web analytics

Menu

Skip to content
Shades of Knife
  • Home
  • True Colors of a Vile Wife
  • Need Inspiration?
  • Blog Updates
  • SOK Gallery
  • Vile News Reporter
  • About Me
  • Contact Me

Shades of Knife

True Colors of a Vile Wife

Tag: Police Confiscated Passport

XXX Vs The State of Telangana on 09 Nov 2020

Posted on November 5, 2022 by ShadesOfKnife

A single judge of Telangana High Court held as follows:

From Para 18, (When Seizure turns into Impounding – 4 weeks from Seizure)

18. Having given due consideration to the submissions made as above and also taking note of the precedents on which reliance is placed by the learned Counsel appearing for the parties, it is to be seen that retaining of passport by the police authorities after the same is seized beyond a period of four weeks would amount to impounding by the police authority, which power the said authority lacks, as has been held by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Suresh Nanda V. C.B.I. (2008) 3 SCC 674. Further, this court having regard to the law laid down by the Apex Court and the provisions of the Cr.P.C. including Section 457 Cr.P.C., has by its order in I.A. No.1 of 2019 in W.P. No.22956 of 2019 held that retaining the seized property by the police after being reported to the Magistrate, would have to be considered only as a custodian and such retaining cannot be considered as impounding by the police authorities and passport holder has to make an application to the concerned Court for release of the passport.

From Para 19,

However, even after commencement of functioning of Courts, if the respondent police authority has failed or fails to take steps in depositing the passport within a period of four weeks, the same would amount to impounding, which power the authorities are not conferred with.

From Para 20,

20. Further, even after the seized material is deposited into Court under seizure report, when it comes to passport seized and deposited into Court, the Court is not empowered to impound the passport under Section 104 of Cr.P.C. upon such deposit. The power to impound a validly issued passport is specifically conferred on the passport authority under Section 10(3) of the Passports Act, 1967, being a special enactment would prevail over Cr.P.C. a general enactment. Thus, even after deposit of seized property into the Court, the respondent authority would be required to take further steps by approaching the passport authority under the Passports Act, 1967, and seek for impounding of passport. The said situation can arise only if any one of the condition enumerated in clause (a) to (h) of sub-section (3) of Section 10 of the Passports Act, 1967 being attracted. At this stage, the judgement rendered by the Madras High Court in Jeyabalan case (supra) would be of aid to the case of the petitioner.

From Para 21 (Very Imp: Passport/Travel document can be cancelled by Passport Authority, even when the physical possession of passport is not there with them)

21. It is also to be seen that for impounding of passport by the passport authority on attracting any of the conditions specified in Sub-section (3) of Section 10 of the Passports Act, 1967, having of physical custody of passport is neither mandatory nor specified. It is only the satisfaction of the passport authority that any of the conditions stipulated in (a) to (h) of Section 10(3) is attracted, the authority can impound the same, irrespective of where the passport holder is residing at. However, before passing of impounding order, the authority is required to give opportunity of hearing to the concerned. Thus, the claim of the respondent authorities that, if passport is released to the petitioner, it will be difficult to apprehend him again, does not appeal to this Court for being accepted for the aforesaid reasons and also having regard to the wide amplitude of powers, the passport authority enjoys, unless the petitioner escapes to countries with whom India does not have Extradition Treaties or Arrangements or seeks asylum in a country so permitting. Even otherwise, the said apprehension also appears to be without any basis for the reason, the petitioner claims to be working onsite/onshore with an Indian IT company and would be on employment visa and all his details would be available with the employer as to the onsite location of working and client details and at a call of the employer, the employee can be withdrawn and deported from wherever he is.

XXX Vs The State of Telangana on 09 Nov 2020

Note: Name of the Petitioner redacted upon his request email dt: 13 Jul 2023

Posted in High Court of Telangana Judgment or Order or Notification | Tagged 1-Judge Bench Decision Catena of Landmark Judgments Referred/Cited to Courts Can Deposit Passport Courts Can Not Impound Passport Only Passport Authority Can Impound Passport Police Confiscated Passport Return The Passport To Accused XXX Vs The State of Telangana | Leave a comment

All Protection from Police High-handedness

Posted on August 15, 2020 by ShadesOfKnife

Biggest threat from supposedly-protective Police is the misuse of the official power that they are delegated with, as per law. The following are some of the aspects that may be helpful for you to deal with this misuse of powers menace. List of Police websites is here.


