<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Justice Shiv Narayan Dhingra Archives - Shades of Knife</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/tag/justice-shiv-narayan-dhingra/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/tag/justice-shiv-narayan-dhingra/</link>
	<description>True Colors of a Vile Wife</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 06:01:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Sharad Kumar Pandey Vs Mamta Pandey on 1 Sep 2010</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/sharad-kumar-pandey-vs-mamta-pandey-on-1-sep-2010/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/sharad-kumar-pandey-vs-mamta-pandey-on-1-sep-2010/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 07:32:37 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[High Court of Delhi Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1-Judge Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice Shiv Narayan Dhingra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Landmark Case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Procedure Explained - Interpretation of Statutes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PWDV Act Sec 27 - Territorial Jurisdiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reportable Judgement or Order]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sharad Kumar Pandey Vs Mamta Pandey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Territorial Jurisdiction]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=23918</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Justice Shiv Narayan Dhingra ji has passed this <a class="glossaryLink"  aria-describedby="tt"  data-cmtooltip="&#60;div class=glossaryItemTitle&#62;Order&#60;/div&#62;&#60;div class=glossaryItemBody&#62;A direction given by a court or judge.&#60;/div&#62;"  href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/glossary/order/"  data-gt-translate-attributes='[{"attribute":"data-cmtooltip", "format":"html"}]'  tabindex='0' role='link'>Order</a> around the definition of a Temporary residence as held by the Section 27 of the PWDV Act 2005. 9. All legislative enactments on matrimonial disputes or custody matters make ordinary residence or residence or the place where parties lived together or the place of cause of [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/sharad-kumar-pandey-vs-mamta-pandey-on-1-sep-2010/">Sharad Kumar Pandey Vs Mamta Pandey on 1 Sep 2010</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/sharad-kumar-pandey-vs-mamta-pandey-on-1-sep-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Neera Singh Vs State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) and Ors on 23 Feb 2007</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/neera-singh-vs-state-govt-of-nct-of-delhi-and-ors-on-23-feb-2007/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/neera-singh-vs-state-govt-of-nct-of-delhi-and-ors-on-23-feb-2007/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2022 19:05:09 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[High Court of Delhi Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1-Judge Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abuse Or Misuse of Process of Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice Shiv Narayan Dhingra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Misuse of Women-Centric Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neera Singh Vs State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) and Ors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PIL - Dowry Givers should be Prosecuted]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=16452</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Justice Shiv Narayan Dhingra ji highlighted as follows: From Paras 3 and 4, 3. A perusal of the complaint would show that as per allegations dowry demand was made even before marriage i.e. at the time of engagement and an AC was demanded from her father by her in-laws and her father had assured that [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/neera-singh-vs-state-govt-of-nct-of-delhi-and-ors-on-23-feb-2007/">Neera Singh Vs State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) and Ors on 23 Feb 2007</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/neera-singh-vs-state-govt-of-nct-of-delhi-and-ors-on-23-feb-2007/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Neera Singh Vs State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) and Ors on 21 Feb 2007</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/neera-singh-vs-state-govt-of-nct-of-delhi-and-ors-on-21-feb-2007/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/neera-singh-vs-state-govt-of-nct-of-delhi-and-ors-on-21-feb-2007/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2022 18:51:42 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[High Court of Delhi Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1-Judge Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abuse Or Misuse of Process of Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice Shiv Narayan Dhingra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Misuse of Section 498A of IPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neera Singh Vs State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) and Ors]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=16445</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Justice Shiv Narayan Dhingra ji highlighted the misuse of 498A IPC by some unscrupulous women. From Para 7, 7. Now-a-days, it has become a tendency to make vague and omnibus allegations against every member of the family of the husband, involving everybody under Section 498A and 406 of the IPC by making one or the [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/neera-singh-vs-state-govt-of-nct-of-delhi-and-ors-on-21-feb-2007/">Neera Singh Vs