<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Not followed Guidelines in Rajnesh Vs Neha Judgment Archives - Shades of Knife</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/tag/not-followed-guidelines-in-rajnesh-vs-neha-judgment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/tag/not-followed-guidelines-in-rajnesh-vs-neha-judgment/</link>
	<description>True Colors of a Vile Wife</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 06:01:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Atul Kumar Bajpai Vs State of UP and Anr on 17 Sep 2025</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/atul-kumar-bajpai-vs-state-of-up-and-anr-on-17-sep-2025/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/atul-kumar-bajpai-vs-state-of-up-and-anr-on-17-sep-2025/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2026 18:07:04 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[High Court of Allahabad Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1-Judge Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atul Kumar Bajpai Vs State of UP and Anr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 340 - Dispose Perjury first]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Not followed Guidelines in Rajnesh Vs Neha Judgment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Perjury - Forged Evidence or False Statements on Oath or False Affidavit Submitted]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=22360</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A single judge of Allahabad High Court held that, perjury applications must be disposed first before deciding maintenance petitions, when false <a class="glossaryLink"  aria-describedby="tt"  data-cmtooltip="&#60;div class=glossaryItemTitle&#62;Affidavit&#60;/div&#62;&#60;div class=glossaryItemBody&#62;A written statement confirmed by oath or affirmation.&#60;/div&#62;"  href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/glossary/affidavit/"  data-gt-translate-attributes='[{"attribute":"data-cmtooltip", "format":"html"}]'  tabindex='0' role='link'>affidavit</a> of Income, Assets and Liabilities is filed. From Paras 8 onwards, 8. For considering the submission made by the learned counsel for the revisionist, it would be worthwhile to reproduce relevant portion of [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/atul-kumar-bajpai-vs-state-of-up-and-anr-on-17-sep-2025/">Atul Kumar Bajpai Vs State of UP and Anr on 17 Sep 2025</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/atul-kumar-bajpai-vs-state-of-up-and-anr-on-17-sep-2025/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jagdamba Trivedi Vs Neha Trivedi on 18 Jan 2021</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/jagdamba-trivedi-vs-neha-trivedi-on-18-jan-2021/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/jagdamba-trivedi-vs-neha-trivedi-on-18-jan-2021/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2025 15:20:40 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[High Court of Chhattisgarh Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1-Judge Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BNSS Sec 144 - Order for maintenance of wives children and parents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Catena of Landmark Judgments Referred/Cited to]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 421 - Warrant for levy of fine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Follow CrPC 421 For Maintenance Recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Issued or Recommended Guidelines or Directions or Protocols to be followed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jagdamba Trivedi Vs Neha Trivedi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Not followed Guidelines in Rajnesh Vs Neha Judgment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reportable Judgement or Order]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=22142</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A good judgment from a single judge of High Court of Chhattisgarh Judgment explaining how important it is to follow the mandate u/s 421 Cr.P.C. while executing maintenance orders u/s 125(1) Cr.P.C. From Paras 10, 11 and 12, 10.A careful perusal of the aforesaid provision would show that for recovery of the amount of maintenance, [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/jagdamba-trivedi-vs-neha-trivedi-on-18-jan-2021/">Jagdamba Trivedi Vs Neha Trivedi on 18 Jan 2021</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/jagdamba-trivedi-vs-neha-trivedi-on-18-jan-2021/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kalavakuru Srinivas Kumar Reddy Vs Kalavakuru @ Revuru Sujatha and Ors on 05 Feb 2025</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/kalavakuru-srinivas-kumar-reddy-vs-kalavakuru-revuru-sujatha-and-ors-on-05-feb-2025/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/kalavakuru-srinivas-kumar-reddy-vs-kalavakuru-revuru-sujatha-and-ors-on-05-feb-2025/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2025 