<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PWDV Act Sec 20 - Maintenance Denied Archives - Shades of Knife</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/tag/maintenance-denied-in-dvc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/tag/maintenance-denied-in-dvc/</link>
	<description>True Colors of a Vile Wife</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2026 08:00:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.3</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Maintenance Judgments</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/maintenance-judgments/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2019 12:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Assorted Court Judgments or Orders or Notifications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Catena of Landmark Judgments Referred/Cited to]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 125 or BNSS 144 - Maintenance Denied]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 125 or BNSS 144 - Maintenance Granted]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC Sec 125 or BNSS Sec 144 - Interim Maintenance Denied]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC Sec 125 or BNSS Sec 144 - Interim Maintenance Granted]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HM Act Sec 24 - Interim Maintenance Denied]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HM Act Sec 24 - Interim Maintenance Granted]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Not followed Guidelines in Rajnesh Vs Neha Judgment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PWDV Act Sec 20 - Maintenance Denied]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PWDV Act Sec 20 - Maintenance Granted]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Summary Post]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=7701</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Maintenance judgments by Enactment Maintenance and Alimony Judgments under Hindu Marriage Act 1955 here. Maintenance Judgments under Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act 1956 here. Maintenance Judgments under Section 125 CrPC [Section 144 BNSS] here. Maintenance Judgments under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 here. Maintenance for Limited Time Period here. Maintenance after Mutual [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/maintenance-judgments/">Maintenance Judgments</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shabnam Parveen Vs The State of West Bengal &#038; Ors on 24 November, 2017</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/shabnam-parveen-vs-the-state-of-west-bengal-ors-on-24-november-2017/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2019 14:20:03 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[High Court of Calcutta Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Muslim DV Case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pay No Maintenance to Daughter-in-Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PIL - CrPC 125 or BNSS 144 Must Go From Statute Book]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PWDV Act Sec 20 - Maintenance Denied]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shabnam Parveen Vs The State of West Bengal and Ors]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=6478</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>High Court of Calcutta (appellette side) has held that u/s 36 of PWDV Act, PWDV Act provisions are in addition to existing laws and basing that argument held that since the complainant (Shabnam Parveen) and the <a class="glossaryLink"  aria-describedby="tt"  data-cmtooltip="&#60;div class=glossaryItemTitle&#62;Respondent&#60;/div&#62;&#60;div class=glossaryItemBody&#62;The party against whom a case is filed.&#60;/div&#62;"  href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/glossary/respondent/"  data-gt-translate-attributes='[{"attribute":"data-cmtooltip", "format":"html"}]'  tabindex='0' role='link'>respondent</a> are mohammaden, the respondent, being father-in-law, is under no obligation to provide maintain allowance to the widow of [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/shabnam-parveen-vs-the-state-of-west-bengal-ors-on-24-november-2017/">Shabnam Parveen Vs The State of West Bengal &#038; Ors on 24 November, 2017</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mamta Gautam Wankhede Vs Gautam Sukhdev Wankhede on 2 February, 2018</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/mamta-gautam-wankhede-vs-gautam-sukhdev-wankhede-on-2-february-2018/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/mamta-gautam-wankhede-vs-gautam-sukhdev-wankhede-on-2-february-2018/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2018 14:15:07 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[High Court of Bombay Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Double Jeopardy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mamta Gautam Wankhede Vs Gautam Sukhdev Wankhede]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PIL - CrPC 125 or BNSS 144 Must Go From Statute Book]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PWDV Act Sec 20 - Maintenance Denied]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=4459</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In this wonderful judgment from Hon&#8217;ble High Court of Bombay, the Hon&#8217;ble Justice has rubbed in it the lower court magistrate without any tolerance. See the rotten mindsets of magistrates of lower courts. From Para 8, The learned Magistrate has gone on record saying that filing of divorce petition by the respondent against the <a class="glossaryLink"  aria-describedby="tt"  data-cmtooltip="&#60;div class=glossaryItemTitle&#62;Petitioner&#60;/div&#62;&#60;div class=glossaryItemBody&#62;A person who files a petition in court.