<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>CrPC 482 – IPC 498A Quashed Archives - Shades of Knife</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/tag/ipc-498a-quashed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/tag/ipc-498a-quashed/</link>
	<description>True Colors of a Vile Wife</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2026 11:01:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Ishwar Chand Sharma and Ors Vs State of U.P. on 29 May 2026</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/ishwar-chand-sharma-and-ors-vs-state-of-u-p-on-29-may-2026/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/ishwar-chand-sharma-and-ors-vs-state-of-u-p-on-29-may-2026/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2026 10:57:10 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2-Judge (Division) Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abuse Or Misuse of Process of Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advocate Antics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 482 – Criminal Proceeding Quashed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 482 – FIR Quashed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 482 – IPC 498A Quashed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ishwar Chand Sharma and Ors Vs State of U.P.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judiciary Antics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reportable Judgement or Order]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=23981</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A division bench of Apex Court passed this reportable judgment. &#160; From Para 10.2, 10.2 It is pertinent to underscore the important role played by the legal fraternity in bringing down the overall pendency of the cases in the Family Courts and criminal cases which are an adjunct to matrimonial disputes by weeding out unimportant [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/ishwar-chand-sharma-and-ors-vs-state-of-u-p-on-29-may-2026/">Ishwar Chand Sharma and Ors Vs State of U.P. on 29 May 2026</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/ishwar-chand-sharma-and-ors-vs-state-of-u-p-on-29-may-2026/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Charul Shukla Vs State of UP and Ors on 25 Mar 2026 &#8211; Judgment Summary</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/charul-shukla-vs-state-of-up-and-ors-on-25-mar-2026-judgment-summary/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/charul-shukla-vs-state-of-up-and-ors-on-25-mar-2026-judgment-summary/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Suprajaa Rajan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2026 18:06:41 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2-Judge (Division) Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abuse Or Misuse of Process of Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charul Shukla Vs State of UP and Ors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 482 – IPC 498A Quashed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dowry Prohibition Act 1961]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DP Act 3 - Giving Abeting to Give Taking Abeting to Take are offences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DP Act 4 - Dowry Demand Not Proved]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=23219</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In Charul Shukla vs State of U.P. &#38; Others (2026), the Supreme Court set aside the Allahabad High Court&#8217;s refusal to quash criminal proceedings against the complainant&#8217;s sister-in-law and parents-in-law. The case alleged offences under Sections 498A, 323, 354 IPC and Sections 3 &#38; 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The Court carefully examined whether [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/charul-shukla-vs-state-of-up-and-ors-on-25-mar-2026-judgment-summary/">Charul Shukla Vs State of UP and Ors on 25 Mar 2026 &#8211; Judgment Summary</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/charul-shukla-vs-state-of-up-and-ors-on-25-mar-2026-judgment-summary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Asha G Vs State of Karnataka on 6 Jan 2026 &#8211; Judgement Summary</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/asha-g-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-6-jan-2026/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/asha-g-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-6-jan-2026/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Suprajaa Rajan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2026 10:50:21 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[High Court of Karnataka Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1-Judge Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abuse Or Misuse of Process of Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asha G Vs State of Karnataka]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 482 - Quash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 482 – IPC 498A Quashed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matrimonial Criminal Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matrimonial dispute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Misuse of Section 498A of IPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quashing of FIR]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=23123</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>498A IPC: Karnataka High Court Quashes Case Against Neighbour Under CrPC 482 (BNSS 528) In Asha G Vs State of Karnataka,&#160;the High Court of Karnataka addressed a crucial legal issue regarding the misuse of Section 498A IPC in matrimonial disputes. The <a class="glossaryLink"  aria-describedby="tt"  data-cmtooltip="&#60;div class=glossaryItemTitle&#62;Petitioner&#60;/div&#62;&#60;div class=glossaryItemBody&#62;A person who files a petition in court.