<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>No Grave Suspicion Against Accused Archives - Shades of Knife</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/tag/no-grave-suspicion-against-accused/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/tag/no-grave-suspicion-against-accused/</link>
	<description>True Colors of a Vile Wife</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 18:57:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Dr Gaurav Paul Vs Dr Deepali Arora on 07 May 2016</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/dr-gaurav-paul-vs-dr-deepali-arora-on-07-may-2016/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/dr-gaurav-paul-vs-dr-deepali-arora-on-07-may-2016/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2020 14:34:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[District or Sessions or Magistrate Court Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Absurd Or After Thought Or Baseless Or False Or General Or Inherently Improbable Or Improved Or UnSpecific Or Omnibus Or Vague Allegations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 239 - Discharged]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discourage Roping In All Relatives Of In-Laws Or Distant Relatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dr Gaurav Paul Vs Dr Deepali Arora]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[No Grave Suspicion Against Accused]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Two Views Possible - Suspicion Vs Grave Suspicion]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=12135</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>All the members of the family accused of 498A IPC offence were discharged as there was no material to prosecute them. There was once a time when copy of complaint in a 498A IPC case was not given to accused, to exercise FIR Quash etc. Had to file RTI application to Police CPIO !!!</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/dr-gaurav-paul-vs-dr-deepali-arora-on-07-may-2016/">Dr Gaurav Paul Vs Dr Deepali Arora on 07 May 2016</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/dr-gaurav-paul-vs-dr-deepali-arora-on-07-may-2016/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Yogesh @ Sachin Jagdish Joshi Vs State of Maharashtra on 28 April, 2008</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/yogesh-sachin-jagdish-joshi-vs-state-of-maharashtra-on-28-april-2008/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Nov 2019 17:13:35 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 227 - Discharged]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 227 - Exercise of Judicial Mind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Landmark Case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Procedure Explained - Interpretation of Statutes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[No Grave Suspicion Against Accused]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Two Views Possible - Suspicion Vs Grave Suspicion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yogesh @ Sachin Jagdish Joshi Vs State of Maharashtra]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=7744</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Apex Court had held that, &#8220;15. It is trite that the words &#8220;not sufficient ground for proceeding against the accused&#8221; appearing in the Section postulate exercise of judicial mind on the part of the Judge to the facts of the case in <a class="glossaryLink"  aria-describedby="tt"  data-cmtooltip="&#60;div class=glossaryItemTitle&#62;Order&#60;/div&#62;&#60;div class=glossaryItemBody&#62;A direction given by a court or judge.&#60;/div&#62;"  href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/glossary/order/"  data-gt-translate-attributes='[{"attribute":"data-cmtooltip", "format":"html"}]'  tabindex='0' role='link'>order</a> to determine whether a case for <a class="glossaryLink"  aria-describedby="tt"  data-cmtooltip="&#60;div class=glossaryItemTitle&#62;Trial&#60;/div&#62;&#60;div class=glossaryItemBody&#62;A formal examination of evidence before a judge.&#60;/div&#62;"  href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/glossary/trial/"  data-gt-translate-attributes='[{"attribute":"data-cmtooltip", "format":"html"}]'  tabindex='0' role='link'>trial</a> has been made out [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/yogesh-sachin-jagdish-joshi-vs-state-of-maharashtra-on-28-april-2008/">Yogesh @ Sachin Jagdish Joshi Vs State of Maharashtra on 28 April, 2008</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chandra Shekhar Alias Lalla Vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 24 April, 2018</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/chandra-shekhar-alias-lalla-vs-the-state-of-madhya-pradesh-on-24-april-2018/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/chandra-shekhar-alias-lalla-vs-the-state-of-madhya-pradesh-on-24-april-2018/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2018 06:14:37 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[High Court of Madhya Pradesh Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Catena of Landmark Judgments Referred/Cited to]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chandra Shekhar Alias Lalla Vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 397/401 - Revision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPC 294 - Obscene acts and songs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPC 307 - Attempt to murder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[No Grave Suspicion Against Accused]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=2362</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Another wonderful judgment from Hon&#8217;ble Apex Court in regards to the principle if grave suspicion exist the trial court should commit the case to trial. A lot of judgments are citing herein.