<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Evidence Act Sec 157 - Former statements of witness may be proved to corroborate later testimony as to same fact Archives - Shades of Knife</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/tag/evidence-act-sec-157-former-statements-of-witness-may-be-proved-to-corroborate-later-testimony-as-to-same-fact/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/tag/evidence-act-sec-157-former-statements-of-witness-may-be-proved-to-corroborate-later-testimony-as-to-same-fact/</link>
	<description>True Colors of a Vile Wife</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 05:59:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Evidence Act Sec 157 &#8211; Former statements of witness may be proved to corroborate later testimony as to same fact</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/evidence-act-sec-157-former-statements-of-witness-may-be-proved-to-corroborate-later-testimony-as-to-same-fact/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/evidence-act-sec-157-former-statements-of-witness-may-be-proved-to-corroborate-later-testimony-as-to-same-fact/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2021 13:37:06 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Bare Acts or State Amendments or Statutes or GOs or Notifications issued by Central or State Governments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evidence Act Sec 157 - Former statements of witness may be proved to corroborate later testimony as to same fact]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=14245</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In <a class="glossaryLink"  aria-describedby="tt"  data-cmtooltip="&#60;div class=glossaryItemTitle&#62;Order&#60;/div&#62;&#60;div class=glossaryItemBody&#62;A direction given by a court or judge.&#60;/div&#62;"  href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/glossary/order/"  data-gt-translate-attributes='[{"attribute":"data-cmtooltip", "format":"html"}]'  tabindex='0' role='link'>order</a> to corroborate the <a class="glossaryLink"  aria-describedby="tt"  data-cmtooltip="&#60;div class=glossaryItemTitle&#62;Testimony&#60;/div&#62;&#60;div class=glossaryItemBody&#62;A statement made by a witness under oath.&#60;/div&#62;"  href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/glossary/testimony/"  data-gt-translate-attributes='[{"attribute":"data-cmtooltip", "format":"html"}]'  tabindex='0' role='link'>testimony</a> of a witness, any former statement made by such witness relating to the same fact, at or about the time when the fact took place, or before any authority legally competent to investigate the fact, may be proved</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/evidence-act-sec-157-former-statements-of-witness-may-be-proved-to-corroborate-later-testimony-as-to-same-fact/">Evidence Act Sec 157 &#8211; Former statements of witness may be proved to corroborate later testimony as to same fact</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/evidence-act-sec-157-former-statements-of-witness-may-be-proved-to-corroborate-later-testimony-as-to-same-fact/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rahim Pathan Vs State of Maharashtra on 04 Jun 2019</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/rahim-pathan-vs-state-of-maharashtra-on-04-jun-2019/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/rahim-pathan-vs-state-of-maharashtra-on-04-jun-2019/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2021 12:11:19 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[High Court of Bombay Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2-Judge (Division) Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Circumstantial Evidence - Last Seen Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Circumstantial Evidence - Suspicion cannot take the place of proof]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 313 - Power to examine the accused]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 437A - Bail to require accused to appear before next appellate Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evidence Act 106 - Burden of Proving Fact Especially Within Knowledge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evidence Act Sec 145 - Cross-examination as to previous statements in writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evidence Act Sec 154 - Question by party to his own witness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evidence Act Sec 157 - Former statements of witness may be proved to corroborate later testimony as to same fact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hostile Witness Case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPC 302 - Punishment for murder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rahim Pathan Vs State of Maharastra]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=14235</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Single bench judge of Bombay High Court held as follows, while acquitting a husband from the allegations of strangulating his wife. From Para 16, 16. Perusal of aforesaid findings reflect that the learned Sessions Judge kept implicit reliance on the <a class="glossaryLink"  aria-describedby="tt"  data-cmtooltip="&#60;div class=glossaryItemTitle&#62;Evidence&#60;/div&#62;&#60;div class=glossaryItemBody&#62;Information presented in court to prove facts.&#60;/div&#62;"  href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/glossary/evidence/"  data-gt-translate-attributes='[{"attribute":"data-cmtooltip", "format":"html"}]'  tabindex='0' role='link'>evidence</a> of PW-2 Sayed Bandeali as well as recitals of the FIR, scribed by PW-9 [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/rahim-pathan-vs-state-of-maharashtra-on-04-jun-2019/">Rahim Pathan Vs State of Maharashtra on 04 Jun 2019</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/rahim-pathan-vs-state-of-maharashtra-on-04-jun-2019/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>R.Shaji Vs State of Kerala on 4 Feb 2013</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/r-shaji-vs-state-of-kerala-on-4-feb-2013/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/r-shaji-vs-state-of-kerala-on-4-feb-2013/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Apr 2021 14:16:23 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2-Judge (Division) Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 161 - Examination of Witnesses By Police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 164 - Recording of Confessions and Statements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evidence Act 106 - Burden of Proving Fact Especially Within Knowledge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evidence Act 134 - Number of witnesses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evidence Act Sec 157 - Former statements of witness may be proved to corroborate later testimony as to same fact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Procedure Explained - Interpretation of Statutes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[R.Shaji Vs State of Kerala]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reportable Judgement or Order]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Statements under Section 154 Cr.P.C. or under Section 161 Cr.P.C. or under Section 164 Cr.P.C. can be used for corroboration and contradictions only but NOT as Substantive Evidence]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=13617</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Lot of legal points explained with respect to the statements given by witnesses in Court in this landmark decision by a Division bench of Apex Court. From Para 13, 13. Clause (iv) of Section 207 Cr.P.C. clearly provides that any statement recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C., shall be made available to the accused along with [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/r-shaji-vs-state-of-kerala-on-4-feb-2013/">R.Shaji Vs State of Kerala on 4 Feb 2013</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/r-shaji-vs-state-of-kerala-on-4-feb-2013/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 
Lazy Loading (feed)
Minified using Disk

Served from: www.shadesofknife.in @ 2026-10-23 17:14:54 by W3 Total Cache
-->