<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>CrPC 397(2) - Revision Not Exercised in Any Interlocutory Order Archives - Shades of Knife</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/tag/crpc-3972-revision-not-exercised-in-any-interlocutory-order/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/tag/crpc-3972-revision-not-exercised-in-any-interlocutory-order/</link>
	<description>True Colors of a Vile Wife</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2025 11:17:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Union of India and Anr Vs W.N.Chadha on 17 Dec 1992</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/union-of-india-and-anr-vs-w-n-chadha-on-17-dec-1992/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/union-of-india-and-anr-vs-w-n-chadha-on-17-dec-1992/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Mar 2023 11:47:17 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2-Judge (Division) Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 156(3) - Any Magistrate Empowered u/s 190 May Order Such an Investigation as above-mentioned]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 397(2) - Revision Not Exercised in an Order under 156(3) CrPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 397(2) - Revision Not Exercised in Any Interlocutory Order]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Landmark Case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Procedure Explained - Interpretation of Statutes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Not Authentic copy hence to be replaced]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reportable Judgement or Order]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Union of India and Anr Vs W.N.Chadha]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=17427</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A Division bench of the Apex Court held as follows, From Para 91, 91. More so, the accused has no right to have any say as regards the manner and method of investigation. Save under certain exceptions under the entire scheme of the Code, the accused has no participation as a matter of right during [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/union-of-india-and-anr-vs-w-n-chadha-on-17-dec-1992/">Union of India and Anr Vs W.N.Chadha on 17 Dec 1992</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/union-of-india-and-anr-vs-w-n-chadha-on-17-dec-1992/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Manoj Kumar Vs State (NCT of Delhi) on 17 Mar 2018</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/manoj-kumar-vs-state-nct-of-delhi-on-17-mar-2018/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/manoj-kumar-vs-state-nct-of-delhi-on-17-mar-2018/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2022 19:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[District or Sessions or Magistrate Court Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1-Judge Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 397(2) - Revision Not Exercised in Any Interlocutory Order]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 397/399 - Revision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 399 - Sessions Judge's powers of revision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dismissal of NBW Cancellation is not Interlocutory so Revision is Maintainable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Issue of Non-Bailable Warrant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manoj Kumar Vs State (NCT of Delhi)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[P.A.Saleem Vs State of Madras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Remedy when Non-Bailable Warrant Not Recalled]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=16251</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A District Court in Delhi passed this detailed Judgment, relying on earlier Madras HC judgment here. From Para 7, At this juncture, reference may be made to Saleem P.A. etc. v. State reported as (1994) 2 LW (Crl.) 402, which is relevant for the present purpose. Paragraph 24 thereof is reproduced as under: &#8220; 24. [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/manoj-kumar-vs-state-nct-of-delhi-on-17-mar-2018/">Manoj Kumar Vs State (NCT of Delhi) on 17 Mar 2018</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/manoj-kumar-vs-state-nct-of-delhi-on-17-mar-2018/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>P.A.Saleem Vs State of Madras on 13 Jul 1994</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/p-a-saleem-vs-state-of-madras-on-13-jul-1994/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/p-a-saleem-vs-state-of-madras-on-13-jul-1994/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2022 18:41:59 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[High Court of Madras Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2-Judge (Division) Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 397(2) - Revision Not Exercised in Any Interlocutory Order]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 397/399 - Revision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 399 - Sessions Judge's powers of revision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dismissal of NBW Cancellation is not Interlocutory so Revision is Maintainable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Issue of Non-Bailable Warrant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Not Authentic copy hence to be replaced]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[P.A.Saleem Vs State of Madras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Remedy when Non-Bailable Warrant Not Recalled]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=16238</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Madras High Court held that, Dismissal of NBW Cancellation is not Interlocutory so Revision is Maintainable u/s 397 CrPC. (24) In view of the discussions as above, the following positions emerge: (1) issuance of a warrant of arrest by a court under this code shall remain in force beyond the date fixed for its return, [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/p-a-saleem-vs-state-of-madras-on-13-jul-1994/">P.A.Saleem Vs State of Madras on 13 Jul 1994</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/p-a-saleem-vs-state-of-madras-on-13-jul-1994/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Girish Kumar Suneja Vs CBI on 13 Jul 2017</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/girish-kumar-suneja-vs-cbi-on-13-jul-2017/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/girish-kumar-suneja-vs-cbi-on-13-jul-2017/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2020 11:02:15 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3-Judge (Full) Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Catena of Landmark Judgments Referred/Cited to]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 397(1) - Stay on Lower Court Proceedings in Revision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 397(2) - Revision Not Exercised in Any Interlocutory Order]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doctrine of Colourable Legislation - Exceeding the Power Entrusted with]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Girish Kumar Suneja Vs CBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intermediate Orders are not Interlocutory Orders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Landmark Case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latin maxim - “Quando aliquid prohibetur ex directo prohibetur et per obliquum”]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latin maxim - “What cannot be done directly cannot be done indirectly”]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reportable Judgement or Order]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=12350</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Supreme Court held that all those <a class="glossaryLink"  aria-describedby="tt"  data-cmtooltip="&#60;div class=glossaryItemTitle&#62;Order&#60;/div&#62;&#60;div class=glossaryItemBody&#62;A direction given by a court or judge.&#60;/div&#62;"  href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/glossary/order/"  data-gt-translate-attributes='[{"attribute":"data-cmtooltip", "format":"html"}]'  tabindex='0' role='link'>Order</a> of a <a class="glossaryLink"  aria-describedby="tt"  data-cmtooltip="&#60;div class=glossaryItemTitle&#62;Trial&#60;/div&#62;&#60;div class=glossaryItemBody&#62;A formal examination of evidence before a judge.&#60;/div&#62;"  href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/glossary/trial/"  data-gt-translate-attributes='[{"attribute":"data-cmtooltip", "format":"html"}]'  tabindex='0' role='link'>Trial</a> Court which terminate the proceedings are not interlocutory Order but are intermediate orders in nature so such Orders are not prohibited in Revision at Session or High Courts. From Para 16, 17 and 18, 16. While the text of sub-section (1) of Section 397 of [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/girish-kumar-suneja-vs-cbi-on-13-jul-2017/">Girish Kumar Suneja Vs CBI on 13 Jul 2017</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/girish-kumar-suneja-vs-cbi-on-13-jul-2017/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>CrPC 397 &#8211; Calling for records to exercise powers of revision</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/crpc-397-calling-for-records-to-exercise-powers-of-revision/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/crpc-397-calling-for-records-to-exercise-powers-of-revision/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2020 10:16:45 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Bare Acts or State Amendments or Statutes or GOs or Notifications issued by Central or State Governments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 397 - Calling for records to exercise powers of revision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 397(1) - Stay on Lower Court Proceedings in Revision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 397(2) - Revision Not Exercised in Any Interlocutory Order]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 397(3) - Second Revision is Not Permissible]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=12338</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>(1) The High Court or any Sessions Judge may call for and examine the record of any proceeding before any inferior Criminal Court situate within its or his local <a class="glossaryLink"  aria-describedby="tt"  data-cmtooltip="&#60;div class=glossaryItemTitle&#62;Jurisdiction&#60;/div&#62;&#60;div class=glossaryItemBody&#62;The authority of a court to hear a case.&#60;/div&#62;"  href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/glossary/jurisdiction/"  data-gt-translate-attributes='[{"attribute":"data-cmtooltip", "format":"html"}]'  tabindex='0' role='link'>jurisdiction</a> for the purpose of satisfying itself or himself; to the correctness, legality or propriety of any finding, sentence or order, recorded or passed, and as [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/crpc-397-calling-for-records-to-exercise-powers-of-revision/">CrPC 397 &#8211; Calling for records to exercise powers of revision</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/crpc-397-calling-for-records-to-exercise-powers-of-revision/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>MS. Bhaskar Industries Ltd Vs MS. Bhiwani Denim and Apparels Ltd and Ors on 27 August 2001</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/ms-bhaskar-industries-ltd-vs-ms-bhiwani-denim-apparels-ltd-and-ors-on-27-august-2001/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/ms-bhaskar-industries-ltd-vs-ms-bhiwani-denim-apparels-ltd-and-ors-on-27-august-2001/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2020 06:04:15 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2-Judge (Division) Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 205 – Magistrate may dispense with personal attendance of accused]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 397(2) - Revision Not Exercised in Any Interlocutory Order]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Landmark Case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Procedure Explained - Interpretation of Statutes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MS. Bhaskar Industries Ltd Vs MS. Bhiwani Denim & Apparels Ltd and Ors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reportable Judgement or Order]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=8584</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Supreme Court held the scope of 205 CrPC in this judgment as, Second is that it is difficult, in the absence of other materials, to decide positively whether the order dated 28.4.2000 is an interlocutory order only. The interdict contained in Section 397(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short the Code) is that [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/ms-bhaskar-industries-ltd-vs-ms-bhiwani-denim-apparels-ltd-and-ors-on-27-august-2001/">MS. Bhaskar Industries Ltd Vs MS. Bhiwani Denim and Apparels Ltd and Ors on 27 August 2001</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/ms-bhaskar-industries-ltd-vs-ms-bhiwani-denim-apparels-ltd-and-ors-on-27-august-2001/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 
Lazy Loading (feed)
Minified using Disk

Served from: www.shadesofknife.in @ 2026-09-12 19:29:00 by W3 Total Cache
-->