13:46:45 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[High Court of Andhra Pradesh Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1-Judge Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kalavakuru Srinivas Kumar Reddy Vs Kalavakuru @ Revuru Sujatha and Ors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Landmark Case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Not followed Guidelines in Rajnesh Vs Neha Judgment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PWDV Act Sec 20 - Maintenance Order Set Aside]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rajnesh Pal Naidu Vs Neha Naidu Joshi and Anr]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=21127</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A single judge bench of Andhra Pradesh High Court held that an <a class="glossaryLink"  aria-describedby="tt"  data-cmtooltip="&#60;div class=glossaryItemTitle&#62;Order&#60;/div&#62;&#60;div class=glossaryItemBody&#62;A direction given by a court or judge.&#60;/div&#62;"  href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/glossary/order/"  data-gt-translate-attributes='[{"attribute":"data-cmtooltip", "format":"html"}]'  tabindex='0' role='link'>Order</a> for Maintenance passed without adhering to the guidelines issued by Apex Court in Rajnesh Vs Neha is liable to be set aside. From Para 6, 6. Learned counsel for the <a class="glossaryLink"  aria-describedby="tt"  data-cmtooltip="&#60;div class=glossaryItemTitle&#62;Petitioner&#60;/div&#62;&#60;div class=glossaryItemBody&#62;A person who files a petition in court.&#60;/div&#62;"  href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/glossary/petitioner/"  data-gt-translate-attributes='[{"attribute":"data-cmtooltip", "format":"html"}]'  tabindex='0' role='link'>petitioner</a> herein/husband would contend that no disclosure statement was filed by the [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/kalavakuru-srinivas-kumar-reddy-vs-kalavakuru-revuru-sujatha-and-ors-on-05-feb-2025/">Kalavakuru Srinivas Kumar Reddy Vs Kalavakuru @ Revuru Sujatha and Ors on 05 Feb 2025</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/kalavakuru-srinivas-kumar-reddy-vs-kalavakuru-revuru-sujatha-and-ors-on-05-feb-2025/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nabaghana Sahoo Vs Smruti Prava Sahoo and Anr on 11 Feb 2025</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/nabaghana-sahoo-vs-smruti-prava-sahoo-and-anr-on-11-feb-2025/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/nabaghana-sahoo-vs-smruti-prava-sahoo-and-anr-on-11-feb-2025/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Feb 2025 10:49:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[High Court of Orissa Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1-Judge Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nabaghana Sahoo Vs Smruti Prava Sahoo and Anr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Not followed Guidelines in Rajnesh Vs Neha Judgment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PWDV Act Sec 12(5) - Dispose In 60 Days]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=20996</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A single Judge from Orissa HC remanded a Maintenance Order back to <a class="glossaryLink"  aria-describedby="tt"  data-cmtooltip="&#60;div class=glossaryItemTitle&#62;Trial&#60;/div&#62;&#60;div class=glossaryItemBody&#62;A formal examination of evidence before a judge.&#60;/div&#62;"  href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/glossary/trial/"  data-gt-translate-attributes='[{"attribute":"data-cmtooltip", "format":"html"}]'  tabindex='0' role='link'>Trial</a> Court, for not complying with SC judgments in Rajnesh and Aditi, since neither of the parties has filed the disclosure affidavit as mandated in Rajnesh. From Para 2, 2. &#8230; It is further submitted by Mr. Mishra that admittedly neither of the [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/nabaghana-sahoo-vs-smruti-prava-sahoo-and-anr-on-11-feb-2025/">Nabaghana Sahoo Vs Smruti Prava Sahoo and Anr on 11 Feb 2025</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/nabaghana-sahoo-vs-smruti-prava-sahoo-and-anr-on-11-feb-2025/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nripendra Chandra Mahanta Vs Pramila Mahanta on 08 Feb 2023</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/nripendra-chandra-mahanta-vs-pramila-mahanta-on-08-feb-2023/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/nripendra-chandra-mahanta-vs-pramila-mahanta-on-08-feb-2023/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2024 17:55:27 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[High Court of Calcutta Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1-Judge Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Not followed Guidelines in Rajnesh Vs Neha Judgment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nripendra Chandra Mahanta Vs