&#60;/div&#62;"  href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/glossary/petitioner/"  data-gt-translate-attributes='[{"attribute":"data-cmtooltip", "format":"html"}]'  tabindex='0' role='link'>petitioner</a>, who was merely a neighbour of the complainant, sought quashing of criminal proceedings [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/asha-g-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-6-jan-2026/">Asha G Vs State of Karnataka on 6 Jan 2026 &#8211; Judgement Summary</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/asha-g-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-6-jan-2026/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sandeep Pathak and Ors Vs Lalitha Tiwari on 10 Mar 2026 &#8211; Judgment Summary</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/sandeep-pathak-and-ors-vs-lalitha-tiwari-on-10-mar-2026-judgment-summary/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/sandeep-pathak-and-ors-vs-lalitha-tiwari-on-10-mar-2026-judgment-summary/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Suprajaa Rajan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2026 16:57:03 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[High Court of Delhi Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1-Judge Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 482 – IPC 498A Quashed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPC 498A - Cruelty Not Proved]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PWDV act]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=23073</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Delhi High Court in Sandeep Pathak and Ors Vs Lalitha Tiwari quashed criminal proceedings under Section 498A IPC (Section 85 BNS), Section 406 IPC (Section 316 BNS), and the DV Act. The Court held that vague and omnibus allegations cannot establish cruelty or criminal breach of trust. It also ruled that DV Act proceedings [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/sandeep-pathak-and-ors-vs-lalitha-tiwari-on-10-mar-2026-judgment-summary/">Sandeep Pathak and Ors Vs Lalitha Tiwari on 10 Mar 2026 &#8211; Judgment Summary</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/sandeep-pathak-and-ors-vs-lalitha-tiwari-on-10-mar-2026-judgment-summary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Deep Dey Vs State of West Bengal and Anr on 6 Mar 2026</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/deep-dey-vs-state-of-west-bengal-and-anr-on-6-mar-2026/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/deep-dey-vs-state-of-west-bengal-and-anr-on-6-mar-2026/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Suprajaa Rajan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2026 13:08:35 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[High Court of Calcutta Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1-Judge Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 482 – Criminal Proceeding Quashed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 482 – IPC 498A Quashed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deep Dey Vs State of West Bengal and Anr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hindu Marriage Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matrimonial dispute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Summary Post]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=23007</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Calcutta High Court: Stamp Paper Marriage Has No Legal Validity; Bigamy Case Quashed A single-judge Bench of the Calcutta High Court&#160;held that a marriage executed only through an agreement on stamp paper has no legal recognition under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The complainant claimed that she married the petitioner through a written agreement on [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/deep-dey-vs-state-of-west-bengal-and-anr-on-6-mar-2026/">Deep Dey Vs State of West Bengal and Anr on 6 Mar 2026</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/deep-dey-vs-state-of-west-bengal-and-anr-on-6-mar-2026/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Asish Bera and Ors Vs The State of West Bengal and Anr on 30 Jan 2026</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/asish-bera-ors-v-the-state-of-west-bengal-anr-on-30-jan-2026/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/asish-bera-ors-v-the-state-of-west-bengal-anr-on-30-jan-2026/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Suprajaa Rajan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2026 15:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[High Court of Calcutta Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1-Judge Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asish Bera & Ors. v. The State of West Bengal & Anr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 482 - Quash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 482 – IPC 498A Quashed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matrimonial dispute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matrimonial disputes law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quashing of FIR]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=22958</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Calcutta High Court held that criminal proceedings cannot continue when the complaint lacks specific material and shows serious inconsistencies. The Court found that the complainant had filed two complaints regarding the same alleged incident without proper explanation. The Court also noted contradictions in the statements recorded during investigation. It observed that courts must prevent [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/asish-bera-ors-v-the-state-of-west-bengal-anr-on-30-jan-2026/">Asish Bera and Ors Vs The State of West Bengal and Anr on 30 Jan 2026</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/asish-bera-ors-v-the-state-of-west-bengal-anr-on-30-jan-2026/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quashing of FIR Under Section 482 CrPC</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/quashing-of-fir-under-section-482-crpc/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/quashing-of-fir-under-section-482-crpc/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Suprajaa Rajan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2026 08:44:14 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal Procedure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abuse of process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 482 – IPC 498A Quashed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matrimonial Litigation India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quashing of FIR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 482 CrPC]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=22878</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Understanding the scope, grounds, and judicial principles governing quashing of criminal proceedings. Criminal prosecution can severely affect personal liberty, reputation, and professional life. However, not every FIR discloses a legally sustainable offence. In such situations, the law provides a constitutional safeguard. The remedy lies under: Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 Specifically, Section 482 CrPC, which [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/quashing-of-fir-under-section-482-crpc/">Quashing of FIR Under Section 482 