<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Burden of Proof shifts to Accused after initial burden has been discharged by the prosecution Archives - Shades of Knife</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/tag/burden-of-proof-shifts-to-accused-after-initial-burden-has-been-discharged-by-the-prosecution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/tag/burden-of-proof-shifts-to-accused-after-initial-burden-has-been-discharged-by-the-prosecution/</link>
	<description>True Colors of a Vile Wife</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2026 18:23:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.1</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>State of Maharashtra Vs Dnyaneshwar Laxman Rao Wankhede on 29 Jul 2009</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/state-of-maharashtra-vs-dnyaneshwar-laxman-rao-wankhede-on-29-jul-2009/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/state-of-maharashtra-vs-dnyaneshwar-laxman-rao-wankhede-on-29-jul-2009/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2023 15:11:18 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2-Judge (Division) Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Burden of Proof shifts to Accused after initial burden has been discharged by the prosecution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Catena of Landmark Judgments Referred/Cited to]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Landmark Case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reportable Judgement or Order]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State of Maharashtra Vs Dnyaneshwar Laxman Rao Wankhede]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=17275</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A division bench of Apex Court cited precedents holding that, From Para 20, 20. Even in a case where the burden is on the accused, it is well-known, the prosecution must prove the foundational facts. [See Noor Aga v. State of Punjab 2008 (9) SCALE 691 and Jayendra Vishnu Thakur v. State of Maharashtra and [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/state-of-maharashtra-vs-dnyaneshwar-laxman-rao-wankhede-on-29-jul-2009/">State of Maharashtra Vs Dnyaneshwar Laxman Rao Wankhede on 29 Jul 2009</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/state-of-maharashtra-vs-dnyaneshwar-laxman-rao-wankhede-on-29-jul-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nawab Vs State of Uttarakhand on 22 Jan 2020</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/nawab-vs-state-of-uttarakhand-on-22-jan-2020/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/nawab-vs-state-of-uttarakhand-on-22-jan-2020/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2021 16:14:03 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2-Judge (Division) Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Burden of Proof shifts to Accused after initial burden has been discharged by the prosecution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Circumstantial Evidence - Suspicion cannot take the place of proof]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evidence Act 106 - Burden of Proving Fact Especially Within Knowledge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nawab Vs State of Uttarakhand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sharad Birdhi Chand Sarda Vs State of Maharashtra]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=13212</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Based on Sharad BirdhiChand here, Apex Court held that the defence of accused is full of holes and cannot be believed and hence his <a class="glossaryLink"  aria-describedby="tt"  data-cmtooltip="&#60;div class=glossaryItemTitle&#62;Appeal&#60;/div&#62;&#60;div class=glossaryItemBody&#62;A request to a higher court to review a decision.&#60;/div&#62;"  href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/glossary/appeal/"  data-gt-translate-attributes='[{"attribute":"data-cmtooltip", "format":"html"}]'  tabindex='0' role='link'>appeal</a> was dismissed.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/nawab-vs-state-of-uttarakhand-on-22-jan-2020/">Nawab Vs State of Uttarakhand on 22 Jan 2020</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/nawab-vs-state-of-uttarakhand-on-22-jan-2020/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sharad Birdhi Chand Sarda Vs State of Maharashtra on 17 Jul 1984</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/sharad-birdhi-chand-sarda-vs-state-of-maharashtra-on-17-jul-1984/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/sharad-birdhi-chand-sarda-vs-state-of-maharashtra-on-17-jul-1984/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2021 15:48:21 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3-Judge (Full) Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Burden of Proof shifts to Accused after initial burden has been discharged by the prosecution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Catena of Landmark Judgments Referred/Cited to]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Circumstantial Evidence - Suspicion cannot take the place of proof]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evidence Act 106 - Burden of Proving Fact Especially Within Knowledge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Issued or Recommended Guidelines or Directions or Protocols to be followed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Landmark Case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Procedure Explained - Interpretation of Statutes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reportable Judgement or Order]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sharad Birdhi Chand Sarda Vs State of Maharashtra]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=13206</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Landmark judgment by a 3-judge bench of Supreme Court around circumstantial <a class="glossaryLink"  aria-describedby="tt"  data-cmtooltip="&#60;div class=glossaryItemTitle&#62;Evidence&#60;/div&#62;&#60;div class=glossaryItemBody&#62;Information presented in court to prove facts.&#60;/div&#62;"  href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/glossary/evidence/"  data-gt-translate-attributes='[{"attribute":"data-cmtooltip", "format":"html"}]'  tabindex='0' role='link'>evidence</a> (Sec 106 of Evidence Act 1872) basis which the accused were acquitted. The 5 golden principles postulated in this decision are as below. 153. A close analysis of this decision would show that the following conditions must be fulfilled before a case against [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/sharad-birdhi-chand-sarda-vs-state-of-maharashtra-on-17-jul-1984/">Sharad Birdhi Chand Sarda Vs State of Maharashtra on 17 Jul 1984</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/sharad-birdhi-chand-sarda-vs-state-of-maharashtra-on-17-jul-1984/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shamnsaheb M. Multtani Vs State of Karnataka on 24 January 2001</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/shamnsaheb-m-multtani-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-24-january-2001/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/shamnsaheb-m-multtani-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-24-january-2001/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2020 17:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3-Judge (Full) Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Burden of Proof shifts to Accused after initial burden has been discharged by the prosecution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DP Act 8A - Burden of proof in certain cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Landmark Case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Procedure Explained - Interpretation of Statutes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shamnsaheb M. Multtani Vs State of Karnataka]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=10085</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Supreme Court held that the burden of proof even in a 304B Dowry death case initially lies on prosecution only and shifts to accused, only after prosecution establishes their case. &#160; Under Section 4 of the Evidence Act whenever it is directed by this Act that the Court shall presume the fact it shall regard [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/shamnsaheb-m-multtani-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-24-january-2001/">Shamnsaheb M. Multtani Vs State of Karnataka on 24 January 2001</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/shamnsaheb-m-multtani-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-24-january-2001/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kali Ram Vs State of Himachal Pradesh on 24 Sep 1973 (SCR)</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/kali-ram-vs-state-of-himachal-pradesh-on-24-sep-1973/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/kali-ram-vs-state-of-himachal-pradesh-on-24-sep-1973/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2020 14:31:43 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3-Judge (Full) Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benefit of Doubt - View Favourable to Accused]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Burden of Proof shifts to Accused after initial burden has been discharged by the prosecution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HR Khanna Judgment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Innocent Until Found Guilty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kali Ram Vs State of Himachal Pradesh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Landmark Case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Procedure Explained - Interpretation of Statutes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Presumption of Innocence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reportable Judgement or Order]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Two Views Possible - Supicion Vs Grave Suspicion]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=9513</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In this landmark judgment, Justice Hans Raj Khanna, held the following valuable principles. From Para 23, 23. Observations in a recent decision of this Court, Shivaji Sahabrao Bobade v. State of Maharashtra 1973 2 SCC 793 to which reference has been made during arguments were not intended to make a departure from the rule of [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/kali-ram-vs-state-of-himachal-pradesh-on-24-sep-1973/">Kali Ram Vs State of Himachal Pradesh on 24 Sep 1973 (SCR)</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/kali-ram-vs-state-of-himachal-pradesh-on-24-sep-1973/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 
Lazy Loading (feed)
Minified using Disk

Served from: www.shadesofknife.in @ 2026-07-15 14:25:18 by W3 Total Cache
-->