<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>CrPC 239 - Discharge Rejected Archives - Shades of Knife</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/tag/discharge-under-crpc-239-rejected/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/tag/discharge-under-crpc-239-rejected/</link>
	<description>True Colors of a Vile Wife</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2026 07:19:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Dr. Rini Johar and Anr Vs State of MP and Ors on 03 Jun 2016</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/dr-rini-johar-and-anr-vs-state-of-mp-and-ors-on-03-jun-2016/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/dr-rini-johar-and-anr-vs-state-of-mp-and-ors-on-03-jun-2016/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2022 05:13:35 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2-Judge (Division) Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Catena of Landmark Judgments Referred/Cited to]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 239 - Discharge Rejected]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 239 - Discharge Rejection is Set Aside]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 41 - When police may arrest without warrant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 41B - Procedure of arrest and duties of officer making arrest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 41D - Right of arrested person to meet an advocate of his choice during interrogation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 46 - Arrest how made]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 482 – Criminal Proceeding Quashed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dr. Rini Johar and Anr Vs State of MP and Ors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grant Compensation For False Prosecution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Landmark Case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reportable Judgement or Order]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=15388</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A division bench of Supreme Court granted compensation to victims of police harassment, while quashing the criminal proceedings. From Para 27, 27. In the case at hand, there has been violation of Article 21 and the petitioners were compelled to face humiliation. They have been treated with an attitude of insensibility. Not only there are [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/dr-rini-johar-and-anr-vs-state-of-mp-and-ors-on-03-jun-2016/">Dr. Rini Johar and Anr Vs State of MP and Ors on 03 Jun 2016</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/dr-rini-johar-and-anr-vs-state-of-mp-and-ors-on-03-jun-2016/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Faisal Ahmed Khan Vs State of Karnataka Mahila PS Bengaluru and Anr on 11 Oct 2019</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/faisal-ahmed-khan-vs-state-of-karnataka-mahila-ps-bengaluru-and-anr-on-11-oct-2019/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/faisal-ahmed-khan-vs-state-of-karnataka-mahila-ps-bengaluru-and-anr-on-11-oct-2019/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2022 09:49:01 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[High Court of Karnataka Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abuse Or Misuse of Process of Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 239 - Discharge Rejected]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 239 - Discharge Rejection is Set Aside]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 239 - When accused shall be discharged]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Faisal Ahmed Khan Vs State of Karnataka Mahila PS Bengaluru and Anr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Terrorism]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=14975</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Another false case filer bites the dust&#8230; 10. Undisputed facts of the case are, <a class="glossaryLink"  aria-describedby="tt"  data-cmtooltip="&#60;div class=glossaryItemTitle&#62;Petitioner&#60;/div&#62;&#60;div class=glossaryItemBody&#62;A person who files a petition in court.&#60;/div&#62;"  href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/glossary/petitioner/"  data-gt-translate-attributes='[{"attribute":"data-cmtooltip", "format":"html"}]'  tabindex='0' role='link'>petitioner</a> was married with complainant in July 2008. Even after her marriage with the petitioner, complainant was defending the petition for restitution of conjugal rights filed by her previous husband Asif Farooqi. Within about three years after marriage, her relation with [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/faisal-ahmed-khan-vs-state-of-karnataka-mahila-ps-bengaluru-and-anr-on-11-oct-2019/">Faisal Ahmed Khan Vs State of Karnataka Mahila PS Bengaluru and Anr on 11 Oct 2019</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/faisal-ahmed-khan-vs-state-of-karnataka-mahila-ps-bengaluru-and-anr-on-11-oct-2019/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>CBI Vs Mukesh Pravinchandra Shroff and Ors on 25 November 2005</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/cbi-vs-mukesh-pravinchandra-shroff-and-ors-on-25-november-2005/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/cbi-vs-mukesh-pravinchandra-shroff-and-ors-on-25-november-2005/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2020 16:31:42 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2-Judge (Division) Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBI Vs Mukesh Pravinchandra Shroff and Ors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 227 - Discharge Rejected]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 239 - Discharge Rejected]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Procedure Explained - Interpretation of Statutes]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=10214</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Here is the one of the shortest decisions from Supreme Court From Para 2, 2. By the impugned <a class="glossaryLink"  aria-describedby="tt"  data-cmtooltip="&#60;div class=glossaryItemTitle&#62;Order&#60;/div&#62;&#60;div class=glossaryItemBody&#62;A direction given by a court or judge.