web analytics

Menu

Skip to content
Shades of Knife
  • Home
  • True Colors of a Vile Wife
  • Need Inspiration?
  • Blog Updates
  • SOK Gallery
  • Vile News Reporter
  • About Me
  • Contact Me

Shades of Knife

True Colors of a Vile Wife

Tag: PWDV Act 18 – Protection Order Granted

T.V.Vyshnavi Vs N.Govindaraj on 12 January, 2017

Posted on November 28, 2018 by ShadesOfKnife

A new story to be heard in this ex parte order. Protection, Maintenance and Compensation orders are granted.

T.V.Vyshnavi Vs N.Govindaraj on 12 January, 2017

[related_posts_by_tax title=”5 Recently Updated Posts, Similar or Related To Above Post” orderby=”post_modified” posts_per_page=”5″ show_date=”true”]

Posted in Chittor DV Cases | Tagged Ex Parte Order PWDV Act 18 - Protection Order Granted PWDV Act 20 - Maintenance Granted PWDV Act 22 - Compensation Granted T.V.Vyshnavi Vs N.Govindaraj | Leave a comment

A.Sandhya Vs P.Rajesh on 8 December, 2017

Posted on November 28, 2018 by ShadesOfKnife

A new story in this DVC. Read it.

A.Sandhya Vs P.Rajesh on 8 December, 2017

 

Posted in Chittor DV Cases | Tagged A.Sandhya Vs P.Rajesh PWDV Act 18 - Protection Order Granted PWDV Act 22 - Compensation Denied PWDV Act Sec 19 - Residential Order (Share in Property) Granted | Leave a comment

Harijana Thodugu Mannala Savithramma Vs Harijana Thodugu Mannala Vijaya Simha on 17 February, 2012

Posted on November 4, 2018 by ShadesOfKnife

Economic abuse is established in this DV case from Anantapur DV Cases Series. Gross misuse of power or glorified ineptness towards differentiating between a Civil Suit for property and giving Residence (not property) Order under DV Act.

Harijana Thodugu Mannala Savithramma Vs Harijana Thodugu Mannala Vijaya Simha on 17 February, 2012

 

Posted in Anantapur DV Cases | Tagged Economic Abuce under DV Act Harijana Thodugu Mannala Savithramma Vs Harijana Thodugu Mannala Vijaya Simha PWDV Act 18 - Protection Order Granted PWDV Act 22 - Compensation Granted PWDV Act Sec 19 - Residential Order (Share in Property) Granted Right to Residence in InLaws property | Leave a comment

Kunapureddy Swarna Kumari Vs Kunapureddy @ Nookala Shanka Balaji Naidu on 12 August, 2016

Posted on July 20, 2018 by ShadesOfKnife

I am going to start the first of the DV cases from West Godavari district with this case which resulted in a key judgment from Hon’ble Supreme Court wherein it was held that courts can allow amendments to the complaint so as to avoid multiplicity of cases and remove infirmities. Read it here. Later on, on 12 August, 2016, the trial court allowed some reliefs in this DV Case.

See the Bullshit reasoning given by magistrate

Admittedly, the parents of P.W.1 have no indigent status and they are financially stable. In such a case, it is likely that the parents of P.W.1 have paid the dowry amount to R.W.1 at the time of marriage. Dowry system is rampant in the Indian society even umpteen number of legislations. Therefore, the probability and plausibility factor coupled with the verbal testimony of P.W.1 impels the court to place implicit reliance upon the testimony of P.W.1 regardless of documentary evidence.

Some more BS sprinkled herein Para 9,

The substantial revelation from para 4 of the counter of R.W.1 is that “the complainant is a kondakapu which is schedule tribe by caste and with a lenient view the respondent married the complainant without taking dowry amount”. This material drives home the message that R.W.1 married P.W.1 on his own volition without any compulsion. On the other hand, it is not the case of the R.W.1 that P.W.1 disguised her caste. In such a case as to why R.W.1 averred in the counter that P.W.1 is a scheduled tribe by caste. In this context, the argument advanced by the learned counsel for the respondent has workable force and this averment is made in the counter with intent to inflict psychological trauma, sorrow, agony and pain to P.W.1.

Just because RCR under Section 9 of HMA is not filed, judge thinks offer of husband to continue marital ties if knife comes back, is highly pretentious and fake.

