<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>DP Act 7(3) - Protection for Aggrieved Person from Prosecution Archives - Shades of Knife</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/tag/dp-act-73-protection-for-aggrieved-person-from-prosecution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/tag/dp-act-73-protection-for-aggrieved-person-from-prosecution/</link>
	<description>True Colors of a Vile Wife</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2026 16:30:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Ajita David Vs State on 29 Jun 2009</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/ajita-david-vs-state-on-29-jun-2009/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/ajita-david-vs-state-on-29-jun-2009/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jul 2021 15:56:35 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[High Court of Madras Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ajita David Vs State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DP Act 7(3) - Protection for Aggrieved Person from Prosecution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Misinterpretation of Earlier Judgment or Settle Principle of Law or Per Incuriam]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=14112</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Inherent bias towards women can lead to incorrect judgments&#8230; This judgment totally fails to consider a question (may be not posed to the Court by the Counsels on both sides) isn&#8217;t this interpretation violative of Articles 14 and 21, Principles of Natural Justice and many more&#8230; More so, since the person aggrieved by the offence [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/ajita-david-vs-state-on-29-jun-2009/">Ajita David Vs State on 29 Jun 2009</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/ajita-david-vs-state-on-29-jun-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jamaluddin Ansari Azad Vs State and Anr on 29 Jul 2013</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/jamaluddin-ansari-azad-vs-state-and-anr-on-29-jul-2013/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/jamaluddin-ansari-azad-vs-state-and-anr-on-29-jul-2013/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jul 2021 15:39:56 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[High Court of Delhi Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1-Judge Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DP Act 7(3) - Protection for Aggrieved Person from Prosecution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jamaluddin Ansari Azad Vs State and Anr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Misinterpretation of Earlier Judgment or Settle Principle of Law or Per Incuriam]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=14109</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>See the interpretation of a single judge from Delhi High Court. From Paras 11 and 12, 11. In Pooja Saxena (supra) it was observed that the observations made in Neera Singh&#8217;s case were obiter and does not constitute a binding precedent for the reason that the provision of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 were not the [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/jamaluddin-ansari-azad-vs-state-and-anr-on-29-jul-2013/">Jamaluddin Ansari Azad Vs State and Anr on 29 Jul 2013</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/jamaluddin-ansari-azad-vs-state-and-anr-on-29-jul-2013/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sameer Saxena Vs State and Anr on 07 March 2011</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/sameer-saxena-vs-state-and-anr-on-07-march-2011/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/sameer-saxena-vs-state-and-anr-on-07-march-2011/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2020 06:22:48 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baseless or Convoluted Judgment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DP Act 3(1) - Giving Taking or Abet to Give or Take is Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DP Act 7(3) - Protection for Aggrieved Person from Prosecution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pooja Saxena vs State and Anr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sameer Saxena Vs State and Anr]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=9869</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>After failure at Delhi High Court here, Supreme Court dismissed the SLP summarily. Sad!</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/sameer-saxena-vs-state-and-anr-on-07-march-2011/">Sameer Saxena Vs State and Anr on 07 March 2011</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/sameer-saxena-vs-state-and-anr-on-07-march-2011/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chitranjan Dev Goel and Ors Vs State (Nct of Delhi) and Ors on 21 March 2016</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/chitranjan-dev-goel-and-ors-vs-state-nct-of-delhi-and-ors-on-21-march-2016/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/chitranjan-dev-goel-and-ors-vs-state-nct-of-delhi-and-ors-on-21-march-2016/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2020 15:21:50 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[High Court of Delhi Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baseless or Convoluted Judgment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chitranjan Dev Goel and Ors Vs State (Nct of Delhi) and Ors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DP Act 3(1) - Giving Taking or Abet to Give or Take is Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DP Act 7(3) - Protection for Aggrieved Person from Prosecution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Misinterpretation of Earlier Judgment or Settle Principle of Law or Per Incuriam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PIL - Dowry Givers should be Prosecuted]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PIL - Effective Solution to Reduce False Dowry Cases]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=9854</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Basing on the Pooja Saxena case here, Parents of women who were alleged to have committed the crime of giving dowry were