web analytics

Menu

Skip to content
Shades of Knife
  • Home
  • True Colors of a Vile Wife
  • Need Inspiration?
  • Blog Updates
  • SOK Gallery
  • Vile News Reporter
  • About Me
  • Contact Me

Shades of Knife

True Colors of a Vile Wife

Tag: Reprimands or Setbacks to YCP Govt of Andhra Pradesh

Tata Power Renewable Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 24 September 2019

Posted on September 5, 2020 by ShadesOfKnife

Due to holding of payments to Renewable Energy Companies that entered into Power Purchase Agreements with State Government (under leadership of N Chandrababu Naidu) by YCP Government, High Court was petitioned to do Justice.

Tata Power Renewable Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 24 September 2019

A complete indexed and mess-wise segregated collection of reprimands received by this incumbent State Government of YSRC Party are here.

Posted in High Court of Andhra Pradesh Judgment or Order or Notification | Tagged Reprimands or Setbacks to YCP Govt of Andhra Pradesh Tata Power Renewable Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh | Leave a comment

State of Andhra Pradesh Vs M Srinivasa Rao on 28 August 2020

Posted on August 31, 2020 by ShadesOfKnife

See Supreme Court deprecated the unethical practice of State Government of Andhra Pradesh in this Order… Hehehe

State of Andhra Pradesh does it again! The incorrigible inefficiency in filing appeal is apparent from page 78 where the present special leave petition has been filed after a delay of 455 days. In view of Post Master General & Ors. v. Living Media India Ltd. & Anr.reported in (2012) 3 SCC 563 there are no more acceptable excuses. These are matters brought before the Court only to obtain a certificate of dismissal to put a quietus to the matter. We strongly deprecate the same.

State of Andhra Pradesh Vs M Srinivasa Rao on 28 August 2020

The earlier judgment from erstwhile High Court of AP.

M.Srinivasa Rao Vs The State of A.P. on 28 August 2018

A complete indexed and mess-wise segregated collection of reprimands received by this incumbent State Government of YSRC Party are here.

Posted in Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification | Tagged CrPC 340 - Dismissed/Rejected IPC 211 - False charge of offence made with intent to injure Reprimands or Setbacks to YCP Govt of Andhra Pradesh | Leave a comment

The State of Andhra Pradesh Vs G Hari Govinda Prasad on 17 August 2020

Posted on August 26, 2020 by ShadesOfKnife

State of AP went to Supreme Court in SLP against the AP High Court Order of Suspension of GOs related to doling out of Amaravati lands to people from Economically Weaker Sections here. Supreme Court dismissed it summarily.

The State of Andhra Pradesh Vs G Hari Govinda Prasad on 17 August 2020
Posted in Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification | Tagged Reprimands or Setbacks to YCP Govt of Andhra Pradesh The State of Andhra Pradesh Vs G Hari Govinda Prasad | Leave a comment

The State of Andhra Pradesh Vs Rajadhani Rytu Parirakshana Samithi and Ors

Posted on August 26, 2020 by ShadesOfKnife

AP High Court has issued Status Quo on the Petition by Rajadhani Rythu Parirakshnana Samithi here. Promptly, State of AP filed SLP at Supreme Court.

On 2020-08-17:

CJI Bobde recused himself from hearing. Not before me.

The State of Andhra Pradesh Vs Rajadhani Rytu Parirakshana Samithi and Ors on 17 August 2020

On 2020-08-19:

Justice Rohinton Fali Nariman recused himself from hearing. Not before me.

The State of Andhra Pradesh Vs Rajadhani Rytu Parirakshana Samithi and Ors on 19 August 2020

On 2020-08-26:

SLP dismissed. Om Shanti…

The State of Andhra Pradesh Vs Rajadhani Rytu Parirakshana Samithi and Ors on 26 August 2020

Gazette from President of India regd Formation of High Court of Andhra Pradesh here.

