<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PWDV Act Sec 23 - Interim Maintenance Granted Archives - Shades of Knife</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/tag/interim-maintenance-granted-in-dvc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/tag/interim-maintenance-granted-in-dvc/</link>
	<description>True Colors of a Vile Wife</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2025 12:11:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Kiran Jyot Maini Vs Anish Pramod Patel on 15 Jul 2024</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/kiran-jyot-maini-vs-anish-pramod-patel-on-15-jul-2024/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/kiran-jyot-maini-vs-anish-pramod-patel-on-15-jul-2024/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2025 18:29:03 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2-Judge (Division) Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Article 142 - Enforcement of decrees and orders of Supreme Court and orders as to discovery etc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HM Act 25 – Permanent Alimony Allowed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Irretrievable Breakdown of Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kiran Jyot Maini Vs Anish Pramod Patel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PWDV Act Sec 23 - Interim Maintenance Granted]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reportable Judgement or Order]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=21284</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A division bench of Apex Court passed this decision. Not sure, why this is a reportable judgment! Citations: Other Sources: &#160; https://www.casemine.com/judgement/in/669778a11312582eb2f9e52c Index of Maintenance Judgments under DV Act is here. Divorce Judgments here. DV Judgements here.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/kiran-jyot-maini-vs-anish-pramod-patel-on-15-jul-2024/">Kiran Jyot Maini Vs Anish Pramod Patel on 15 Jul 2024</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/kiran-jyot-maini-vs-anish-pramod-patel-on-15-jul-2024/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sonika Vs Vikas on 06 Jan 2022</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/sonika-vs-vikas-on-06-jan-2022/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/sonika-vs-vikas-on-06-jan-2022/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2022 06:40:10 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[District or Sessions or Magistrate Court Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PWDV Act Sec 23 - Interim Maintenance Granted]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sonika Vs Vikas]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=15024</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A Court in Delhi says that Interim maintenance has to be given to a woman who continues to reside in her matrimonial home. From Paras 3 and 4, 3. After perusing the complaint u/s. 12 of Prevention of Woman from Domestic Violence Act (PWDV Act), the reply thereto and the documents filed, the learned trial [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/sonika-vs-vikas-on-06-jan-2022/">Sonika Vs Vikas on 06 Jan 2022</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/sonika-vs-vikas-on-06-jan-2022/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Binita Dass Vs Uttam Kumar on 9 Aug 2019</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/binita-dass-vs-uttam-kumar-on-9-aug-2019/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/binita-dass-vs-uttam-kumar-on-9-aug-2019/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2020 19:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[High Court of Delhi Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1-Judge Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Binita Dass Vs Uttam Kumar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Procedure Explained - Interpretation of Statutes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PWDV Act Sec 23 - Interim Maintenance Granted]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PWDV Act Sec 23 – No Interim Maintenance to Wife who has Source of Income]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=11965</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Single-judge Bench said one thing in this <a class="glossaryLink"  aria-describedby="tt"  data-cmtooltip="&#60;div class=glossaryItemTitle&#62;Order&#60;/div&#62;&#60;div class=glossaryItemBody&#62;A direction given by a court or judge.&#60;/div&#62;"  href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/glossary/order/"  data-gt-translate-attributes='[{"attribute":"data-cmtooltip", "format":"html"}]'  tabindex='0' role='link'>Order</a> which is as follows: 7. Qualification of the wife and the capacity to earn cannot be a ground to deny interim maintenance to a wife who is dependant and does not have any source of income. The converse is read like this: Wife who is independant and [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/binita-dass-vs-uttam-kumar-on-9-aug-2019/">Binita Dass Vs Uttam Kumar on 9 Aug 2019</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/binita-dass-vs-uttam-kumar-on-9-aug-2019/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ajay Kumar Vs Lata @ Sharuti on 08 April 2019</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/ajay-kumar-vs-lata-sharuti-on-08-april-2019/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/ajay-kumar-vs-lata-sharuti-on-08-april-2019/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2020 18:18:44 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ajay Kumar Vs Lata @ Sharuti]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PWDV Act Sec 23 - Interim Maintenance Granted]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=9452</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Supreme Court upheld that Brother-in-law who is in a domestic relationship with the applicant has to pay the Interim maintanance. Citations: [] Other Source links: The index page is here.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/ajay-kumar-vs-lata-sharuti-on-08-april-2019/">Ajay Kumar Vs Lata @ Sharuti on 08 April 2019</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/ajay-kumar-vs-lata-sharuti-on-08-april-2019/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Manish Jain Vs Akanksha Jain on 30 March, 2017</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/manish-jain-vs-akanksha-jain-on-30-march-2017/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2019 17:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HM Act 24 - Dont Consider Means or Education of Wife]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HM Act Sec 24 - Interim Maintenance Reduced]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maintenance under both 24 HMA and PWDVA is Maintainable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manish Jain Vs Akanksha Jain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PWDV Act Sec 23 - Interim Maintenance Granted]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reportable Judgement or Order]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=7396</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In this Judgment from Supreme Court, it was held that education of knife is not a consideration to decide interim maintenance. What the fcuk?? Whatever happened to Nari_MyFoot_Shakti? From Para 15, An order