It is specifically pleaded in para 20 of the counter that R.W.1 would accord warm welcome to P.W.1, if she comes and joins him. In this context, the counsel for the respondent questioned P.W.1 whether she is willing to join R.W.1, on which she emphatically denied. If in truth R.W.1 has any transparent honesty and righteousness to continue the marital tie without snapping, he would have invoked the coercive provision as envisaged under section 9 of Hindu Marriages Act i.e., for restitution of conjugal rights, however R.W.1 is very much indifferent and inactive and did not offer any solemn explanation as to why he failed to resort to the provisions of section 9 of Hindu Marriages Act. This material makes me to understand that the offer of R.W.1 to continue the marital bond with P.W.1 is highly pretentious and fake.

In contrary, read this BS, when it was questioned, why knife didn’t file IPC 498A criminal case from Para 17 and 18,

The third limb of the argument canvassed by the learned counsel for the respondent is that, if in truth P.W.1 suffered low marital happiness on account of cruelty alleged to have been perpetrated by the respondent, surely she would have set the criminal machinery in motion under section 498-A IPC and this circumstance clearly points out that P.W.1 is guilty of matrimonial misconduct. In this contextual facts, regard must be had to the material forth came from the cross examination of R.W.1. During cross examination R.W.1 affirms that “He deposed in O.P. No.22/2010 on the file of Principal Senior Civil Judge’s Court that P.W.1 is tradition ridden woman and always prays the almighty and she is a big devotee“.

In general the woman who are orthodox and have a firm belief over traditions and old customs may not turn impulsive and aggressive and may not resort to criminals proceedings against their husbands believing that their family reputation will be marred irretrievably and irreplaceably. This material gives some formidable feedback to the court that P.W.1 is highly traditional lady and has traditional approach towards life and due to which reason she might not have lodged complaint against the respondent under section 498-A IPC.

One rule for husband and another philosophy for knife.

Another gem of dogshit here from Para 19. Enjoy…

P.W.1 candidly admits in the cross examination that “ I filed application under section 13 of Hindu marriages Act for seeking the dissolution of marriage on the file of Principle Senior Civil Judge, Eluru and the same was ended in dismissal”. In the normal scheme of things, no married woman who have grown up and marriageable children would not venture to walkout from the marriage and gets her marital life ruined, unless the home atmosphere in the matrimony is uncongenial. This material makes me cognizant that R.W.1 resorted to domestic violence in the shared household.

No application of mind, why this S13 application is dismissed!!!

From Para 20, this is the observation: From this material, it appeals to me that P.W.1 is very sensitive and gullible lady.

Read Para 23 for more fun-filled entertainment.

Kunapureddy Swarna Kumari Vs Kunapureddy @ Nookala Shanka Balaji Naidu on 12 August, 2016

Now, read the appeals filed by both husband (here) and wife (here). Entire Index is here.

Posted in West Godavari DV Cases | Tagged Baseless or Convoluted Judgment Kunapureddy Swarna Kumari Vs Kunapureddy @ Nookala Shanka Balaji Naidu No Territorial Jurisdiction PWDV Act 18 - Protection Order Granted PWDV Act 20 - Maintenance From Date of Order PWDV Act 20 - Maintenance Granted PWDV Act 22 - Compensation Granted | Leave a comment

Polugoni Jyothi Vs Polugoni Sydulu on 5 August, 2013

Posted on July 10, 2018 by ShadesOfKnife

Result of not following the legal procedure dutifully can be seen in this DVC.

Polugoni Jyothi Vs Polugoni Sydulu on 5 August, 2013
Posted in Prakasam DV Cases | Tagged Polugoni Jyothi Vs Polugoni Sydulu PWDV Act 18 - Protection Order Granted PWDV Act 20 - Maintenance Granted PWDV Act Sec 19 - Residential Order (Rent) Granted | Leave a comment

Yanamala Srilakshmi Vs Late Yanamala Ravi @ Ravindra on 14 February, 2018

Posted on July 10, 2018 by ShadesOfKnife

Read Para 10 to know the arbitrary way Protection order is granted solely by the deposition of Knife, wherein husband is long dead to challenge it.

