering docket sheet) given to Court should be in green-colored Conquest paper, in legal size only.
    • Update: This requirement is no longer valid, as AP HC decided to do-away with conquest/legal paper at all District Courts in the State of AP. Details here.
  • Petitions can be submitted in the Court to the Magistrate (via the Court attendant) or filed at the Bench Clerk’s office to Supervisor/Clerk there. Go with first option always.
    • IMPORTANT: Obtain signature of the APP/PP on the petition that is going to be submitted to Court and then submit. Else, petition may be taken in, but then you will have to file a memo with signature from APP/PP. To avoid this double work, find out on what days (Mon-Sat) does the APP/PP of that Court come to Court. Then give a copy to APP/PP for their perusal and get received copy signature on the Original petition that will be submitted to Court.
  • For every petition submitted to Court, one copy should be given to PP/APP in Criminal Cases (like 498A IPC etc) and to Prosecution advocate in Civil Cases (like DVC, 125 CrPC etc). This can be in regular white paper, in legal size only.
  • Copy of petition to be served on OP advocate/A.PP before providing a copy to Court, preferably. Otherwise, OP Advocate can create ruckus and this can lead to another date.
  • Each petition we submit to Court should have Rs.2/- (in Andhra Pradesh) Court Fee stamp on it. Check your Court procedure, where should it be attached. Even check amount of stamps necessary. To be on safer side, many attach more valued stamp than necessary.
  • No stamps necessary to stick on replies given by us such as Counter, Written Statements etc
  • Ensure the proper sections are cited on the petition’s cause title. There will be objections raised by APP/PP on this technicality itself.
  • Ensure verification section is there on your affidavits. And signed.
  • If there are a bunch of documents along with the petition, tie them together with a strong thread/tag.
  • Use Memos to convey information to Court. I used a memo to convey that I be exempted from Daily hearing for a certain week time due to personal emergencies. Magistrate did consider my memo/request and delayed the NDOH to another date.

The strategy to win in this case is as mentioned here.


 

Posted in Sandeep Pamarati | Tagged CrPC 239 - Discharge CrPC 239 - Discharge Rejected CrPC 248 - Acquittal or conviction IPC 498A - Husband or relative of husband of a woman subjecting her to cruelty Sandeep Pamarati | 6 Comments

Supreme Court and High Court Judgments to cite in Discharge (u/s 227 or 239) or Quash petition (u/s 482)

Posted on April 6, 2018 by ShadesOfKnife

Here is a list the Supreme Court of India judgments applicable to various legal grounds to go for Discharge u/s 227 or 239 or 245 and Quash u/s 482.

Included few High Court judgments too for reference. Read the individual judgments to find the operative text of the respective judgments.

There are quite a few legal grounds on the basis of which a case can be discharged at Magistrate/Sessions Court or Quashed (High Court and Supreme Court).

Note1: Read State Of Orissa Vs Debendra Nath Padhi on 29 November, 2004 to understand that during Quash proceedings at High Court, Evidence of Sterling/Unimpeachable Quality from Defence/Accused can be adduced to dismantle the case of Prosecution at Trial Court.)

Note2: Second 482 CrPC petition is maintainable as per Landmark judgment in ‘Superintendent and Remembrancer of Legal Affairs West Bengal Vs Mohan Singh and Ors on 08 Oct 1974‘.

Note3: A Petition under section 482 CrPC is maintainable even when a Revision is available under 397/401 CrPC says, ‘Dhariwal Tobaco Products Ltd and Ors Vs State of Maharashtra and Anr on 17 Dec 2008‘. This view is re-affirmed by a 3-Judge bench of Supreme Court in, Prabhu Chawla Vs State of Rajasthan and Anr on 05 Sep 2016.

Note4: Read recent landmark decision of a Full bench of the Apex Court on when to/not to Quash a FIR/case in ‘Neeharika Infrastructure Pvt Ltd Vs State of Maharashtra and Ors‘ [2021 SCC ONLINE SC 315]

Note4: In recent landmark judgment Pradeep Kumar Kesarwani Vs State of Uttar Pradesh and Anr on 02 Sep 2025, Supreme Court issued 4-steps test/procedure to be followed by High Courts, in alleged False Rape cases.

Note: If you want to read this thread from beginning, go here.

