web analytics

Menu

Skip to content
Shades of Knife
  • Home
  • True Colors of a Vile Wife
  • Need Inspiration?
  • Blog Updates
  • SOK Gallery
  • Vile News Reporter
  • About Me
  • Contact Me

Shades of Knife

True Colors of a Vile Wife

Tag: Ex Parte Order

R.Jyothi Vs K.Chandra Babu on 03 November, 2017

Posted on November 28, 2018 by ShadesOfKnife

Read a nice story in this case.

No reliefs from other respondents as none were requested in the petition.

There is no relief order against respondents 2 to 5 as the petitioner did not asked any relief from respondents 2 to 5.

R.Jyothi Vs K.Chandra Babu on 03 November, 2017

[related_posts_by_tax title=”5 Recently Updated Posts, Similar or Related To Above Post” orderby=”post_modified” posts_per_page=”5″ show_date=”true”]

Posted in Chittor DV Cases | Tagged Ex Parte Order PWDV Act 20 - Maintenance Granted PWDV Act Sec 19 - Residential Order (Rent) Granted R.Jyothi Vs K.Chandra Babu | Leave a comment

T.V.Vyshnavi Vs N.Govindaraj on 12 January, 2017

Posted on November 28, 2018 by ShadesOfKnife

A new story to be heard in this ex parte order. Protection, Maintenance and Compensation orders are granted.

T.V.Vyshnavi Vs N.Govindaraj on 12 January, 2017

[related_posts_by_tax title=”5 Recently Updated Posts, Similar or Related To Above Post” orderby=”post_modified” posts_per_page=”5″ show_date=”true”]

Posted in Chittor DV Cases | Tagged Ex Parte Order PWDV Act 18 - Protection Order Granted PWDV Act 20 - Maintenance Granted PWDV Act 22 - Compensation Granted T.V.Vyshnavi Vs N.Govindaraj | Leave a comment

N.Sumithra Vs R.K.Govinda Rajulu on 30 October, 2017

Posted on November 28, 2018 by ShadesOfKnife

Another ex parte order in DV case.

A key observation by Magistrate

The Petitioner has also sought for compensation Rs.10,00,000/- from the 1st Respondent. But she did not specify as to on what counts she had sought such compensation. In these circumstances, the mere averment in the Petition is not sufficient to grant compensation to the Petitioner, since the tie between the Petitioner/ Aggrieved Person is sacred the marital tie and it cannot be equated with any business relation wherein the damages or compensation will be paid for breach.

N.Sumithra Vs R.K.Govinda Rajulu on 30 October, 2017

[related_posts_by_tax title=”5 Recently Updated Posts, Similar or Related To Above Post” orderby=”post_modified” posts_per_page=”5″ show_date=”true”]

Posted in Chittor DV Cases | Tagged Ex Parte Order N.Sumithra Vs R.K.Govinda Rajulu PWDV Act 20 - Maintenance Granted | Leave a comment

A.Bharathi Vs K.Bhaskar on 26 July, 2018

Posted on November 28, 2018 by ShadesOfKnife

In this order from Chittor Magistrate court, all 6 respondents were set ex-parte. Just by the deposition/evidence of the knife, the magistrate believed that P.W.1 was subjected to domestic violence by demanding additional dowry.

Nice…

A.Bharathi Vs K.Bhaskar on 26 July, 2018

[related_posts_by_tax title=”5 Recently Updated Posts, Similar or Related To Above Post” orderby=”post_modified” posts_per_page=”5″ show_date=”true”]

Posted in Chittor DV Cases | Tagged A.Bharathi Vs K.Bhaskar Ex Parte Order PWDV Act 20 - Maintenance Granted | Leave a comment

Darsi Saritha Vs Darsi Srinivasa Rao on 24 June, 2013

Posted on July 10, 2018 by ShadesOfKnife

Another one of those ex parte DVC dole outs to Knife.

 

Darsi Saritha Vs Darsi Srinivasa Rao on 24 June, 2013
Posted in Prakasam DV Cases | Tagged Darsi Saritha Vs Darsi Srinivasa Rao Ex Parte Order PWDV Act 20 - Maintenance Granted | Leave a comment

Arjun Singh Vs Mohindra Kumar & Ors on 13 December, 1963

Posted on July 10, 2018 by ShadesOfKnife

The Hon’ble Apex Court has explained the following in this landmark judgment

  • ‘principle of res judicata’
  • difference between words “good cause” for nonappearance in O. IX, r. 7 and “sufficient cause” for the same purpose in O. IX, r. 13
  • ‘res judicata’ could be as much applicable to different stages of the same suit as to findings on issues in different suits.
  • If the entirety of the “hearing” of a suit has been completed and the Court being competent to pronounce judgment then and there, adjourns the suit merely for the purpose of pronouncing judgment under O. XX, r. 1, there is clearly no adjournment of “the hearing” of the suit, for there is nothing more to be heard in the suit.
  • ln the present context when once the hearing starts, the Code contemplates only two stages in the trial of the suit:
    • (1) Where the hearing is adjourned or
    • (2) where the hearing is completed. Where the hearing is completed the parties have no further rights or privileges in the matter and it is only for the convenience of the Court that O. XX, r. 1 permits judgment to be delivered after an interval after the hearing is completed.