Posted in Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification | Tagged Reprimands or Setbacks to YCP Govt of Andhra Pradesh The State of Andhra Pradesh Vs Rajadhani Rytu Parirakshana Samithi and Ors | Leave a comment

Rajadhani Rythu Parirakshnana Samithi Vs State of Andhra Pradesh and Ors

Posted on August 26, 2020 by ShadesOfKnife

Rajadhani Rythu Parirakshnana Samithi filed this WP with the following prayers

  1. Writ of Mandamus a declaring that the State of Andhra Pradesh has no legislative competence change the Capital of the State or to denude Amaravati from being the war of the 3 civic wings of the State including the Legislature Executive i the Judiciary
  2. declaring that the Andhra Pradesh Capital Region Development Repeal Act 2020 is ultra vires Articles 3 4 14 19 21 197 Parts IX and DA 300A of the Constitution of India r/w Sections 312 and 94 of the A P State Reorganisation Act 2014 and urgently declare it to be null and void
  3. declaring that the Andhra Pradesh Decentralisation and Inclusivement of All Regions Act 2020 is ultra vires Articles 3 4 14 19 197 174 Parts IX and IXA 300A of the Constitution of India r/w 5 312 and 94 of the A P State Reorganisation Act 2014 and consequently declare it to be null and void
  4. declaring the report of the High-Powered Committee dated 17 01 2020 as being bad in law and ultra vires of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India
  5. directing the Respondents to forthwith forbear from acting pursuant to or in furtherance of the report of the High-Powered Committee dated 17 01 2020
  6. directing the Respondents to forthwith forbear from shifting any of the offices of the 3 civic wings of the State including but not limited to the Raj Bhavan Chief Ministers Camp Office offices of the Secretariat Heads of Departments of the Government Police Department State Corporations State Government Offices and Officers from their current locations in and around Amaravati and from trifurcating the Capital for a period of 30 years or such time as this Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case
  7. directing the Respondents to implement the Master Plan as notified on 23 06 2016 under Section 39 of the Andhra Pradesh Capital Region Development Authority Act 2014 including by constructing the necessary buildings and housing the offices of the 3 civic wings of the State Government including the Executive Judiciary and Legislature in Amaravati

On 2020-08-04: High Court granted 10 days time to file Counter.

Rajadhani Rythu Parirakshnana Samithi Vs State of Andhra Pradesh and Ors on 04 August 2020_compressed

On 2020-08-14: Common Counter Filed by State. High Court ordered to file one paperbook from either side with Registrar Judicial via email id, [[email protected]]. Status Quo Maintained.

Rajadhani Rythu Parirakshnana Samithi Vs State of Andhra Pradesh and Ors on 14 August 2020_compressed

On 2020-08-27:

Status Quo Maintained. Adjourned to Sep 21st 2020


On 2020-09-21:

More time is given to file Counter-affidavits.

Rajadhani Rythu Parirakshnana Samithi Vs State of Andhra Pradesh and Ors on 21 Sep 2020_compressed

On 2020-10-06:

Multiple IAs are various subjects

  • Status Quo continues on the operation of the dumbo laws (to repeal CRDA Act and to Decentralize Development Act).
  • Counter to be filed by AG against the IAs seeking prohibition of spending of State Exchequer for purpose of creating infrastructure for CM at Visakhapatnam, ignoring the ones at Amaravati.
  • Files preceding the setup of two committees 1) Boston Consulting Group 2) High Powered Committee; Files pertaining to the two dumbo Bills. Court ordered for those files to be placed before Court
  • Issue a bulletin of AP Council notifying the 8 member Select Council to work on dumbo Bills. Also the video footage of Council for Court perusal dt 16 and 17 June 2020. Also provide Bluebooks of the dumbo Bills and the register will Bills details. Registers with Legislative called as Legislative Standing Order during 16 and 7 June 2020. And official verbatim  proceedings
  • Seeking Master plan notified under section 39 of CRDA Act
  • appointment of advocate commissioner to find out the reality of construction of permanent buildings in Amaravati
  • Suspension of operation of reports of the two committees
  • Accountant General and Principal Accountant General are impleaded – Allowed; advocate also identified and reflected in cause list.
Rajadhani Rythu Parirakshnana Samithi Vs State of Andhra Pradesh and Ors on 06 Oct 2020_compressed

On 2020-11-02:

Since Government agreed not to shift the Corporation offices which were already situated outside Amaravati region, the two IAs were closed as no need for adjudication arises.

Rajadhani Rythu Parirakshnana Samithi Vs State of Andhra Pradesh and Ors on 02 Nov 2020

 

 


The bozo team went to Supreme Court here. Another set of Reddys team filed another SLP at SC and get facepalm here.

