<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PWDV Act Sec 22 - Compensation Granted Archives - Shades of Knife</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/tag/compensation-under-22-dvact/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/tag/compensation-under-22-dvact/</link>
	<description>True Colors of a Vile Wife</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Mar 2024 04:56:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Dr.XXXXX Vs Dr.XXXXX on 16 Jun 2020</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/dr-xxxxx-vs-dr-xxxxx-on-16-jun-2020/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/dr-xxxxx-vs-dr-xxxxx-on-16-jun-2020/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2022 06:42:48 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[District or Sessions or Magistrate Court Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dr.XXXXX Vs Dr.XXXXX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Misinterpretation of Earlier Judgment or Settle Principle of Law or Per Incuriam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Perverse Order/Judgment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PWDV Act Sec 20 - Maintenance Granted]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PWDV Act Sec 22 - Compensation Granted]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=16216</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Look at the perversity of the Judgment. Bad <a class="glossaryLink"  aria-describedby="tt"  data-cmtooltip="&#60;div class=glossaryItemTitle&#62;Cross-Examination&#60;/div&#62;&#60;div class=glossaryItemBody&#62;Questioning of a witness by the opposing party&#60;/div&#62;"  href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/glossary/cross-examination/"  data-gt-translate-attributes='[{"attribute":"data-cmtooltip", "format":"html"}]'  tabindex='0' role='link'>cross-examination</a> led to Part allowance of this DV case. And a free copy of Judgment only to <a class="glossaryLink"  aria-describedby="tt"  data-cmtooltip="&#60;div class=glossaryItemTitle&#62;Petitioner&#60;/div&#62;&#60;div class=glossaryItemBody&#62;A person who files a petition in court.&#60;/div&#62;"  href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/glossary/petitioner/"  data-gt-translate-attributes='[{"attribute":"data-cmtooltip", "format":"html"}]'  tabindex='0' role='link'>petitioner</a>/wife. A copy for Husband? Sec 24 of the PWDV Act gone to dogs&#8230; Index of their cases is here.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/dr-xxxxx-vs-dr-xxxxx-on-16-jun-2020/">Dr.XXXXX Vs Dr.XXXXX on 16 Jun 2020</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/dr-xxxxx-vs-dr-xxxxx-on-16-jun-2020/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>T.V.Vyshnavi Vs N.Govindaraj on 12 January, 2017</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/t-v-vyshnavi-vs-n-govindaraj-on-12-january-2017/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/t-v-vyshnavi-vs-n-govindaraj-on-12-january-2017/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2018 14:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Chittor DV Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ex Parte Order]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PWDV Act Sec 18 - Protection Order Granted]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PWDV Act Sec 20 - Maintenance Granted]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PWDV Act Sec 22 - Compensation Granted]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[T.V.Vyshnavi Vs N.Govindaraj]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=4261</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A new story to be heard in this <a class="glossaryLink"  aria-describedby="tt"  data-cmtooltip="&#60;div class=glossaryItemTitle&#62;Ex parte&#60;/div&#62;&#60;div class=glossaryItemBody&#62;A legal proceeding conducted by one party without the presence of the other.&#60;/div&#62;"  href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/glossary/ex-parte/"  data-gt-translate-attributes='[{"attribute":"data-cmtooltip", "format":"html"}]'  tabindex='0' role='link'>ex parte</a> <a class="glossaryLink"  aria-describedby="tt"  data-cmtooltip="&#60;div class=glossaryItemTitle&#62;Order&#60;/div&#62;&#60;div class=glossaryItemBody&#62;A direction given by a court or judge.&#60;/div&#62;"  href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/glossary/order/"  data-gt-translate-attributes='[{"attribute":"data-cmtooltip", "format":"html"}]'  tabindex='0' role='link'>order</a>. Protection, Maintenance and Compensation orders are granted. [related_posts_by_tax title=&#8221;5 Recently Updated Posts, Similar or Related To Above Post&#8221; orderby=&#8221;post_modified&#8221; posts_per_page=&#8221;5&#8243; show_date=&#8221;true&#8221;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/t-v-vyshnavi-vs-n-govindaraj-on-12-january-2017/">T.V.Vyshnavi Vs N.Govindaraj on 12 January, 2017</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/t-v-vyshnavi-vs-n-govindaraj-on-12-january-2017/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shaik Sahanaj Begum Vs Shaik Mohammed Rafi on 29 October, 2015</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/shaik-sahanaj-begum-vs-shaik-mohammed-rafi-on-29-october-2015/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/shaik-sahanaj-begum-vs-shaik-mohammed-rafi-on-29-october-2015/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2018 20:09:13 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Anantapur DV Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PWDV Act Sec 18 - Protection Order Denied]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PWDV Act Sec 19 - Residential Order (Rent) Granted]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PWDV Act Sec 20 - Maintenance Granted]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PWDV Act Sec 21 - Custody Denied]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PWDV Act Sec 22 - Compensation Granted]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shaik Sahanaj Begum Vs Shaik Mohammed Rafi]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=4130</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Except for a paltry maintenance and residence order, rest of the beggings are dismissed by the Hon&#8217;ble Court in this DV Case. &#160;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/shaik-sahanaj-begum-vs-shaik-mohammed-rafi-on-29-october-2015/">Shaik Sahanaj Begum Vs Shaik Mohammed Rafi on 29 October, 2015</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/shaik-sahanaj-begum-vs-shaik-mohammed-rafi-on-29-october-2015/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Harijana