web analytics

Menu

Skip to content
Shades of Knife
  • Home
  • True Colors of a Vile Wife
  • Need Inspiration?
  • Blog Updates
  • SOK Gallery
  • Vile News Reporter
  • About Me
  • Contact Me

Shades of Knife

True Colors of a Vile Wife

Tag: PWDV Act Sec 2(q) – ‘Adult Male’ Words Struck Down by SC – Any Person Can Be Respondent In PWDV Case

Afzalunnisa Begum Vs The State of A.P. on 10 December, 2009

Posted on January 9, 2019 by ShadesOfKnife

 

Afzalunnisa Begum Vs The State of A.P. on 10 December, 2009

[related_posts_by_tax title=”5 Recently Updated Posts, Similar or Related To Above Post” orderby=”post_modified” posts_per_page=”5″ show_date=”true”]

Posted in High Court of Andhra Pradesh Judgment or Order or Notification | Tagged Afzalunnisa Begum Vs The State of A.P. PWDV Act Sec 2(q) – ‘Adult Male’ Words Struck Down by SC - Any Person Can Be Respondent In PWDV Case Work-In-Progress Article | Leave a comment

Archana Hemant Naik Vs Urmilaben I. Naik And Anr on 25 August, 2009

Posted on January 9, 2019 by ShadesOfKnife

 

Archana Hemant Naik Vs Urmilaben I. Naik And Anr on 25 August, 2009

[related_posts_by_tax title=”5 Recently Updated Posts, Similar or Related To Above Post” orderby=”post_modified” posts_per_page=”5″ show_date=”true”]

Posted in High Court of Bombay Judgment or Order or Notification | Tagged Archana Hemant Naik Vs Urmilaben I. Naik And Anr PWDV Act Sec 2(q) – ‘Adult Male’ Words Struck Down by SC - Any Person Can Be Respondent In PWDV Case Work-In-Progress Article | Leave a comment

Eveneet Singh Vs Prashant Chaudhri & Ors on 20 December, 2010

Posted on January 9, 2019 by ShadesOfKnife

 

 

Eveneet Singh Vs Prashant Chaudhri & Ors on 20 December, 2010

[related_posts_by_tax title=”5 Recently Updated Posts, Similar or Related To Above Post” orderby=”post_modified” posts_per_page=”5″ show_date=”true”]

Posted in High Court of Delhi Judgment or Order or Notification | Tagged Eveneet Singh Vs Prashant Chaudhri and Ors PWDV Act Sec 2(q) – ‘Adult Male’ Words Struck Down by SC - Any Person Can Be Respondent In PWDV Case Work-In-Progress Article | Leave a comment

Preeti Satija Vs Raj Kumari on 15 January, 2014

Posted on January 9, 2019 by ShadesOfKnife

 

Preeti Satija Vs Raj Kumari on 15 January, 2014

[related_posts_by_tax title=”5 Recently Updated Posts, Similar or Related To Above Post” orderby=”post_modified” posts_per_page=”5″ show_date=”true”]

Posted in High Court of Delhi Judgment or Order or Notification | Tagged Preeti Satija Vs Raj Kumari PWDV Act Sec 2(q) – ‘Adult Male’ Words Struck Down by SC - Any Person Can Be Respondent In PWDV Case Work-In-Progress Article | Leave a comment

J.Anitha Valarmathy Vs K.John Hilton Maharaja on 17 July, 2014

Posted on January 9, 2019 by ShadesOfKnife

 

J.Anitha Valarmathy Vs K.John Hilton Maharaja on 17 July, 2014

[related_posts_by_tax title=”5 Recently Updated Posts, Similar or Related To Above Post” orderby=”post_modified” posts_per_page=”5″ show_date=”true”]

Posted in High Court of Madras Judgment or Order or Notification | Tagged J.Anitha Valarmathy Vs K.John Hilton Maharaja PWDV Act Sec 2(q) – ‘Adult Male’ Words Struck Down by SC - Any Person Can Be Respondent In PWDV Case Work-In-Progress Article | Leave a comment

Varsha Kapoor Vs UOI & Ors. on 3 June, 2010

Posted on January 2, 2019 by ShadesOfKnife

A very ‘convoluted 2-classes of aggrieved person‘ interpretation of respondent in a DV Act case by Hon’ble Supreme Court in this dismissed writ petition.

