web analytics

Menu

Skip to content
Shades of Knife
  • Home
  • True Colors of a Vile Wife
  • Need Inspiration?
  • Blog Updates
  • SOK Gallery
  • Vile News Reporter
  • About Me
  • Contact Me

Shades of Knife

True Colors of a Vile Wife

Tag: CrPC 482 – Quashed Due to Out-Of-Court Settlement

K Bharathi Devi and Anr Vs State of Telangana and Anr on 03 Oct 2024

Posted on September 6 by ShadesOfKnife

A division bench of the Apex Court held as follows,

From Para 25,

25. It has been held that there are certain offences which overwhelmingly and predominantly bear civil flavour having arisen out of civil, mercantile, commercial, financial, partnership or such like transactions or the offences arising out of matrimony, particularly relating to dowry, etc. or a family dispute, where the wrong is basically to the victim and the offender and the victim have settled all disputes between them amicably, the High Court would be justified in quashing the criminal proceedings, even if the offences have not been made compoundable.

From Para 28,

28. In paragraph 61, this Court observes that, in which cases power to quash the criminal proceeding or complaint or FIR may be exercised, where the offender and the victim have settled their dispute, would depend on the facts and circumstances of each case. However, the Court reiterates that the criminal cases having an overwhelmingly and predominatingly civil flavour stand on a different footing for the purposes of quashing. The Court particularly refers to the offences arising out of commercial, financial, mercantile, civil, partnership or such like transactions or the offences arising out of matrimony relating to dowry, etc. or family disputes where the wrong is basically private or personal in nature and the parties have resolved their entire dispute. The Court finds that in such cases, the possibility of conviction is remote and bleak and continuation of the criminal case would put the accused to great oppression and prejudice and extreme injustice would be caused to him by not quashing the criminal case despite full and complete settlement and compromise with the victim.

K Bharathi Devi and Anr Vs State of Telangana and Anr on 03 Oct 2024

Citations: [2024 INSC 750]

Other Sources:

https://indiankanoon.org/doc/179779353/

https://www.verdictum.in/court-updates/supreme-court/k-bharthi-devi-v-state-of-telangana-2024-insc-750-criminal-cases-with-civil-character-should-be-quashed-when-parties-have-resolved-disputes-1553531

K. BHARATHI  DEVI & ANR. Vs STATE OF TELANGANA & ANR.


The Order of the Telangana High Court that was challenged.

K Suresh Kumar and Ors Vs State of Telangana and Anr on 01 Sep 2017

Index of Quash judgments is here.

Posted in Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification | Tagged 2-Judge (Division) Bench Decision CrPC 482 – Quashed Due to Out-Of-Court Settlement K Bharathi Devi and Anr Vs State of Telangana and Anr Reportable Judgement or Order | Leave a comment

Ishwar Singhal and Ors Vs State of UP and Ors on 11 Jan 2022

Posted on July 24, 2025 by ShadesOfKnife

A single judge at Lucknow Bench of Allahabad High Court held as follows,

From Para 18,

18. In the present case, First Information Report No. 501 of 2019, under Sections 323, 354, 498A, 504 I.P.C. and Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, Police Station Mandion, District Lucknow was lodged on 14.06.2019 by the opposite party No.4 and during the course of investigation, FIR and its consequential proceedings were challenged before this Court, and thereafter, matter was referred to the Mediation and Conciliation Centre of this Court with the consent of counsel for the opposite party No.4 on the first date and it was successfully concluded and presently opposite party No.4 is enjoying her matrimonial life and residing with her husband and children. As in the case of Ram Lal Yadav (supra), this Court held that Investigating
Officer can not be restrained from arresting the accused of a cognizable offence. The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Bhajan Lal (supra) and Ramawatar (supra) already held that FIR and its consequential proceedings can be quashed (u/s 482 Cr.P.C.), therefore, this Court is of the view that impugned FIR and its consequential proceedings is liable to be quashed in terms of settlement agreement of parties before Mediation and Conciliation Centre of this Court.

