<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Maintainability Archives - Shades of Knife</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/tag/maintainability/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/tag/maintainability/</link>
	<description>True Colors of a Vile Wife</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2025 19:24:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Kade Kumar Swamy Vs Agam Pandu and 6 Ors on 02 Dec 2020</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/kade-kumar-swamy-vs-agam-pandu-and-6-ors-on-02-dec-2020/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/kade-kumar-swamy-vs-agam-pandu-and-6-ors-on-02-dec-2020/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Aug 2021 18:09:01 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[High Court of Telangana Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judiciary Antics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kade Kumar Swamy Vs Agam Pandu and 6 Ors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maintainability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Non Application or Exercise of Judicial Mind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Numbering of Petition]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=14315</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A Presiding officer in Telangana went into merits of a petition (which was seeking permanent injunction over a suit scheduled property) and rejected it, even before it was numbered!!! A single judge bench of the Telangana High Court sent the PO to training in Judicial Academy&#8230; An earlier instance, just about a month back!!! &#160;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/kade-kumar-swamy-vs-agam-pandu-and-6-ors-on-02-dec-2020/">Kade Kumar Swamy Vs Agam Pandu and 6 Ors on 02 Dec 2020</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/kade-kumar-swamy-vs-agam-pandu-and-6-ors-on-02-dec-2020/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Masood Khan Vs. Millie Hazarika on 04 Mar 2021</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/masood-khan-vs-millie-hazarika-on-04-mar-2021/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/masood-khan-vs-millie-hazarika-on-04-mar-2021/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Apr 2021 16:27:48 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[High Court of Meghalaya Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1-Judge Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Catena of Landmark Judgments Referred/Cited to]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Procedure Explained - Interpretation of Statutes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maintainability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Masood Khan Vs. Millie Hazarika]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=13524</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Disagreeing with a catena of judgements here, here, here, here, Single-bench of High Court of Meghalaya relied upon this landmark decision from Supreme Court here and held that a false DV case can be quashed u/s 482 CrPC. From Paras 33, 34 and 33, 33. The argument of the learned counsel for the <a class="glossaryLink"  aria-describedby="tt"  data-cmtooltip="&#60;div class=glossaryItemTitle&#62;Respondent&#60;/div&#62;&#60;div class=glossaryItemBody&#62;The party against whom a case is filed.&#60;/div&#62;"  href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/glossary/respondent/"  data-gt-translate-attributes='[{"attribute":"data-cmtooltip", "format":"html"}]'  tabindex='0' role='link'>Respondent</a> No. [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/masood-khan-vs-millie-hazarika-on-04-mar-2021/">Masood Khan Vs. Millie Hazarika on 04 Mar 2021</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/masood-khan-vs-millie-hazarika-on-04-mar-2021/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>V.K.Vijayalekshmi Amma Vs Bindu V on 2 Dec 2009</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/v-k-vijayalekshmi-amma-vs-bindu-v-on-2-dec-2009/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/v-k-vijayalekshmi-amma-vs-bindu-v-on-2-dec-2009/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Apr 2021 15:31:14 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[High Court of Kerala Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Landmark Case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maintainability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V.K.Vijayalekshmi Amma Vs Bindu V]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=13508</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>This case was decided by a single-judge bench and key points are highlighted below. This case law was cited here. &#160; &#160; Citations : [2010 AIR KER NOC 415], [2010 ILR KER 1 60], [2010 CRLJ NOC 549], [2010 RCR CIVIL 6 1046], [2010 KERLT 1 79], [2009 SCC ONLINE KER 6448], [2010 AIC 87 [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/v-k-vijayalekshmi-amma-vs-bindu-v-on-2-dec-2009/">V.K.Vijayalekshmi Amma Vs Bindu V on 2 Dec 2009</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/v-k-vijayalekshmi-amma-vs-bindu-v-on-2-dec-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Latha.P.C and Ors Vs State of Kerala and Ors on 15 Sep 2020</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/latha-p-c-and-ors-vs-state-of-kerala-and-ors-on-15-sep-2020/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/latha-p-c-and-ors-vs-state-of-kerala-and-ors-on-15-sep-2020/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Apr 2021 14:26:13 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[High Court of Kerala Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discourage Roping In All Relatives Of In-Laws Or Distant Relatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latha.P.C and Ors Vs State of Kerala and Ors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Procedure