 

Arjun Singh vs Mohindra Kumar & Ors on 13 December, 1963
Posted in Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification | Tagged Arjun Singh Vs Mohindra Kumar and Ors Delay in Passing Orders or Judgments After Reserving the Same Ex Parte Order Landmark Case Legal Procedure Explained - Interpretation of Statutes | Leave a comment

Samagowni Padmavathi Vs Samagowni Sri Hari on 18 April, 2015

Posted on July 9, 2018 by ShadesOfKnife

Maintenance ordered in this judgment.

 

Samagowni Padmavathi Vs Samagowni Sri Hari on 18 April, 2015
Posted in Prakasam DV Cases | Tagged Ex Parte Order PWDV Act 20 - Maintenance From Date of Order PWDV Act 20 - Maintenance Granted Samagowni Padmavathi Vs Samagowni Sri Hari | Leave a comment

Saiba Sreedevi Vs Saiba Sridhara Rao on 26 June, 2013

Posted on July 9, 2018 by ShadesOfKnife

No DV was proved by Knife hence DVC is dismissed

 

Saiba Sreedevi Vs Saiba Sridhara Rao on 26 June, 2013
Posted in Prakasam DV Cases | Tagged Ex Parte Order PWDV Act - Dismissed On Merits PWDV Act 18 - Protection Order Denied PWDV Act 22 - Compensation Denied PWDV Act Sec 19 - Residential Order (Rent) Denied Saiba Sreedevi Vs Saiba Sridhara Rao | Leave a comment

Pathan Bazidhunnisa Vs Shaik Shafiul Rahman on 21 July, 2016

Posted on July 7, 2018 by ShadesOfKnife

Another sh_t of judgment here. Read this entire Para 9 for the entertainment.

As seen the allegations of the petitioner, she was being demanded by the Respondents for want of additional dowry. But there is no proof for that. This Court feels that demanding additional dowry is not an offence. As far as the Domestic Violence Act is concerned, to deal the said offence, there is a separate legislation is enacted. But the quantum of mental agony which an innocent woman faced when she is not in a position to meet the financial requirements of the husband shall have to be understand in the prospective of legislation. The petitioner stated in her evidence that the Respondents harassed her for want of additional dowry. For asking the proof of Domestic Harassment against a woman, is not feasible in all the circumstances. It is depend upon the circumstances of a party. When the husband demands additional dowry, the demand must be took place inside the wall and no third party will have an opportunity to witness the said demand. Logically no husband demands the dowry or other articles in front of others. Obviously, any demand for want of dowry will be took place within four corners of the wall. For proving that fact, evidence may not require. The victim evidence itself is sufficient to prove her case. It is not a standard proof of believing of a particular fact. It is depend upon the circumstances. When the allegation of harassment was depicted by the petitioner herself, the demeanor of the witness manner which she speaks will play a vital role in deciding the case. Because, no third party will have an opportunity to see the harassment alleged to be happened against the petitioner. Therefore, this court feels that Pw1 evidence is alone sufficient to prove her version. If the respondents really did not commit any offence, they should come to the court and defend the case. But the defendants did not choose to put forth their defence in any manner. They fail to attend before this court in all hearing dates. In view of the no challenging the testimony of witness, this court holds the issue in favor of petitioner.

 

Pathan Bazidhunnisa Vs Shaik Shafiul Rahman on 21 July, 2016
Posted in Prakasam DV Cases | Tagged Baseless or Convoluted Judgment Ex Parte Order Magistrate Sravan Kumar Pathan Bazidhunnisa Vs Shaik Shafiul Rahman PWDV Act Sec 12 - DV Case Proved And Reliefs Granted | Leave a comment

Shaik Shakheela Vs Shaik Mahamad Rafi on 22 September, 2017

Posted on July 1, 2018 by ShadesOfKnife

This is another ex parte order in the DV Case. Since there is no challenge to the averments of the Knife in the petition, Judge liberally allows reliefs.