Now coming to the relief sought by the petitioner that is pertaining to maintenance and residential
orders, the allegation against the respondent as per P.W1 is that the respondent started harassing P.W1. On this aspect P.w1 elaborately deposed that about the harassment of R1 to R3 in her evidence. At one instance she and her child also confined in a room and not provided with food. After seven or eight days her parents came and saved their life. Subsequently she was treated by the parents now she is depending upon her parents mercy. Further coming to the aspect of Protection orders in view of above discussion, it is clear that the petitioner is entitled for Protection order.

Yanamala Srilakshmi Vs Late Yanamala Ravi @ Ravindra on 14 February, 2018
Posted in Prakasam DV Cases | Tagged No Shared Household PWDV Act 18 - Protection Order Granted PWDV Act Sec 19 - Residential Order (Rent) Denied Yanamala Srilakshmi Vs Late Yanamala Ravi @ Ravindra | Leave a comment

Ravilla Sasikala Vs Ravilla Venkata Swamy on 31 July, 2013

Posted on July 9, 2018 by ShadesOfKnife

Nothing to write about. Maintenance granted in this DVC.

 

Ravilla Sasikala Vs Ravilla Venkata Swamy on 31 July, 2013
Posted in Prakasam DV Cases | Tagged PWDV Act 18 - Protection Order Granted PWDV Act 20 - Maintenance Granted Ravilla Sasikala Vs Ravilla Venkata Swamy | Leave a comment

Velpula Kalyani Vs Velpula Venkata Rao on 4 December, 2017

Posted on July 9, 2018 by ShadesOfKnife

It seems, the burden of proof is pushed onto the husband who has to prove that he didn’t commit DV. This is the essence of this judgment.

Note: The husband was acquitted in the IPC 498A case filed by Knife. Here is the judgment.

 

Velpula Kalyani Vs Velpula Venkata Rao on 4 December, 2017

 

Posted in Prakasam DV Cases | Tagged Acquitted in IPC 498A Baseless or Convoluted Judgment PWDV Act 18 - Protection Order Granted PWDV Act 20 - Maintenance Granted PWDV Act 22 - Compensation Denied PWDV Act Sec 19 - Residential Order (Rent) Granted Velpula Kalyani Vs Velpula Venkata Rao | Leave a comment

Ganipineni Sudharani Vs Ganipineni KrishnaMohan on 2 May, 2017

Posted on July 8, 2018 by ShadesOfKnife

Here is another BS judgment from same justice. Blatant misinterpretation of an earlier Supreme Court order to cause advantage to the party of Knife. Either by ignorance or for kickbacks received. God Knows

Shame on him.

 

Ganipineni Sudharani Vs Ganipineni KrishnaMohan on 2 May, 2017
Posted in Prakasam DV Cases | Tagged Ganipineni Sudharani Vs Ganipineni KrishnaMohan Magistrate Sravan Kumar Misinterpretation of Earlier Judgment or Settle Principle of Law PWDV Act 18 - Protection Order Granted PWDV Act 20 - Maintenance Granted PWDV Act 22 - Compensation Granted PWDV Act Sec 19 - Residential Order (Rent) Granted | 2 Comments

Ravuri Venkata Lakshmi Mahathi Vs Ravuri Venkata Durga Butchi Rajeswararao on 22 April, 2016

Posted on July 2, 2018 by ShadesOfKnife

Read this judgment to understand how the biased judges give liberal reliefs using gender-biased laws such as PWDV Act. In the process wrongly interpret the Delhi High Court judgment, wherein in reality High Court has declined giving maintenance to unscrupulous knife, our judge in this present case understood and interpreted it totally wrongly and to suit the Knife.

 

Ravuri Venkata Lakshmi Mahathi Vs Ravuri Venkata Durga Butchi Rajeswararao on 22 April, 2016

The judgment cited in this order and wrongly interpreted is available here.

Posted in Prakasam DV Cases | Tagged Magistrate Sravan Kumar Misinterpretation of Earlier Judgment or Settle Principle of Law PWDV Act 18 - Protection Order Granted PWDV Act 20 - Maintenance Granted PWDV Act 22 - Compensation Granted Ravuri Venkata Lakshmi Mahathi Vs Ravuri Venkata Durga Butchi Rajeswararao | Leave a comment

Post navigation

  • Older posts

Search within entire Content of “Shades of Knife”