BNSS is available here.


Note: If you need some reliefs from Judiciary, go here.

Threats of all kinds

  1. Generally, some Police calls you up and demands your appearance in the Police Station. He/She gives threats if you disobey such demands. Be clever and ensure you create electronic evidence of such threats and in this digital age, it is easy to get such corrupt/abusive police out of department. That is, only if you want to do that. If you have fear of later consequences, do not do this and suffer later.

Routine Violation of Guidelines issued by Supreme Court of India in it’s Judgments/Orders

  1. No automatic arrest should be effected for any offence in India which carries a punishment of 7 years or less. In such cases, strict adherence of procedure laid down in 41A CrPC is to be followed. This is as per Arnesh Kumar judgment. All the baseless false and motivated cases fall within this bracket. So, if any police violates this guideline, there are consequences listed in the same judgment. So, invoke this judgment, if the offences listed in FIR carry punishment of 7 years or less. This protection is reinforced by this judgment here. Read this page too. The procedure to be followed by police while arresting is elucidated in the landmark judgements here and here.
  2. To overcome this hurdle placed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court, Police add at least one section which carries punishment more than 7 years or less. If that case, immediately obtain Anticipatory Bail u/s 438 for all the accused persons mentioned in the FIR and this is not a stage where you can argue that allegations on accused other than A1 (most probably your parents and siblings) do not make out the said offence/section. Read about Anticipatory Bail in the below section. Make good use of the efiling facility, during COVID-19 times, as Bails are categorized as Urgent matters, with the help of any advocate in your favorable/local area.
  3. Even if civil matters are pending in courts between parties like DVC, Maintenance, Divorce, Custody, Succession, Police cannot deny to register FIR. 3-Judge bench of SC says so here.
  4. Use this latest judgment here if Police tinker with 41A CrPC/35 BNSS Notices. Police have to attach FIR copy along with 41A CrPC/35 BNSS Notice.

Get FIR from Police websites

Obtain a copy of FIR from the websites of the respective police departments. The list is here. Show them this landmark judgment here, if they act smart.


Use RTI to Obtain Complaint Copy and FIR

One can file a RTI application to the Public Information Officer (PIO) designated to every Police station and seek a copy of Complaint and FIR laid against you. It will take 30 days or less for this, as stipulated in the RTI Act. You can invoke Sec 7 – Risk to live or personal liberty to obtain the above documents in 48 hours.


Compoundability of Offences u/s 320 Cr.P.C.

Not all people can dare to go through the rigors of an Criminal trial for obvious reasons. Cr.P.C provides section 320 which has a list of offences that can be compounded by settling the matter amicable in a Lok Adalat.

In Andhra Pradesh, 494 IPC and 498A IPC are made compoundable via a State amendment here on the recommendation of the Chairperson, AP Women’s Commission.


Bail

Go here.

Additionally, stop all further communication with the gang of Opposite party family, as it is easy for them, on that fact alone (can claim a ground that you threatened them with what-not) to get your bail cancelled. Do NOT be a emotional dumbo and screw your (and your family/parent’s) bail. Please.

And once an Anticipatory Bail is granted, it protected the grantee/accused until the end of trial and there is no need to obtain Regular Bail, after Charge sheet is filed by Police into the Court. Case law here.


Register a complaint against Public Servant (No sanction from Government required!!!)

If any Public servant (read as Judge, Magistrate or Police) does something to violate their duty as prescribed u/s 197 CrPC, they are liable for criminal prosecution u/s 166A IPC. Read full details here.

Additionally, you can invoke section 29 of Police Act 1861 here or/and Section 4 of Police-Forces (Restriction of Rights) Act, 1966 here.


Beauty of Zero FIR

In Lalita Kumari judgement here, Supreme Court held that if a cognizable offence is reported or brought to the notice of a police station, the IO of that station has to register an FIR. If the said police station does not have territorial jurisdiction, it has to register a FIR with zero ‘0’ number and then transfer it to the police station which has territorial jurisdiction. Other judgments on same principle here or listed in chronological order here.


Possibility of Quashing the FIR and the subsequent proceedings

Once you (and/or your family members) are safe from Police clutches, evaluate the possibilities of Quashing the entire proceedings initiated by Police (or Court) u/s 482 CrPC. Begin reading from here to understand what is meant by a Quash Petition and how best to use it (if applicable) in your cases.


