<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>CrPC 167 - Procedure when investigation cannot be completed in twenty-four hours Archives - Shades of Knife</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/tag/crpc-167-procedure-when-investigation-cannot-be-completed-in-twenty-four-hours/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/tag/crpc-167-procedure-when-investigation-cannot-be-completed-in-twenty-four-hours/</link>
	<description>True Colors of a Vile Wife</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 05:59:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.2</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Bikramjit Singh Vs State of Punjab on 12 Oct 2020</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/bikramjit-singh-vs-state-of-punjab-on-12-oct-2020/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/bikramjit-singh-vs-state-of-punjab-on-12-oct-2020/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2020 16:21:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3-Judge (Full) Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bikramjit Singh Vs State of Punjab]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 167 - Default Bail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 167 - Procedure when investigation cannot be completed in twenty-four hours]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Procedure Explained - Interpretation of Statutes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reportable Judgement or Order]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=11918</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Supreme Court held that, the default <a class="glossaryLink"  aria-describedby="tt"  data-cmtooltip="&#60;div class=glossaryItemTitle&#62;Bail&#60;/div&#62;&#60;div class=glossaryItemBody&#62;Temporary release of an accused person awaiting trial.&#60;/div&#62;"  href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/glossary/bail/"  data-gt-translate-attributes='[{"attribute":"data-cmtooltip", "format":"html"}]'  tabindex='0' role='link'>bail</a> that is available to an accused person u/s 167(2)(a) of CrPC, is part of the fundamental rights available to him/her under Article 21 of Constitution of India. From Para 28, A conspectus of the aforesaid decisions would show that so long as an application for grant of default [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/bikramjit-singh-vs-state-of-punjab-on-12-oct-2020/">Bikramjit Singh Vs State of Punjab on 12 Oct 2020</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/bikramjit-singh-vs-state-of-punjab-on-12-oct-2020/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Subhash Bahadur @Upender Vs State (NCT of Delhi) on 6 Nov 2020</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/subhash-bahadur-upender-vs-state-nct-of-delhi-on-6-nov-2020/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/subhash-bahadur-upender-vs-state-nct-of-delhi-on-6-nov-2020/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2020 16:11:39 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[High Court of Delhi Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Article 21 - Protection of life and personal liberty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 167 - Default Bail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 167 - Procedure when investigation cannot be completed in twenty-four hours]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subhash Bahadur @Upender Vs State (NCT of Delhi)]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=11913</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Delhi High Court held that there is no need for filing an formal application seeking default bail, once the conditions set out in section 167(2)(a) are made out, as continued confinement violates fundamental right under Article 21. From Paras 32, 33 and 34, 32. A plain reading of the Proviso (a) to Section 167(2) of [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/subhash-bahadur-upender-vs-state-nct-of-delhi-on-6-nov-2020/">Subhash Bahadur @Upender Vs State (NCT of Delhi) on 6 Nov 2020</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/subhash-bahadur-upender-vs-state-nct-of-delhi-on-6-nov-2020/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Saravanan Vs State Rep by the Inspector of Police on 15 Oct 2020</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/saravanan-vs-state-rep-by-the-inspector-of-police-on-15-oct-2020/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/saravanan-vs-state-rep-by-the-inspector-of-police-on-15-oct-2020/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2020 08:21:22 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3-Judge (Full) Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 167 - Procedure when investigation cannot be completed in twenty-four hours]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 437 - When bail may be taken in case of Non-Bailable Offence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reportable Judgement or Order]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saravanan Vs State Rep by the Inspector of Police]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=11332</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Supreme Court answered this short question in this reportable case of a regular/default bail issue where <a class="glossaryLink"  aria-describedby="tt"  data-cmtooltip="&#60;div class=glossaryItemTitle&#62;Trial&#60;/div&#62;&#60;div class=glossaryItemBody&#62;A formal examination of evidence before a judge.&#60;/div&#62;"  href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/glossary/trial/"  data-gt-translate-attributes='[{"attribute":"data-cmtooltip", "format":"html"}]'  tabindex='0' role='link'>Trial</a> court and High Court imposed Rs.8,00,000/- as a deposit. whether while releasing the appellant-accused on default bail/statutory bail under Section 167(2), Cr.P.C., any condition of deposit of amount as imposed by the High Court, could have been imposed? [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/saravanan-vs-state-rep-by-the-inspector-of-police-on-15-oct-2020/">Saravanan Vs State Rep by the Inspector of Police on 15 Oct 2020</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/saravanan-vs-state-rep-by-the-inspector-of-police-on-15-oct-2020/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>All Bail Judgments</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/all-bail-judgments/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/all-bail-judgments/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2020 16:40:17 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Assorted Court Judgments or Orders or Notifications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Catena of Landmark Judgments Referred/Cited to]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 167 - Procedure when investigation cannot be completed in twenty-four hours]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 167(2) - Default or Statutory Bail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 437 - When bail may be taken in case of Non-Bailable Offence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC Sec 438 - Anticipatory Bail]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=10359</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Here are all kinds of Bail matters, granted/denied, Regular/Anticipatory etc Station Bail Regular Bail Orders u/s 437 Anticipatory Bail Orders u/s 438 CrPC Default or Statutory Bail u/s 167(2) Transit Bail NBW Judgments &#160; Index to MASTER sitemap here.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/all-bail-judgments/">All Bail Judgments</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/all-bail-judgments/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>CrPC 167 &#8211; Procedure when investigation cannot be completed in twenty-four hours</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/crpc-167-procedure-when-investigation-cannot-be-completed-in-twenty-four-hours/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/crpc-167-procedure-when-investigation-cannot-be-completed-in-twenty-four-hours/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2020 09:33:26 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Bare Acts or State Amendments or Statutes or GOs or Notifications issued by Central or State Governments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 167 - Procedure when investigation cannot be completed in twenty-four hours]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=9961</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>(1) Whenever any person is arrested and detained in custody, and it appears that the investigation cannot be completed within the period of twenty-four hours fixed by section 57, and there are grounds for believing that the accusation or information is well-founded, the officer in charge of the police station or the police officer making [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/crpc-167-procedure-when-investigation-cannot-be-completed-in-twenty-four-hours/">CrPC 167 &#8211; Procedure when investigation cannot be completed in twenty-four hours</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/crpc-167-procedure-when-investigation-cannot-be-completed-in-twenty-four-hours/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 
Lazy Loading (feed)
Minified using Disk

Served from: www.shadesofknife.in @ 2026-10-05 02:04:12 by W3 Total Cache
-->