Just read it, it is revolting. It doesn’t even occur to them that a daughter-in-law can and does affect cruelty on mother-in-law. It is so sad.

From Para 29,

For centuries, jurists and legal scholars have debated about the functions of law, viz., why do we need law, and what does it do for society? More specifically, what functions does the law perform? Though there may not be unanimity amongst the scholars of law on the precise functions, it is widely recognized that the recurring theme of law includes; (i) social control, (ii) disputes settlement and (iii) social engineering. Though there are many methods of social control, law is considered one of the forms of former social control by prescribing social norms within which individuals/members of the society have to behave. Likewise, law discharges the functions of disputes settlement, i.e., disputes are settled by application of the law of land providing for legal rights and obligations. Apart from these, many scholars are of the view that principal function of law in modern society is social engineering (with which we are concerned here). It refers to purposive, application and direct social change initiated, guided and supported by law.

From Para 30,

Though it will remain a matter of never ending debate as to whether law brings social change or social changes in society brings law (i.e. whether law “leads” change or “follows” change), it has to be accepted that many times laws are passed to ensure normative changes in the society. Abolition of Sati Pratha by an appropriate enactment is a sterling example. In broad terms, “change” is of two types: continuous or evolutionary and discontinuous or revolutionary. The most common form of change is continuous. This day-to-day incremental change is a subtle, but dynamic, factor in social analysis.

From Para 31, peaks of convoluted and rust-ridden mindsets, yukk

The journey from enacting Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 to Amendment in IPC by incorporating Section 498A and 304B to the passing of DV Act is aimed at bringing desirable and much needed social change in this particular sphere. Therefore, Courts are required to give an interpretation which subserves the aforesaid purpose with which the law is enacted. The contention advanced by the petitioner, which negates the right given to women by this legislation has to be eschewed.

Here petitioner is also a woman but judge says, her contention negates the right given to other women by legislation.

Woman mean young-daughter-in-law only.

Varsha Kapoor Vs UOI & Ors. on 3 June, 2010

[related_posts_by_tax title=”5 Recently Updated Posts, Similar or Related To Above Post” orderby=”post_modified” posts_per_page=”5″ show_date=”true”]

Posted in Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification | Tagged Misinterpretation of Earlier Judgment or Settle Principle of Law PWDV Act Sec 2(q) – ‘Adult Male’ Words Struck Down by SC - Any Person Can Be Respondent In PWDV Case Varsha Kapoor Vs UOI and Ors | Leave a comment

Kusum Lata Sharma Vs State and Anr on 2 September, 2011

Posted on December 26, 2018 by ShadesOfKnife

This is the landmark judgment from Delhi High Court which held that “A mother who is being maltreated and harassed by her son would be an “aggrieved person”. If the said harassment is caused through the female relative of the son i.e. his wife, the said female relative will fall within the ambit of the “respondent‟. This phenomenon of the daughters-in-law harassing their mothers-in-law especially who are dependent is not uncommon in the Indian society.”

From Paras 9 and 10,

9. As a matter of fact, para ‘4(i)’ clarifies that even those women who are sisters, widows, mothers, single woman or living with the abuser are entitled  to legal protection under the proposed legislation. A mother who is being maltreated and harassed by her son would be an “aggrieved person”. If the said harassment is caused through the female relative of the son i.e. his wife, the said female relative will fall within the ambit of the ‘respondent’. This phenomenon of the daughters-in-law harassing their mothers-in-law especially who are dependent is not uncommon in the Indian society.
10. In view of the authoritative pronouncement of the Hon’ble Supreme Court, para ‘4’ of the Statement of Objects and Reasons cannot be stated to have excluded a female relative of the male partner or a respondent and thus, a mother-in-law being an “aggrieved person” can file a complaint against the daughter-in-law as a respondent.

