<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Landmark Case Archives - Shades of Knife</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/tag/landmark-case/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/tag/landmark-case/</link>
	<description>True Colors of a Vile Wife</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2026 03:21:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.2</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Pradeep Ram Vs State of Jharkhand and Anr on 1 Jul 2019</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/pradeep-ram-vs-state-of-jharkhand-and-anr-on-1-jul-2019/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/pradeep-ram-vs-state-of-jharkhand-and-anr-on-1-jul-2019/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2026 16:43:20 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2-Judge (Division) Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Catena of Landmark Judgments Referred/Cited to]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Landmark Case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pradeep Ram Vs State of Jharkhand and Anr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reportable Judgement or Order]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=24278</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A division of Supreme Court held as follows, From Paras 7 and 9, (Question of law formulated due to divergent views on the point) 7. From the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties and the pleadings on the record, following are the issues, which arise for consideration in these appeals:- (i) Whether in [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/pradeep-ram-vs-state-of-jharkhand-and-anr-on-1-jul-2019/">Pradeep Ram Vs State of Jharkhand and Anr on 1 Jul 2019</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/pradeep-ram-vs-state-of-jharkhand-and-anr-on-1-jul-2019/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chajoo Ram Vs Radhey Shyam and Anr on 23 Mar 1971</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/chajoo-ram-vs-radhey-shyam-and-anr-on-23-mar-1971/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/chajoo-ram-vs-radhey-shyam-and-anr-on-23-mar-1971/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2026 07:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3-Judge (Full) Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chajoo Ram Vs Radhey Shyam and Anr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Landmark Case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Perjury - Prima Facie Opinion of Perjury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Perjury Under Section 340 CrPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reportable Judgement or Order]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=24212</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A full court bench of the Apex Court held as follows, with respect to When should a Prosecution for perjury be ordered . The prosecution for perjury should be sanctioned by courts, only in those cases where the perjury appears to be deliberate and conscious and the conviction is reasonably probable or likely. No doubt [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/chajoo-ram-vs-radhey-shyam-and-anr-on-23-mar-1971/">Chajoo Ram Vs Radhey Shyam and Anr on 23 Mar 1971</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/chajoo-ram-vs-radhey-shyam-and-anr-on-23-mar-1971/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sharad Kumar Pandey Vs Mamta Pandey on 1 Sep 2010</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/sharad-kumar-pandey-vs-mamta-pandey-on-1-sep-2010/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/sharad-kumar-pandey-vs-mamta-pandey-on-1-sep-2010/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 07:32:37 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[High Court of Delhi Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1-Judge Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice Shiv Narayan Dhingra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Landmark Case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Procedure Explained - Interpretation of Statutes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PWDV Act Sec 27 - Territorial Jurisdiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reportable Judgement or Order]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sharad Kumar Pandey Vs Mamta Pandey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Territorial Jurisdiction]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=23918</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Justice Shiv Narayan Dhingra ji has passed this <a class="glossaryLink"  aria-describedby="tt"  data-cmtooltip="&#60;div class=glossaryItemTitle&#62;Order&#60;/div&#62;&#60;div class=glossaryItemBody&#62;A direction given by a court or judge.&#60;/div&#62;"  href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/glossary/order/"  data-gt-translate-attributes='[{"attribute":"data-cmtooltip", "format":"html"}]'  tabindex='0' role='link'>Order</a> around the definition of a Temporary residence as held by the Section 27 of the PWDV Act 2005. 9. All legislative enactments on matrimonial disputes or custody matters make ordinary residence or residence or the place where parties lived together or the place of cause of [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/sharad-kumar-pandey-vs-mamta-pandey-on-1-sep-2010/">Sharad Kumar Pandey Vs Mamta Pandey on 1 Sep 2010</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/sharad-kumar-pandey-vs-mamta-pandey-on-1-sep-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Prahlad Singh Bhati Vs N.C.T. Delhi and Anr on 23 Mar 2001</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/prahlad-singh-bhati-vs-n-c-t-delhi-and-anr-on-23-mar-2001/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/prahlad-singh-bhati-vs-n-c-t-delhi-and-anr-on-23-mar-2001/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2026 11:51:18 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2-Judge (Division) Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC Sec 438 - Anticipatory Bail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Landmark Case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Procedure Explained - Interpretation of Statutes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prahlad Singh Bhati Vs N.C.T. Delhi and Anr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reportable Judgement or Order]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=23891</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A division bench of Supreme Court held as follows, The <a class="glossaryLink"  aria-describedby="tt"  data-cmtooltip="&#60;div class=glossaryItemTitle&#62;Jurisdiction&#60;/div&#62;&#60;div class=glossaryItemBody&#62;The authority of a court to hear a case.