No Jurisdiction Judgments

  1. Satvinder Kaur vs State (Govt. Of N.C.T. Of Delhi) on 5 October, 1999 (1999) 8 SCC 728
  2. Y. Abraham Ajith & Ors Vs Inspector Of Police, Chennai & Anr on 17 August, 2004
  3. Manish Ratan And Others Vs State Of M.P And Another on 01 Nov 2006
  4. Sonu and others Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi and another on 10 October, 2007
  5. Bhura Ram And Ors vs State Of Rajasthan & Anr on 2 April, 2008
  6. Geeta Mehrotra & Anr vs State Of U.P. & Anr on 17 October, 2012 (Includes delay in complaint, vague allegations)
  7. Sivangala Thandi Deepak & Others Vs The State of A.P. on 11 July 2014
  8. Amarendu Jyoti And Others vs. State Of Chhattisgarh And Others on 4 Aug, 2014
  9. Sudhir Mansinghka Vs State (Govt Of Nct Of Delhi) & Anr on 4 August, 2015
  10. Amit Kumar Yadav And Others vs State Of Telangana on 11 September, 2015 (AP High Court judgment; Includes delay in complaint, perjury)
  11. G.Ramamoorthy Vs The State Of Karnataka on 31 July, 2017
  12. Manoj Vishwakarma & Ors vs The State Of Bihar & Anr on 12 September, 2017
  13. Vishnu Mohan Jha & Ors vs The State Of Bihar & Anr on 21 November, 2017
  14. Yadwinder Singh & Others vs State Of H.P. & Others on 10 August, 2018
  15. Rupali Devi Vs State of UP and Ors on 09 April, 2019 (Bad law: No territorial Jurisdiction is applicable in 498A IPC cases); Interestingly, no other new/overruling judgment till date.

 

Vague and General and omnibus Allegations

  1. MS Pepsi Foods Ltd and Anr Vs Spl JM and Ors on 4 November, 1997 (Complaint Case)
  2. Ashok Chaturvedi and Ors Vs Shitul H Chanchani and Anr on 13 August, 1998 (Complaint Case)
  3. B.S. Joshi & Ors Vs State Of Haryana & Anr on 13 March, 2003 (High Courts can quash a FIR or non-compoundable cases also not listed under CrPC 320)
  4. Neelu Chopra and Anr Vs Bharti on 7 October, 2009
  5. Preeti Gupta & Anr vs State Of Jharkhand & Anr on 13 August, 2010
  6. Joseph Salvaraj A Vs State of Gujarat and Ors on 4 Jul 2011 [SC: Quash can be done even after charge sheet is filed by Police]
  7. Gian Singh Vs State Of Punjab & Anr on 24 September, 2012 (Scenarios when a criminal proceeding can be quashed)
  8. Buravilli Siva Madhuri Vs. Sri Buravilli Satya Venkata Lakshmana Rao and others on 25 September, 2012
  9. Dipakbhai Ratilal Patel Vs State Of Gujarat on 26 September, 2014
  10. Sandeep Singh Bais Vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 9 March, 2017
  11. Nafisa Anjum Vs State of Chhattisgarh on 26 Sep 2018 [Chattisgarh HC: DV on relatives quashed who do not have shared household]
  12. Korimerla Videesha Vs State of A.P. and Anr on 12 October, 2018 (AP High Court)
  13. Anil Kumar and 2 Ors Vs State of A.P. Anr on 03 Apr 2019 (Telangana High Court: No evidence of Dowry Transaction)
  14. Rajendra Bhagat Vs State of Jharkhand on 03 Jan 2022 (Conviction of 498A IPC set aside due to settlement; Cites BS Joshi caselaw)
  15. Kahkashan Kausar @ Sonam Vs State of Bihar on 08 Feb 2022 (498A IPC quashed due to General and Omnibus allegations)
  16. Krishnanand Mishra and Anr Vs State of Jharkhand on 09 Aug 2023 [Jharkhand HC: Misuse of Section 498A IPC; General and Omnibus allegations]
  17. Rajan and Anr Vs The State of Madhya Pradesh and Anr on 17 Aug 2023 [Package of 5 cases laid on parents of husband]
  18. Abhishek Gour Vs State of MP on 31 Aug 2023 [SC: Quash can be done even after charge sheet is filed by Police]
  19. Rakesh Rajput and Anr Vs State of Jharkhand and Anr on 31 Oct 2023 [Jharkhand HC: Misuse of Section 498A IPC; General and Omnibus allegations]
  20. Mamta Shailesh Chandra Vs State of Uttarakhand and Ors on 29 Jan 2024 [SC: Quash can be done even after charge sheet is filed by Police]
  21. Mainoddin Vs State of Karnataka on 02 Feb 2024 [Relied on Kahkashan Kausar @ Sonam Vs State of Bihar]
  22. Mamida Anil Kumar Reddy Vs State of AP and Anr on 05 Feb 2024 [Relying on Kahkashan Kausar @ Sonam Vs State of Bihar, Apex Court trashed the nonsensical decision of AP High Court]
  23. Rajesh Aggarwal and Anr Vs State of NCT Delhi and Anr on 12 Mar 2024 [DHC: Relied on Kahkashan Kausar @ Sonam Vs State of Bihar]
  24. Mathi Vijaya Lakshmi and Ors Vs State of Telangana and Anr on 03 May 2024 [TelHC: Relied on Category 1 of Bhajan lal and Preethi Gupta]
  25. CB Prakash and Anr Vs State of Karnataka and Anr on 04 Jun 2024 [KarHC: Relied on Kahkashan Kausar]
  26. Shaileshbhai Ranchhodbhai Patel and Anr Vs State of Gujarat and Ors on 28 Aug 2024 [SC: FIR can be quashed even after filing of CS]
  27. Dara Lakshmi Narayana and 6 Ors Vs State of Telangana and Anr on 10 Dec 2024 [SC: Counterblast case]
  28. Ghanshyam Soni Vs State (NCT of Delhi) and Anr on 04 Jun 2025 [DHC: Making generic and ambiguous allegations is abuse of process of law]
  29. Raj Kamal Yadav and Anr Vs Manju Yadav and Other on 7 Aug 2025 [DHC: Making generic and ambiguous allegations against distant relatives is abuse of process of law]
  30. Tushar Sampat Mane and Ors Vs State of Maharashtra on 8 Aug 2025 [BomHC : holding allegations were vague, exaggerated, and not grave enough to constitute cruelty under IPC.]
  31. Sanjay D Jain and Ors Vs State of Maharashtra and Ors on 26 Sep 2025 [SC: Making generic and ambiguous allegations is abuse of process of law, Vague and general allegations cannot lead to forming of a prima facie case]
  32. Asha G Vs State of Karnataka on 6 Jan 2026 [KarHC : Neighbours cannot be prosecuted under Section 498A IPC]
  33. Asish Bera & Ors. v. The State of West Bengal & Anr on 30 Jan 2026 [CalHC : Quashed due to lack of material and duplicate complaints.]
  34. Dr.Sushil Kumar Purbey and Anr Vs The State of Bihar and Ors on 9 Mar 2026 [SC :Quashed criminal proceedings against in-laws, held that identical omnibus allegations cannot justify differential treatment]
  35. Charul Shukla Vs State of UP and Ors on 25 Mar 2026 [SC : FIR against in-laws quashed due to vague allegations, lack of evidence, and unexplained delay.]
  36. Sivaraman Nair and Ors Vs State of Kerala and Anr on 24 Apr 2026 [SC : Quashes criminal proceedings against in-laws, emphasising absence of specific allegations and misuse of criminal law in matrimonial disputes.]