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/chandra-shekhar-alias-lalla-vs-the-state-of-madhya-pradesh-on-24-april-2018/">Chandra Shekhar Alias Lalla Vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 24 April, 2018</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/chandra-shekhar-alias-lalla-vs-the-state-of-madhya-pradesh-on-24-april-2018/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>CBI, Hyderabad Vs K. Narayana Rao on 21 September, 2012</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/cbi-hyderabad-vs-k-narayana-rao-on-21-september-2012/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/cbi-hyderabad-vs-k-narayana-rao-on-21-september-2012/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2018 06:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Absurd Or After Thought Or Baseless Or False Or General Or Inherently Improbable Or Improved Or UnSpecific Or Omnibus Or Vague Allegations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBI Hyderabad Vs K. Narayana Rao]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 227 - Discharge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 228 - Framing of charge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 482 – FIR Quashed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[No Grave Suspicion Against Accused]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PIL - Advertising by Advocates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reportable Judgement or Order]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=2365</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>This Judgment from Apex Court based on Sajjan Kumar case affirms that the liability against an opining advocate arises only when the lawyer was an active participant in a plan to defraud. 22) &#8230; In the law of negligence, professionals such as lawyers, doctors, architects and others are included in the category of persons professing [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/cbi-hyderabad-vs-k-narayana-rao-on-21-september-2012/">CBI, Hyderabad Vs K. Narayana Rao on 21 September, 2012</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/cbi-hyderabad-vs-k-narayana-rao-on-21-september-2012/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dilawar Balu Kurane Vs State of Maharashtra on 8 January, 2002</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/dilawar-balu-kurane-vs-state-of-maharashtra-on-8-january-2002/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/dilawar-balu-kurane-vs-state-of-maharashtra-on-8-january-2002/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2018 19:24:21 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 227 - Discharge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dilawar Balu Kurane Vs State Of Maharashtra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Landmark Case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Procedure Explained - Interpretation of Statutes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[No Grave Suspicion Against Accused]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reportable Judgement or Order]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=2356</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Nice judgment from Apex Court regarding discharge of an accused under S 227 of CrPC. In exercising powers under Section 227 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the settled position of law is that the Judge while considering the question of framing the charges under the said section has the undoubted power to sift and [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/dilawar-balu-kurane-vs-state-of-maharashtra-on-8-january-2002/">Dilawar Balu Kurane Vs State of Maharashtra on 8 January, 2002</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/dilawar-balu-kurane-vs-state-of-maharashtra-on-8-january-2002/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Union of India Vs Prafulla Kumar Samal and Anr on 6 Nov 1978</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/union-of-india-vs-prafulla-kumar-samal-and-anr-on-6-nov-1978/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/union-of-india-vs-prafulla-kumar-samal-and-anr-on-6-nov-1978/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2018 13:37:03 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2-Judge (Division) Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 227 - Discharge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 227 - Discharged]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Landmark Case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Procedure Explained - Interpretation of Statutes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[No Grave Suspicion Against Accused]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reportable Judgement or Order]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Union Of India Vs Prafulla Kumar Samal and Anr]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=2347</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Awesome judgment from Hon&#8217;ble Apex Court whereby a person is discharged under section 227 Cr.P.C. from the offence under Prevention of Corruption Act. From Para 3 The short point which arises for determination in this case is the scope and ambit of an order of discharge to be passed by a Special Judge under section [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/union-of-india-vs-prafulla-kumar-samal-and-anr-on-6-nov-1978/">Union of India Vs Prafulla Kumar Samal and Anr on 6 Nov 1978</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/union-of-india-vs-prafulla-kumar-samal-and-anr-on-6-nov-1978/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 
Lazy Loading (feed)
Minified using Disk

Served from: www.shadesofknife.in @ 2026-08-23 13:17:42 by W3 Total Cache
-->