Investigation and Charge sheet

  1. Police are given certain time to complete investigation, as per Law. No point in poking them with RTI applications seeking progress/evidence collected, copy of Charge sheet etc. as such documents will be anyways given to accused persons (one complete set for each accused person) on your first appearance day in Court, after you receive summons from Court. Check your case details/progress regularly on eCourts app.
  2. Police may offer to remove sections and/or accused person from charge sheet for some gratification. On payment of bribe, they may follow through on do so as well. What they do not tell you is about a petition/right called as Protect petition that the de-facto complainant has. By filing this petition or by appearing in Court and orally giving statement that Police colluded with accused and removed sections and/or accused person from charge sheet for some gratification, Magistrate/Judge is within their power to restore back the sections and/or accused person on to the charge sheet. Don’t fall for this trap and lose money, as what you get in return is illusory.
  3. If the I.O. decides to file a charge sheet against you upon completion of investigation, you can request (no demand here) that you be given a copy of charge sheet and other documents (including witness statements recorded u/s 161 CrPC) that are being submitted to Court u/s 173 CrPC.
    • This relief lies in 173(7) CrPC which reads as: “(7) Where the police officer investigating the case finds it convenient so to do, he may furnish to the accused copies of all or any of the documents referred to in sub-section (5).”

File a complaint at Police Station

Whenever you have to report a cognizable complaint to Police, just follow the three steps in that very same order quickly. Do not crib or cry, if one step does not work per your liking.

PRE-COGNIZANCE STAGE:

  1. Register a written/oral Complaint with the nearest police station where the crime has occurred. This is mandatory as per section 154(1) CrPC.
  2. In the event Police do not register FIR based on your complaint, come back from there and file a Escalation letter (do not send same complaint as-it-is; if you want, you annex a copy of your complaint given at police station to this Escalation letter) to Senior Superintendent of Police of the District or the Commissioner of Police of the Metropolitan City via Registered Post with Acknowledgement Due card. This is mandatory requirement as per section 154(3) CrPC.
  3. Once your complaint to PS in (1) and escalation to SP/CP/SSP in (2) are exhausted and do not give result (registration of FIR and providing a copy to you, free), then register a complaint with the Magistrate Court which exercises Jurisdiction upto the above PS/SP Officer. The prayer will be to ‘direct the SP to direct the PS to register FIR. This is the procedure as per section 156(3) CrPC. If a FIR is registered in any of the these three scenarios, such case is called a Warrant case.
  4. The judgments list is here.

POST-COGNIZANCE STAGE:

  1. If Magistrate does not pass any direction as per above procedures, file a complaint directly u/s 190 CrPC r/w Sec 200 CrPC and Sec 202 CrPC. This is called as Private complaint.
  2. There is scope for going to High Court u/s 482 CrPC.
  3. If all of the above steps fail, go to the High Court under Writ Jurisdiction and file a Writ Petition u/Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking registration of FIR.

Note: Check the Schedule 1-Table in CrPC book to know if a particular IPC crime is Cognizable of not.


Remedies against Malicious Prosecution in India

Check out this page here.

Your Fundamental Rights Against Police Abuse

Even during investigation or arrest, every citizen in India enjoys constitutional protections. Police powers are not unlimited, and misuse of authority can be challenged in courts.

The following constitutional rights protect individuals from police high-handedness.

Article 14 – Equality Before Law

Every person is equal before the law. Police authorities cannot discriminate based on religion, caste, gender, political opinion, or personal bias.

Article 21 – Right to Life and Personal Liberty

No person can be deprived of life or liberty except according to procedure established by law. Illegal detention, torture, custodial violence, and harassment violate this fundamental right.

Article 22 – Protection Against Arbitrary Arrest

A person arrested by police has the right:

  • To be informed of the grounds of arrest
  • To consult and be defended by a lawyer
  • To be produced before a magistrate within 24 hours

Detention beyond 24 hours without judicial authorization is illegal.

Article 39A – Right to Free Legal Aid

If a person cannot afford legal representation, the State must provide legal aid through Legal Services Authorities.

Rights of Citizens During Police Arrest

The Supreme Court of India has issued several guidelines to prevent abuse of police powers. These safeguards must be followed during arrest and detention.

The Arrest Memo

When a person is arrested, police must prepare an arrest memo containing:

  • Date and time of arrest
  • Name of arresting officer
  • Name of witness
  • Signature of the arrested person

Informing Family or Friend

Police must inform a relative, friend, or nominated person about the arrest and place of detention.