 

Posted in High Court of Andhra Pradesh Judgment or Order or Notification | Tagged Rajadhani Rythu Parirakshnana Samithi Vs State of Andhra Pradesh and Ors Reprimands or Setbacks to YCP Govt of Andhra Pradesh | Leave a comment

Alla Rama Krishna Reddy Vs State of Andhra Pradesh on 23 July 2020

Posted on July 23, 2020 by ShadesOfKnife

 

WP(PIL) 174/2019

 

 

23 July 2020

High Court dismissed the PIL finding no Public Interest but sufficient Political Interest here and here. Media favourable to YSRCP finds HC favouring TDP here. In case the original article is removed from site, here is a true copy saved from the site. This serves as Secondary evidence as per Evidence Act.

HC Favours TDP

 

17 December 2019

HC Orders probe here.

 

6 December 2019

Nara Chandra Babu inaugurates the Party Headquarters here and here.

MLA files PIL here.

 

Posted in High Court of Andhra Pradesh Judgment or Order or Notification | Tagged Alla Rama Krishna Reddy Vs State of Andhra Pradesh Reprimands or Setbacks to YCP Govt of Andhra Pradesh | Leave a comment

LG Polymers India Private Limited Vs Andhra Pradesh Pollution Control Board

Posted on June 28, 2020 by ShadesOfKnife

Supreme Court had passed an interim order on 15-06-2020, staying the NGT Order to appropriate the 50 Crores deposited by LG Polymers for 10 Days.

LG Polymers India Private Limited Vs Andhra Pradesh Pollution Control Board on 15 June 2020

In this Order dated 26-06-2020, Supreme Court extended the stay for 2 more weeks.

LG Polymers India Private Limited Vs Andhra Pradesh Pollution Control Board on 15 June 2020

A complete indexed and mess-wise segregated collection of reprimands received by this incumbent State Government of YSRC Party are here.

Posted in Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification | Tagged In Re Poisonous gas leakage in Visakhapatnam LG Polymers India Private Limited Vs Andhra Pradesh Pollution Control Board Reprimands or Setbacks to YCP Govt of Andhra Pradesh Work-In-Progress Article | Leave a comment

Dr Kolaventy Sudhakara Rao Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Posted on June 5, 2020 by ShadesOfKnife

Visakhapatnam Police had, in May 2020, arrested publicly while beating Dr. Sudhakar, the anesthesiologist based in Visakhapatnam, on the road itself (for supposedly created nuisance on a national highway). Earlier he was suspended in April 2020, for questioning the lack of PPE kits to medical staff (which were allegedly diverted to Political buffoons of State Govt)

Facts here and here. Twisted Facts by this biased media here.

AP HC had taken suo moto cognizance of this case. Here is the Order for Investigation by CBI.

In re. Incident against Dr Sudhakar at Visakhapatnam on 22 May 2020

In WP/9725/2020, AP High Court ordered the discharge of Dr. Sudhakar, from the Government Hospital for Mental Care after following protocols since he was neither in CBI nor police custody, he could be released after getting permission from the superintendent of the hospital.

Kolaventy Kaveri Lakshmi Bhai Vs State of Andhra Pradesh on 05 Jun 2020

Another Writ was disposed as infructuous due to release of Dr Sudhakar from the mental care hospital, Visakhapatnam. Here is the Order.

Dr.Kolaventy Sudhakara Rao Vs State of Andhra Pradesh on 19 Jun 2020

A complete indexed and mess-wise segregated collection of reprimands received by this incumbent State Government of YSRC Party are here.

Posted in High Court of Andhra Pradesh Judgment or Order or Notification | Tagged Dr Kolaventy Sudhakara Rao Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh Reprimands or Setbacks to YCP Govt of Andhra Pradesh | Leave a comment

State of AP Vs N Ramesh Kumar IAS and Ors

Posted on June 4, 2020 by ShadesOfKnife

State Government went to Supreme Court challenging the AP HC judgement here. Here is the SLP filed in Supreme Court.

SEC_Ramesh_Kumar___Andhra_Pradesh_Govt_SLP

Notice got issued to respondents and the case posted after two weeks

State of AP Vs Ramesh Kumar IAS and Ors on 10 June 2020

SLP is allowed and tagged to other SLP(C) No.7294/2020 and SLP(C) Nos.7310-7311/2020

2 State of AP Vs Ramesh Kumar IAS and Ors on 18 June 2020

Tagged with Diary No.13379/2020 and listed after four weeks.