&#60;/div&#62;"  href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/glossary/order/"  data-gt-translate-attributes='[{"attribute":"data-cmtooltip", "format":"html"}]'  tabindex='0' role='link'>order</a>, the Special Court has discharged the accused Raghunath Lekhraj Wadhwa, Jitendra Ratilal Shroff and Mukesh Pravinchandra Shroff from Special Case No. 4 of 1997. From a bare perusal of the impugned order, it would appear that [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/cbi-vs-mukesh-pravinchandra-shroff-and-ors-on-25-november-2005/">CBI Vs Mukesh Pravinchandra Shroff and Ors on 25 November 2005</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/cbi-vs-mukesh-pravinchandra-shroff-and-ors-on-25-november-2005/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Savitri WO Maruti Nayak Vs The State Of Karnataka on 11 April, 2017</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/savitri-wo-maruti-nayak-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-11-april-2017/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/savitri-wo-maruti-nayak-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-11-april-2017/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2018 06:22:09 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[High Court of Karnataka Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 239 - Discharge Rejected]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 482 – IPC 498A Quashed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Savitri WO Maruti Nayak Vs The State Of Karnataka]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Witness Statements Not Corroborating The Allegations]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=3874</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Another beautiful judgment from High Court of Karnataka in this revision petition on Discharge dismissal. From Para 10, I have perused the said statements dated 10.07.2011, namely Sangondeppa Siddappa Hulagabal, the statement Sangondeppa Ningondeppa Lesappagol, Shrishail Basappa Gundagi, Kallappa Beerappa Dafedar, Mallappa Mahadev Baligar, Tammanna Beerappa Jakkannavar and Ningappa Siddappa Layannavar. Looking to all these [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/savitri-wo-maruti-nayak-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-11-april-2017/">Savitri WO Maruti Nayak Vs The State Of Karnataka on 11 April, 2017</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/savitri-wo-maruti-nayak-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-11-april-2017/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sheoraj Singh Ahlawat &#038; Ors Vs State Of U.P.&#038; Anr on 9 November, 2012</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/sheoraj-singh-ahlawat-ors-vs-state-of-u-p-anr-on-9-november-2012/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/sheoraj-singh-ahlawat-ors-vs-state-of-u-p-anr-on-9-november-2012/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2018 13:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 239 - Discharge Rejected]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sheoraj Singh Ahlawat and Ors Vs State Of U.P. and Anr]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=3094</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Apex Court in the judgment held that there are specific allegation on the husband and his parents on a IPC 498A case and hence dismissed their <a class="glossaryLink"  aria-describedby="tt"  data-cmtooltip="&#60;div class=glossaryItemTitle&#62;Appeal&#60;/div&#62;&#60;div class=glossaryItemBody&#62;A request to a higher court to review a decision.&#60;/div&#62;"  href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/glossary/appeal/"  data-gt-translate-attributes='[{"attribute":"data-cmtooltip", "format":"html"}]'  tabindex='0' role='link'>appeal</a> requesting their discharge from the case. &#160;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/sheoraj-singh-ahlawat-ors-vs-state-of-u-p-anr-on-9-november-2012/">Sheoraj Singh Ahlawat &#038; Ors Vs State Of U.P.&#038; Anr on 9 November, 2012</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/sheoraj-singh-ahlawat-ors-vs-state-of-u-p-anr-on-9-november-2012/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>State of Karnataka Vs H.K. Nagaraj Kumar on 16 April, 2018</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/state-of-karnataka-vs-h-k-nagaraj-kumar-on-16-april-2018/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/state-of-karnataka-vs-h-k-nagaraj-kumar-on-16-april-2018/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2018 10:21:50 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[District or Sessions or Magistrate Court Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 239 - Discharge Rejected]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Misinterpretation of Earlier Judgment or Settle Principle of Law or Per Incuriam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State of Karnataka Vs H.K. Nagaraj Kumar]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=2890</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>This is judgment from a Senior Civil Judge at Tumkur. See how he totally flouts the settled principles in law established by Hon&#8217;ble Apex Court in a catena of judgments that if accused produces <a class="glossaryLink"  aria-describedby="tt"  data-cmtooltip="&#60;div class=glossaryItemTitle&#62;Evidence&#60;/div&#62;&#60;div class=glossaryItemBody&#62;Information presented in court to prove facts.&#60;/div&#62;"  href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/glossary/evidence/"  data-gt-translate-attributes='[{"attribute":"data-cmtooltip", "format":"html"}]'  tabindex='0' role='link'>evidence</a> of sterling quality which destroys the case of prosecution, it can be looked into. From Para 9, Therefore, at this [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/state-of-karnataka-vs-h-k-nagaraj-kumar-on-16-april-2018/">State of Karnataka Vs H.K. Nagaraj Kumar on 16 April, 2018</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/state-of-karnataka-vs-h-k-nagaraj-kumar-on-16-april-2018/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sandeep Pamarati Vs Ungrateful Knife (IPC 498A Case)</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/sandeep-pamarati-vs-ungrateful-knife-ipc-498a-case/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/sandeep-pamarati-vs-ungrateful-knife-ipc-498a-case/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2018 10:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Sandeep Pamarati]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 239 - Discharge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 239 - Discharge Rejected]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 248 - Acquittal or conviction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPC 498A - Husband or relative of husband of a woman subjecting her to cruelty]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=615</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Hi Folks, Sharing with you all, how I dealt with the false 498A IPC case put on me and my innocent parents, along with timelines. I have also shared samples/templates made out of my petitions (obviously, totally redacted) along with below timelines, in PDF format. Take little pains to have them drafted for your cases. [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/sandeep-pamarati-vs-ungrateful-knife-ipc-498a-case/">Sandeep Pamarati Vs Ungrateful Knife (IPC 498A Case)</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/sandeep-pamarati-vs-ungrateful-knife-ipc-498a-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 
Lazy Loading (feed)
Minified using Disk

Served from: www.shadesofknife.in @ 2026-09-12 17:58:45 by W3 Total Cache
-->