Pramila Mahanta]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=20700</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A single judge of Calcutta High Court at Jalpaiguri remanded the maintenance case back to Trial Court since husband failed to file Income affidavit. Although learned counsel for the petitioner is justified in arguing that the proposition laid down in Rajnesh vs. Neha has not been observed at all in the present case, on humanitarian [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/nripendra-chandra-mahanta-vs-pramila-mahanta-on-08-feb-2023/">Nripendra Chandra Mahanta Vs Pramila Mahanta on 08 Feb 2023</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/nripendra-chandra-mahanta-vs-pramila-mahanta-on-08-feb-2023/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Meegada Venu Gopala Rao Vs Meegada Usha Rani and Ors on 10 Jul 2024</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/meegada-venu-gopala-rao-vs-meegada-usha-rani-and-ors-on-10-jul-2024/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/meegada-venu-gopala-rao-vs-meegada-usha-rani-and-ors-on-10-jul-2024/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2024 17:13:25 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[High Court of Andhra Pradesh Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1-Judge Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meegada Venu Gopala Rao Vs Meegada Usha Rani and Ors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Not followed Guidelines in Rajnesh Vs Neha Judgment]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=20683</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A single judge of APHC relying on judgment passed in my earlier client case here, set aside the Trial Court Order and remanded the case back. From Paras 5-7, 5. Sri Raja Reddy Koneti, the learned counsel for petitioner, submits that in similar facts and circumstances, this Court by common order dated 25.04.2024 disposed of [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/meegada-venu-gopala-rao-vs-meegada-usha-rani-and-ors-on-10-jul-2024/">Meegada Venu Gopala Rao Vs Meegada Usha Rani and Ors on 10 Jul 2024</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/meegada-venu-gopala-rao-vs-meegada-usha-rani-and-ors-on-10-jul-2024/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Darshanik M M Vs  Poornima A on 04 Dec 2023</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/darshanik-m-m-vs-poornima-a-on-04-dec-2023/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/darshanik-m-m-vs-poornima-a-on-04-dec-2023/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2024 14:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[High Court of Karnataka Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1-Judge Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Darshanik M M Vs Poornima A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Not followed Guidelines in Rajnesh Vs Neha Judgment]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=20528</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A single judge of Karnataka High Court at Bengaluru Bench passed the following order in compliance of Rajnesh Pal Naidu Vs Neha Naidu Joshi and Anr on 04 Nov 2020 From Paras 4-7, 4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the amount of Rs.5 lakhs is directed to be paid from nowhere, as [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/darshanik-m-m-vs-poornima-a-on-04-dec-2023/">Darshanik M M Vs  Poornima A on 04 Dec 2023</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/darshanik-m-m-vs-poornima-a-on-04-dec-2023/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Abhilash.M.V Vs Soumya Soman on 10 Nov 2023</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/abhilash-m-v-vs-soumya-soman-on-10-nov-2023/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/abhilash-m-v-vs-soumya-soman-on-10-nov-2023/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2024 13:26:41 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[High Court of Kerala Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1-Judge Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abhilash.M.V Vs Soumya Soman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[No Opportunity given to file Counter/WS/Objections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Not followed Guidelines in Rajnesh Vs Neha Judgment]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=20513</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A single judge bench of Kerala High Court held as follows, From Paras 4-7, 4. When the revision petition came up for consideration on 20.3.2023, this Court admitted the revision petition and stayed further proceedings in M.C.No.6/2020, subject to the condition that the revision petitioner deposits the arrears of maintenance due to the second <a class="glossaryLink"  aria-describedby="tt"  data-cmtooltip="&#60;div class=glossaryItemTitle&#62;Respondent&#60;/div&#62;&#60;div class=glossaryItemBody&#62;The party against whom a case is filed.