let free. Citations: [2016 SCC ONLINE DEL 2130], [2016 DLT CN B 229 30] Other Source links: https://indiankanoon.org/doc/134987777/ https://www.casemine.com/judgement/in/5728e42ee56109277ee48517 https://www.quickcompany.in/judgements/judgement-7b760d46-8b0b-48bd-9a45-794161ac3e2c</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/chitranjan-dev-goel-and-ors-vs-state-nct-of-delhi-and-ors-on-21-march-2016/">Chitranjan Dev Goel and Ors Vs State (Nct of Delhi) and Ors on 21 March 2016</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/chitranjan-dev-goel-and-ors-vs-state-nct-of-delhi-and-ors-on-21-march-2016/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Malreddy Ramachandra Reddy Vs C. Vanaja Reddy and Ors on 16 April 2003</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/malreddy-ramachandra-reddy-vs-c-vanaja-reddy-and-ors-on-16-april-2003/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/malreddy-ramachandra-reddy-vs-c-vanaja-reddy-and-ors-on-16-april-2003/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2020 09:23:09 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[High Court of Andhra Pradesh Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baseless or Convoluted Judgment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DP Act 3(1) - Giving Taking or Abet to Give or Take is Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DP Act 7(3) - Protection for Aggrieved Person from Prosecution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malreddy Ramachandra Reddy Vs C. Vanaja Reddy and Ors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Misinterpretation of Earlier Judgment or Settle Principle of Law or Per Incuriam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PIL - Dowry Givers should be Prosecuted]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PIL - Effective Solution to Reduce False Dowry Cases]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=9830</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Justice K C Bhanu from AP High Court has held as follows: From Para 2, 2. <a class="glossaryLink"  aria-describedby="tt"  data-cmtooltip="&#60;div class=glossaryItemTitle&#62;Petitioner&#60;/div&#62;&#60;div class=glossaryItemBody&#62;A person who files a petition in court.&#60;/div&#62;"  href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/glossary/petitioner/"  data-gt-translate-attributes='[{"attribute":"data-cmtooltip", "format":"html"}]'  tabindex='0' role='link'>Petitioner</a> is an accused in C.C. No. 224/1995. Chinna Chowk Police laid a charge-sheet against him, his parents and three sisters for an offence punishable under Section 498-A of the Indian Penal Code and for offences punishable under Sections [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/malreddy-ramachandra-reddy-vs-c-vanaja-reddy-and-ors-on-16-april-2003/">Malreddy Ramachandra Reddy Vs C. Vanaja Reddy and Ors on 16 April 2003</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/malreddy-ramachandra-reddy-vs-c-vanaja-reddy-and-ors-on-16-april-2003/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ram Gopal Sah Vs State Of Jharkhand on 03 December 2008</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/ram-gopal-sah-vs-state-of-jharkhand-on-03-december-2008/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/ram-gopal-sah-vs-state-of-jharkhand-on-03-december-2008/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2020 08:45:56 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[High Court of Jharkhand Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baseless or Convoluted Judgment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DP Act 3(1) - Giving Taking or Abet to Give or Take is Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DP Act 7(3) - Protection for Aggrieved Person from Prosecution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PIL - Dowry Givers should be Prosecuted]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PIL - Effective Solution to Reduce False Dowry Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ram Gopal Sah Vs State Of Jharkhand]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=9821</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Justice NN Tiwari had held as follows (without any legal basis): From Para 6, 6. Learned Counsel for the complainant, on the other hand, submitted that the ground for assailing the impugned <a class="glossaryLink"  aria-describedby="tt"  data-cmtooltip="&#60;div class=glossaryItemTitle&#62;Order&#60;/div&#62;&#60;div class=glossaryItemBody&#62;A direction given by a court or judge.&#60;/div&#62;"  href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/glossary/order/"  data-gt-translate-attributes='[{"attribute":"data-cmtooltip", "format":"html"}]'  tabindex='0' role='link'>order</a> by the petitioner is wholly misconceived and baseless. From the allegations made in the complaint, it is evident that the accused persons [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/ram-gopal-sah-vs-state-of-jharkhand-on-03-december-2008/">Ram Gopal Sah Vs State Of Jharkhand on 03 December 2008</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/ram-gopal-sah-vs-state-of-jharkhand-on-03-december-2008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>PIL &#8211; Dowry Givers should be prosecuted (Veerabhadra Rao Pamarathi and Anr Vs UOI and Ors)</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/pil-dowry-givers-should-be-prosecuted-veerabhadra-rao-pamarathi-and-anr-vs-uoi-and-ors/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/pil-dowry-givers-should-be-prosecuted-veerabhadra-rao-pamarathi-and-anr-vs-uoi-and-ors/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2020 06:22:10 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Judicial Activism (for Public Benefit)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DP Act 3(1) - Giving Taking or Abet to Give or Take is Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DP Act 7(3) - Protection for Aggrieved Person from Prosecution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PIL - Dowry Givers should be Prosecuted]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandeep Pamarati]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=9806</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>After