 

Shaik Shakheela Vs Shaik Mahamad Rafi on 22 September, 2017
Posted in Prakasam DV Cases | Tagged Ex Parte Order PWDV Act 18 - Protection Order Granted PWDV Act 20 - Maintenance Granted PWDV Act 22 - Compensation Granted PWDV Act Sec 19 - Residential Order (Rent) Granted Shaik Shakheela Vs Shaik Mahamad Rafi | Leave a comment

Post navigation

  • Older posts

Search within entire Content of “Shades of Knife”

My Legal Twitter Timeline

Tweets by @SandeepPamarati

My MRA Twitter Timeline

Tweets by @Shadesofknife

Recent Posts

  • State of Maharashtra Vs Dnyaneshwar Laxman Rao Wankhede on 29 Jul 2009 January 26, 2023
  • Sabiya Begum Malka Vs State of U.P. and Ors on 18 May 2016 January 24, 2023
  • Y.Narasimha Rao and Ors Vs Y.Venkata Lakshmi and Anr on 9 Jul 1991 January 19, 2023
  • Messers S.J.S. Business Enterprises Vs State of Bihar and Ors on 17 Mar 2004 January 17, 2023
  • Ramjas Foundation and Ors vs Union of India and Ors on 9 Nov 2010 January 17, 2023

Most Read Posts

  • Do you know that there is time limit of 60 days to dispose of a Domestic Violence case in India under sec 12(5) of PWDV Act? (8,971 views)
  • XXX Vs State of Kerala and Ors on 05 July 2022 (2,811 views)
  • Ratandeep Singh Ahuja Vs Harpreet Kaur on 11 Oct 2022 (869 views)
  • State Bank of India and Anr Vs Ajay Kumar Sood on 16 Aug 2022 (843 views)
  • Abbas Hatimbhai Kagalwala Vs The State of Maharashtra and Anr on 23 Aug 2022 (816 views)
  • Bar Council of India Vs Bonnie Foi Law College and Ors (714 views)
  • Sandeep Pamarati Vs State of AP and Anr on 29 Sep 2022 (Disposal of DVC in 60 days) (670 views)
  • P Parvathi Vs Pathloth Mangamma on 7 Jul 2022 (668 views)
  • Mukesh Singh versus State of Uttar Pradesh on 30 Sep 2022 (578 views)
  • Joginder Singh Vs Rajwinder Kaur on 29 Oct 2022 (556 views)

Tags

Legal Procedure Explained - Interpretation of Statutes (323)Reportable Judgement or Order (319)Landmark Case (310)2-Judge (Division) Bench Decision (259)Work-In-Progress Article (218)Catena of Landmark Judgments Referred/Cited to (210)1-Judge Bench Decision (145)Sandeep Pamarati (88)3-Judge (Full) Bench Decision (79)Article 21 - Protection of life and personal liberty (74)Perjury Under 340 CrPC (53)Issued or Recommended Guidelines or Directions or Protocols to be followed (52)Absurd Or After Thought Or Baseless Or False Or General Or Inherently Improbable Or Improved Or UnSpecific Or Omnibus Or Vague Allegations (51)Reprimands or Setbacks to YCP Govt of Andhra Pradesh (49)Summary Post (46)CrPC 482 - Quash (38)Not Authentic copy hence to be replaced (34)Advocate Antics (34)Rules of the Act/Ordinance/Notification/Circular (33)IPC 498a - Not Made Out (32)

Categories

Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification (629)Bare Acts or State Amendments or Statutes or GOs or Notifications issued by Central or State Governments (297)High Court of Andhra Pradesh Judgment or Order or Notification (159)High Court of Delhi Judgment or Order or Notification (108)High Court of Bombay Judgment or Order or Notification (91)High Court of Karnataka Judgment or Order or Notification (66)General Study Material (55)High Court of Madras Judgment or Order or Notification (53)Assorted Court Judgments or Orders or Notifications (48)Prakasam DV Cases (46)LLB Study Material (45)High Court of Punjab & Haryana Judgment or Order or Notification (45)Judicial Activism (for Public Benefit) (40)High Court of Allahabad Judgment or Order or Notification (39)District or Sessions or Magistrate Court Judgment or Order or Notification (38)High Court of Kerala Judgment or Order or Notification (30)High Court of Gujarat Judgment or Order or Notification (25)High Court of Madhya Pradesh Judgment or Order or Notification (25)High Court of Calcutta Judgment or Order or Notification (18)High Court of Patna Judgment or Order or Notification (17)

Recent Comments

  • ShadesOfKnife on Beena MS Vs Shino G Babu on 04 Feb 2022
  • Vincent on Beena MS Vs Shino G Babu on 04 Feb 2022
  • ShadesOfKnife on Syed Nazim Husain Vs Additional Principal Judge Family Court & Anr on 9 January, 2003
  • Ravi on Syed Nazim Husain Vs Additional Principal Judge Family Court & Anr on 9 January, 2003
  • ShadesOfKnife on Beena MS Vs Shino G Babu on 04 Feb 2022