Thodugu Mannala Savithramma Vs Harijana Thodugu Mannala Vijaya Simha on 17 February, 2012</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/harijana-thodugu-mannala-savithramma-vs-harijana-thodugu-mannala-vijaya-simha-on-17-february-2012/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/harijana-thodugu-mannala-savithramma-vs-harijana-thodugu-mannala-vijaya-simha-on-17-february-2012/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2018 17:14:15 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Anantapur DV Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economic Abuce under DV Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harijana Thodugu Mannala Savithramma Vs Harijana Thodugu Mannala Vijaya Simha]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PWDV Act Sec 18 - Protection Order Granted]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PWDV Act Sec 19 - Residential Order (Share in Property) Granted]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PWDV Act Sec 22 - Compensation Granted]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Right to Residence in InLaws property]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=4111</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Economic abuse is established in this DV case from Anantapur DV Cases Series. Gross misuse of power or glorified ineptness towards differentiating between a Civil Suit for property and giving Residence (not property) Order under DV Act. &#160;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/harijana-thodugu-mannala-savithramma-vs-harijana-thodugu-mannala-vijaya-simha-on-17-february-2012/">Harijana Thodugu Mannala Savithramma Vs Harijana Thodugu Mannala Vijaya Simha on 17 February, 2012</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/harijana-thodugu-mannala-savithramma-vs-harijana-thodugu-mannala-vijaya-simha-on-17-february-2012/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kunapureddy Swarna Kumari Vs Kunapureddy @ Nookala Shanka Balaji Naidu on 12 August, 2016</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/kunapureddy-swarna-kumari-vs-kunapureddy-nookala-shanka-balaji-naidu-on-12-august-2016/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/kunapureddy-swarna-kumari-vs-kunapureddy-nookala-shanka-balaji-naidu-on-12-august-2016/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2018 15:18:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[West Godavari DV Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baseless or Convoluted Judgment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kunapureddy Swarna Kumari Vs Kunapureddy @ Nookala Shanka Balaji Naidu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[No Territorial Jurisdiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PWDV Act Sec 18 - Protection Order Granted]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PWDV Act Sec 20 - Maintenance From Date of Order]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PWDV Act Sec 20 - Maintenance Granted]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PWDV Act Sec 22 - Compensation Granted]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=3062</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>I am going to start the first of the DV cases from West Godavari district with this case which resulted in a key judgment from Hon&#8217;ble Supreme Court wherein it was held that courts can allow amendments to the complaint so as to avoid multiplicity of cases and remove infirmities. Read it here. Later on, [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/kunapureddy-swarna-kumari-vs-kunapureddy-nookala-shanka-balaji-naidu-on-12-august-2016/">Kunapureddy Swarna Kumari Vs Kunapureddy @ Nookala Shanka Balaji Naidu on 12 August, 2016</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/kunapureddy-swarna-kumari-vs-kunapureddy-nookala-shanka-balaji-naidu-on-12-august-2016/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ganipineni Sudharani Vs Ganipineni KrishnaMohan on 2 May, 2017</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/ganipineni-sudharani-vs-ganipineni-krishnamohan-on-2-may-2017/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/ganipineni-sudharani-vs-ganipineni-krishnamohan-on-2-may-2017/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2018 17:54:43 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Prakasam DV Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ganipineni Sudharani Vs Ganipineni KrishnaMohan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magistrate Sravan Kumar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Misinterpretation of Earlier Judgment or Settle Principle of Law or Per Incuriam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PWDV Act Sec 18 - Protection Order Granted]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PWDV Act Sec 19 - Residential Order (Rent) Granted]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PWDV Act Sec 20 - Maintenance Granted]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PWDV Act Sec 22 - Compensation Granted]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=2807</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Here is another BS judgment from same justice. Blatant misinterpretation of an earlier Supreme Court order to cause advantage to the party of Knife. Either by ignorance or for kickbacks received. God Knows Shame on him. &#160;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/ganipineni-sudharani-vs-ganipineni-krishnamohan-on-2-may-2017/">Ganipineni Sudharani Vs Ganipineni KrishnaMohan on 2 May, 2017</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/ganipineni-sudharani-vs-ganipineni-krishnamohan-on-2-may-2017/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ravuri Venkata Lakshmi Mahathi Vs Ravuri Venkata Durga Butchi Rajeswararao on 22 April, 2016</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/ravuri-venkata-lakshmi-mahathi-vs-ravuri-venkata-durga-butchi-rajeswararao-on-22-april-2016/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/ravuri-venkata-lakshmi-mahathi-vs-ravuri-venkata-durga-butchi-rajeswararao-on-22-april-2016/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2018 18:24:25 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Prakasam DV Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magistrate Sravan Kumar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Misinterpretation of Earlier Judgment or Settle Principle of Law or Per Incuriam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PWDV Act Sec 18 - Protection Order