&#60;/div&#62;"  href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/glossary/respondent/"  data-gt-translate-attributes='[{"attribute":"data-cmtooltip", "format":"html"}]'  tabindex='0' role='link'>respondent</a> [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/abhilash-m-v-vs-soumya-soman-on-10-nov-2023/">Abhilash.M.V Vs Soumya Soman on 10 Nov 2023</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/abhilash-m-v-vs-soumya-soman-on-10-nov-2023/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ragimani Gangadhar Vs Ragimani Padmavathi and Anr on 08 Sep 2022</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/ragimani-gangadhar-vs-ragimani-padmavathi-and-anr-on-08-sep-2022/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/ragimani-gangadhar-vs-ragimani-padmavathi-and-anr-on-08-sep-2022/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Aug 2024 17:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[High Court of Andhra Pradesh Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1-Judge Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Not followed Guidelines in Rajnesh Vs Neha Judgment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ragimani Gangadhar Vs Ragimani Padmavathi and Anr]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=20294</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A single judge bench of AP High Court held as follows, From Para 9, 9. This Court has gone through the said judgment. It did not hold that simultaneous proceedings under different enactments cannot be made. In fixing quantum of maintenance, it would be relevant in bringing to <a class="glossaryLink"  aria-describedby="tt"  data-cmtooltip="&#60;div class=glossaryItemTitle&#62;Notice&#60;/div&#62;&#60;div class=glossaryItemBody&#62;Information given officially regarding legal proceedings.&#60;/div&#62;"  href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/glossary/notice/"  data-gt-translate-attributes='[{"attribute":"data-cmtooltip", "format":"html"}]'  tabindex='0' role='link'>notice</a> of the Court about filing of [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/ragimani-gangadhar-vs-ragimani-padmavathi-and-anr-on-08-sep-2022/">Ragimani Gangadhar Vs Ragimani Padmavathi and Anr on 08 Sep 2022</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/ragimani-gangadhar-vs-ragimani-padmavathi-and-anr-on-08-sep-2022/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>K Sreekanth Naik Vs P Nalini and Anr on 25 Apr 2024</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/k-sreekanth-naik-vs-p-nalini-and-anr-on-25-apr-2024/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/k-sreekanth-naik-vs-p-nalini-and-anr-on-25-apr-2024/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2024 19:44:31 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[High Court of Andhra Pradesh Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1-Judge Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BNSS Sec 144 - Order for maintenance of wives children and parents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Catena of Landmark Judgments Referred/Cited to]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 125 or BNSS 144 - Order for Maintenance of Wives Children and Parents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[K Sreekanth Naik Vs P Nalini and Anr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Landmark Case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Not followed Guidelines in Rajnesh Vs Neha Judgment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rajnesh Pal Naidu Vs Neha Naidu Joshi and Anr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reportable Judgement or Order]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=19786</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A single judge bench of Andhra Pradesh High Court held that an Order for Maintenance passed without adhering to the guidelines issued by Apex Court in Rajnesh Vs Neha is liable to be set aside. From Para 5, 5. During the <a class="glossaryLink"  aria-describedby="tt"  data-cmtooltip="&#60;div class=glossaryItemTitle&#62;Hearing&#60;/div&#62;&#60;div class=glossaryItemBody&#62;A proceeding before a judge to examine facts.&#60;/div&#62;"  href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/glossary/hearing/"  data-gt-translate-attributes='[{"attribute":"data-cmtooltip", "format":"html"}]'  tabindex='0' role='link'>hearing</a>, it is brought to the notice of the Court that both parties have [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/k-sreekanth-naik-vs-p-nalini-and-anr-on-25-apr-2024/">K Sreekanth Naik Vs P Nalini and Anr on 25 Apr 2024</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/k-sreekanth-naik-vs-p-nalini-and-anr-on-25-apr-2024/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 
Lazy Loading (feed)
Minified using Disk

Served from: www.shadesofknife.in @ 2026-10-23 17:10:48 by W3 Total Cache
-->