losing out (didn&#8217;t lose the case but didn&#8217;t get opportunity to argue in-person) in an earlier attempt here, I decided to take Writ Petition route as I am (along with my parents!) one of the affected person of this biased implementation of a convoluted interpretation of section 7(3) of Dowry Prohibition Act 1961 (amended [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/pil-dowry-givers-should-be-prosecuted-veerabhadra-rao-pamarathi-and-anr-vs-uoi-and-ors/">PIL &#8211; Dowry Givers should be prosecuted (Veerabhadra Rao Pamarathi and Anr Vs UOI and Ors)</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/pil-dowry-givers-should-be-prosecuted-veerabhadra-rao-pamarathi-and-anr-vs-uoi-and-ors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kudarathullah Khan Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 21 March 2012</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/kudarathullah-khan-vs-the-state-of-andhra-pradesh-on-21-march-2012/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/kudarathullah-khan-vs-the-state-of-andhra-pradesh-on-21-march-2012/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2020 05:56:25 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[High Court of Andhra Pradesh Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DP Act 3(1) - Giving Taking or Abet to Give or Take is Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DP Act 7(3) - Protection for Aggrieved Person from Prosecution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice K C Bhanu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kudarathullah Khan Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PIL - Dowry Givers should be Prosecuted]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=9801</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Justice K C Bhanu from AP High Court has held as follows in one of the shortest and cleanest Judgments I have read: From Para 5, 5. Under Section 3 of the Act if any person, after the commencement of this Act gives or takes or abets the giving or taking of dowry, he shall [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/kudarathullah-khan-vs-the-state-of-andhra-pradesh-on-21-march-2012/">Kudarathullah Khan Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 21 March 2012</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/kudarathullah-khan-vs-the-state-of-andhra-pradesh-on-21-march-2012/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Yashpal Kumar Vs Bhola Nath Khanna and Anr on 1 March 2012</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/yashpal-kumar-vs-bhola-nath-khanna-and-anr-on-1-march-2012/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/yashpal-kumar-vs-bhola-nath-khanna-and-anr-on-1-march-2012/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2020 17:05:52 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[High Court of Delhi Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baseless or Convoluted Judgment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DP Act 3(1) - Giving Taking or Abet to Give or Take is Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DP Act 7(3) - Protection for Aggrieved Person from Prosecution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Misinterpretation of Earlier Judgment or Settle Principle of Law or Per Incuriam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PIL - Dowry Givers should be Prosecuted]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PIL - Effective Solution to Reduce False Dowry Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yashpal Kumar Vs Bhola Nath Khanna and Anr]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=9791</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>This is a Delhi High Court judgment where a certain conclusion is made without basis. Just an earlier judgment is cited as support even that one lacks justification. Funny. From Para 8, 8. It is thus evident that Section 7 (3) is a non obstante clause and will thus prevail on any other law for [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/yashpal-kumar-vs-bhola-nath-khanna-and-anr-on-1-march-2012/">Yashpal Kumar Vs Bhola Nath Khanna and Anr on 1 March 2012</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/yashpal-kumar-vs-bhola-nath-khanna-and-anr-on-1-march-2012/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pooja Saxena vs State and Anr on 20 October 2010</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/pooja-saxena-vs-state-and-anr-on-20-october-2010/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/pooja-saxena-vs-state-and-anr-on-20-october-2010/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2020 06:42:24 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[High Court of Delhi Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baseless or Convoluted Judgment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DP Act 3(1) - Giving Taking or Abet to Give or Take is Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DP Act 7(3) - Protection for Aggrieved Person from Prosecution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Misinterpretation of Earlier Judgment or Settle Principle of Law or Per Incuriam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PIL - Dowry Givers should be Prosecuted]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PIL - Effective Solution to Reduce False Dowry Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pooja Saxena vs State and Anr]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=9775</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Read through the Para 11 of this Delhi High Judgment to learn how NOT to draw conclusions from thin air u/s 482 CrPC proceedings. 11. The above observation of this Court obviously is an obiter and does not constitute a binding precedent for the reason that the provisions of the Dowry Prohibition Act 1961 were [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/pooja-saxena-vs-state-and-anr-on-20-october-2010/">Pooja Saxena vs State and Anr on 20 October 2010</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/pooja-saxena-vs-state-and-anr-on-20-october-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 
Lazy Loading (feed)
Minified using Disk

Served from: www.shadesofknife.in @ 2026-06-24 17:33:08 by W3 Total Cache
-->