Granted]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PWDV Act Sec 20 - Maintenance Granted]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PWDV Act Sec 22 - Compensation Granted]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ravuri Venkata Lakshmi Mahathi Vs Ravuri Venkata Durga Butchi Rajeswararao]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=2722</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Read this judgment to understand how the biased judges give liberal reliefs using gender-biased laws such as PWDV Act. In the process wrongly interpret the Delhi High Court judgment, wherein in reality High Court has declined giving maintenance to unscrupulous knife, our judge in this present case understood and interpreted it totally wrongly and to [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/ravuri-venkata-lakshmi-mahathi-vs-ravuri-venkata-durga-butchi-rajeswararao-on-22-april-2016/">Ravuri Venkata Lakshmi Mahathi Vs Ravuri Venkata Durga Butchi Rajeswararao on 22 April, 2016</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/ravuri-venkata-lakshmi-mahathi-vs-ravuri-venkata-durga-butchi-rajeswararao-on-22-april-2016/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Madhala Sujatha Vs Madhala Srinivasulu on 8 June, 2015</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/madhala-sujatha-vs-madhala-srinivasulu-on-8-june-2015/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/madhala-sujatha-vs-madhala-srinivasulu-on-8-june-2015/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2018 19:58:36 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Prakasam DV Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Madhala Sujatha Vs Madhala Srinivasulu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PWDV Act Sec 18 - Protection Order Granted]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PWDV Act Sec 20 - Maintenance Granted]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PWDV Act Sec 22 - Compensation Granted]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=2718</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Interesting points in this case of DV. PW1 has deposed in her chief examination that at the time of her marriage her parents have given cash of Rs.1,81,000/- and gold ornaments weighing 20 sovereigns to the <a class="glossaryLink"  aria-describedby="tt"  data-cmtooltip="&#60;div class=glossaryItemTitle&#62;Respondent&#60;/div&#62;&#60;div class=glossaryItemBody&#62;The party against whom a case is filed.&#60;/div&#62;"  href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/glossary/respondent/"  data-gt-translate-attributes='[{"attribute":"data-cmtooltip", "format":"html"}]'  tabindex='0' role='link'>respondent</a> no.1. PW1 has stated during the course of her cross-examination that the said cash and gold ornaments were [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/madhala-sujatha-vs-madhala-srinivasulu-on-8-june-2015/">Madhala Sujatha Vs Madhala Srinivasulu on 8 June, 2015</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/madhala-sujatha-vs-madhala-srinivasulu-on-8-june-2015/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shaik Shakheela Vs Shaik Mahamad Rafi on 22 September, 2017</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/shaik-shakheela-vs-shaik-mahamad-rafi-on-22-september-2017/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/shaik-shakheela-vs-shaik-mahamad-rafi-on-22-september-2017/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2018 19:05:22 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Prakasam DV Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ex Parte Order]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PWDV Act Sec 18 - Protection Order Granted]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PWDV Act Sec 19 - Residential Order (Rent) Granted]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PWDV Act Sec 20 - Maintenance Granted]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PWDV Act Sec 22 - Compensation Granted]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shaik Shakheela Vs Shaik Mahamad Rafi]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=2712</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>This is another ex parte order in the DV Case. Since there is no challenge to the averments of the Knife in the petition, Judge liberally allows reliefs. &#160;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/shaik-shakheela-vs-shaik-mahamad-rafi-on-22-september-2017/">Shaik Shakheela Vs Shaik Mahamad Rafi on 22 September, 2017</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/shaik-shakheela-vs-shaik-mahamad-rafi-on-22-september-2017/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tagaram Raja Kumari Vs Cherukuri Aruna Kumar on 20 January, 2015</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/tagaram-raja-kumari-vs-cherukuri-aruna-kumar-on-20-january-2015/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/tagaram-raja-kumari-vs-cherukuri-aruna-kumar-on-20-january-2015/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2018 03:27:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Prakasam DV Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PWDV Act Sec 12 - DV Case Proved And Reliefs Granted]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PWDV Act Sec 18 - Protection Order Granted]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PWDV Act Sec 19 - Residential Order (Rent) Granted]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PWDV Act Sec 20 - Maintenance Granted]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PWDV Act Sec 22 - Compensation Granted]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tagaram Raja Kumari Vs Cherukuri Aruna Kumar]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=2680</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Hon&#8217;ble court in this judgment ordered monthly maintenance, protection order, residence order, compensation and also litigation costs. From Para 10, The respondents dispute the marriage of the petitioner with the respondent no.1 and the status of the petitioner as the legally wedded wife of the respondent no.1. No doubt the petitioner did not produce any [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/tagaram-raja-kumari-vs-cherukuri-aruna-kumar-on-20-january-2015/">Tagaram Raja Kumari Vs Cherukuri Aruna Kumar on 20 January, 2015</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/tagaram-raja-kumari-vs-cherukuri-aruna-kumar-on-20-january-2015/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 
Lazy Loading (feed)
Minified using Disk

Served from: www.shadesofknife.in @ 2026-09-12 18:47:54 by W3 Total Cache
-->