Ishwar Singhal and Ors Vs State of UP and Ors on 11 Jan 2022
Posted in High Court of Allahabad Judgment or Order or Notification | Tagged 1-Judge Bench Decision Catena of Landmark Judgments Referred/Cited to CrPC 482 – Quashed Due to Out-Of-Court Settlement FIR Quashed Due to Out-Of-Court Settlement Ishwar Singhal and Ors Vs State of UP and Ors | Leave a comment

Arshad Ahmad and Ors Vs State NCT of Delhi and Anr on 02 Jun 2022

Posted on July 22, 2022 by ShadesOfKnife

 

Arshad Ahmad and Ors Vs State NCT of Delhi and Anr on 02 Jun 2022
Posted in High Court of Delhi Judgment or Order or Notification | Tagged 1-Judge Bench Decision Arshad Ahmad and Ors Vs State NCT of Delhi and Anr CrPC 482 – Quashed Due to Out-Of-Court Settlement False Incest Or Rape Or Sexual Or Sexual Harassment Allegations FIR Quashed Due to Out-Of-Court Settlement IPC 376 - Punishment for rape Misinterpretation of Earlier Judgment or Settle Principle of Law or Per Incuriam | Leave a comment

Alok Jaiswal and Anr Vs State of U.P. and Anr on 8 August, 2019

Posted on August 18, 2019 by ShadesOfKnife

Nice deal… Paid Rs.22 lakhs and got mukthi from all criminal cases in one swell-swoop… Courtesy: Allahabad High Court.

Alok Jaiswal and Anr Vs State of U.P. and Anr on 8 August, 2019

Reproduced in accordance with Section 52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, lobis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court and District Court Websites such as ecourts.gov.in

Posted in High Court of Allahabad Judgment or Order or Notification | Tagged Alok Jaiswal and Anr Vs State of U.P. and Anr CrPC 482 - Quash CrPC 482 – Quashed Due to Out-Of-Court Settlement

M.G.M.Joseph Anand Vs Suvitha Suganthi on 28 August, 2018

Posted on January 21, 2019 by ShadesOfKnife

Lying knife had the audacity to file criminal and DV cases, after the husband obtained ex parte divorce decree. Both are quashed as improbable to believe cases. Despite this, husband offered to pay 2 Crore rupees to lying knife.

As always, cases are quashed but no malicious prosecution proceedings were initiated by Hon’ble High Court of Madras.

M.G.M.Joseph Anand Vs Suvitha Suganthi on 28 August, 2018

 

Posted in High Court of Madras Judgment or Order or Notification | Tagged Absurd Or After Thought Or Baseless Or False Or General Or Inherently Improbable Or Improved Or UnSpecific Or Omnibus Or Vague Allegations CrPC 482 – Quashed Due to Out-Of-Court Settlement Delay or Unexplained Delay In Filing Complaint IPC 406 - Not Made Out M.G.M.Joseph Anand Vs Suvitha Suganthi Mala Fide Untenable Maliciously Instituted Case Solely Intended to Harass | Leave a comment

Minakshi Gaur Vs Chitranjan Gaur

Posted on December 1, 2018 by ShadesOfKnife

In this judgment from Apex Court, it was held that, despite the wife was a working lady and had income from properties, “Since both the wife and husband are residing at Agra. In our view, it is not possible for the wife to maintain herself in the town of Agra with the income of less than Rupees nine thousand per month. The husband, who is earning at least Rupees Twenty thousand per month, as stated by the appellant in this appeal and not controverted, is liable to pay some amount of maintenance to the wife so that she may be able to maintain herself. In the facts and circumstances of the case, we are of the view that it would be just and expedient to direct the husband to pay Rupees five thousand per month to the wife by way of maintenance from the date of filing of the petition under Section 125 Cr.P.C.”

This is the installment scheme devised by Apex Court, which goes into future installments too.

“Respondent No.1 is directed to pay maintenance at the rate of Rupees five thousand per month from 1st November, 1998 till 31st July, 2008 in the following manner:
By 31st August, 2008, Rupees fifty thousand;
By 30th September, 2008, Rupees fifty thousand;
By 31st October, 2008, Rupees fifty thousand;
By 31st November, 2008, Rupees One lakh fifty thousand;
By 31st December, 2008, Rupees One lakh fifty thousand;
By 31st January, 2009, the balance amount.”

Minakshi Gaur Vs Chitranjan Gaur and Anr on 29 July, 2008

Then, in just over 6 months, a settlement is arrived at by the parties and per the settlement terms, all cases between them are quashed in one fell swoop. Read Pages 2 and 3.