Explained - Interpretation of Statutes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maintainability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Misinterpretation of Earlier Judgment or Settle Principle of Law or Per Incuriam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[No Shared Household]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Preeti Gupta and Anr Vs State Of Jharkhand and Anr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reportable Judgement or Order]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=13502</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A single-judge bench of Kerala High Court, while denying to invoke 482 CrPC to quash a DV case based on the landmark judgment here, held as follows. But Supreme Court had taken a different view in the landmark judgment here just a month later. From Para 8, 8. The Act is a welfare legislation enacted [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/latha-p-c-and-ors-vs-state-of-kerala-and-ors-on-15-sep-2020/">Latha.P.C and Ors Vs State of Kerala and Ors on 15 Sep 2020</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/latha-p-c-and-ors-vs-state-of-kerala-and-ors-on-15-sep-2020/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>P.Surendran Vs State of Tamil Nadu on 29 March 2019</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/p-surendran-vs-state-of-tamil-nadu-on-29-march-2019/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/p-surendran-vs-state-of-tamil-nadu-on-29-march-2019/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2020 12:19:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2-Judge (Division) Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judiciary Antics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Landmark Case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maintainability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Non Application or Exercise of Judicial Mind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Numbering of Petition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[P.Surendran Vs State of Tamil Nadu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reportable Judgement or Order]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=10742</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Supreme Court very clearly said a staff on Administration on Justice, such as Registry Staff can not exercise Judicial functions. From Paras 9 and 10, 9. The nature of judicial function is well settled under our legal system. Judicial function is the duty to act judicially, which invests with that character. The distinguishing factor which [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/p-surendran-vs-state-of-tamil-nadu-on-29-march-2019/">P.Surendran Vs State of Tamil Nadu on 29 March 2019</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/p-surendran-vs-state-of-tamil-nadu-on-29-march-2019/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Prakash Nagardas Dubal-Shaha Vs Meena Prakash Dubal Shah and Ors on 22 April 2016</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/prakash-nagardas-dubal-shaha-vs-meena-prakash-dubal-shah-and-ors-on-22-april-2016/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/prakash-nagardas-dubal-shaha-vs-meena-prakash-dubal-shah-and-ors-on-22-april-2016/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2020 18:03:40 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maintainability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prakash Nagardas Dubal-Shaha Vs Meena Prakash Dubal Shah and Ors]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=9444</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Supreme Court held that undecided divorce case does not affect the maintainability of a DV case. Citations: [] Other Source links: The index page is here.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/prakash-nagardas-dubal-shaha-vs-meena-prakash-dubal-shah-and-ors-on-22-april-2016/">Prakash Nagardas Dubal-Shaha Vs Meena Prakash Dubal Shah and Ors on 22 April 2016</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/prakash-nagardas-dubal-shaha-vs-meena-prakash-dubal-shah-and-ors-on-22-april-2016/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Juveria Abdul Majid Patni Vs Atif Iqbal Mansoori on 18 September, 2014</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/juveria-abdul-majid-patni-vs-atif-iqbal-mansoori-on-18-september-2014/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/juveria-abdul-majid-patni-vs-atif-iqbal-mansoori-on-18-september-2014/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2018 20:04:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Juveria Abdul Majid Patni Vs Atif Iqbal Mansoori]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Landmark Case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Procedure Explained - Interpretation of Statutes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maintainability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PWDV Act Sec 2(f) - Maintainable After Divorce]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=4864</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In this Supreme Court judgment, it was held that From Para 31, &#8220;An act of domestic violence once committed, subsequent <a class="glossaryLink"  aria-describedby="tt"  data-cmtooltip="&#60;div class=glossaryItemTitle&#62;Decree&#60;/div&#62;&#60;div class=glossaryItemBody&#62;A formal order issued by a court.