<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Misuse of Section 498A of IPC Archives - Shades of Knife</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/tag/misuse-of-ipc-498a/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/tag/misuse-of-ipc-498a/</link>
	<description>True Colors of a Vile Wife</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2026 11:21:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Asha G Vs State of Karnataka on 6 Jan 2026 &#8211; Judgement Summary</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/asha-g-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-6-jan-2026/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/asha-g-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-6-jan-2026/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Suprajaa Rajan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2026 10:50:21 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[High Court of Karnataka Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1-Judge Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abuse Or Misuse of Process of Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asha G Vs State of Karnataka]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 482 - Quash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 482 – IPC 498A Quashed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matrimonial Criminal Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matrimonial dispute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Misuse of Section 498A of IPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quashing of FIR]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=23123</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>498A IPC: Karnataka High Court Quashes Case Against Neighbour Under CrPC 482 (BNSS 528) In Asha G Vs State of Karnataka,&#160;the High Court of Karnataka addressed a crucial legal issue regarding the misuse of Section 498A IPC in matrimonial disputes. The <a class="glossaryLink"  aria-describedby="tt"  data-cmtooltip="&#60;div class=glossaryItemTitle&#62;Petitioner&#60;/div&#62;&#60;div class=glossaryItemBody&#62;A person who files a petition in court.&#60;/div&#62;"  href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/glossary/petitioner/"  data-gt-translate-attributes='[{"attribute":"data-cmtooltip", "format":"html"}]'  tabindex='0' role='link'>petitioner</a>, who was merely a neighbour of the complainant, sought quashing of criminal proceedings [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/asha-g-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-6-jan-2026/">Asha G Vs State of Karnataka on 6 Jan 2026 &#8211; Judgement Summary</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/asha-g-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-6-jan-2026/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rajesh Chaddha Vs State of Uttar Pradesh on 13 May 2025 &#8211; Judgement Summary</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/vague-allegations-cannot-sustain-conviction-under-section-498a-ipc/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/vague-allegations-cannot-sustain-conviction-under-section-498a-ipc/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Suprajaa Rajan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2026 14:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Acquitted in IPC 498A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dowry Prohibition Act 1961]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matrimonial Criminal Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matrimonial Litigation India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Misuse of Section 498A of IPC]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=22992</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In Rajesh Chaddha v. State of Uttar Pradesh, the&#160;Supreme Court held that vague and omnibus allegations cannot sustain a conviction under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961. The Court examined a case where the husband challenged his conviction for alleged cruelty and dowry [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/vague-allegations-cannot-sustain-conviction-under-section-498a-ipc/">Rajesh Chaddha Vs State of Uttar Pradesh on 13 May 2025 &#8211; Judgement Summary</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/vague-allegations-cannot-sustain-conviction-under-section-498a-ipc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Raj Kamal Yadav and Anr Vs Manju Yadav and Other on 7 Aug 2025</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/raj-kamal-yadav-and-anr-vs-manju-yadav-and-other-on-7-aug-2025/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/raj-kamal-yadav-and-anr-vs-manju-yadav-and-other-on-7-aug-2025/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2025 18:46:48 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[High Court of Delhi Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1-Judge Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 482 – Criminal Proceeding Quashed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discourage Roping In All Relatives Of In-Laws Or Distant Relatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Maxims]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Misuse of Section 498A of IPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Misuse of Women-Centric Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Raj Kamal Yadav and Anr Vs Manju Yadav and Other]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=21890</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A single Judge of Delhi High Court held as follows, From Para 15, 15. First and foremost, it may be noted that the allegation of &#8220;arm twisting&#8221; the <a class="glossaryLink"  aria-describedby="tt"  data-cmtooltip="&#60;div class=glossaryItemTitle&#62;Respondent&#60;/div&#62;&#60;div class=glossaryItemBody&#62;The party against whom a case is filed.