<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Iqbal Singh Marwah and Anr vs Meenakshi Marwah and Anr Archives - Shades of Knife</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/tag/iqbal-singh-marwah-anr-vs-meenakshi-marwah-anr/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/tag/iqbal-singh-marwah-anr-vs-meenakshi-marwah-anr/</link>
	<description>True Colors of a Vile Wife</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 05:59:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Bhima Razu Prasad Vs State of Tamil Nadu on 12 Mar 2021</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/bhima-razu-prasad-vs-state-of-tamil-nadu-on-12-mar-2021/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/bhima-razu-prasad-vs-state-of-tamil-nadu-on-12-mar-2021/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2021 16:46:01 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2-Judge (Division) Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bhima Razu Prasad Vs State of Tamil Nadu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iqbal Singh Marwah and Anr vs Meenakshi Marwah and Anr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Procedure Explained - Interpretation of Statutes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reportable Judgement or Order]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=13574</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Referring to a catena of case laws, Division bench of SC said the following: From Para 5, It is well settled that Section 195(1)(b) creates a bar against taking cognizance of offences against the administration of justice for the purpose of guarding against baseless or vindictive prosecutions by private parties. The provisions of this Section [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/bhima-razu-prasad-vs-state-of-tamil-nadu-on-12-mar-2021/">Bhima Razu Prasad Vs State of Tamil Nadu on 12 Mar 2021</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/bhima-razu-prasad-vs-state-of-tamil-nadu-on-12-mar-2021/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sasikala Pushpa and Ors Vs State of Tamil Nadu on 07 May 2019</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/sasikala-pushpa-and-ors-vs-state-of-tamil-nadu-on-07-may-2019/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/sasikala-pushpa-and-ors-vs-state-of-tamil-nadu-on-07-may-2019/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2020 07:19:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2-Judge (Division) Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 340 read with CrPC 195]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iqbal Singh Marwah and Anr vs Meenakshi Marwah and Anr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Perjury Under Section 340 CrPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reportable Judgement or Order]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sasikala Pushpa and Ors Vs State of Tamil Nadu]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=11434</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Citing Iqbal Marwah here and other landmark case laws, Supreme Court says, From Para 10, 10. It is fairly well settled that before lodging of the complaint, it is necessary that the court must be satisfied that it was expedient in the interest of justice to lodge the complaint. It is not necessary that the [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/sasikala-pushpa-and-ors-vs-state-of-tamil-nadu-on-07-may-2019/">Sasikala Pushpa and Ors Vs State of Tamil Nadu on 07 May 2019</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/sasikala-pushpa-and-ors-vs-state-of-tamil-nadu-on-07-may-2019/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Iqbal Singh Marwah &#038; Anr Vs Meenakshi Marwah &#038; Anr on 11 March, 2005</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/iqbal-singh-marwah-anr-vs-meenakshi-marwah-anr-on-11-march-2005/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/iqbal-singh-marwah-anr-vs-meenakshi-marwah-anr-on-11-march-2005/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2018 15:23:51 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[5-Judge Constitutional Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Catena of Landmark Judgments Referred/Cited to]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iqbal Singh Marwah and Anr vs Meenakshi Marwah and Anr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Landmark Case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Procedure Explained - Interpretation of Statutes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Not Expedient In Interest Of Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Perjury Under Section 340 CrPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reportable Judgement or Order]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=2480</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>This is an important judgment from Hon&#8217;ble Supreme Court on a contention point as documented in Para 5, 5. The principal controversy revolves round the interpretation of the expression &#8220;when such offence is alleged to have been committed in respect of a document produced or given in <a class="glossaryLink"  aria-describedby="tt"  data-cmtooltip="&#60;div class=glossaryItemTitle&#62;Evidence&#60;/div&#62;&#60;div class=glossaryItemBody&#62;Information presented in court to prove facts.&#60;/div&#62;"  href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/glossary/evidence/"  data-gt-translate-attributes='[{"attribute":"data-cmtooltip", "format":"html"}]'  tabindex='0' role='link'>evidence</a> in a proceeding in any Court&#8221; occurring [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/iqbal-singh-marwah-anr-vs-meenakshi-marwah-anr-on-11-march-2005/">Iqbal Singh Marwah &#038; Anr Vs Meenakshi Marwah &#038; Anr on 11 March, 2005</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/iqbal-singh-marwah-anr-vs-meenakshi-marwah-anr-on-11-march-2005/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 
Lazy Loading (feed)
Minified using Disk

Served from: www.shadesofknife.in @ 2026-11-13 10:00:09 by W3 Total Cache
-->