State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) and Ors on 21 Feb 2007</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/neera-singh-vs-state-govt-of-nct-of-delhi-and-ors-on-21-feb-2007/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sumer Singh Salkan Vs Asstt Director and Ors on 11 Aug 2010</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/sumer-singh-salkan-vs-asstt-director-and-ors-on-11-aug-2010/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/sumer-singh-salkan-vs-asstt-director-and-ors-on-11-aug-2010/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 May 2022 06:35:32 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[High Court of Delhi Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1-Judge Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Catena of Landmark Judgments Referred/Cited to]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Issued or Recommended Guidelines or Directions or Protocols to be followed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice Shiv Narayan Dhingra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Landmark Case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Procedure Explained - Interpretation of Statutes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Look Out Circular Notices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reportable Judgement or Order]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sumer Singh Salkan Vs Asstt Director and Ors]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=15527</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Hon&#8217;ble Delhi High Court had issued certain guidelines to be followed for issuing Look Out Circulars. A. Recourse to LOC can be taken by investigating agency in cognizable offences under IPC or other penal laws, where the accused was deliberately evading arrest or not appearing in the <a class="glossaryLink"  aria-describedby="tt"  data-cmtooltip="&#60;div class=glossaryItemTitle&#62;Trial&#60;/div&#62;&#60;div class=glossaryItemBody&#62;A formal examination of evidence before a judge.&#60;/div&#62;"  href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/glossary/trial/"  data-gt-translate-attributes='[{"attribute":"data-cmtooltip", "format":"html"}]'  tabindex='0' role='link'>trial</a> court despite NBWs and other coercive measures [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/sumer-singh-salkan-vs-asstt-director-and-ors-on-11-aug-2010/">Sumer Singh Salkan Vs Asstt Director and Ors on 11 Aug 2010</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/sumer-singh-salkan-vs-asstt-director-and-ors-on-11-aug-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rampyari and Ors Vs Ms Kamlesh on 09 Mar 2010</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/rampyari-and-ors-vs-ms-kamlesh-on-09-mar-2010/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/rampyari-and-ors-vs-ms-kamlesh-on-09-mar-2010/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2020 12:44:07 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[High Court of Delhi Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1-Judge Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fine For Delay Tactics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice Shiv Narayan Dhingra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prevent Delays In Court Proceedings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rampyari and Ors Vs Ms Kamlesh]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=11462</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Justice Shri Shiv Narayan Dhingra ji fined 25K INR to be paid to the <a class="glossaryLink"  aria-describedby="tt"  data-cmtooltip="&#60;div class=glossaryItemTitle&#62;Respondent&#60;/div&#62;&#60;div class=glossaryItemBody&#62;The party against whom a case is filed.&#60;/div&#62;"  href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/glossary/respondent/"  data-gt-translate-attributes='[{"attribute":"data-cmtooltip", "format":"html"}]'  tabindex='0' role='link'>Respondent</a>, due to the delay tactics employed by <a class="glossaryLink"  aria-describedby="tt"  data-cmtooltip="&#60;div class=glossaryItemTitle&#62;Petitioner&#60;/div&#62;&#60;div class=glossaryItemBody&#62;A person who files a petition in court.&#60;/div&#62;"  href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/glossary/petitioner/"  data-gt-translate-attributes='[{"attribute":"data-cmtooltip", "format":"html"}]'  tabindex='0' role='link'>Petitioner</a>/her Advocate in dragging on the case&#8230;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/rampyari-and-ors-vs-ms-kamlesh-on-09-mar-2010/">Rampyari and Ors Vs Ms Kamlesh on 09 Mar 2010</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/rampyari-and-ors-vs-ms-kamlesh-on-09-mar-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sanjay Bhardwaj and Ors Vs The State and Anr on 27 August 2010</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/sanjay-bhardwaj-and-ors-vs-the-state-and-anr-on-27-august-2010/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/sanjay-bhardwaj-and-ors-vs-the-state-and-anr-on-27-august-2010/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2020 08:18:19 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[High Court of Delhi Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice Shiv Narayan Dhingra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PWDV Act Sec 23 - Interim Maintenance Order Set Aside]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sanjay Bhardwaj and Ors Vs The State and Anr]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=9784</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Justice Dhingra held as follows From Para 4, 4. A perusal of Domestic Violence Act shows that Domestic Violence Act does not create any additional right in favour of wife regarding maintenance. It only enables the Magistrate to pass a maintenance order as per the rights