Right to Legal Counsel

An arrested person has the right to consult a lawyer during interrogation.

Medical Examination

The arrested person must undergo medical examination periodically while in custody to prevent torture or abuse.

Production Before Magistrate

The accused must be produced before a magistrate within 24 hours of arrest.

Failure to follow these procedures can make the arrest illegal.

Important Supreme Court Judgments Protecting Citizens

Over the years, the Supreme Court has issued several landmark rulings to prevent police misuse of power.

D.K. Basu vs State of West Bengal

This landmark judgment laid down detailed guidelines for arrest and detention to prevent custodial violence.

Joginder Kumar vs State of Uttar Pradesh

The Court held that police cannot arrest someone merely because they have the power to do so. Arrest must be justified.

Arnesh Kumar vs State of Bihar

The Court ruled that police should not make automatic arrests in offences punishable with imprisonment up to seven years. Instead, a notice under Section 41A CrPC should be issued.

Lalita Kumari vs Government of Uttar Pradesh

The Court made it mandatory for police to register an FIR when information discloses a cognizable offence.

What Police Cannot Legally Do

Police powers are limited by law. The following actions may amount to abuse of authority.

Illegal Detention

Police cannot detain a person in the police station without formal arrest.

Arrest Without Proper Grounds

Arrest cannot be used as a tool of intimidation or harassment.

Forced Confessions

Police cannot force a person to sign statements or confessions.

Threats or Coercion

Threatening family members or using intimidation tactics is illegal.

Seizing Property Without Documentation

If property is seized, police must prepare a seizure memo and provide a copy.

If any of these actions occur, the affected person may approach courts for relief.

Special Protections for Women

Indian law provides additional safeguards to protect women from abuse during police investigation.

Arrest of Women at Night

Women should not be arrested after sunset and before sunrise except in exceptional circumstances and with permission of a magistrate.

Female Officers

Search of women must be conducted only by female police officers.

Recording of Statements

Statements of women may be recorded at their residence rather than at a police station in appropriate cases.

Protection of Dignity

The dignity and privacy of women must be respected during investigation.

Violation of these safeguards can lead to disciplinary and legal action against police officers.

How to File a Complaint Against Police Misconduct

If a police officer behaves unlawfully, several remedies are available.

Complaint to Superintendent of Police (SP)

A written complaint can be filed with the district Superintendent of Police describing the misconduct.

Complaint to Police Complaints Authority

Most states have a Police Complaints Authority (PCA) that investigates serious allegations such as:

  • Custodial torture
  • Illegal detention
  • Abuse of power

Approach the Magistrate

A complaint can be filed before a Judicial Magistrate seeking investigation or legal action against the officer.

Human Rights Commission

Complaints can be made to the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) or State Human Rights Commission in cases involving custodial violence or illegal detention.

Immediate Legal Remedies in Case of Police Harassment

If a person faces harassment or illegal action by police, the following remedies may be used.

Anticipatory Bail

If there is apprehension of arrest in a false case, the person can apply for anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC.

Writ Petition in High Court

Under Article 226 of the Constitution, a person may approach the High Court seeking protection from police harassment.

Habeas Corpus

If someone is illegally detained, a Habeas Corpus petition may be filed demanding that the detained person be produced before the court.

Compensation for Custodial Abuse

Courts may award compensation if police violate fundamental rights.

Practical Steps to Protect Yourself from Police Harassment

If police start calling or visiting frequently, it is important to remain calm and act strategically.

Maintain Documentation

Keep records of:

  • Call logs
  • Messages
  • Notices issued by police
  • Copies of complaints filed

Record Interactions

If legally permissible, record conversations or interactions to preserve evidence.

Avoid Signing Blank Papers

Never sign blank documents or statements without reading them carefully.

Seek Legal Advice

Consult a lawyer before responding to serious allegations or notices.

Inform Family Members

Always inform family or trusted persons if you are called to a police station.

Evidence That Can Help Prove Police Misconduct

In cases of police abuse, evidence plays a crucial role.

Important forms of evidence include:

  • CCTV footage
  • Audio or video recordings
  • Medical examination reports
  • Witness statements
  • Phone call records
  • Copies of police notices

Preserving such evidence can significantly strengthen a legal case.

When to Approach the High Court

In serious cases of police harassment, approaching the High Court may be necessary.