&#60;/div&#62;"  href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/glossary/decree/"  data-gt-translate-attributes='[{"attribute":"data-cmtooltip", "format":"html"}]'  tabindex='0' role='link'>decree</a> of divorce will not absolve the liability of the Respondent from the offence committed or to deny the benefit to which the aggrieved person is entitled under the Domestic Violence Act, 2005 including monetary [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/juveria-abdul-majid-patni-vs-atif-iqbal-mansoori-on-18-september-2014/">Juveria Abdul Majid Patni Vs Atif Iqbal Mansoori on 18 September, 2014</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/juveria-abdul-majid-patni-vs-atif-iqbal-mansoori-on-18-september-2014/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>V.Ravi Kumar Vs State of Tamilnadu on 14 December, 2018</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/v-ravi-kumar-vs-state-of-tamilnadu-on-14-december-2018/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/v-ravi-kumar-vs-state-of-tamilnadu-on-14-december-2018/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2018 13:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Catena of Landmark Judgments Referred/Cited to]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Procedure Explained - Interpretation of Statutes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maintainability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reportable Judgement or Order]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V.Ravi Kumar Vs State of Tamilnadu]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=4652</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The key contention resolved in this judgment from Hon&#8217;ble Apex Court is that &#8220;whether the High Court should have quashed the criminal proceedings being Crime No.54 of 2005 on the grounds that the appellant had withdrawn an earlier complaint without assigning reasons; the transactions being commercial in nature, the ingredients of an offence under the [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/v-ravi-kumar-vs-state-of-tamilnadu-on-14-december-2018/">V.Ravi Kumar Vs State of Tamilnadu on 14 December, 2018</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/v-ravi-kumar-vs-state-of-tamilnadu-on-14-december-2018/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Giduthuri Kesari Kumar And Others Vs State of Telangana on 16 February 2015</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/giduthuri-kesari-kumar-and-others-vs-state-of-telangana-on-16-february-2015/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/giduthuri-kesari-kumar-and-others-vs-state-of-telangana-on-16-february-2015/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2018 20:53:36 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[High Court of Andhra Pradesh Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Giduthuri Kesari Kumar And Others Vs State Of Telangana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Go For Appeal Instead Of Quash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Landmark Case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Procedure Explained - Interpretation of Statutes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maintainability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[No Domestic Relationship Exists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[No Shared Household]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PWDV Act - DV Case Not Quashed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PWDV Act Sec 29 - Appeal Available]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandeep Pamarati]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=4005</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A landmark quash judgment by Hon&#8217;ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh, which laid down few criteria only under which DVC quash under CrPC 482 is maintainable. From Para 13, The next aspect is having regard to the fact that the reliefs provided under Section 18 to 22 are civil reliefs and enquiry under Sec. 12 [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/giduthuri-kesari-kumar-and-others-vs-state-of-telangana-on-16-february-2015/">Giduthuri Kesari Kumar And Others Vs State of Telangana on 16 February 2015</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/giduthuri-kesari-kumar-and-others-vs-state-of-telangana-on-16-february-2015/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lalita Kumari Vs Govt. of U.P. and Ors on 12 November, 2013</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/lalita-kumari-vs-govt-of-u-p-and-ors-on-12-november-2013/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/lalita-kumari-vs-govt-of-u-p-and-ors-on-12-november-2013/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2018 20:39:50 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[5-Judge Constitutional Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Compulsory Registration of FIR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 154 - Information in Cognizable Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lalita Kumari Vs Govt.Of U.P. and Ors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Landmark Case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Procedure Explained - Interpretation of Statutes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maintainability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zero FIR to be Filed Investigated and Transferred]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=2337</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In this landmark case, Supreme Court clarified the position on whether a police officer is bound to register a First Information Report (FIR) upon receiving any information relating to commission of a cognizable offence under Section 154 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short &#8216;the Code&#8217;) or the police officer has the power [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/lalita-kumari-vs-govt-of-u-p-and-ors-on-12-november-2013/">Lalita Kumari Vs Govt. of U.P. and Ors on 12 November, 2013</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/lalita-kumari-vs-govt-of-u-p-and-ors-on-12-november-2013/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 
Lazy Loading (feed)
Minified using Disk

Served from: www.shadesofknife.in @ 2026-08-23 14:13:21 by W3 Total Cache
-->