Archives of SoK

  • January 2023 (12)
  • December 2022 (12)
  • November 2022 (8)
  • October 2022 (13)
  • September 2022 (17)
  • August 2022 (10)
  • July 2022 (21)
  • June 2022 (27)
  • May 2022 (23)
  • April 2022 (32)
  • March 2022 (17)
  • February 2022 (6)
  • January 2022 (2)
  • December 2021 (7)
  • November 2021 (7)
  • October 2021 (6)
  • September 2021 (10)
  • August 2021 (31)
  • July 2021 (45)
  • June 2021 (17)
  • May 2021 (17)
  • April 2021 (18)
  • March 2021 (58)
  • February 2021 (14)
  • January 2021 (50)
  • December 2020 (35)
  • November 2020 (68)
  • October 2020 (67)
  • September 2020 (29)
  • August 2020 (41)
  • July 2020 (20)
  • June 2020 (36)
  • May 2020 (40)
  • April 2020 (38)
  • March 2020 (26)
  • February 2020 (43)
  • January 2020 (35)
  • December 2019 (35)
  • November 2019 (4)
  • October 2019 (18)
  • September 2019 (58)
  • August 2019 (33)
  • July 2019 (12)
  • June 2019 (19)
  • May 2019 (5)
  • April 2019 (19)
  • March 2019 (58)
  • February 2019 (11)
  • January 2019 (90)
  • December 2018 (97)
  • November 2018 (43)
  • October 2018 (31)
  • September 2018 (73)
  • August 2018 (47)
  • July 2018 (143)
  • June 2018 (92)
  • May 2018 (102)
  • April 2018 (59)
  • March 2018 (8)

Blogroll

  • Daaman Promoting Harmony 0
  • Fight against Legal Terrorism Fight against Legal Terrorism along with MyNation Foundation 0
  • Good Morning Good Morning News 0
  • Insaaf India Insaaf Awareness Movement 0
  • MyNation Hope Foundation Wiki 0
  • MyNation.net Equality, Justice and Harmony 0
  • Sarvepalli Legal 0
  • Save Indian Family Save Indian Family Movement 0
  • SIF Chandigarh SIF Chandigarh 0
  • The Male Factor The Male Factor 0
  • Vaastav Foundation The Social Reality 0
  • Voice4india Indian Laws, Non-profits, Environment 0
  • Writing Law Writing Law by Ankur 0

RSS Cloudflare Status

  • Maintenance impacting SSL API availability and certificate issuance February 14, 2023
    THIS IS A SCHEDULED EVENT Feb 14, 14:00 - 16:00 UTCJan 26, 10:38 UTCScheduled - On February 14th, 2023, Cloudflare will be doing database maintenance that will impact SSL API availability and may result in certificate issuance delays. The scheduled maintenance will be on February 14, 2023, 14:00 - 16:00 UTC.During the maintenance window, SSL-related […]
  • ICN (Seoul) on 2023-02-06 February 6, 2023
    THIS IS A SCHEDULED EVENT Feb 6, 17:00 - 23:00 UTCFeb 1, 06:20 UTCScheduled - We will be performing scheduled maintenance in ICN (Seoul) datacenter on 2023-02-06 between 17:00 and 23:00 UTC. Traffic might be re-routed from this location, hence there is a possibility of a slight increase in latency during this maintenance window for […]
  • PHX (Phoenix) on 2023-02-03 February 3, 2023
    THIS IS A SCHEDULED EVENT Feb 3, 10:00 - 12:00 UTCFeb 1, 07:20 UTCScheduled - We will be performing scheduled maintenance in PHX (Phoenix) datacenter on 2023-02-03 between 10:00 and 12:00 UTC. Traffic might be re-routed from this location, hence there is a possibility of a slight increase in latency during this maintenance window for […]

RSS List of Spam Server IPs from Project Honeypot

  • 222.187.188.121 | S January 31, 2023
    Event: Bad Event | Total: 2 | First: 2023-01-31 | Last: 2023-01-31
  • 192.142.21.64 | S January 31, 2023
    Event: Bad Event | Total: 156 | First: 2023-01-11 | Last: 2023-01-31
  • 192.142.21.141 | S January 31, 2023
    Event: Bad Event | Total: 384 | First: 2023-01-11 | Last: 2023-01-31
Proudly powered by WordPress
Theme: Flint by Star Verte LLC

Bad Behavior has blocked 410 access attempts in the last 7 days.

pixel