&#60;/div&#62;"  href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/glossary/jurisdiction/"  data-gt-translate-attributes='[{"attribute":"data-cmtooltip", "format":"html"}]'  tabindex='0' role='link'>jurisdiction</a> to grant <a class="glossaryLink"  aria-describedby="tt"  data-cmtooltip="&#60;div class=glossaryItemTitle&#62;Bail&#60;/div&#62;&#60;div class=glossaryItemBody&#62;Temporary release of an accused person awaiting trial.&#60;/div&#62;"  href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/glossary/bail/"  data-gt-translate-attributes='[{"attribute":"data-cmtooltip", "format":"html"}]'  tabindex='0' role='link'>bail</a> has to be exercised on the basis of well settled principles having regard to the circumstances of each case and not in an arbitrary manner. While granting the bail, the court has to keep in mind the nature of accusations, the [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/prahlad-singh-bhati-vs-n-c-t-delhi-and-anr-on-23-mar-2001/">Prahlad Singh Bhati Vs N.C.T. Delhi and Anr on 23 Mar 2001</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/prahlad-singh-bhati-vs-n-c-t-delhi-and-anr-on-23-mar-2001/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mohanlal Shamij Soni Vs UOI and Anr on 22 Feb 1991</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/mohanlal-shamij-soni-vs-uoi-and-anr-on-22-feb-1991/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/mohanlal-shamij-soni-vs-uoi-and-anr-on-22-feb-1991/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2026 05:35:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2-Judge (Division) Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Catena of Landmark Judgments Referred/Cited to]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 311 - Power to summon material witness or examine person present]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Landmark Case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Procedure Explained - Interpretation of Statutes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mohanlal Shamij Soni Vs UOI and Anr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reportable Judgement or Order]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=23820</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A division bench of the Apex Court held that under section 311 of Cr.P.C. (read along with the Section 165 of <a class="glossaryLink"  aria-describedby="tt"  data-cmtooltip="&#60;div class=glossaryItemTitle&#62;Evidence&#60;/div&#62;&#60;div class=glossaryItemBody&#62;Information presented in court to prove facts.&#60;/div&#62;"  href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/glossary/evidence/"  data-gt-translate-attributes='[{"attribute":"data-cmtooltip", "format":"html"}]'  tabindex='0' role='link'>Evidence</a> Act), a Criminal Court has wide power to summon any person as witness, at any stage of the case, even after completion of defence evidence and argument stages. From Para 9, 9. The [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/mohanlal-shamij-soni-vs-uoi-and-anr-on-22-feb-1991/">Mohanlal Shamij Soni Vs UOI and Anr on 22 Feb 1991</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/mohanlal-shamij-soni-vs-uoi-and-anr-on-22-feb-1991/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pune Bar Association Vs Union of India on 22 May 2026</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/pune-bar-association-vs-union-of-india-on-22-may-2026/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/pune-bar-association-vs-union-of-india-on-22-may-2026/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2026 13:21:07 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3-Judge (Full) Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BSA Sec 63 - Admissibility of electronic records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evidence Act 65B - Admissibility of electronic records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Landmark Case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Procedure Explained - Interpretation of Statutes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pune Bar Association Vs Union of India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reportable Judgement or Order]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=23476</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A full bench of Supreme Court of India decided this issue, inconclusively. Problem Statement, simply put is, From Para 1, 1. <a class="glossaryLink"  aria-describedby="tt"  data-cmtooltip="&#60;div class=glossaryItemTitle&#62;Petitioner&#60;/div&#62;&#60;div class=glossaryItemBody&#62;A person who files a petition in court.&#60;/div&#62;"  href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/glossary/petitioner/"  data-gt-translate-attributes='[{"attribute":"data-cmtooltip", "format":"html"}]'  tabindex='0' role='link'>Petitioner</a>, Pune Bar Association, contends that Section 63(4) of Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 20231, read with the Schedule thereto is unconstitutional as it imposes undue hardship on an ordinary litigant by requiring submission of a [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/pune-bar-association-vs-union-of-india-on-22-may-2026/">Pune Bar Association Vs Union of India on 22 May 2026</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/pune-bar-association-vs-union-of-india-on-22-may-2026/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Baijnath and ors vs State of Madhya Pradesh on 18 Nov 2016</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/baijnath-and-ors-vs-state-of-madhya-pradesh-on-18-nov-2016/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/baijnath-and-ors-vs-state-of-madhya-pradesh-on-18-nov-2016/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2026 13:30:41 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2-Judge (Division) Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Acquittal restored]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Acquitted in IPC 498A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baijnath and Ors Vs State of Madhya Pradesh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal Appeal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dowry death]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Landmark Case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[matrimonial offences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[presumption of dowry death]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sec 113B Evidence Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 304B]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 498A IPC]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=22576</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A two-judge Bench of the Supreme Court of India, in Baijnath &#38; Ors. v. State of Madhya Pradesh (18 November 2016), held that the unnatural death of a married woman within seven years of marriage does not, by itself, amount to dowry