Situations where High Court intervention may be appropriate include:

  • Continuous harassment by police without lawful basis
  • Threats of illegal arrest
  • Refusal to register FIR
  • Illegal detention
  • Fabrication of false cases

High Courts have wide powers to issue directions to police authorities and protect citizens’ rights.

Conclusion

Police authorities play a vital role in maintaining law and order, but their powers must always be exercised within the framework of the law. Citizens are not helpless against abuse of authority. The Constitution, criminal procedure laws, and judicial precedents provide strong safeguards against arbitrary police action.

Understanding one’s rights, maintaining proper documentation, and using available legal remedies can effectively protect individuals from police high-handedness.

Anyone facing serious harassment should seek legal advice and take appropriate steps through the legal system to safeguard their rights.


MASTER SITEMAP here.

Posted in LLB Study Material | Tagged Misuse of Police Powers Police Act 1861 Police Confiscated Passport Police Reforms Remedies against Malicious Prosecution in India Work-In-Progress Article | Leave a comment

Jignesh Prakash Shah Vs CBI on 4 June, 2018

Posted on July 22, 2018 by ShadesOfKnife

Basing squarely on Suresh Nanda Vs CBI judgment, High Court of Bombay, also ordered the CBI to return Jignesh’s passport within a period of three weeks from judgment date.

Jignesh Prakash Shah Vs CBI on 4 June, 2018

A little intro to Mr.Jignesh Prakash Shah here and a new book.

Posted in High Court of Bombay Judgment or Order or Notification | Tagged Courts Can Not Impound Passport Do Not Leave India Without Permission Of Court Jignesh Prakash Shah Vs CBI Only Passport Authority Can Impound Passport Police Confiscated Passport | Leave a comment

Search within entire Content of “Shades of Knife”

My Legal X Timeline

Advocate Sandeep Pamarati 🇮🇳💪👨🏻‍🎓 Follow

AP High Court Advocate with M Tech (CS) || 12 years in 'Software Industry' as Solution Architect || Blogs at https://t.co/29CB9BzK4w || #TDPTwitter

SandeepPamarati
Retweet on Twitter Advocate Sandeep Pamarati 🇮🇳💪👨🏻‍🎓 Retweeted
rose_k01 Rosy @rose_k01 ·
10 Jul

Women in the Yao village of China are famous for having the Longest hair in the World averaging 6 feet long. Women in their 80s still don't have a Single grey hair!! Their secret is Fermented Rice water. Watch How they make & use it 🍚🌾💧

Reply on Twitter 2075635918879523325 Retweet on Twitter 2075635918879523325 897 Like on Twitter 2075635918879523325 3904 X 2075635918879523325
Retweet on Twitter Advocate Sandeep Pamarati 🇮🇳💪👨🏻‍🎓 Retweeted
ani ANI @ani ·
12 Jul

Promo | ANI Podcast with R.V.S. Mani, Former Under Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, Premieres Today at 5 PM IST

"Narendra Modi and Amit Shah Were the Targets in the Ishrat Jahan Case."

"None of the Files Had the Term 'Hindu Terror' Until 2010."

"Digvijaya Singh Asked Me to

Reply on Twitter 2076177037165994029 Retweet on Twitter 2076177037165994029 623 Like on Twitter 2076177037165994029 1599 X 2076177037165994029
Retweet on Twitter Advocate Sandeep Pamarati 🇮🇳💪👨🏻‍🎓 Retweeted
kolla_ch1 చైతన్య కొల్లా @kolla_ch1 ·
11 Jul

రాష్ట్రం మీద పడి.. అడ్డ గాడిదల్లా... అడ్డ దిడ్డంగా పడి దోచుకున్న అడ్డమైన ఎదవలకు ఊడిగం చేస్తూ

డెలివరీ బాయ్ లను అవమానపర్చే

ఆ నెల తక్కువ సన్నాసి మొహాన కొట్టండయ్యా దీన్ని 🤷‍♂️

Reply on Twitter 2076018293836808437 Retweet on Twitter 2076018293836808437 111 Like on Twitter 2076018293836808437 643 X 2076018293836808437
Retweet on Twitter Advocate Sandeep Pamarati 🇮🇳💪👨🏻‍🎓 Retweeted
shunyta_007 𝐒ɦυ𐓣𝗒𝗍α @shunyta_007 ·
12 Jul

Observation Skills 🔥

Reply on Twitter 2076189650885226496 Retweet on Twitter 2076189650885226496 537 Like on Twitter 2076189650885226496 3151 X 2076189650885226496
Load More