for maintenance pendente lite or for costs of the proceedings is conditional on the circumstance that the wife or husband who makes [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/manish-jain-vs-akanksha-jain-on-30-march-2017/">Manish Jain Vs Akanksha Jain on 30 March, 2017</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chembeti Srilakshmi Vs Chembeti Sreenu on 7 January 2016</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/chembeti-srilakshmi-vs-chembeti-sreenu-on-7-january-2016/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/chembeti-srilakshmi-vs-chembeti-sreenu-on-7-january-2016/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2018 19:42:14 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Prakasam DV Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chembeti Srilakshmi Vs Chembeti Sreenu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DP Act 4 - Dowry Demand Not Proved]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act 2005]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PWDV Act Sec 23 - Interim Maintenance Granted]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rules of the Act/Ordinance/Notification/Circular]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=2761</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>This is a good judgment affirming some key aspects in dealing with false DV cases. From Para 15, Pw1 did not provide any information regarding the houses possessed by the <a class="glossaryLink"  aria-describedby="tt"  data-cmtooltip="&#60;div class=glossaryItemTitle&#62;Respondent&#60;/div&#62;&#60;div class=glossaryItemBody&#62;The party against whom a case is filed.&#60;/div&#62;"  href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/glossary/respondent/"  data-gt-translate-attributes='[{"attribute":"data-cmtooltip", "format":"html"}]'  tabindex='0' role='link'>respondent</a>. She simply pleaded that the respondent possessed landed properties and houses at various places. But to prove her contention no piece of document filed. [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/chembeti-srilakshmi-vs-chembeti-sreenu-on-7-january-2016/">Chembeti Srilakshmi Vs Chembeti Sreenu on 7 January 2016</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/chembeti-srilakshmi-vs-chembeti-sreenu-on-7-january-2016/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ravuri Sujatha Vs Hanumantha Rao on 9 September, 2016</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/ravuri-sujatha-vs-hanumantha-rao-on-9-september-2016/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/ravuri-sujatha-vs-hanumantha-rao-on-9-september-2016/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2018 14:55:50 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Prakasam DV Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PWDV Act Sec 23 - Interim Maintenance Granted]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ravuri Sujatha Vs Hanumantha Rao]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=2658</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In continuation of the case posted here, in this order, Hon&#8217;ble court ordered the respondent-husband to pay interim monthly maintenance @ Rs.4,000/- to the <a class="glossaryLink"  aria-describedby="tt"  data-cmtooltip="&#60;div class=glossaryItemTitle&#62;Petitioner&#60;/div&#62;&#60;div class=glossaryItemBody&#62;A person who files a petition in court.&#60;/div&#62;"  href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/glossary/petitioner/"  data-gt-translate-attributes='[{"attribute":"data-cmtooltip", "format":"html"}]'  tabindex='0' role='link'>petitioner</a> from the date of this order till the disposal of DVC, whereas the request from Knife was to grant Rs.25,000/- per month. &#160; &#160;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/ravuri-sujatha-vs-hanumantha-rao-on-9-september-2016/">Ravuri Sujatha Vs Hanumantha Rao on 9 September, 2016</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/ravuri-sujatha-vs-hanumantha-rao-on-9-september-2016/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Murali Mohan Krishna Vs Lavanya on 8 August, 2017</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/murali-mohan-krishna-vs-lavanya-on-8-august-2017/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/murali-mohan-krishna-vs-lavanya-on-8-august-2017/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2018 18:39:06 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[High Court of Karnataka Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Murali Mohan Krishna Vs Lavanya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PWDV Act Sec 23 - Inquire Prima Facie DV Before Granting Interim Maintenance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PWDV Act Sec 23 - Interim Maintenance Granted]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Work-In-Progress Article]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=2303</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Good judgment again from Hon&#8217;ble Karnataka High Court which held that Magistrate must conduct Inquiry in the nature of summary trial before Interim Maintenance. Citations: [2 Other Source links:</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/murali-mohan-krishna-vs-lavanya-on-8-august-2017/">Murali Mohan Krishna Vs Lavanya on 8 August, 2017</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/murali-mohan-krishna-vs-lavanya-on-8-august-2017/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Krishnamurthy Nookula Vs Savitha Y on 9 December, 2009</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/krishnamurthy-nookula-vs-savitha-y-on-9-december-2009/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/krishnamurthy-nookula-vs-savitha-y-on-9-december-2009/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2018 18:37:34 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[High Court of Karnataka Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kavitha M Vs Raghu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Krishnamurthy Nookula Vs Savitha Y]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Overruled Judgment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PWDV Act Sec 23 - Inquire Prima Facie DV Before Granting Interim Maintenance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PWDV Act Sec 23 - Interim Maintenance Granted]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandeep Pamarati]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=2302</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Good judgment from Co-ordinate bench of Hon&#8217;ble Karnataka High Court which held that Magistrate must conduct Inquiry in the nature of summary trial before Interim Maintenance. Citations: [(2009) 12 KAR CK 0083], [ ], Other Source links: https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1502986/ https://www.courtkutchehry.com/Judgement/Search/t/598623-krishna-murthy-nookula-appellant-hash Krishnamurthy Nookula vs Savitha Y on 9 December, 2009 HC of Karnataka This judgment is over [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/krishnamurthy-nookula-vs-savitha-y-on-9-december-2009/">Krishnamurthy Nookula Vs Savitha Y on 9 December, 2009</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/krishnamurthy-nookula-vs-savitha-y-on-9-december-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 
Lazy Loading (feed)
Minified using Disk

Served from: www.shadesofknife.in @ 2026-06-23 15:04:50 by W3 Total Cache
-->