 

Allegations do not attract provisions of Sections in FIR

  1. R.P. Kapur Vs State of Punjab 25 March, 1960
  2. Dr.N.G.Dastane Vs. Mrs.S.Dastane on 19 March, 1975
  3. State of Karnataka Vs. L. Muniswamy AIR 1977 SC 1489 [Inadequate material to sustain the charge of prosecution]
  4. Smt. Sarla Prabhakar Waghmare v State of Maharashtra & Ors 1990 (2) RCR 18
  5. State Of Haryana Vs Ch Bhajan Lal on 21 November, 1990 [A set of subsequent case laws arose from this landmark judgment]
  6. Richhpal Kaur v. State of Haryana and Anr. 1991 (2)
  7. V. Bhagat vs D. Bhagat on 19 November, 1993 AIR 1994 SC 710
  8. State of H.P.V Nikku Ram & Ors 1995 (6) SCC 219
  9. Satish Mehra Vs Delhi Administration and Anr on 31 July 1996
  10. Shobha Rani v Madhukar Reddy AIR 1998 SC 121
  11. Mohd. Hoshan v. State of A.P.; (2002) 7 SCC 414
  12. Girdhar Shankar Tawade v. State of Maharashtra, AIR 2002 SC 2078
  13. Savitri Devi Vs Ramesh Chand And Ors. on 19 May, 2003 (Delhi High Court)
  14. Manju Ram Kalita vs State Of Assam on 29 May, 2009 (Conviction under IPC 498A set aside)
  15. Sundar Babu & Ors Vs State Of Tamil Nadu on 19 February, 2009
  16. U.Suvetha Vs State By Insp.Of Police & Anr on 6 May, 2009 (Concubine is not a relative of husband)
  17. Shakson Belthissor Vs State Of Kerala & Anr on 6 July, 2009 [Allegations do not attract 498A IPC ingredients]
  18. Vijeta Gajra Vs State Of Nct Of Delhi on 7 July, 2010
  19. Preeti Gupta & Anr vs State Of Jharkhand & Anr on 13 August, 2010 [SC: Family members who are residing away from accused No.1 cannot be roped into the case]
  20. Sunita Jha Vs State Of Jharkhand & Anr on 13 September, 2010
  21. S Praveen Vs State Of Karnataka on 25 June, 2012
  22. Asha Devi & Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar & Anr. on 24 July, 2012
  23. Banti And Others vs State Of U.P. And Another on 31 August, 2012
  24. Movva Raja Ram Vs State Of A.P. on 18 June, 2013
  25. State Of Punjab Vs Gurmit Singh on 2 July, 2014
  26. Babita Sumanprakash Soni Vs State Of Gujarat & on 4 December, 2014 (Concubine is not a relative of husband; IPC 494 is not applicable on concubine)
  27. Deepika Tiwary Vs State Of Jharkhand on 6 January, 2015
  28. Gayathri Kunjithaya Vs State Of Kerala On 19 January 2015
  29. Rajinder Singh Vs State of Punjab on 26 February 2015 [Overruled Appasaheb and Vipin Jaiswal]
  30. Dr. Rajneesh Satyadev Rajpurohit Vs Magistrate No.3 on 16 April, 2015
  31. Shaik Riayazun Bee Vs The State Of A.P. on 1 June, 2016
  32. Varala Bharath Kumar Vs The State Of Telangana on 5 September, 2017 [Allegations do not attract 498A and 406 IPC ingredients]
  33. Subramani Vs The Sub-Inspector Of Police on 31 October, 2017 (Marriage should be there, to apply IPC 498A)
  34. K R Nandakumar Vs State Of Karnataka on 16 March, 2018
  35. K. Subba Rao Vs The State Of Telangana on 21 August, 2018
  36. Arnab Manoranjan Goswami Vs State of Maharashtra and Ors on 11 Nov 2020 [allegations do not attract the provision of IPC 306; Separate FIRs Filed At Different Jurisdictions And In Same Incident Under Same Offence NOT allowed]
  37. Samad Habib Mithani and Ors Vs State of Maharashtra and Anr on 25 Jul 2024 [relying on R.P. Kapur Vs State of Punjab, Family members cannot be roped into the case]
  38. Mr xxxx Bhat Vs State of Karnataka and Ms xxxx Rao on 28 Jun 2024 [relying on R.P. Kapur Vs State of Punjab, Achin Gupta Vs State of Haryana and Bhajan Lal, quashed proceedings; 211 IPC also suggested]
  39. Geetababi Khambra Vs State of MP and Anr on 9 Jan 2024 [MPHC:absence of specific date and time when the complainant-wife was subjected to the demand of dowry is sufficient to quash Dowry demand allegation]