3 State of AP Vs Ramesh Kumar IAS and Ors on 08 July 2020

State Election Commission also filed SLP which got tagged with original case

The Andhra Pradesh State Election Commission Vs Ganduri Mashesh on 17 August 2020

Now, Ramesh Kumar moved an application to bring on record of Supreme Court additional documents. Here is the application/affidavit

Ramesh Kumar's Application to bring additional facts on record

Supreme Court gave 1 week to AP Govt to file Counter to it.

State of AP Vs Ramesh Kumar IAS and Ors on 24 July 2020

Respondent filed reply affidavit. Supreme Court gave 4 weeks to AP Govt to file a rejoinder to it.

State of AP Vs Ramesh Kumar IAS and Ors on 11 August 2020

A complete indexed and mess-wise segregated collection of reprimands received by this incumbent State Government of YCP are here.

Posted in Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification | Tagged Reprimands or Setbacks to YCP Govt of Andhra Pradesh State of AP Vs N Ramesh Kumar IAS and Ors | Leave a comment

State of AP Vs Suryadevara Venkata Rao on 03 June 2020

Posted on June 3, 2020 by ShadesOfKnife

Supreme Court dismissed the Appeal of the State Government (desirous of painting Panchayat Buildings in their party colours) and held as follows,

We have examined the matter carefully. We are of the opinion that the judgment of the High Court does not warrant interference. There is no  ambiguity in the direction issued by the High Court by its judgment dated 10.03.2020 that any colour which is similar to the flag of any political party should not be used for painting the Gram Panchayat buildings.

We are not in agreement with Mr. Narasimha that the Writ Petition was premature. As the grievance was that G.O. Nos. 622 and 623 dated 23.04.2020 were issued in gross violation of its earlier judgment, the High Court committed no error in adjudicating the dispute raised in the Writ Petition. The directions issued by the High Court in the judgment dated 10.03.2020 are clear and unambiguous. The High Court is right in holding that the respondents have made a deliberate attempt in circumventing the directions issued on 10.03.2020. Executive orders are subjected to judicial review and the judgments of the courts which have become final should be followed by compliance of the directions given therein. Any attempt to disobey the directions issued by courts would be subversive to the Rule of Law. Public confidence in the judiciary will be eroded if its orders are not obeyed.

As the judgment dated 10.03.2020 in Writ Petition No.117 of 2019 has attained finality, the directions given by the High Court have to be complied with. We approve the findings of the High Court that G.O. Nos. 622 and 623 dated 23.04.2020 were issued only to avoid compliance of the directions issued in Writ Petition No.117 of 2019.
Therefore, we direct the respondents to remove the existing colours on the Gram Panchayat buildings in compliance of the directions issued by the High Court by its judgment dated 10.3.2020 within a period of four weeks from today. As we have extended time for compliance of the directions in the judgment dated 10.03.2020, the contempt proceedings initiated by the High Court are closed.

State of AP Vs Suryadevara Venkata Rao on 03 June 2020

AP High Court judgment is here.


A complete indexed and mess-wise segregated collection of reprimands received by this incumbent State Government of YSRC Party are here.

Posted in Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification | Tagged Guidelines on Colour combination theme for painting of Gram Panchayat Buildings Reprimands or Setbacks to YCP Govt of Andhra Pradesh State of AP Vs Suryadevara Venkata Rao | Leave a comment

Post navigation

  • Older posts
  • Newer posts

Search within entire Content of “Shades of Knife”

My Legal X Timeline

Advocate Sandeep Pamarati 🇮🇳💪👨🏻‍🎓 Follow

AP High Court Advocate with M Tech (CS) || 12 years in 'Software Industry' as Solution Architect || Blogs at https://t.co/29CB9BzK4w || #TDPTwitter

SandeepPamarati
Retweet on Twitter Advocate Sandeep Pamarati 🇮🇳💪👨🏻‍🎓 Retweeted
thisguyknowsai Brady Long @thisguyknowsai ·
22 Jun

A German psychologist proved in 1885 that cramming erases what you learned within 48 hours. He published the fix in the same book. Almost no school on Earth has adopted it in 140 years.