death under Section 304B IPC. The Court ruled that the prosecution must prove [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/baijnath-and-ors-vs-state-of-madhya-pradesh-on-18-nov-2016/">Baijnath and ors vs State of Madhya Pradesh on 18 Nov 2016</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/baijnath-and-ors-vs-state-of-madhya-pradesh-on-18-nov-2016/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Umme Farva Vs State of U.P. and Anr on 14 Jan 2026</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/umme-farva-vs-state-of-u-p-and-anr-on-14-jan-2026/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/umme-farva-vs-state-of-u-p-and-anr-on-14-jan-2026/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2026 17:36:56 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[High Court of Allahabad Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1-Judge Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 173 - Report of Police Officer on Completion of Investigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 195 - Prosecution for contempt of lawful authority of public servants or for offences against public justice and for offences relating to documents given in evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPC 166A - Public servant disobeying direction under law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPC 177 - Furnishing false information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPC 182 - False information with intent to cause public servant to use his lawful power to the injury of another person]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Landmark Case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Police Closure Reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Umme Farva Vs State of U.P. and Anr]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=22539</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A single judge of Allahabad High Court held as follows, From Para 14, 14. In this case, the Investigating Officer, investigated the matter and found that, no case has been made out against the wife/accused-applicant under Sections 504 and 507 I.P.C., and thereafter, he prepared the police report/final report (closure report) on 19.06.2024 under Section [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/umme-farva-vs-state-of-u-p-and-anr-on-14-jan-2026/">Umme Farva Vs State of U.P. and Anr on 14 Jan 2026</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/umme-farva-vs-state-of-u-p-and-anr-on-14-jan-2026/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Geddam Jhansi and Anr Vs State of Telangana and Anr on 07 Feb 2025</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/geddam-jhansi-and-anr-vs-state-of-telangana-and-anr-on-07-feb-2025/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/geddam-jhansi-and-anr-vs-state-of-telangana-and-anr-on-07-feb-2025/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2025 13:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2-Judge (Division) Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Article 142 - Enforcement of decrees and orders of Supreme Court and orders as to discovery etc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 482 – DVC Proceeding Quashed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geddam Jhansi Vs State of Telangana and Anr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Landmark Case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reportable Judgement or Order]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Same Allegations in IPC 498A and DVC]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=22267</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A division bench of the Supreme Court invoked Article 142 of the Constitution to quash a DV case, which has same allegations as in a false 498A IPC case. 40. Accordingly, we allow both the present Criminal Appeals as below: (i) The impugned <a class="glossaryLink"  aria-describedby="tt"  data-cmtooltip="&#60;div class=glossaryItemTitle&#62;Judgement&#60;/div&#62;&#60;div class=glossaryItemBody&#62;The final decision of a court&#60;/div&#62;"  href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/glossary/judgement/"  data-gt-translate-attributes='[{"attribute":"data-cmtooltip", "format":"html"}]'  tabindex='0' role='link'>judgement</a> and order dated 04.04.2022 passed by the Ld. Single Bench of [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/geddam-jhansi-and-anr-vs-state-of-telangana-and-anr-on-07-feb-2025/">Geddam Jhansi and Anr Vs State of Telangana and Anr on 07 Feb 2025</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/geddam-jhansi-and-anr-vs-state-of-telangana-and-anr-on-07-feb-2025/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Srinivasa D Vs Asha on 20 Mar 2025</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/srinivasa-d-vs-asha-on-20-mar-2025/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/srinivasa-d-vs-asha-on-20-mar-2025/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2025 12:12:06 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[High Court of Karnataka Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1-Judge Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC Sec 125 or BNSS Sec 144 - Interim Maintenance Denied]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Issued or Recommended Guidelines or Directions or Protocols to be followed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Landmark Case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Perjury - Initiate Prosecution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reportable Judgement or Order]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Srinivasa D Vs Asha]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=22170</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A wonderful judgment from a single judge of Karnataka High Court, Bengaluru bench, acknowledging that litigants lie in their income <a class="glossaryLink"  aria-describedby="tt"  data-cmtooltip="&#60;div class=glossaryItemTitle&#62;Affidavit&#60;/div&#62;&#60;div class=glossaryItemBody&#62;A written statement confirmed by oath or affirmation.&#60;/div&#62;"  href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/glossary/affidavit/"  data-gt-translate-attributes='[{"attribute":"data-cmtooltip", "format":"html"}]'  tabindex='0' role='link'>affidavit</a> and directing the Family Courts to initiate perjury proceedings in accordance with law. From Paras 10 to 13, 10. Time and again, it is seen by this Court that in several matters, the parties [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/srinivasa-d-vs-asha-on-20-mar-2025/">Srinivasa D Vs Asha on 20 Mar 2025</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/srinivasa-d-vs-asha-on-20-mar-2025/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 
Lazy Loading (feed)
Minified using Disk

Served from: www.shadesofknife.in @ 2026-10-05 00:43:55 by W3 Total Cache
-->