 

Maliciously Instituted/ Counterblast cases/ Delay Not explained Cases

  1. State of Karnataka Vs M. Devendrappa and Anr on 16 Jan 2002 [Category 7 of Bhajan lal; Counterblast case]
  2. Sanapareddy Maheedhar and Anr Vs State of Andhra Pradesh and Anr on 13 December 2007 [Time-barred u/s 468]
  3. Priya Vrat Singh & Ors Vs Shyam Ji Sahai on 5 August, 2008
  4. State Of A.P Vs M. Madhusudhan Rao on 24 October, 2008
  5. MS Eicher Tractors Ltd and Ors Vs Harihar Singh and Anr on 7 Nov 2008 [Category 7 of Bhajan lal; Counterblast case]
  6. Sundar Babu & Ors Vs State Of Tamil Nadu on 19 February, 2009
  7. Office of the Chief Post Master Vs Living Media India Ltd on 24 February 2012 [Various liberal principles in condoning delays under Sec 5 of Limitation Act; Time limitation applies to Govt instrumentality-appellant]
  8. Rajiv Thapar and Ors Vs Madan Lal Kapoor on 23 January, 2013 [SC: guidelines to/not to quash/discharge]
  9. Vineet Kumar And Ors Vs State Of UP & Anr on 31 March, 2017
  10. State vs Mumtaz Ali & Anr on 8 August, 2017
  11. Chandresh Shrivastava Vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 22 February, 2018
  12. Dudekula Khasim Vs State of Andhra Pradesh on 24 Mar 2020 [APHC: Counterblast case to Husband’s divorce case]
  13. Abhishek Singh Vs State of M.P. on 26 Dec 2022 [MPHC: 498A IPC covers invalid marriages also]
  14. Swapan Kumar Das Vs State of West Bengal on 21 Aug 2023 [CalHC: proceeding are instituted only to fulfil personal grudge; Category 1 of Bhajan lal]
  15. Achin Gupta Vs State of Haryana and Anr on 03 May 2024 [Category 7 of Bhajan lal; Counterblast case]
  16. Shivendra Pratap Singh Thakur Vs State of Chhattisgarh and Ors on 15 May 2024 [SC: FIR which was lodged after 39 days of the incident, does not indicate the date or time]
  17. Musin Babulal Thengade and Ors Vs State of Maharashtra and Anr on 29 Jan 2025 [BomHC: Limitation for prosecution under Section 498-A does not continue for indefinite period]
  18. Geddam Jhansi and Anr Vs State of Telangana and Anr on 07 Feb 2025 [SC: DVC proceedings quash for same allegations under Article 142 of Constitution]
  19. Arshad Neyaz Khan Vs State of Jharkhand and Anr on 24 Sep 2025 [SC: IPC 420 Vs IPC 406]