Minakshi Gaur Vs Chitranjan Gaur and Anr on 06 February, 2009
Posted in Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification | Tagged CrPC 125 or BNSS 144 - Order for Maintenance of Wives Children and Parents CrPC 482 – Quashed Due to Out-Of-Court Settlement Minakshi Gaur Vs Chitranjan Gaur | Leave a comment

Search within entire Content of “Shades of Knife”

My Legal X Timeline

Advocate Sandeep Pamarati 🇮🇳💪👨🏻‍🎓 Follow

AP High Court Advocate with M Tech (CS) || 12 years in 'Software Industry' as Solution Architect || Blogs at https://t.co/29CB9BzK4w || #TDPTwitter

SandeepPamarati
Retweet on Twitter Advocate Sandeep Pamarati 🇮🇳💪👨🏻‍🎓 Retweeted
iloveindia_007

I Love India ✌️

Verified account @iloveindia_007 ·
11 Sep

శాఫ్ ఎండీ భరణి, కమీషనర్ తమీమ్ అన్సారియా గార్లను అభినందించిన ముఖ్యమంత్రి చంద్రబాబు గారు 🥰😍🙏🙏

Reply on Twitter 2098308267554566271 Retweet on Twitter 2098308267554566271 109 Like on Twitter 2098308267554566271 655 X 2098308267554566271
Retweet on Twitter Advocate Sandeep Pamarati 🇮🇳💪👨🏻‍🎓 Retweeted
shehzad_ind

Shehzad Jai Hind

Verified account @shehzad_ind ·
11 Sep

Chinmoy Krishna Das got just FIVE HOURS to bid his mother farewell.

To the anti-CAA lobby
To the selective Human rights lobby
To the “eyes on Gaza” lobby
To the Oped writing lobby

where the f@&K is your outrage for persecuted Hindus?

Oh sorry : Hindu lives don’t matter.

Reply on Twitter 2098385902313804193 Retweet on Twitter 2098385902313804193 5325 Like on Twitter 2098385902313804193 16065 X 2098385902313804193
Retweet on Twitter Advocate Sandeep Pamarati 🇮🇳💪👨🏻‍🎓 Retweeted
tdpdigitalmedia

TDP Digital Media

@tdpdigitalmedia ·
14h

పెద్ద అప్పలరాజు ఆంధ్రప్రదేశ్ గర్వించదగ్గ బాక్సర్! ఆయన నేషనల్ ఛాంపియన్! ఆయన సెమీఫైనల్ వీడియోలు ఇప్పటికీ దూరదర్శన్‌లో ఉన్నాయి! రాష్ట్రం గర్వించే క్రీడాకారుడిని అవమానించడం ఇప్పటికైనా ఆపుతావా @ysjagan రెడ్డీ!

#DSCFakesByYCP #MegaDSC
#JaganAgainstTeachers
#PsychoFekuJagan

Reply on Twitter 2098669032077742524 Retweet on Twitter 2098669032077742524 5 Like on Twitter 2098669032077742524 9 X 2098669032077742524
Retweet on Twitter Advocate Sandeep Pamarati 🇮🇳💪👨🏻‍🎓 Retweeted
andhranexus

Andhra Nexus

Verified account @andhranexus ·
11 Sep

🚨 Lithium & gallium deposits identified in Kadapa Basin.

NGRI scientists detected up to 1,000 ppm lithium and 250 ppm gallium in samples from the Vempalle Formation.

The Central Government has sanctioned ₹140 crore for further exploration.

Reply on Twitter 2098325454260449441 Retweet on Twitter 2098325454260449441 47 Like on Twitter 2098325454260449441 380 X 2098325454260449441

Recent Posts

  • Nanduri Mahesh Babu Vs UOI and Ors on 17 Feb 2025 September 13, 2026
  • Pasagadula Sai Kiran Vs UOI and Ors on 04 Aug 2022 September 12, 2026
  • Vennapusa Mythri Vs The State of AP and Ors on 3 Oct 2023 September 12, 2026
  • Peter T.V Vs District Police Chief and Anr on 03 Aug 2026 September 12, 2026
  • Judgments around Issuance of Police Clearance Certificate September 12, 2026