My Legal Twitter Timeline

Tweets by @SandeepPamarati

My MRA Twitter Timeline

Tweets by @Shadesofknife

Recent Posts

  • Bijumon and Ors Vs The New India Assurance Co on 28 Feb 2023 March 9, 2023
  • Jai Prakash Tiwari Vs State of Madhya Pradesh on 04 Aug 2022 March 8, 2023
  • Ayush Mahendra Vs State of Telangana on 05 Jan 2021 March 8, 2023
  • Premchand Vs State of Maharashtra on 03 Mar 2023 March 8, 2023
  • Vibhor Garg Vs Neha March 5, 2023

Most Read Posts

  • Bar Council of India Vs Bonnie Foi Law College and Ors (1,192 views)
  • Ratandeep Singh Ahuja Vs Harpreet Kaur on 11 Oct 2022 (1,139 views)
  • Sandeep Pamarati Vs State of AP and Anr on 29 Sep 2022 (Disposal of DVC in 60 days) (1,118 views)
  • Abbas Hatimbhai Kagalwala Vs The State of Maharashtra and Anr on 23 Aug 2022 (1,054 views)
  • XYZ Vs State of Madhya Pradesh and Ors on 05 Aug 2022 (918 views)
  • Mukesh Singh versus State of Uttar Pradesh on 30 Sep 2022 (803 views)
  • Joginder Singh Vs Rajwinder Kaur on 29 Oct 2022 (788 views)
  • Bar Council of India Vs Twinkle Rahul Mangaonkar and Ors on 02 Aug 2022 (666 views)
  • Ram Kumar Vs State of UP and Ors on 28 Sep 2022 (516 views)
  • Altaf Ahmad Zargar and Anr Vs Sana Alias Ruksana and Anr on 02 Sep 2022 (424 views)

Tags

Legal Procedure Explained - Interpretation of Statutes (333)Reportable Judgement or Order (329)Landmark Case (318)2-Judge (Division) Bench Decision (268)Work-In-Progress Article (218)Catena of Landmark Judgments Referred/Cited to (217)1-Judge Bench Decision (151)Sandeep Pamarati (88)3-Judge (Full) Bench Decision (82)Article 21 - Protection of life and personal liberty (75)Issued or Recommended Guidelines or Directions or Protocols to be followed (53)Perjury Under 340 CrPC (53)Absurd Or After Thought Or Baseless Or False Or General Or Inherently Improbable Or Improved Or UnSpecific Or Omnibus Or Vague Allegations (51)Reprimands or Setbacks to YCP Govt of Andhra Pradesh (49)Summary Post (46)CrPC 482 - Quash (38)Not Authentic copy hence to be replaced (35)Advocate Antics (34)Rules of the Act/Ordinance/Notification/Circular (33)IPC 498a - Not Made Out (32)

Categories

Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification (639)Bare Acts or State Amendments or Statutes or GOs or Notifications issued by Central or State Governments (299)High Court of Andhra Pradesh Judgment or Order or Notification (160)High Court of Delhi Judgment or Order or Notification (108)High Court of Bombay Judgment or Order or Notification (91)High Court of Karnataka Judgment or Order or Notification (66)General Study Material (54)High Court of Madras Judgment or Order or Notification (53)Assorted Court Judgments or Orders or Notifications (48)Prakasam DV Cases (46)LLB Study Material (45)High Court of Punjab & Haryana Judgment or Order or Notification (45)Judicial Activism (for Public Benefit) (41)High Court of Allahabad Judgment or Order or Notification (40)District or Sessions or Magistrate Court Judgment or Order or Notification (38)High Court of Kerala Judgment or Order or Notification (31)High Court of Gujarat Judgment or Order or Notification (26)High Court of Madhya Pradesh Judgment or Order or Notification (25)High Court of Calcutta Judgment or Order or Notification (18)High Court of Patna Judgment or Order or Notification (17)

Recent Comments

  • ShadesOfKnife on Sanjay Bhardwaj and Ors Vs The State and Anr on 27 August 2010
  • G Reddeppa on Sanjay Bhardwaj and Ors Vs The State and Anr on 27 August 2010
  • ShadesOfKnife on Beena MS Vs Shino G Babu on 04 Feb 2022
  • Vincent on Beena MS Vs Shino G Babu on 04 Feb 2022
  • ShadesOfKnife on Syed Nazim Husain Vs Additional Principal Judge Family Court & Anr on 9 January, 2003