His name was Hermann Ebbinghaus.

He had no lab. No funding. No colleagues.

He worked alone

Reply on Twitter 2068965021514891696 Retweet on Twitter 2068965021514891696 901 Like on Twitter 2068965021514891696 2632 X 2068965021514891696
Retweet on Twitter Advocate Sandeep Pamarati 🇮🇳💪👨🏻‍🎓 Retweeted
factcheckapgov FactCheck.AP.Gov.in @factcheckapgov ·
22 Jun

ఎంతో ప్రతిష్టాత్మకంగా నిర్వహించి ప్రజల ఆరోగ్యం పట్ల అవగాహన కల్పించిన అంతర్జాతీయ యోగా దినోత్సవం సందర్భంగా రాష్ట్రం లో పలుచోట్ల నిర్వహించిన యోగా కార్యక్రమం పై కొందరు తప్పుడు ప్రచారం చేస్తున్నారు. ఈ కార్యక్రమం కోసం రూ. 600 కోట్లు ఖర్చు అయినట్లు చెప్పడం పూర్తిగా అసత్యం. రాష్ట్రంలో

Reply on Twitter 2068972932827869255 Retweet on Twitter 2068972932827869255 38 Like on Twitter 2068972932827869255 85 X 2068972932827869255
Retweet on Twitter Advocate Sandeep Pamarati 🇮🇳💪👨🏻‍🎓 Retweeted
jaitdp Telugu Desam Party @jaitdp ·
22 Jun

చీఫ్ మినిస్టర్.. టీచర్ అయిన వేళ

అంగన్వాడీ కేంద్రాన్ని సందర్శించిన సీఎం చంద్రబాబు కాసేపు టీచర్‌గా మారి, పిల్లల అభ్యసనం ఎలా ఉందో తెలుసుకున్నారు. ఇంగ్లీష్ ఆల్ఫాబెట్స్ చెప్పమని సీఎం అడిగేసరికి పిల్లలు చక్కగా చెప్పారు.
#ChandrababuNaidu
#AndhraPradesh

Reply on Twitter 2068873963246399922 Retweet on Twitter 2068873963246399922 69 Like on Twitter 2068873963246399922 304 X 2068873963246399922
Retweet on Twitter Advocate Sandeep Pamarati 🇮🇳💪👨🏻‍🎓 Retweeted
jaynitx Jaynit @jaynitx ·
21h

Marc Andreessen went on Chris Williamson's podcast and broke down exactly how Elon Musk runs multiple companies at once

No other CEO on Earth does this:

1. Every week, Musk shows up at each of his companies, identifies the single biggest problem that company is having that

Reply on Twitter 2069072158735942107 Retweet on Twitter 2069072158735942107 619 Like on Twitter 2069072158735942107 3267 X 2069072158735942107
Load More

Recent Posts

  • Pavul Yesu Dhasan Vs Registrar SHRC of TN and Ors on 30 Apr 2025 June 18, 2026
  • Manoj Kumar Vs Nita Bharti on 17 Mar 2026 June 17, 2026
  • Cruelty as a Criminal Offence Explained June 12, 2026
  • Bail Compliance Undertaking Format – Draft, Legal Requirements & Sample Template June 12, 2026
  • Warning Signs of Escalating Matrimonial Litigation – Early Red Flags Every Spouse Should Recognize June 12, 2026

Most Read Posts

  • Reply to Section 41A CrPC Notice – Format with Legal Explanation (4,942 views)
  • Anu Aggarwal Vs Sushant Aggarwal on 20 Jan 2026 (3,473 views)
  • Umme Farva Vs State of U.P. and Anr on 14 Jan 2026 (3,365 views)
  • Charge Sheet and Final Report Explained (2,810 views)
  • Regular Bail Application Format (Section 437/439 CrPC) (2,189 views)
  • Neha Lal Vs Abhishek Kumar on 20 Jan 2026 (1,998 views)
  • Arrest Procedure in 498A cases after Arnesh Kumar (1,930 views)
  • Discharge Application Format in 498A Case – Draft, Procedure & Sample Template (1,773 views)
  • Can You Travel Abroad After an FIR Is Registered? – Legal Position Explained (1,687 views)
  • Atul Kumar Bajpai Vs State of UP and Anr on 17 Sep 2025 (1,536 views)