 

Material evidence required that supports allegations

  1. R.P. Kapur Vs State of Punjab 25 March, 1960
  2. Hira Lal & Ors. v. State (Govt. of NCT), Delhi, AIR 2003 SC 2865
  3. Kaliyaperumal & Anr. v. State of Tamil Nadu, AIR 2003 SC 3828
  4. CBI Vs Mukesh Pravinchandra Shroff and Ors on 25 November 2005
  5. Parkash Singh Badal and Anr Vs State of Punjab and Ors on 6 December 2006 [there prima facie appears existence of any material and not the sufficiency of the materials]
  6. Ran Singh and Anr. Vs. State of Haryana and Anr, Case no. appeal (Crl) 222 of 2008 arising out of SLP (Crl.) No. 3089 of 2006
  7. M. Srinivasulu v. State of A.P., AIR 2007 SC 3146
  8. Appasaheb & Anr. v. State of Maharashtra, AIR 2007 SC 763 [Overruled in Rajinder Singh here]
  9. Shivanand Mallappa Koti v. State of Karnataka, AIR 2007 SC 2314
  10. Sukhram v. State of Maharashtra, AIR 2007 SC 3050
  11. Vipin Jaiswal Vs State of A.P. on 13 March 2013 [Demand of Property has to be in connection with marriage, as per Sec 2 of DP Act 1961] [Overruled in Rajinder Singh here]
  12. Surinder Singh Vs State of Haryana on 13 November 2013 [Part-paid dowry is in Connection with Marriage]
  13. M. Sudarshan Goud and Ors Vs The State of AP on 24 April 2020 [Demand of Property has to be in connection with marriage, as per Sec 2 of DP Act 1961]

 

Approaching Court with unclean hands

  1. All Perjury judgments can be gainfully utilized. They are here.

 

498A IPC not maintainable due to null and void marriage/Earlier Divorce

  1. Shivcharan Lal Verma and Anr Vs State of Madhya Pradesh on 19 Feb 2002 [SC]
  2. Reema Aggarwal v. Anupam And Others on 8 Jan 2004 [SC: Held as per incuriam]
  3. Mohit Gupta and Ors vs Govt of NCT of Delhi and Anr on 16 Oct 2006 [DelHC]
  4. Mohammad Miyan and Ors Vs State of UP on 21 Aug 2018 [SC: Earlier divorced hence offences of IPC 498A and Dowry Prohibition Act is not tenable/maintainable]
  5. Kanchanapally Srinivas Vs State of Telangana on 26 Apr 2021 [TSHC: Relying on Mohammad Miyan, Earlier divorced hence offences of IPC 498A and Dowry Prohibition Act is not tenable/maintainable]
  6. Kode Narasimha Kumar and Ors Vs State of AP on 10 Nov 2022 [APHC: Relying on Mohammad Miyan, Earlier divorced hence offences of IPC 498A and Dowry Prohibition Act is not tenable/maintainable]
  7. P Sivakumar and 2 Ors Vs State of Tamil Nadu on 09 Feb 2023 [SC]
  8. Kantharaju Vs State of Karnataka on 17 Jul 2023 [KarHC]
  9. M.Sreenivasulu and Ors Vs State of AP and Ors on 15 May 2024 [APHC]

 

Discharge Judgments u/s 227 Cr.P.C.

  1. All discharge judgments u/s 227 CrPC can be found here.

 

Discharge Judgments u/s 239 Cr.P.C.

  1. All discharge judgments u/s 239 CrPC can be found here.

 

 


MASTER SITEMAP here.

Posted in Assorted Court Judgments or Orders or Notifications | Tagged Absurd Or After Thought Or Baseless Or False Or General Or Inherently Improbable Or Improved Or UnSpecific Or Omnibus Or Vague Allegations Catena of Landmark Judgments Referred/Cited to Counterblast case CrPC 227 - Discharged CrPC 239 - Discharged CrPC 482 - Quash CrPC 482 - Saving of inherent powers of High Court CrPC 482 โ€“ Criminal Proceeding Quashed IPC 494 - Not Made Out Against Woman IPC 498a - Not Made Out Is Not Relative Of Husband Limitation Act 1963 Sec 5 - Extension of prescribed period in certain cases Mala Fide Untenable Maliciously Instituted Case Solely Intended to Harass No Material To Sustain Charge No Territorial Jurisdiction Sandeep Pamarati | Leave a comment

Post navigation

  • Older posts
  • Newer posts

Search within entire Content of “Shades of Knife”

My Legal X Timeline

Advocate Sandeep Pamarati ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ’ช๐Ÿ‘จ๐Ÿปโ€๐ŸŽ“ Follow

AP High Court Advocate with M Tech (CS) || 12 years in 'Software Industry' as Solution Architect || Blogs at https://t.co/29CB9BzK4w || #TDPTwitter