Kusum Lata Sharma Vs State & Anr. on 2 September, 2011

Citations : [2011 DMC 3 1], [2011 CRIMES 4 548], [2011 DLT 181 775], [2011 DRJ 126 298], [2011 ILR SUPP DELHI 4 435], [2012 RCR CRIMINAL 1 924], [2011 SCC ONLINE DEL 3710], [2011 AIC 106 846], [2011 AD DELHI 6 576]

Other Sources :

https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1272794/

https://www.casemine.com/judgement/in/56090db1e4b014971117a40b

Posted in High Court of Delhi Judgment or Order or Notification | Tagged Hiral P Harsora and Ors Vs. Kusum Narottamdas Harsora and Ors Kusum Lata Sharma vs State and Anr. Landmark Case Legal Procedure Explained - Interpretation of Statutes PWDV Act - Mother-in-Law can file DV case on Daughter-in-Law PWDV Act Sec 2(q) – ‘Adult Male’ Words Struck Down by SC - Any Person Can Be Respondent In PWDV Case Sandhya Manoj Wankhade Vs Manoj Bhimrao Wankhade and Ors | Leave a comment

Ramu Singh Tomar & Ano. v. Smt. Bhuri Bai on 15 February, 2017

Posted on December 25, 2018 by ShadesOfKnife

In this judgment from Madhya Pradesh High Court, it was held that “monetary relief is not restricted to maintenance only. In fact it is the monetary relief to meet the expenses and losses suffered. However, as the monetary relief can be granted towards loss of earnings, medical expenses, for expenses incurred and losses suffered by the aggrieved person, therefore, it cannot be said that the lump sum amount of Rs. 15,000 so awarded by the Appellate Court was only by way of Maintenance Amount.”

Ramu Singh Tomar & Ano. v. Smt. Bhuri Bai on 15 February, 2017

 

Posted in High Court of Madhya Pradesh Judgment or Order or Notification | Tagged Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act 2005 PWDV Act Sec 2(q) – ‘Adult Male’ Words Struck Down by SC - Any Person Can Be Respondent In PWDV Case Ramu Singh Tomar and Ano. Vs Smt. Bhuri Bai Statement of Objects and Reasons | Leave a comment

Harbans Lal Malik Vs Payal Malik on 29 July, 2010

Posted on December 25, 2018 by ShadesOfKnife

This is the Delhi High Court judgment from Shri. Shiv Narayan Dhingra, affirming that in a DV case, respondent can be other family member other than husband and are liable for relief mentioned under Monetary Relief u/s 20 of PWDV Act.

Punch Statement:

The girl and the parents of the girl knew it very well that they had selected a person for marriage with whom the girl was going to live abroad and the matrimonial home and the shared household was going to be outside India. This act of marrying a person settled abroad is a voluntary act of the girl. If she had not intended to enjoy the fat salary which boys working abroad get and the material facilities available abroad, she could have refused to marry him and settled for a boy having moderate salary within India. After having chosen a person living abroad, putting the responsibility, after failure of marriage, on the shoulders on his parents and making them criminals in the eyes of law because matrimonial ties between the two could not last for long, does not sound either legally correct or morally correct. How can the parents of a boy who is working abroad, living abroad, an adult, free to take his own decisions, be arrayed as criminals or respondents if the marriage between him and his wife failed due to any reason whatsoever after few years of marriage. If the sin committed by such parents of boy is that they facilitated the marriage, then this sin is equally committed by parents of the girl. If such marriage fails then parents of both bride and groom would have to share equal responsibility. The responsibility of parents of the groom cannot be more. Shelter of Indian culture and joint family cannot be taken to book only relatives of boy. A woman’s shared household in India in such cases is also her parents’ house where she lived before marriage and not her in-laws’ house where she did not live after marriage.

Another one here:

I am surprised that the Courts below did not give weight to the judgment of New Jersey where parties lived for 7 ½ years but assumed jurisdiction under Domestic Violence Act because of the pure temporary residence (as pleaded by her) of wife in Delhi who is otherwise resident of Hissar. The Court of ASJ wanted that the order of the Court of MM should be honoured by the US while the Court here would not honour a decree of Court of USA where the husband and wife lived for 7 ½ years.