&#60;/div&#62;"  href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/glossary/petitioner/"  data-gt-translate-attributes='[{"attribute":"data-cmtooltip", "format":"html"}]'  tabindex='0' role='link'>petitioner</a> [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/mamta-gautam-wankhede-vs-gautam-sukhdev-wankhede-on-2-february-2018/">Mamta Gautam Wankhede Vs Gautam Sukhdev Wankhede on 2 February, 2018</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/mamta-gautam-wankhede-vs-gautam-sukhdev-wankhede-on-2-february-2018/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ballikurava Kiranmayi Vs Ballikurava Anjaneyulu on 5 May, 2015</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/ballikurava-kiranmayi-vs-ballikurava-anjaneyulu-on-5-may-2015/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/ballikurava-kiranmayi-vs-ballikurava-anjaneyulu-on-5-may-2015/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2018 17:43:32 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Prakasam DV Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Acquitted in IPC 498A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ballikurava Kiranmayi Vs Ballikurava Anjaneyulu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 125 or BNSS 144 - Maintenance Granted]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PWDV Act Sec 18 - Protection Order Denied]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PWDV Act Sec 20 - Maintenance Denied]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=2753</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Knife eyed share in houses and in lands of In Laws via this DV Case. Since maintenance was already granted in CrPC 125 case, no maintenance was granted in DVC. As there are no specific allegations of DV on respondent and&#160; also incidentally they got acquittal from the 498A case, no protection <a class="glossaryLink"  aria-describedby="tt"  data-cmtooltip="&#60;div class=glossaryItemTitle&#62;Order&#60;/div&#62;&#60;div class=glossaryItemBody&#62;A direction given by a court or judge.&#60;/div&#62;"  href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/glossary/order/"  data-gt-translate-attributes='[{"attribute":"data-cmtooltip", "format":"html"}]'  tabindex='0' role='link'>order</a> was [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/ballikurava-kiranmayi-vs-ballikurava-anjaneyulu-on-5-may-2015/">Ballikurava Kiranmayi Vs Ballikurava Anjaneyulu on 5 May, 2015</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/ballikurava-kiranmayi-vs-ballikurava-anjaneyulu-on-5-may-2015/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Moodududla Srinivas Vs N.Usha Rani on 13 April, 2017</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/moodududla-srinivas-vs-smt-n-usha-rani-on-13-april-2017/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/moodududla-srinivas-vs-smt-n-usha-rani-on-13-april-2017/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2018 18:46:26 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[High Court of Andhra Pradesh Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1-Judge Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 125 or BNSS 144 - Maintenance Denied]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moodududla Srinivas Vs N.Usha Rani]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[No Domestic Relationship Exists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PWDV Act Sec 20 - Maintenance Denied]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=2251</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In this Andhra Pradesh High Court judgment, Dr. Justice D Siva Sankara Rao ordered that as no relation exists in the nature of marriage, no maintenance is maintainable in section 125 as well as Domestic Violence Cases.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/moodududla-srinivas-vs-smt-n-usha-rani-on-13-april-2017/">Moodududla Srinivas Vs N.Usha Rani on 13 April, 2017</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/moodududla-srinivas-vs-smt-n-usha-rani-on-13-april-2017/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Indra Sarma vs V.K.V.Sarma on 26 November, 2013</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/indra-sarma-vs-v-k-v-sarma-on-26-november-2013/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/indra-sarma-vs-v-k-v-sarma-on-26-november-2013/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2018 18:22:21 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indra Sarma vs V.K.V.Sarma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Landmark Case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Procedure Explained - Interpretation of Statutes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[No Domestic Relationship Exists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PWDV Act - Women In Live-In Relationships Entitled To Maintenance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PWDV Act Sec 20 - Maintenance Denied]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reportable Judgement or Order]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=2245</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>This is awesome judgment from Hon&#8217;ble Supreme Court that reaffirmed that When there is no relationship in the nature of marriage, no DV can apply. iStory! Ms. Indra Sarma, an unmarried woman, left her job and began a &#8220;live-in&#8221; relationship with Mr. V.K.V. Sarma for a period as long as 18 years, despite knowing that [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/indra-sarma-vs-v-k-v-sarma-on-26-november-2013/">Indra Sarma vs V.K.V.Sarma on 26 November, 2013</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/indra-sarma-vs-v-k-v-sarma-on-26-november-2013/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jayantilal Kanji Nagda Vs State of Maharashtra and anr. on 8 May, 2015</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/jayantilal-kanji-nagda-vs-state-of-maharashtra-and-anr-on-8-may-2015/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/jayantilal-kanji-nagda-vs-state-of-maharashtra-and-anr-on-8-may-2015/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2018 13:49:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[High Court of Bombay Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jayantilal Kanji Nagda Vs State of Maharashtra and anr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[No Domestic Relationship Exists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PWDV Act Sec 20 - Maintenance Denied]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandeep Pamarati]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=2227</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>This is a Bombay High Court judgment clarifying that when there is no domestic relationship, no domestic violence can happen. &#160;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/jayantilal-kanji-nagda-vs-state-of-maharashtra-and-anr-on-8-may-2015/">Jayantilal Kanji Nagda Vs State of Maharashtra and anr. on 8 May, 2015</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/jayantilal-kanji-nagda-vs-state-of-maharashtra-and-anr-on-8-may-2015/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 
Lazy Loading (feed)
Minified using Disk

Served from: www.shadesofknife.in @ 2026-08-09 03:45:06 by W3 Total Cache
-->