<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Evidence Act 114A - Adverse Inference Archives - Shades of Knife</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/tag/evidence-act-114a-adverse-inference/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/tag/evidence-act-114a-adverse-inference/</link>
	<description>True Colors of a Vile Wife</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 05:59:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Prahlad Vs State of Rajasthan on 14 Nov 2018</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/prahlad-vs-state-of-rajasthan-on-14-nov-2018/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/prahlad-vs-state-of-rajasthan-on-14-nov-2018/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2021 08:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3-Judge (Full) Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Circumstantial Evidence - Suspicion cannot take the place of proof]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 313 - Power to examine the accused]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Death Penalty Commuted to Life Imprisonment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evidence Act 114A - Adverse Inference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prahlad Vs State of Rajasthan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Right to Remain Silent]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=12773</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Supreme Court says, 9. No explanation is forthcoming from the statement of the accused under Section 313 Cr.P.C. as to when he parted the company of the victim. Also, no explanation is there as to what happened after getting the chocolates for the victim. The silence on the part of the accused, in such a [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/prahlad-vs-state-of-rajasthan-on-14-nov-2018/">Prahlad Vs State of Rajasthan on 14 Nov 2018</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/prahlad-vs-state-of-rajasthan-on-14-nov-2018/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shaik Mehataj @ Jareena Vs Shaik Humayun on 3 October, 2016</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/shaik-mehataj-jareena-vs-shaik-humayun-on-3-october-2016/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/shaik-mehataj-jareena-vs-shaik-humayun-on-3-october-2016/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2018 18:17:19 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Prakasam DV Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DP Act 4 - Dowry Demand Not Proved]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evidence Act 114A - Adverse Inference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hearsay Evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inability to Maintain Self Not Testified]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shaik Mehataj @ Jareena Vs Shaik Humayun]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=2757</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Some interesting points in this DVC <a class="glossaryLink"  aria-describedby="tt"  data-cmtooltip="&#60;div class=glossaryItemTitle&#62;Order&#60;/div&#62;&#60;div class=glossaryItemBody&#62;A direction given by a court or judge.&#60;/div&#62;"  href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/glossary/order/"  data-gt-translate-attributes='[{"attribute":"data-cmtooltip", "format":"html"}]'  tabindex='0' role='link'>order</a>. From Para 10, There is no <a class="glossaryLink"  aria-describedby="tt"  data-cmtooltip="&#60;div class=glossaryItemTitle&#62;Pleading&#60;/div&#62;&#60;div class=glossaryItemBody&#62;Formal written statements of claims and defenses.&#60;/div&#62;"  href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/glossary/pleading/"  data-gt-translate-attributes='[{"attribute":"data-cmtooltip", "format":"html"}]'  tabindex='0' role='link'>pleading</a> and <a class="glossaryLink"  aria-describedby="tt"  data-cmtooltip="&#60;div class=glossaryItemTitle&#62;Evidence&#60;/div&#62;&#60;div class=glossaryItemBody&#62;Information presented in court to prove facts.&#60;/div&#62;"  href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/glossary/evidence/"  data-gt-translate-attributes='[{"attribute":"data-cmtooltip", "format":"html"}]'  tabindex='0' role='link'>evidence</a> of the <a class="glossaryLink"  aria-describedby="tt"  data-cmtooltip="&#60;div class=glossaryItemTitle&#62;Petitioner&#60;/div&#62;&#60;div class=glossaryItemBody&#62;A person who files a petition in court.&#60;/div&#62;"  href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/glossary/petitioner/"  data-gt-translate-attributes='[{"attribute":"data-cmtooltip", "format":"html"}]'  tabindex='0' role='link'>petitioner</a> before this Court that the <a class="glossaryLink"  aria-describedby="tt"  data-cmtooltip="&#60;div class=glossaryItemTitle&#62;Respondent&#60;/div&#62;&#60;div class=glossaryItemBody&#62;The party against whom a case is filed.&#60;/div&#62;"  href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/glossary/respondent/"  data-gt-translate-attributes='[{"attribute":"data-cmtooltip", "format":"html"}]'  tabindex='0' role='link'>respondent</a> no.1 was consuming alcohol even prior to their marriage or that he had started to consume alcohol from the first day of their marriage or immediately thereafter. According to the [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/shaik-mehataj-jareena-vs-shaik-humayun-on-3-october-2016/">Shaik Mehataj @ Jareena Vs Shaik Humayun on 3 October, 2016</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/shaik-mehataj-jareena-vs-shaik-humayun-on-3-october-2016/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 
Lazy Loading (feed)
Minified using Disk

Served from: www.shadesofknife.in @ 2026-10-23 18:21:51 by W3 Total Cache
-->