&#60;/div&#62;"  href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/glossary/respondent/"  data-gt-translate-attributes='[{"attribute":"data-cmtooltip", "format":"html"}]'  tabindex='0' role='link'>respondent</a> by the petitioners is a fine piece of irony. In fact, if anyone is twisting arms here, it is the respondent herself. Of course, not in [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/raj-kamal-yadav-and-anr-vs-manju-yadav-and-other-on-7-aug-2025/">Raj Kamal Yadav and Anr Vs Manju Yadav and Other on 7 Aug 2025</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/raj-kamal-yadav-and-anr-vs-manju-yadav-and-other-on-7-aug-2025/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dara Lakshmi Narayana and 6 Ors Vs State of Telangana and Anr on 10 Dec 2024</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/dara-lakshmi-narayana-and-6-ors-vs-state-of-telangana-and-anr-on-10-dec-2024/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/dara-lakshmi-narayana-and-6-ors-vs-state-of-telangana-and-anr-on-10-dec-2024/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2025 18:05:38 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2-Judge (Division) Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abuse Or Misuse of Process of Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Counterblast case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dara Lakshmi Narayana and 6 Ors Vs State of Telangana and Anr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Landmark Case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Misuse of Section 498A of IPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Misuse of Women-Centric Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reportable Judgement or Order]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=21579</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A division bench of Apex Court hung the false 498A IPC case high and dry and reminded the High Courts of their solemn duty to stop the misuse of matrimonial laws as weapons. From Para 8, 8. Learned counsel for the appellants submitted that the appellants never demanded any dowry from respondent No.2. Respondent No.2 [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/dara-lakshmi-narayana-and-6-ors-vs-state-of-telangana-and-anr-on-10-dec-2024/">Dara Lakshmi Narayana and 6 Ors Vs State of Telangana and Anr on 10 Dec 2024</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/dara-lakshmi-narayana-and-6-ors-vs-state-of-telangana-and-anr-on-10-dec-2024/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mohammad Wajid and Anr Vs State of U.P. and Ors on 08 Aug 2023</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/mohammad-wajid-and-anr-vs-state-of-u-p-and-ors-on-08-aug-2023/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/mohammad-wajid-and-anr-vs-state-of-u-p-and-ors-on-08-aug-2023/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2025 18:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2-Judge (Division) Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abuse Or Misuse of Process of Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Misuse of Section 498A of IPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Misuse of Women-Centric Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mohammad Wajid and Anr Vs State of U.P. and Ors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reportable Judgement or Order]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=21573</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A division bench of Supreme Court cautioned High Courts about malicious matrimonial cases. From Para 30, 30. At this stage, we would like to observe something important. Whenever an accused comes before the Court invoking either the inherent powers under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) or extraordinary <a class="glossaryLink"  aria-describedby="tt"  data-cmtooltip="&#60;div class=glossaryItemTitle&#62;Jurisdiction&#60;/div&#62;&#60;div class=glossaryItemBody&#62;The authority of a court to hear a case.&#60;/div&#62;"  href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/glossary/jurisdiction/"  data-gt-translate-attributes='[{"attribute":"data-cmtooltip", "format":"html"}]'  tabindex='0' role='link'>jurisdiction</a> under Article 226 [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/mohammad-wajid-and-anr-vs-state-of-u-p-and-ors-on-08-aug-2023/">Mohammad Wajid and Anr Vs State of U.P. and Ors on 08 Aug 2023</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/mohammad-wajid-and-anr-vs-state-of-u-p-and-ors-on-08-aug-2023/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ajay Rajendra Khare and Ors Vs State of Maharashtra on 10 Jun 2025</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/ajay-rajendra-khare-and-ors-vs-state-of-maharashtra-on-10-jun-2025/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/ajay-rajendra-khare-and-ors-vs-state-of-maharashtra-on-10-jun-2025/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2025 18:35:52 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[High Court of Bombay Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2-Judge (Division) Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abuse Or Misuse of Process of Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ajay Rajendra Khare and Ors Vs State of Maharashtra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Misuse of Public Funds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Misuse of Section 498A of IPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Misuse of Women-Centric Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reportable Judgement or Order]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=21567</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A division bench of Bombay High Court at Aurangabad Bench identified a fake case and dust-binned it. From Para 7, 7 At the outset, we would like to start with observations that in matrimonial disputes suppression of facts carry importance. In fact, the marriage stands on the footing of faith, feelings and respect for each [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/ajay-rajendra-khare-and-ors-vs-state-of-maharashtra-on-10-jun-2025/">Ajay Rajendra Khare and Ors Vs State of Maharashtra on 10 Jun 2025</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/ajay-rajendra-khare-and-ors-vs-state-of-maharashtra-on-10-jun-2025/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Yashodeep Bisanrao Vadode Vs State of Maharashtra and Anr on 21 Oct 2024</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/yashodeep-bisanrao-vadode-vs-state-of-maharashtra-and-anr-on-21-oct-2024/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/yashodeep-bisanrao-vadode-vs-state-of-maharashtra-and-anr-on-21-oct-2024/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Oct 2024 11:27:32 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2-Judge (Division) Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Misuse of Section 498A of IPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Misuse of Women-Centric Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Non-Reportable Judgement or Order]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yashodeep