available under existing laws. While, the Act specifies the [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/sanjay-bhardwaj-and-ors-vs-the-state-and-anr-on-27-august-2010/">Sanjay Bhardwaj and Ors Vs The State and Anr on 27 August 2010</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/sanjay-bhardwaj-and-ors-vs-the-state-and-anr-on-27-august-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Padmawati and Ors Vs Harijan Sewak Sangh and Ors on 06 November 2008</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/padmawati-and-ors-vs-harijan-sewak-sangh-and-ors-on-06-november-2008/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jan 2020 10:29:51 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[High Court of Delhi Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice Shiv Narayan Dhingra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Padmawati and Ors Vs Harijan Sewak Sangh and Ors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Perjury - Forged Evidence or False Statements on Oath or False Affidavit Submitted]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Perjury Under Section 340 CrPC]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=8193</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>My favorite Judge, Shri Shiv Narayan Dhingra ji had delivered this gem of an order. 9. Before parting with this case, I consider it necessary to pen down that one of the reasons for overflowing of Court dockets is the frivolous litigation in which the Courts are engaged by the litigants and which is dragged [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/padmawati-and-ors-vs-harijan-sewak-sangh-and-ors-on-06-november-2008/">Padmawati and Ors Vs Harijan Sewak Sangh and Ors on 06 November 2008</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kaveri Vs Neel Sagar and Anr on 25 October, 2010</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/kaveri-vs-neel-sagar-and-anr-on-25-october-2010/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Dec 2019 12:56:07 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[High Court of Delhi Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Able To Maintain Herself]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inability to Maintain Self Not Testified]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice Shiv Narayan Dhingra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kaveri Vs Neel Sagar and Anr]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=8017</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Shri Shiv Narayan Dhingra ji again comes to the rescue of a mother and a brother from the false case laid by cunning sister, who didn&#8217;t claim that she is unable to maintain herself. Citations: Indiankanoon.org or Casemine link: https://indiankanoon.org/doc/141414000/ Reproduced in accordance with Section 52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from main.sci.gov.in/judgments, judis.nic.in, [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/kaveri-vs-neel-sagar-and-anr-on-25-october-2010/">Kaveri Vs Neel Sagar and Anr on 25 October, 2010</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vijay Verma Vs State NCT of Delhi and Anr on 13 August, 2010</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/vijay-verma-vs-state-nct-of-delhi-and-anr-on-13-august-2010/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2019 06:22:51 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[High Court of Delhi Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice Shiv Narayan Dhingra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[No Shared Household]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PWDV Act - Misuse For Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vijay Verma Vs State NCT of Delhi and Anr]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=7894</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The US-Resident Dumbo filed DV Case to grab up her father&#8217;s property that he had made into the name of his grandson. Shri Shiv Narayan Dhingra ji of Delhi High Court has delivered this judgment wherein the false claim of a woman was crushed due to lack of Shared Household criteria by showing her, her [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/vijay-verma-vs-state-nct-of-delhi-and-anr-on-13-august-2010/">Vijay Verma Vs State NCT of Delhi and Anr on 13 August, 2010</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bhupender Singh Mehra Vs State NCT of Delhi and Anr on 8 October, 2010</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/bhupender-singh-mehra-vs-state-nct-of-delhi-and-anr-on-8-october-2010/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jul 2019 12:55:55 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[High Court of Delhi Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bhupender Singh Mehra Vs State NCT of Delhi and Anr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Incident Report is Not Optional in Case Under PWDV Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice Shiv Narayan Dhingra]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=6747</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Shri SN Dhingra ji has held that Magistrate is mandatorily supposed to &#8220;to consider the domestic incident report and consider the contents of the application and find out whether the respondents (petitioners herein) had any domestic relationship with the applicant and could be fitted in the definition of the &#8220;respondent&#8221; as given in Section 2(q) [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/bhupender-singh-mehra-vs-state-nct-of-delhi-and-anr-on-8-october-2010/">Bhupender Singh Mehra Vs State NCT of Delhi and Anr on 8 October, 2010</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 
Lazy Loading (feed)
Minified using Disk

Served from: www.shadesofknife.in @ 2026-10-23 17:08:00 by W3 Total Cache
-->