<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>No Territorial Jurisdiction Archives - Shades of Knife</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/tag/no-territorial-jurisdiction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/tag/no-territorial-jurisdiction/</link>
	<description>True Colors of a Vile Wife</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 06:00:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Nirman Sagar Vs Monika Sagar Chaudhari and Anr on 01 Apr 2022</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/nirman-sagar-vs-monika-sagar-chaudhari-and-anr-on-01-apr-2022/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/nirman-sagar-vs-monika-sagar-chaudhari-and-anr-on-01-apr-2022/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2024 05:24:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[High Court of Madhya Pradesh Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1-Judge Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 125 or BNSS 144 - Order for Maintenance of Wives Children and Parents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 126 - Procedure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nirman Sagar Vs Monika Sagar Chaudhari and Anr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[No Territorial Jurisdiction]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=19177</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A single judge of Madhya Pradesh High Court at Gwalior bench held as follows, From Para 9, 9. Thus, the proceedings under Section 125 of Cr.P.C. may be taken against any person in any district where he or his wife resides or where he last resided with her wife or as the case may be [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/nirman-sagar-vs-monika-sagar-chaudhari-and-anr-on-01-apr-2022/">Nirman Sagar Vs Monika Sagar Chaudhari and Anr on 01 Apr 2022</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/nirman-sagar-vs-monika-sagar-chaudhari-and-anr-on-01-apr-2022/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Indian Olympic Association Vs Kerala Olympic Association and Ors on 06 Nov 2020</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/indian-olympic-association-vs-kerala-olympic-association-and-ors-on-06-nov-2020/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/indian-olympic-association-vs-kerala-olympic-association-and-ors-on-06-nov-2020/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2020 19:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1-Judge Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Catena of Landmark Judgments Referred/Cited to]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indian Olympic Association Vs Kerala Olympic Association and Ors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[No Territorial Jurisdiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transfer Petition Rejected]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=11957</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Single-judge bench held that, if a if a court has no <a class="glossaryLink"  aria-describedby="tt"  data-cmtooltip="&#60;div class=glossaryItemTitle&#62;Jurisdiction&#60;/div&#62;&#60;div class=glossaryItemBody&#62;The authority of a court to hear a case.&#60;/div&#62;"  href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/glossary/jurisdiction/"  data-gt-translate-attributes='[{"attribute":"data-cmtooltip", "format":"html"}]'  tabindex='0' role='link'>jurisdiction</a> to try a lis, it is good for the party raising the issue of jurisdiction to seek the dismissal/return of the proceedings, rather than seeking a transfer. From Para 14, 14. Suffice it to say that if a court has no jurisdiction to [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/indian-olympic-association-vs-kerala-olympic-association-and-ors-on-06-nov-2020/">Indian Olympic Association Vs Kerala Olympic Association and Ors on 06 Nov 2020</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/indian-olympic-association-vs-kerala-olympic-association-and-ors-on-06-nov-2020/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Deepak Kumar @ Deepak Saha Vs Hindustan Media Ventrues Ltd and Ors on 06 July 2017</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/deepak-kumar-deepak-saha-vs-hindustan-media-ventrues-ltd-ors-on-06-july-2017/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/deepak-kumar-deepak-saha-vs-hindustan-media-ventrues-ltd-ors-on-06-july-2017/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2019 08:40:21 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[High Court of Delhi Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 199 - Defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deepak Kumar @ Deepak Saha Vs Hindustan Media Ventrues Ltd and Ors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPC 499 - Defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPC 500 - Punishment For Defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[No Territorial Jurisdiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Work-In-Progress Article]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=5492</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>This case is regards to the Defamation plaint to be presented to the court of correct territorial jurisdiction. Citations: [ Indiankanoon.org or ILR link: The Index for Defamation Judgments is here. Reproduced in accordance with Section 52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from main.sci.gov.in/judgments, judis.nic.in, lobis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court and District [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/deepak-kumar-deepak-saha-vs-hindustan-media-ventrues-ltd-ors-on-06-july-2017/">Deepak Kumar @ Deepak Saha Vs Hindustan Media Ventrues Ltd and Ors on 06 July 2017</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/deepak-kumar-deepak-saha-vs-hindustan-media-ventrues-ltd-ors-on-06-july-2017/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rajesh