Tags

Reportable Judgement or Order (433)2-Judge (Division) Bench Decision (413)Legal Procedure Explained - Interpretation of Statutes (382)Landmark Case (381)1-Judge Bench Decision (362)Catena of Landmark Judgments Referred/Cited to (293)Work-In-Progress Article (215)3-Judge (Full) Bench Decision (101)Sandeep Pamarati (92)Article 21 - Protection of life and personal liberty (80)Issued or Recommended Guidelines or Directions or Protocols to be followed (71)Perjury Under 340 CrPC (66)Absurd Or After Thought Or Baseless Or False Or General Or Inherently Improbable Or Improved Or UnSpecific Or Omnibus Or Vague Allegations (61)Reprimands or Setbacks to YCP Govt of Andhra Pradesh (49)Summary Post (47)CrPC 482 - Quash (43)HM Act 13 - Divorce Granted to Husband (42)Legal Terrorism (41)Divorce granted on Cruelty ground (41)Not Authentic copy hence to be replaced (40)

Categories

Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification (753)Bare Acts or State Amendments or Statutes or GOs or Notifications issued by Central or State Governments (328)High Court of Andhra Pradesh Judgment or Order or Notification (186)High Court of Delhi Judgment or Order or Notification (164)High Court of Bombay Judgment or Order or Notification (112)High Court of Karnataka Judgment or Order or Notification (93)Legal Procedure (77)High Court of Madras Judgment or Order or Notification (70)High Court of Allahabad Judgment or Order or Notification (61)LLB Study Material (59)General Study Material (56)High Court of Punjab & Haryana Judgment or Order or Notification (52)Assorted Court Judgments or Orders or Notifications (50)High Court of Kerala Judgment or Order or Notification (46)Prakasam DV Cases (46)Judicial Activism (for Public Benefit) (45)District or Sessions or Magistrate Court Judgment or Order or Notification (44)High Court of Madhya Pradesh Judgment or Order or Notification (38)High Court of Gujarat Judgment or Order or Notification (28)High Court of Calcutta Judgment or Order or Notification (27)

Recent Comments

  • eCourts India on Compromise-Based Quashing in Matrimonial Cases – Complete Legal Strategy
  • The Divorce Law Firm on Life Cycle Stages of a Divorce case
  • The Divorce Law Firm on Life Cycle Stages of a Divorce case
  • ShadesOfKnife on Sandeep Pamarati Vs Ungrateful Knife (IPC 498A Case)
  • KONURU VINAYKUMAR on Sandeep Pamarati Vs Ungrateful Knife (IPC 498A Case)

Archives of SoK

  • June 2026 (9)
  • May 2026 (24)
  • April 2026 (33)
  • March 2026 (42)
  • February 2026 (30)
  • January 2026 (21)
  • December 2025 (2)
  • November 2025 (3)
  • October 2025 (17)
  • September 2025 (12)
  • August 2025 (5)
  • July 2025 (10)
  • June 2025 (15)
  • May 2025 (3)
  • April 2025 (10)
  • March 2025 (7)
  • February 2025 (8)
  • January 2025 (1)
  • December 2024 (3)
  • November 2024 (4)
  • October 2024 (16)
  • September 2024 (15)
  • August 2024 (14)
  • July 2024 (11)
  • June 2024 (18)
  • May 2024 (13)
  • April 2024 (9)
  • March 2024 (23)
  • February 2024 (15)
  • January 2024 (11)
  • December 2023 (11)
  • November 2023 (9)
  • October 2023 (13)
  • September 2023 (12)
  • August 2023 (15)
  • July 2023 (17)
  • June 2023 (11)
  • May 2023 (6)
  • April 2023 (5)
  • March 2023 (10)
  • February 2023 (9)
  • January 2023 (12)
  • December 2022 (12)
  • November 2022 (8)
  • October 2022 (13)
  • September 2022 (17)
  • August 2022 (10)
  • July 2022 (21)
  • June 2022 (27)
  • May 2022 (23)
  • April 2022 (32)
  • March 2022 (17)
  • February 2022 (6)
  • January 2022 (2)
  • December 2021 (7)
  • November 2021 (7)
  • October 2021 (6)
  • September 2021 (10)
  • August 2021 (31)
  • July 2021 (45)
  • June 2021 (17)
  • May 2021 (17)
  • April 2021 (18)
  • March 2021 (58)
  • February 2021 (14)
  • January 2021 (50)
  • December 2020 (35)
  • November 2020 (68)
  • October 2020 (67)
  • September 2020 (28)
  • August 2020 (41)
  • July 2020 (20)
  • June 2020 (36)
  • May 2020 (40)
  • April 2020 (38)
  • March 2020 (26)
  • February 2020 (43)
  • January 2020 (35)
  • December 2019 (34)
  • November 2019 (4)
  • October 2019 (18)
  • September 2019 (57)
  • August 2019 (33)
  • July 2019 (12)
  • June 2019 (18)
  • May 2019 (5)
  • April 2019 (19)
  • March 2019 (58)
  • February 2019 (11)
  • January 2019 (90)
  • December 2018 (97)
  • November 2018 (43)
  • October 2018 (31)
  • September 2018 (73)
  • August 2018 (47)
  • July 2018 (143)
  • June 2018 (92)
  • May 2018 (97)
  • April 2018 (59)
  • March 2018 (8)