Recent Posts

  • Prahlad Singh Bhati Vs N.C.T. Delhi and Anr on 23 Mar 2001 July 12, 2026
  • Application for Day-to-Day Trial – Format, Procedure & Sample Draft July 8, 2026
  • Pooja Ramesh Singh Vs JnK Bank and Anr on 02 Jul 2026 July 8, 2026
  • A.S.S.K.Durga Prasad Vs NCDRC and Ors on 24 Jun 2026 July 7, 2026
  • Application for Permanent Exemption from Appearance – Format, Procedure & Sample Draft July 7, 2026

Most Read Posts

  • Reply to Section 41A CrPC Notice – Format with Legal Explanation (5,050 views)
  • Anu Aggarwal Vs Sushant Aggarwal on 20 Jan 2026 (3,603 views)
  • Umme Farva Vs State of U.P. and Anr on 14 Jan 2026 (3,531 views)
  • Charge Sheet and Final Report Explained (3,005 views)
  • Regular Bail Application Format (Section 437/439 CrPC) (2,374 views)
  • Neha Lal Vs Abhishek Kumar on 20 Jan 2026 (2,151 views)
  • Arrest Procedure in 498A cases after Arnesh Kumar (2,056 views)
  • Discharge Application Format in 498A Case – Draft, Procedure & Sample Template (1,925 views)
  • Can You Travel Abroad After an FIR Is Registered? – Legal Position Explained (1,868 views)
  • Life Cycle of a Perjury Case (1,794 views)

Tags

Reportable Judgement or Order (436)2-Judge (Division) Bench Decision (422)Legal Procedure Explained - Interpretation of Statutes (386)Landmark Case (383)1-Judge Bench Decision (366)Catena of Landmark Judgments Referred/Cited to (297)Work-In-Progress Article (215)3-Judge (Full) Bench Decision (101)Sandeep Pamarati (91)Article 21 - Protection of life and personal liberty (80)Issued or Recommended Guidelines or Directions or Protocols to be followed (71)Perjury Under 340 CrPC (66)Absurd Or After Thought Or Baseless Or False Or General Or Inherently Improbable Or Improved Or UnSpecific Or Omnibus Or Vague Allegations (62)Reprimands or Setbacks to YCP Govt of Andhra Pradesh (49)Summary Post (47)CrPC 482 - Quash (44)HM Act Sec 13 - Divorce Granted to Husband (42)Divorce Granted on Cruelty ground (42)Legal Terrorism (41)Abuse Or Misuse of Process of Court (40)

Categories

Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification (758)Bare Acts or State Amendments or Statutes or GOs or Notifications issued by Central or State Governments (329)High Court of Andhra Pradesh Judgment or Order or Notification (187)High Court of Delhi Judgment or Order or Notification (164)High Court of Bombay Judgment or Order or Notification (112)High Court of Karnataka Judgment or Order or Notification (95)Legal Procedure (83)High Court of Madras Judgment or Order or Notification (71)High Court of Allahabad Judgment or Order or Notification (62)LLB Study Material (59)General Study Material (56)High Court of Punjab & Haryana Judgment or Order or Notification (53)Assorted Court Judgments or Orders or Notifications (51)High Court of Kerala Judgment or Order or Notification (47)Judicial Activism (for Public Benefit) (47)Prakasam DV Cases (46)District or Sessions or Magistrate Court Judgment or Order or Notification (44)High Court of Madhya Pradesh Judgment or Order or Notification (38)High Court of Gujarat Judgment or Order or Notification (28)High Court of Telangana Judgment or Order or Notification (28)

Recent Comments

  • eCourts India on Compromise-Based Quashing in Matrimonial Cases – Complete Legal Strategy
  • The Divorce Law Firm on Life Cycle Stages of a Divorce case
  • The Divorce Law Firm on Life Cycle Stages of a Divorce case
  • ShadesOfKnife on Sandeep Pamarati Vs Ungrateful Knife (IPC 498A Case)
  • KONURU VINAYKUMAR on Sandeep Pamarati Vs Ungrateful Knife (IPC 498A Case)