Gutta Vs State of A.P. on 1 March, 2011</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/rajesh-gutta-vs-state-of-a-p-on-1-march-2011/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/rajesh-gutta-vs-state-of-a-p-on-1-march-2011/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2018 18:49:32 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[High Court of Andhra Pradesh Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 161 - Examination of Witnesses By Police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 162 - Statements To Police Not To Be Signed - Use Of Statements In Evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 188 - Offence Committed Outside India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 482 – Criminal Proceeding Quashed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delay or Unexplained Delay In Filing Complaint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Procedure Explained - Interpretation of Statutes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[No Territorial Jurisdiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rajesh Gutta Vs State of A.P.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[What is Investigation]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=3877</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Hon&#8217;ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh held that, In which it is clearly stated that the police Officer has to question the victim girl, witnesses and contradict the witnesses and record the same. In the present case, the statement of the victim girl is concerned, the investigation officer stated in the charge sheet that he [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/rajesh-gutta-vs-state-of-a-p-on-1-march-2011/">Rajesh Gutta Vs State of A.P. on 1 March, 2011</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/rajesh-gutta-vs-state-of-a-p-on-1-march-2011/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chandralekha Vs State Of Rajasthan &#038; Anr on 14 December, 2012</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/chandralekha-vs-state-of-rajasthan-anr-on-14-december-2012/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/chandralekha-vs-state-of-rajasthan-anr-on-14-december-2012/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2018 15:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2-Judge (Division) Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Absurd Or After Thought Or Baseless Or False Or General Or Inherently Improbable Or Improved Or UnSpecific Or Omnibus Or Vague Allegations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chandralekha Vs State Of Rajasthan and Anr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delay or Unexplained Delay In Filing Complaint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discourage Roping In All Relatives Of In-Laws Or Distant Relatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[No Territorial Jurisdiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Non-Reportable Judgement or Order]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Not Continuing Offence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Willful Desertion By Knife]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=3846</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>This judgment should have been a reported one for it covers soo many good points to dustbin the complaint of the knife against the family members. Read the tags for more info. From Para 8, &#8230;. However, after a careful perusal of the FIR and after taking into consideration the attendant circumstances, we are of [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/chandralekha-vs-state-of-rajasthan-anr-on-14-december-2012/">Chandralekha Vs State Of Rajasthan &#038; Anr on 14 December, 2012</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/chandralekha-vs-state-of-rajasthan-anr-on-14-december-2012/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>G.Ramamoorthy Vs The State Of Karnataka on 31 July, 2017</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/g-ramamoorthy-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-31-july-2017/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/g-ramamoorthy-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-31-july-2017/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2018 14:31:02 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[High Court of Karnataka Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 482 - Quash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 482 – IPC 498A Quashed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[G.Ramamoorthy Vs The State Of Karnataka]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPC 498a - Not Made Out]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[No Territorial Jurisdiction]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=3718</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>This is the quash judgment from hon&#8217;ble high court of Karnataka, relying on Y Abhraham Ajith case, wherein it was held that when all allegations are stated to have happened at Vellore, Tamilnadu, Indiranagar police doesn&#8217;t have jurisdiction to file the FIR in Bengaluru, Karnataka. &#160;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/g-ramamoorthy-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-31-july-2017/">G.Ramamoorthy Vs The State Of Karnataka on 31 July, 2017</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/g-ramamoorthy-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-31-july-2017/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>State vs Mumtaz Ali &#038; Anr on 8 August, 2017</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/state-vs-mumtaz-ali-anr-on-8-august-2017/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/state-vs-mumtaz-ali-anr-on-8-august-2017/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2018 14:20:39 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[High Court of Rajasthan Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPC 406 - Not Made Out]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPC 498a - Not Made Out]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[No Territorial Jurisdiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Not Continuing Offence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State vs Mumtaz Ali and Anr]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=3714</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>This is a short revision <a class="glossaryLink"  aria-describedby="tt"  data-cmtooltip="&#60;div class=glossaryItemTitle&#62;Order&#60;/div&#62;&#60;div class=glossaryItemBody&#62;A direction given by a court or judge.