Blogroll

  • Daaman Promoting Harmony 0
  • Fight against Legal Terrorism Fight against Legal Terrorism along with MyNation Foundation 0
  • Good Morning Good Morning News 0
  • Insaaf India Insaaf Awareness Movement 0
  • MyNation Hope Foundation Wiki 0
  • MyNation.net Equality, Justice and Harmony 0
  • Sarvepalli Legal 0
  • Save Indian Family Save Indian Family Movement 0
  • SIF Chandigarh SIF Chandigarh 0
  • The Male Factor The Male Factor 0
  • Unitedmen Foundation a dedicated community forged with the mission to unite men facing legal challenges in marital disputes. 0
  • Vaastav Foundation The Social Reality 0
  • Vinayak my2centsworth – This blog is for honest law abiding men, married or planning to get married 0
  • Voice4india Indian Laws, Non-profits, Environment 0
  • Writing Law Writing Law by Ankur 0

RSS Cloudflare Status

  • ARN (Stockholm) on 2026-06-25 June 25, 2026
    THIS IS A SCHEDULED EVENT Jun 25, 00:00 - 05:00 UTC Jun 19, 14:18 UTC Scheduled - We will be performing scheduled maintenance in ARN (Stockholm) datacenter on 2026-06-25 between 00:00 and 05:00 UTC.Traffic might be re-routed from this location, hence there is a possibility of a slight increase in latency during this maintenance window […]
  • ARN (Stockholm) on 2026-06-24 June 24, 2026
    THIS IS A SCHEDULED EVENT Jun 24, 00:00 - 05:00 UTC Jun 19, 13:08 UTC Scheduled - We will be performing scheduled maintenance in ARN (Stockholm) datacenter on 2026-06-24 between 00:00 and 05:00 UTC.Traffic might be re-routed from this location, hence there is a possibility of a slight increase in latency during this maintenance window […]
  • EWR (Newark) on 2026-06-22 June 23, 2026
    Jun 23, 09:00 UTC Completed - The scheduled maintenance has been completed. Jun 22, 01:00 UTC In progress - Scheduled maintenance is currently in progress. We will provide updates as necessary. Jun 19, 06:32 UTC Scheduled - We will be performing scheduled maintenance in EWR (Newark) datacenter between 2026-06-22 01:00 and 2026-06-23 09:00 UTC.Traffic might […]

RSS List of Spam Server IPs from Project Honeypot

  • 34.14.86.214 | SD June 22, 2026
    Event: Bad Event | Total: 12 | First: 2026-01-12 | Last: 2026-06-22
  • 34.52.210.100 | S June 22, 2026
    Event: Bad Event | Total: 2 | First: 2026-06-22 | Last: 2026-06-22
  • 45.174.88.88 | S June 22, 2026
    Event: Bad Event | Total: 10 | First: 2025-08-07 | Last: 2026-06-22
Owned and Operated by Advocate Sandeep Pamarati
Proudly powered by WordPress
Theme: Flint by Star Verte LLC

Bad Behavior has blocked 1326 access attempts in the last 7 days.

pixel