CrPC</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/quashing-of-fir-under-section-482-crpc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sanjay D Jain and Ors Vs State of Maharashtra and Ors on 26 Sep 2025</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/sanjay-d-jain-and-ors-vs-state-of-maharashtra-and-ors-on-26-sep-2025/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/sanjay-d-jain-and-ors-vs-state-of-maharashtra-and-ors-on-26-sep-2025/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2025 14:31:22 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3-Judge (Full) Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Catena of Landmark Judgments Referred/Cited to]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 482 – Criminal Proceeding Quashed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 482 – IPC 498A Quashed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discourage Roping In All Relatives Of In-Laws Or Distant Relatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPC 498a - Not Made Out Against Parents or Relatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Landmark Case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reportable Judgement or Order]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=21971</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A full bench of Apex Court ruled that none of the offences in the FIR were made out against the Petitioners. From Paras 8-12, 8. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and having perused the FIR dated 06.02.2022 as well as the final report, we are of the considered opinion that the criminal [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/sanjay-d-jain-and-ors-vs-state-of-maharashtra-and-ors-on-26-sep-2025/">Sanjay D Jain and Ors Vs State of Maharashtra and Ors on 26 Sep 2025</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/sanjay-d-jain-and-ors-vs-state-of-maharashtra-and-ors-on-26-sep-2025/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Musin Babulal Thengade and Ors Vs State of Maharashtra and Anr on 29 Jan 2025</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/musin-babulal-thengade-and-ors-vs-state-of-maharashtra-and-anr-on-29-jan-2025/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/musin-babulal-thengade-and-ors-vs-state-of-maharashtra-and-anr-on-29-jan-2025/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2025 12:34:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[High Court of Bombay Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2-Judge (Division) Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Catena of Landmark Judgments Referred/Cited to]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 472 - Continuing offence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 473 - Extension of period of limitation in certain cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 482 – IPC 498A Quashed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delay or Unexplained Delay In Filing Complaint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPC 498A - 3 Years Limitation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPC 498A - Husband or relative of husband of a woman subjecting her to cruelty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Landmark Case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Procedure Explained - Interpretation of Statutes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislative Intent must be Respect while Interpreting Statutes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Musin Babulal Thengade and Ors Vs State of Maharashtra and Anr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rupali Devi Vs State of UP and Ors]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=21092</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A division bench of Bombay High Court at Aurangabab held that From Para 6, 6. Apart from this, the learned A.P.P. has also placed reliance on judgment of Hon&#8217;ble Supreme Court in the matter of Rupali Devi Vs. State of Uttar pradesh reported in AIR OnLine (2019) SC 394. From Paras 9 and 10, 9. [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/musin-babulal-thengade-and-ors-vs-state-of-maharashtra-and-anr-on-29-jan-2025/">Musin Babulal Thengade and Ors Vs State of Maharashtra and Anr on 29 Jan 2025</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/musin-babulal-thengade-and-ors-vs-state-of-maharashtra-and-anr-on-29-jan-2025/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kanchanapally Srinivas Vs State of Telangana on 26 Apr 2021</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/kanchanapally-srinivas-vs-state-of-telangana-on-26-apr-2021/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/kanchanapally-srinivas-vs-state-of-telangana-on-26-apr-2021/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jul 2024 19:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[High Court of Telangana Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1-Judge Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 482 - IPC 498A case Quashed Due To Earlier Divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 482 – IPC 498A Quashed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 482 – IPC 498A Quashed Due To Compromise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kanchanapally Srinivas Vs State of Telangana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mohammad Miyan Vs State of UP]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=20222</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A single judge bench of the Telangana High Court held as follows, From Paras 3-6, 3. Sri K. Venumadhav, learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the 2nd <a class="glossaryLink"  aria-describedby="tt"  data-cmtooltip="&#60;div class=glossaryItemTitle&#62;Respondent&#60;/div&#62;&#60;div class=glossaryItemBody&#62;The party against whom a case is filed.&#60;/div&#62;"  href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/glossary/respondent/"  data-gt-translate-attributes='[{"attribute":"data-cmtooltip", "format":"html"}]'  tabindex='0' role='link'>respondent</a> herself filed a petition vide FCOP.No.1267 of 2017 seeking dissolution of marriage on the ground of cruelty and the same was decreed on 12.04.2018 and [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/kanchanapally-srinivas-vs-state-of-telangana-on-26-apr-2021/">Kanchanapally Srinivas Vs State of Telangana on 26 Apr 2021</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/kanchanapally-srinivas-vs-state-of-telangana-on-26-apr-2021/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 
Lazy Loading (feed)
Minified using Disk

Served from: www.shadesofknife.in @ 2026-08-16 16:27:04 by W3 Total Cache
-->