&#60;/div&#62;"  href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/glossary/order/"  data-gt-translate-attributes='[{"attribute":"data-cmtooltip", "format":"html"}]'  tabindex='0' role='link'>order</a> from hon&#8217;ble High Court of Rajasthan, wherein it was held that due to limitation restriction, the complaint was time barred and as such Magistrate was right in not taking cognizance of this case. The knife filed 498A case after separating from husband for 10-12 years!!! And the sweet response [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/state-vs-mumtaz-ali-anr-on-8-august-2017/">State vs Mumtaz Ali &#038; Anr on 8 August, 2017</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/state-vs-mumtaz-ali-anr-on-8-august-2017/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>City Union Bank Vs Venugopal on 19 March, 2013</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/city-union-bank-vs-venugopal-on-19-march-2013/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/city-union-bank-vs-venugopal-on-19-march-2013/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2018 08:51:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[High Court of Karnataka Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[City Union Bank Vs Venugopal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[No Territorial Jurisdiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transfer of Criminal Case]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=3650</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In this case, hon&#8217;ble High Court of Karnataka, has not done quash but ordered the case to be transferred to a different police station, as the original PS has no jurisdiction to investigate the case.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/city-union-bank-vs-venugopal-on-19-march-2013/">City Union Bank Vs Venugopal on 19 March, 2013</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/city-union-bank-vs-venugopal-on-19-march-2013/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Manju Dutta Vs The State &#038; Ors. on 29 January, 2013</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/manju-dutta-vs-the-state-ors-on-29-january-2013/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/manju-dutta-vs-the-state-ors-on-29-january-2013/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2018 14:28:08 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[High Court of Delhi Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 397/401 - Revision Dismissed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manju Dutta Vs The State and Ors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[No Territorial Jurisdiction]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=3625</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In this judgment from Hon&#8217;ble High Court of Delhi, it was held that if there are no allegations of any offence taking place within the jurisdiction of this Court the falsely instituted IPC 498A/406 case was liable to be quashed. In addition, it was held that, At the same time in view of the judgment [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/manju-dutta-vs-the-state-ors-on-29-january-2013/">Manju Dutta Vs The State &#038; Ors. on 29 January, 2013</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/manju-dutta-vs-the-state-ors-on-29-january-2013/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Yadwinder Singh &#038; Others vs State Of H.P. &#038; Others on 10 August, 2018</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/yadwinder-singh-others-vs-state-of-h-p-others-on-10-august-2018/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/yadwinder-singh-others-vs-state-of-h-p-others-on-10-august-2018/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2018 11:58:25 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[High Court of Himachal Pradesh Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 482 - Quash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 482 - Saving of inherent powers of High Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[No Territorial Jurisdiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandeep Pamarati]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yadwinder Singh and Others vs State Of H.P. and Others]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=3596</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A detailed judgment from Hon&#8217;ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh, categorically held that police at Nalagarh had no jurisdiction, as has/had been held hereinabove, proceedings if any pending before Courts at Nalagarh cannot be allowed to sustain and thereby the FIR dated 7.10.2014 as well as consequent proceedings are quashed and set aside And the [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/yadwinder-singh-others-vs-state-of-h-p-others-on-10-august-2018/">Yadwinder Singh &#038; Others vs State Of H.P. &#038; Others on 10 August, 2018</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/yadwinder-singh-others-vs-state-of-h-p-others-on-10-august-2018/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 
Lazy Loading (feed)
Minified using Disk

Served from: www.shadesofknife.in @ 2026-10-23 17:06:56 by W3 Total Cache
-->