Bisanrao Vadode Vs State of Maharashtra and Anr]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=20744</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A division bench of Apex Court held that it is a matter of common knowledge that exaggerated versions of the incident are reflected in a large number of complaints and the tendency of over implication is also reflected in a large number of cases. From Paras 11-13, 11. In the contextual situation, it is only [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/yashodeep-bisanrao-vadode-vs-state-of-maharashtra-and-anr-on-21-oct-2024/">Yashodeep Bisanrao Vadode Vs State of Maharashtra and Anr on 21 Oct 2024</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/yashodeep-bisanrao-vadode-vs-state-of-maharashtra-and-anr-on-21-oct-2024/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Krishnanand Mishra and Anr Vs State of Jharkhand on 09 Aug 2023</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/krishnanand-mishra-and-anr-vs-state-of-jharkhand-on-09-aug-2023/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/krishnanand-mishra-and-anr-vs-state-of-jharkhand-on-09-aug-2023/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2024 19:24:35 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[High Court of Jharkhand Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1-Judge Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Absurd Or After Thought Or Baseless Or False Or General Or Inherently Improbable Or Improved Or UnSpecific Or Omnibus Or Vague Allegations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abuse Or Misuse of Process of Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Catena of Landmark Judgments Referred/Cited to]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Krishnanand Mishra and Anr Vs State of Jharkhand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Misuse of Section 498A of IPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Misuse of Women-Centric Laws]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=20555</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A single bench judge of Jharkhand High Court quashed the false 498A IPC case against brother-in-law (Nandoi) and sister-in-law (Nanad). From Paras 11 and 12, 11. Section 498-A of the Indian Penal Code was inserted in the statute with pious view for punishing cruelty of the husband, however, nowadays, the said Section is being misused [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/krishnanand-mishra-and-anr-vs-state-of-jharkhand-on-09-aug-2023/">Krishnanand Mishra and Anr Vs State of Jharkhand on 09 Aug 2023</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/krishnanand-mishra-and-anr-vs-state-of-jharkhand-on-09-aug-2023/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Achin Gupta Vs State of Haryana and Anr on 03 May 2024</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/achin-gupta-vs-state-of-haryana-and-anr-on-03-may-2024/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/achin-gupta-vs-state-of-haryana-and-anr-on-03-may-2024/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2024 20:28:18 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2-Judge (Division) Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abuse Or Misuse of Process of Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Achin Gupta Vs State of Haryana and Anr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Catena of Landmark Judgments Referred/Cited to]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discourage Roping In All Relatives Of In-Laws Or Distant Relatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Landmark Case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Misuse of Section 498A of IPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Misuse of Women-Centric Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reportable Judgement or Order]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=19810</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A division bench of the Apex Court held as follows, From Para 31-32, 31. We are of the view that the category 7 referred to above should be taken into consideration and applied in a case like the one on hand a bit liberally. If the Court is convinced by the fact that the involvement [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/achin-gupta-vs-state-of-haryana-and-anr-on-03-may-2024/">Achin Gupta Vs State of Haryana and Anr on 03 May 2024</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/achin-gupta-vs-state-of-haryana-and-anr-on-03-may-2024/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mainoddin Vs State of Karnataka on 02 Feb 2024</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/mainoddin-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-02-feb-2024/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/mainoddin-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-02-feb-2024/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Mar 2024 10:28:25 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2-Judge (Division) Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abuse Or Misuse of Process of Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discourage Roping In All Relatives Of In-Laws Or Distant Relatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPC 498a - Not Made Out Against Parents or Relatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mainoddin Vs State of Karnataka]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Misuse of Section 498A of IPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Misuse of Women-Centric Laws]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=19288</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A division bench of Apex Court held that, &#8216;vague,general and omnibus allegations against the family members/relatives implicating them in matrimonial disputes are an abuse of process of law.&#8217; From Paras 4 and 5, 4. The present appellant is the younger brother of the husband of complainant-respondent no.2 and the only allegation made against him in [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/mainoddin-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-02-feb-2024/">Mainoddin Vs State of Karnataka on 02 Feb 2024</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/mainoddin-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-02-feb-2024/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 
Lazy Loading (feed)
Minified using Disk

Served from: www.shadesofknife.in @ 2026-06-24 07:54:36 by W3 Total Cache
-->