SandeepPamarati
Retweet on Twitter Advocate Sandeep Pamarati ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ’ช๐Ÿ‘จ๐Ÿปโ€๐ŸŽ“ Retweeted
andhrafact เฐฎเฐจ เฐ†เฐ‚เฐงเฑเฐฐ @andhrafact ·
18h

เฐตเฐพเฐกเฑ‡๐Ÿƒvs เฐตเฑ€เฐกเฑ๐Ÿง›โ€โ™‚๏ธ=เฐธเฐฟเฐ—เฑเฐ—เฑเฐฎเฐพเฐฒเฐฟเฐจ เฐ…เฐชเฐฐเฐฟเฐšเฑเฐคเฑเฐกเฑ

เฐฐเฐพเฐทเฑเฐŸเฑเฐฐ เฐฎเฐฆเฑเฐฏ เฐจเฑ€เฐณเฑเฐฒเฑเฐจเฑเฐจ เฐšเฑ‹เฐŸ WASHINGTONเฐ•เฐกเฐคเฐพ,center เฐ‡เฐตเฑเฐตเฐฆเฑ เฐ…เฐฏเฐฟเฐจเฐพ เฐ•เฐกเฐคเฐพ.เฐจเฐพ เฐฌเฑเฐฐเฑเฐฐเฐฒเฑ‹ เฐตเฐšเฑเฐšเฑ‡ เฐ†เฐฒเฑ‹เฐšเฐจเฐคเฑ‹ เฐ•เฐกเฐคเฐพ.CBN เฐตเฐฒเฑเฐฒ เฐ•เฐพเฐฆเฑ เฐŽเฐŸเฑเฐฒเฐพ เฐšเฑ†เฐฏเฑเฐฏเฐพเฐฒเฑ‹ ACCENTUREเฐคเฑ‹ 10 เฐธเฐฟเฐŸเฑเฐŸเฐฟเฐ‚เฐ—เฑ เฐตเฑ‡เฐธเฐพ,เฐ‡เฐฆเฐฟเฐ—เฑ‹ เฐกเฐฟเฐŸเฑˆเฐฒเฑเฐกเฑ plan.เฐฐเฐพเฐœเฐงเฐพเฐจเฐฟ RE เฐนเฐ‚เฐ—เฐพเฐฎเฐพเฐคเฑ‹ 2BILLION$ เฐคเฑ†เฐธเฑเฐคเฐพ๐Ÿง›โ€โ™‚๏ธ

vs

เฐฐเฐพเฐœเฐงเฐพเฐจเฐฟ เฐ…เฐ‚เฐŸเฑ‡ เฐเฐ‚เฐŸเฐฟ?๐Ÿƒ

Reply on Twitter 2062217009140576691 Retweet on Twitter 2062217009140576691 37 Like on Twitter 2062217009140576691 77 X 2062217009140576691
Retweet on Twitter Advocate Sandeep Pamarati ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ’ช๐Ÿ‘จ๐Ÿปโ€๐ŸŽ“ Retweeted
narendramodi Narendra Modi @narendramodi ·
3 Jun

Delighted to meet the Chairman of the Rastriya Swatantra Party of Nepal Mr. Rabi Lamichhane. I welcome and fully share his desire to work closely together for a shared and prosperous future.

Nepal is a priority partner under our Neighbourhood First policy and we look forward to

Reply on Twitter 2062085139031810119 Retweet on Twitter 2062085139031810119 4893 Like on Twitter 2062085139031810119 36952 X 2062085139031810119
Retweet on Twitter Advocate Sandeep Pamarati ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ’ช๐Ÿ‘จ๐Ÿปโ€๐ŸŽ“ Retweeted
pradip103 Pradeep Bhandari(เคชเฅเคฐเคฆเฅ€เคช เคญเค‚เคกเคพเคฐเฅ€)๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ @pradip103 ·
5h

CONGRESS ALLOWS SHARIA COMPLIANT GYM IN KERALA!

Congressโ€™ win in Kerala has ensured one thing : IUML gets a free hand and Congress bends itself to the diktats of Muslim League.

Keralaโ€™s so-called โ€˜Islam-friendly gymโ€™ mandates No music. Gender segregation. Mandatory religious

Reply on Twitter 2062415901740470707 Retweet on Twitter 2062415901740470707 173 Like on Twitter 2062415901740470707 410 X 2062415901740470707
Retweet on Twitter Advocate Sandeep Pamarati ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ’ช๐Ÿ‘จ๐Ÿปโ€๐ŸŽ“ Retweeted
ani ANI @ani ·
2 Jun

#WATCH | Maharashtra: The passing out parade at the Combat Army Aviation Training School in Nashik, concluded on an emotional note for a couple as Captain Bharat Bhardwaj proposed marriage to his partner.