Most Read Posts

  • Charge Sheet and Final Report Explained (3,457 views)
  • Discharge Application Format in 498A Case – Draft, Procedure & Sample Template (2,387 views)
  • Appeal, Revision and Review Explained (1,982 views)
  • Anju Garg and Anr Vs Deepak Kumar Garg on 28 Sep 2022 - Judgement Summary (1,608 views)
  • How Courts Quash Omnibus Allegations in Matrimonial FIRs - Case Study (1,481 views)
  • Framing of Charges Explained (1,422 views)
  • Sandeep Pathak and Ors Vs Lalitha Tiwari on 10 Mar 2026 - Judgment Summary (1,124 views)
  • Parvinder Singh Khurana Vs Enforcement of Directorate on 19 May 2026 (1,101 views)
  • Application for Exemption from Personal Appearance During Investigation – Format, Procedure & Sample Draft (995 views)
  • Memo to Court Seeking Compliance of Affidavit of Assets & Liabilities (972 views)

Tags

Reportable Judgement or Order (443)2-Judge (Division) Bench Decision (428)Legal Procedure Explained - Interpretation of Statutes (389)Landmark Case (384)1-Judge Bench Decision (375)Catena of Landmark Judgments Referred/Cited to (301)Work-In-Progress Article (215)3-Judge (Full) Bench Decision (101)Sandeep Pamarati (91)Article 21 - Protection of life and personal liberty (80)Issued or Recommended Guidelines or Directions or Protocols to be followed (71)Perjury Under Section 340 CrPC (70)Absurd Or After Thought Or Baseless Or False Or General Or Inherently Improbable Or Improved Or UnSpecific Or Omnibus Or Vague Allegations (62)Reprimands or Setbacks to YCP Govt of Andhra Pradesh (49)Summary Post (47)CrPC 482 - Quash (44)CrPC 125 or BNSS 144 - Order for Maintenance of Wives Children and Parents (43)HM Act Sec 13 - Divorce Granted to Husband (42)Abuse Or Misuse of Process of Court (42)Divorce Granted on Cruelty ground (42)

Categories

Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification (763)Bare Acts or State Amendments or Statutes or GOs or Notifications issued by Central or State Governments (329)High Court of Andhra Pradesh Judgment or Order or Notification (190)High Court of Delhi Judgment or Order or Notification (167)High Court of Bombay Judgment or Order or Notification (112)High Court of Karnataka Judgment or Order or Notification (95)Legal Procedure (84)High Court of Madras Judgment or Order or Notification (71)High Court of Allahabad Judgment or Order or Notification (63)LLB Study Material (59)General Study Material (56)Assorted Court Judgments or Orders or Notifications (54)High Court of Punjab & Haryana Judgment or Order or Notification (53)High Court of Kerala Judgment or Order or Notification (48)Judicial Activism (for Public Benefit) (47)Prakasam DV Cases (46)District or Sessions or Magistrate Court Judgment or Order or Notification (44)High Court of Madhya Pradesh Judgment or Order or Notification (38)High Court of Calcutta Judgment or Order or Notification (28)High Court of Telangana Judgment or Order or Notification (28)

Recent Comments

  • pradeep jain on How to Challenge Ex Parte Orders in Criminal and Matrimonial Proceedings – Legal Remedies
  • Lawyer Sonia on Regular Bail Application Format (Section 437/439 CrPC)
  • vinod gupta on Reply to Section 41A CrPC Notice – Format with Legal Explanation
  • eCourts India on Compromise-Based Quashing in Matrimonial Cases – Complete Legal Strategy
  • The Divorce Law Firm on Life Cycle Stages of a Divorce case