Archives of SoK

  • March 2023 (9)
  • February 2023 (9)
  • January 2023 (12)
  • December 2022 (12)
  • November 2022 (8)
  • October 2022 (13)
  • September 2022 (17)
  • August 2022 (10)
  • July 2022 (21)
  • June 2022 (27)
  • May 2022 (23)
  • April 2022 (32)
  • March 2022 (17)
  • February 2022 (6)
  • January 2022 (2)
  • December 2021 (7)
  • November 2021 (7)
  • October 2021 (6)
  • September 2021 (10)
  • August 2021 (31)
  • July 2021 (45)
  • June 2021 (17)
  • May 2021 (17)
  • April 2021 (18)
  • March 2021 (58)
  • February 2021 (14)
  • January 2021 (50)
  • December 2020 (35)
  • November 2020 (68)
  • October 2020 (67)
  • September 2020 (29)
  • August 2020 (41)
  • July 2020 (20)
  • June 2020 (36)
  • May 2020 (40)
  • April 2020 (38)
  • March 2020 (26)
  • February 2020 (43)
  • January 2020 (35)
  • December 2019 (35)
  • November 2019 (4)
  • October 2019 (18)
  • September 2019 (58)
  • August 2019 (33)
  • July 2019 (12)
  • June 2019 (19)
  • May 2019 (5)
  • April 2019 (19)
  • March 2019 (58)
  • February 2019 (11)
  • January 2019 (90)
  • December 2018 (97)
  • November 2018 (43)
  • October 2018 (31)
  • September 2018 (73)
  • August 2018 (47)
  • July 2018 (143)
  • June 2018 (92)
  • May 2018 (102)
  • April 2018 (59)
  • March 2018 (8)

Blogroll

  • Daaman Promoting Harmony 0
  • Fight against Legal Terrorism Fight against Legal Terrorism along with MyNation Foundation 0
  • Good Morning Good Morning News 0
  • Insaaf India Insaaf Awareness Movement 0
  • MyNation Hope Foundation Wiki 0
  • MyNation.net Equality, Justice and Harmony 0
  • Sarvepalli Legal 0
  • Save Indian Family Save Indian Family Movement 0
  • SIF Chandigarh SIF Chandigarh 0
  • The Male Factor The Male Factor 0
  • Vaastav Foundation The Social Reality 0
  • Voice4india Indian Laws, Non-profits, Environment 0
  • Writing Law Writing Law by Ankur 0

RSS Cloudflare Status

  • MAN (Manchester) on 2023-04-04 April 4, 2023
    THIS IS A SCHEDULED EVENT Apr 4, 00:30 - 06:30 UTCMar 23, 12:00 UTCScheduled - We will be performing scheduled maintenance in MAN (Manchester) datacenter on 2023-04-04 between 00:30 and 06:30 UTC. Traffic might be re-routed from this location, hence there is a possibility of a slight increase in latency during this maintenance window for […]
  • MIA (Miami) on 2023-03-31 March 31, 2023
    THIS IS A SCHEDULED EVENT Mar 31, 06:00 - 08:00 UTCMar 21, 19:01 UTCScheduled - We will be performing scheduled maintenance in MIA (Miami) datacenter on 2023-03-31 between 06:00 and 08:00 UTC. Traffic might be re-routed from this location, hence there is a possibility of a slight increase in latency during this maintenance window for […]
  • ICN (Seoul) on 2023-03-28 March 28, 2023
    THIS IS A SCHEDULED EVENT Mar 28, 17:00 - 23:00 UTCMar 21, 09:01 UTCScheduled - We will be performing scheduled maintenance in ICN (Seoul) datacenter on 2023-03-28 between 17:00 and 23:00 UTC. Traffic might be re-routed from this location, hence there is a possibility of a slight increase in latency during this maintenance window for […]

RSS List of Spam Server IPs from Project Honeypot

  • 103.192.228.242 | SD March 22, 2023
    Event: Bad Event | Total: 18,542 | First: 2017-04-19 | Last: 2023-03-22
  • 103.20.11.183 | SD March 22, 2023
    Event: Bad Event | Total: 4,310 | First: 2017-01-11 | Last: 2023-03-22
  • 43.229.241.88 | SD March 22, 2023
    Event: Bad Event | Total: 1,476 | First: 2017-01-22 | Last: 2023-03-22
Proudly powered by WordPress
Theme: Flint by Star Verte LLC

Bad Behavior has blocked 893 access attempts in the last 7 days.

pixel