Reply on Twitter 2061739907320860704 Retweet on Twitter 2061739907320860704 858 Like on Twitter 2061739907320860704 14162 X 2061739907320860704
Load More

Recent Posts

  • Are Offices of Dowry Prohibition Officers in AP designated as Police Stations? June 3, 2026
  • Pune Bar Association Vs Union of India on 22 May 2026 June 2, 2026
  • Chidurala Shyamsubder Vs State of Telangana on 27 Aug 2018 May 28, 2026
  • Birendra Kumar Tiwari Vs Neetu Tiwari on 07 Dec 2022 May 27, 2026
  • Parvinder Singh Khurana Vs Enforcement of Directorate on 19 May 2026 May 26, 2026

Most Read Posts

  • Reply to Section 41A CrPC Notice โ€“ Format with Legal Explanation (4,829 views)
  • Anu Aggarwal Vs Sushant Aggarwal on 20 Jan 2026 (3,359 views)
  • Umme Farva Vs State of U.P. and Anr on 14 Jan 2026 (3,189 views)
  • Charge Sheet and Final Report Explained (2,432 views)
  • Jinesh CR Vs Aswathy PR on 19 Nov 2025 (2,124 views)
  • Geddam Jhansi and Anr Vs State of Telangana and Anr on 07 Feb 2025 (2,085 views)
  • Regular Bail Application Format (Section 437/439 CrPC) (1,987 views)
  • Neha Lal Vs Abhishek Kumar on 20 Jan 2026 (1,877 views)
  • Arrest Procedure in 498A cases after Arnesh Kumar (1,782 views)
  • Discharge Application Format in 498A Case โ€“ Draft, Procedure & Sample Template (1,564 views)

Tags

Reportable Judgement or Order (433)2-Judge (Division) Bench Decision (411)Legal Procedure Explained - Interpretation of Statutes (381)Landmark Case (381)1-Judge Bench Decision (361)Catena of Landmark Judgments Referred/Cited to (293)Work-In-Progress Article (215)3-Judge (Full) Bench Decision (101)Sandeep Pamarati (92)Article 21 - Protection of life and personal liberty (80)Issued or Recommended Guidelines or Directions or Protocols to be followed (71)Perjury Under 340 CrPC (66)Absurd Or After Thought Or Baseless Or False Or General Or Inherently Improbable Or Improved Or UnSpecific Or Omnibus Or Vague Allegations (61)Reprimands or Setbacks to YCP Govt of Andhra Pradesh (49)Summary Post (47)CrPC 482 - Quash (43)HM Act 13 - Divorce Granted to Husband (42)Legal Terrorism (41)Not Authentic copy hence to be replaced (40)Divorce granted on Cruelty ground (40)

Categories

Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification (752)Bare Acts or State Amendments or Statutes or GOs or Notifications issued by Central or State Governments (327)High Court of Andhra Pradesh Judgment or Order or Notification (186)High Court of Delhi Judgment or Order or Notification (164)High Court of Bombay Judgment or Order or Notification (112)High Court of Karnataka Judgment or Order or Notification (93)Legal Procedure (73)High Court of Madras Judgment or Order or Notification (70)High Court of Allahabad Judgment or Order or Notification (61)LLB Study Material (58)General Study Material (56)High Court of Punjab & Haryana Judgment or Order or Notification (52)Assorted Court Judgments or Orders or Notifications (50)High Court of Kerala Judgment or Order or Notification (46)Prakasam DV Cases (46)Judicial Activism (for Public Benefit) (45)District or Sessions or Magistrate Court Judgment or Order or Notification (44)High Court of Madhya Pradesh Judgment or Order or Notification (38)High Court of Gujarat Judgment or Order or Notification (28)High Court of Telangana Judgment or Order or Notification (27)

Recent Comments

  • The Divorce Law Firm on Life Cycle Stages of a Divorce case
  • The Divorce Law Firm on Life Cycle Stages of a Divorce case
  • ShadesOfKnife on Sandeep Pamarati Vs Ungrateful Knife (IPC 498A Case)
  • KONURU VINAYKUMAR on Sandeep Pamarati Vs Ungrateful Knife (IPC 498A Case)
  • ShadesOfKnife on Lifecycle Stages of a Section 498A IPC Case