Archives of SoK

  • September 2026 (6)
  • August 2026 (6)
  • July 2026 (19)
  • June 2026 (19)
  • May 2026 (24)
  • April 2026 (33)
  • March 2026 (42)
  • February 2026 (30)
  • January 2026 (21)
  • December 2025 (2)
  • November 2025 (3)
  • October 2025 (17)
  • September 2025 (12)
  • August 2025 (5)
  • July 2025 (10)
  • June 2025 (15)
  • May 2025 (3)
  • April 2025 (10)
  • March 2025 (7)
  • February 2025 (8)
  • January 2025 (1)
  • December 2024 (3)
  • November 2024 (4)
  • October 2024 (16)
  • September 2024 (15)
  • August 2024 (14)
  • July 2024 (11)
  • June 2024 (18)
  • May 2024 (13)
  • April 2024 (9)
  • March 2024 (23)
  • February 2024 (15)
  • January 2024 (11)
  • December 2023 (11)
  • November 2023 (9)
  • October 2023 (13)
  • September 2023 (12)
  • August 2023 (15)
  • July 2023 (17)
  • June 2023 (11)
  • May 2023 (6)
  • April 2023 (5)
  • March 2023 (10)
  • February 2023 (9)
  • January 2023 (12)
  • December 2022 (12)
  • November 2022 (8)
  • October 2022 (13)
  • September 2022 (17)
  • August 2022 (10)
  • July 2022 (21)
  • June 2022 (27)
  • May 2022 (23)
  • April 2022 (32)
  • March 2022 (17)
  • February 2022 (6)
  • January 2022 (2)
  • December 2021 (7)
  • November 2021 (7)
  • October 2021 (6)
  • September 2021 (10)
  • August 2021 (31)
  • July 2021 (45)
  • June 2021 (17)
  • May 2021 (17)
  • April 2021 (18)
  • March 2021 (58)
  • February 2021 (14)
  • January 2021 (50)
  • December 2020 (35)
  • November 2020 (68)
  • October 2020 (67)
  • September 2020 (28)
  • August 2020 (41)
  • July 2020 (20)
  • June 2020 (36)
  • May 2020 (40)
  • April 2020 (38)
  • March 2020 (26)
  • February 2020 (43)
  • January 2020 (35)
  • December 2019 (34)
  • November 2019 (4)
  • October 2019 (18)
  • September 2019 (57)
  • August 2019 (33)
  • July 2019 (12)
  • June 2019 (18)
  • May 2019 (5)
  • April 2019 (19)
  • March 2019 (58)
  • February 2019 (11)
  • January 2019 (90)
  • December 2018 (97)
  • November 2018 (43)
  • October 2018 (31)
  • September 2018 (73)
  • August 2018 (47)
  • July 2018 (143)
  • June 2018 (92)
  • May 2018 (97)
  • April 2018 (59)
  • March 2018 (8)

Blogroll

  • Daaman Promoting Harmony 0
  • Fight against Legal Terrorism Fight against Legal Terrorism along with MyNation Foundation 0
  • Good Morning Good Morning News 0
  • Insaaf India Insaaf Awareness Movement 0
  • MyNation Hope Foundation Wiki 0
  • MyNation.net Equality, Justice and Harmony 0
  • Sarvepalli Legal 0
  • Save Indian Family Save Indian Family Movement 0
  • SIF Chandigarh SIF Chandigarh 0
  • The Male Factor The Male Factor 0
  • Unitedmen Foundation a dedicated community forged with the mission to unite men facing legal challenges in marital disputes. 0
  • Vaastav Foundation The Social Reality 0
  • Vinayak my2centsworth – This blog is for honest law abiding men, married or planning to get married 0
  • Voice4india Indian Laws, Non-profits, Environment 0
  • Writing Law Writing Law by Ankur 0

RSS feed: Cloudflare Status Cloudflare Status

  • GRU (São Paulo) on 2026-09-18 September 18, 2026
    Sep 9, 14:40 UTCScheduled - We will be performing scheduled maintenance in GRU (São Paulo) datacenter on 2026-09-18 between 06:00 and 14:00 UTC. Traffic might be re-routed from this location, hence there is a possibility of a slight increase in latency during this maintenance window for end-users in the affected region. For PNI / CNI […]
    Cloudflare Status

RSS feed: List of Spam Server IPs from Project Honeypot List of Spam Server IPs from Project Honeypot

  • 34.81.164.82 | SD September 11, 2026
    Event: Bad Event | Total: 13 | First: 2026-09-11 | Last: 2026-09-11
Owned and Operated by Advocate Sandeep Pamarati and Advocate Suprajaa Rajan
Proudly powered by WordPress
Theme: Flint by Star Verte LLC

Bad Behavior has blocked 294 access attempts in the last 7 days.

pixel