Archives of SoK

  • July 2026 (13)
  • June 2026 (19)
  • May 2026 (24)
  • April 2026 (33)
  • March 2026 (42)
  • February 2026 (30)
  • January 2026 (21)
  • December 2025 (2)
  • November 2025 (3)
  • October 2025 (17)
  • September 2025 (12)
  • August 2025 (5)
  • July 2025 (10)
  • June 2025 (15)
  • May 2025 (3)
  • April 2025 (10)
  • March 2025 (7)
  • February 2025 (8)
  • January 2025 (1)
  • December 2024 (3)
  • November 2024 (4)
  • October 2024 (16)
  • September 2024 (15)
  • August 2024 (14)
  • July 2024 (11)
  • June 2024 (18)
  • May 2024 (13)
  • April 2024 (9)
  • March 2024 (23)
  • February 2024 (15)
  • January 2024 (11)
  • December 2023 (11)
  • November 2023 (9)
  • October 2023 (13)
  • September 2023 (12)
  • August 2023 (15)
  • July 2023 (17)
  • June 2023 (11)
  • May 2023 (6)
  • April 2023 (5)
  • March 2023 (10)
  • February 2023 (9)
  • January 2023 (12)
  • December 2022 (12)
  • November 2022 (8)
  • October 2022 (13)
  • September 2022 (17)
  • August 2022 (10)
  • July 2022 (21)
  • June 2022 (27)
  • May 2022 (23)
  • April 2022 (32)
  • March 2022 (17)
  • February 2022 (6)
  • January 2022 (2)
  • December 2021 (7)
  • November 2021 (7)
  • October 2021 (6)
  • September 2021 (10)
  • August 2021 (31)
  • July 2021 (45)
  • June 2021 (17)
  • May 2021 (17)
  • April 2021 (18)
  • March 2021 (58)
  • February 2021 (14)
  • January 2021 (50)
  • December 2020 (35)
  • November 2020 (68)
  • October 2020 (67)
  • September 2020 (28)
  • August 2020 (41)
  • July 2020 (20)
  • June 2020 (36)
  • May 2020 (40)
  • April 2020 (38)
  • March 2020 (26)
  • February 2020 (43)
  • January 2020 (35)
  • December 2019 (34)
  • November 2019 (4)
  • October 2019 (18)
  • September 2019 (57)
  • August 2019 (33)
  • July 2019 (12)
  • June 2019 (18)
  • May 2019 (5)
  • April 2019 (19)
  • March 2019 (58)
  • February 2019 (11)
  • January 2019 (90)
  • December 2018 (97)
  • November 2018 (43)
  • October 2018 (31)
  • September 2018 (73)
  • August 2018 (47)
  • July 2018 (143)
  • June 2018 (92)
  • May 2018 (97)
  • April 2018 (59)
  • March 2018 (8)

Blogroll

  • Daaman Promoting Harmony 0
  • Fight against Legal Terrorism Fight against Legal Terrorism along with MyNation Foundation 0
  • Good Morning Good Morning News 0
  • Insaaf India Insaaf Awareness Movement 0
  • MyNation Hope Foundation Wiki 0
  • MyNation.net Equality, Justice and Harmony 0
  • Sarvepalli Legal 0
  • Save Indian Family Save Indian Family Movement 0
  • SIF Chandigarh SIF Chandigarh 0
  • The Male Factor The Male Factor 0
  • Unitedmen Foundation a dedicated community forged with the mission to unite men facing legal challenges in marital disputes. 0
  • Vaastav Foundation The Social Reality 0
  • Vinayak my2centsworth – This blog is for honest law abiding men, married or planning to get married 0
  • Voice4india Indian Laws, Non-profits, Environment 0
  • Writing Law Writing Law by Ankur 0

RSS Cloudflare Status

  • Cloudflare Storage Maintenance July 16, 2026
    THIS IS A SCHEDULED EVENT Jul 16, 12:00 - 13:00 UTC Jul 6, 22:38 UTC Scheduled - Cloudflare has scheduled maintenance for our backend storage systems. Services will continue to operate normally, but customers will be unable to create/delete/modify Client-Side Security settings via the Dashboard or the public API for a period of up to […]
    Cloudflare

RSS List of Spam Server IPs from Project Honeypot

  • 188.95.67.196 | S July 13, 2026
    Event: Bad Event | Total: 106 | First: 2025-03-27 | Last: 2026-07-13
Owned and Operated by Advocate Sandeep Pamarati and Advocate Suprajaa Rajan
Proudly powered by WordPress
Theme: Flint by Star Verte LLC

Bad Behavior has blocked 1108 access attempts in the last 7 days.

pixel