Archives of SoK

  • June 2026 (2)
  • May 2026 (24)
  • April 2026 (33)
  • March 2026 (42)
  • February 2026 (30)
  • January 2026 (21)
  • December 2025 (2)
  • November 2025 (3)
  • October 2025 (17)
  • September 2025 (12)
  • August 2025 (5)
  • July 2025 (10)
  • June 2025 (15)
  • May 2025 (3)
  • April 2025 (10)
  • March 2025 (7)
  • February 2025 (8)
  • January 2025 (1)
  • December 2024 (3)
  • November 2024 (4)
  • October 2024 (16)
  • September 2024 (15)
  • August 2024 (14)
  • July 2024 (11)
  • June 2024 (18)
  • May 2024 (13)
  • April 2024 (9)
  • March 2024 (23)
  • February 2024 (15)
  • January 2024 (11)
  • December 2023 (11)
  • November 2023 (9)
  • October 2023 (13)
  • September 2023 (12)
  • August 2023 (15)
  • July 2023 (17)
  • June 2023 (11)
  • May 2023 (6)
  • April 2023 (5)
  • March 2023 (10)
  • February 2023 (9)
  • January 2023 (12)
  • December 2022 (12)
  • November 2022 (8)
  • October 2022 (13)
  • September 2022 (17)
  • August 2022 (10)
  • July 2022 (21)
  • June 2022 (27)
  • May 2022 (23)
  • April 2022 (32)
  • March 2022 (17)
  • February 2022 (6)
  • January 2022 (2)
  • December 2021 (7)
  • November 2021 (7)
  • October 2021 (6)
  • September 2021 (10)
  • August 2021 (31)
  • July 2021 (45)
  • June 2021 (17)
  • May 2021 (17)
  • April 2021 (18)
  • March 2021 (58)
  • February 2021 (14)
  • January 2021 (50)
  • December 2020 (35)
  • November 2020 (68)
  • October 2020 (67)
  • September 2020 (28)
  • August 2020 (41)
  • July 2020 (20)
  • June 2020 (36)
  • May 2020 (40)
  • April 2020 (38)
  • March 2020 (26)
  • February 2020 (43)
  • January 2020 (35)
  • December 2019 (34)
  • November 2019 (4)
  • October 2019 (18)
  • September 2019 (57)
  • August 2019 (33)
  • July 2019 (12)
  • June 2019 (18)
  • May 2019 (5)
  • April 2019 (19)
  • March 2019 (58)
  • February 2019 (11)
  • January 2019 (90)
  • December 2018 (97)
  • November 2018 (43)
  • October 2018 (31)
  • September 2018 (73)
  • August 2018 (47)
  • July 2018 (143)
  • June 2018 (92)
  • May 2018 (97)
  • April 2018 (59)
  • March 2018 (8)

Blogroll

  • Daaman Promoting Harmony 0
  • Fight against Legal Terrorism Fight against Legal Terrorism along with MyNation Foundation 0
  • Good Morning Good Morning News 0
  • Insaaf India Insaaf Awareness Movement 0
  • MyNation Hope Foundation Wiki 0
  • MyNation.net Equality, Justice and Harmony 0
  • Sarvepalli Legal 0
  • Save Indian Family Save Indian Family Movement 0
  • SIF Chandigarh SIF Chandigarh 0
  • The Male Factor The Male Factor 0
  • Unitedmen Foundation a dedicated community forged with the mission to unite men facing legal challenges in marital disputes. 0
  • Vaastav Foundation The Social Reality 0
  • Vinayak my2centsworth – This blog is for honest law abiding men, married or planning to get married 0
  • Voice4india Indian Laws, Non-profits, Environment 0
  • Writing Law Writing Law by Ankur 0

RSS Cloudflare Status

  • Cloudflare Storage Maintenance June 15, 2026
    THIS IS A SCHEDULED EVENT Jun 15, 12:00 - 13:00 UTC May 28, 22:16 UTC Scheduled - Cloudflare has scheduled maintenance for our backend storage systems. Services will continue to operate normally, but customers will be unable to create/delete/modify tunnels, routes, hostname routes, virtual networks, devices and tunnel configurations via the Dashboard or the public […]
  • Cloudflare Storage Maintenance June 4, 2026
    THIS IS A SCHEDULED EVENT Jun 4, 12:00 - 13:00 UTC May 21, 00:41 UTC Scheduled - Cloudflare has scheduled maintenance for our backend storage systems. Services will continue to operate normally, customers will be unable to modify configurations via the Dashboard or the public API for a period of up to 3 minutes. This […]
  • Network Congestion in Frankfurt June 4, 2026
    Jun 4, 06:59 UTC Resolved - Cloudflare observed network congestion in Frankfurt from 05:53 UTC to 06:08 UTC. The issue is now resolved.

RSS List of Spam Server IPs from Project Honeypot

  • 193.193.237.158 | SD June 3, 2026
    Event: Bad Event | Total: 1,352 | First: 2025-11-25 | Last: 2026-06-03
  • 158.94.211.154 | S June 3, 2026
    Event: Bad Event | Total: 987 | First: 2026-01-28 | Last: 2026-06-03
  • 45.164.196.232 | S June 3, 2026
    Event: Bad Event | Total: 5 | First: 2026-06-03 | Last: 2026-06-03
Owned and Operated by Advocate Sandeep Pamarati
Proudly powered by WordPress
Theme: Flint by Star Verte LLC

Bad Behavior has blocked 595 access attempts in the last 7 days.

pixel