Harbans Lal Malik Vs Payal Malik on 29 July, 2010

 

Posted in High Court of Delhi Judgment or Order or Notification | Tagged Definition of Family Harbans Lal Malik Vs Payal Malik Justice Shiv Narayan Dhingra Landmark Case Legal Procedure Explained - Interpretation of Statutes PWDV Act Sec 2(q) – ‘Adult Male’ Words Struck Down by SC - Any Person Can Be Respondent In PWDV Case PWDV Act Sec 29 - Appeal Dismissed On Merits | Leave a comment

Hiral P Harsora and Ors Vs Kusum Narottamdas Harsora and Ors on October 6, 2016

Posted on May 21, 2018 by ShadesOfKnife

This landmark judgment from Justice R.F. Nariman and Justice Kurian Joseph at Hon’ble Supreme Court has struck down the words “adult male” appearing in Section 2(q) of the Act as discriminatory.

 

Hiral P Harsora and ors Vs. Kusum Narottamdas Harsora & Ors on October 6, 2016

Citation: [2016 SCC OnLine SC 1118] or [(2016) 10 SCC 165]

Other Source links: https://indiankanoon.org/doc/114237665/


More than 5 years back, Supreme Court has actually held that Women can also be made respondents in a DV case here.


The index page is here.

Posted in Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification | Tagged Hiral P Harsora and Ors Vs. Kusum Narottamdas Harsora and Ors Landmark Case No Shared Household Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act 2005 PWDV Act Sec 2(q) – ‘Adult Male’ Words Struck Down by SC - Any Person Can Be Respondent In PWDV Case Statement of Objects and Reasons | Leave a comment

Search within entire Content of “Shades of Knife”

My Legal Twitter Timeline

Tweets by @SandeepPamarati

My MRA Twitter Timeline

Tweets by @Shadesofknife

Recent Posts

  • Neera Singh Vs State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) and Ors on 23 Feb 2007 August 11, 2022
  • Neera Singh Vs State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) and Ors on 21 Feb 2007 August 11, 2022
  • Naresh Kumar Yalla Vs State of Telangana on 21 Jul 2022 August 10, 2022
  • Pasagadula Sai Kiran Vs Union of India and Ors on 04 Aug 2022 August 10, 2022
  • XXX Vs State of Kerala and Ors on 05 July 2022 August 8, 2022

Most Read Posts

  • Jagdish Shrivastava Vs State of Maharashtra on 11 Mar 2022 (2,116 views)
  • Bhagyashri Jagdish Jaiswal Vs Jagdish Sajjanlala Jaiswal and Anr on 26 Feb 2022 (1,824 views)
  • Satender Kumar Antil Vs CBI and Anr on 11 Jul 2022 (1,240 views)
  • Luckose Zachariah Vs Joseph Joseph on 18 Feb 2022 (1,082 views)
  • Prabha Tyagi Vs Kamlesh Devi on 12 May 2022 (1,058 views)
  • Gayatri alias Gadigevva Vs Vijay Hadimani on 03 Dec 2021 (1,046 views)
  • Kahkashan Kausar @ Sonam Vs State of Bihar on 08 Feb 2022 (1,030 views)
  • Rajendra Bhagat Vs State of Jharkhand on 03 Jan 2022 (971 views)
  • Ravneet Kaur Vs Prithpal Singh Dhingra on 24 Feb 2022 (946 views)
  • Kamlesh Devi Vs Jaipal and Ors on 04 Oct 2019 (918 views)

Tags

Legal Procedure Explained - Interpretation of Statutes (317)Reportable Judgement or Order (304)Landmark Case (300)2-Judge (Division) Bench Decision (231)Work-In-Progress Article (214)Catena of Landmark Judgments (199)1-Judge Bench Decision (121)Sandeep Pamarati (87)3-Judge (Full) Bench Decision (76)Article 21 - Protection of life and personal liberty (73)Absurd Or After Thought Or Baseless Or False Or General Or Inherently Improbable Or Improved Or UnSpecific Or Omnibus Or Vague Allegations (51)Perjury Under 340 CrPC (51)Reprimands or Setbacks to YCP Govt of Andhra Pradesh (49)Summary Post (46)Issued or Recommended Guidelines or Directions or Protocols to be followed (43)CrPC 482 - Quash (37)Advocate Antics (34)Rules of the Act/Ordinance/Notification/Circular (33)Not Authentic copy hence to be replaced (33)IPC 498a - Not Made Out (32)

Categories

Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification (610)Bare Acts or State Amendments or Statutes or GOs or Notifications issued by Central or State Governments (296)High Court of Andhra Pradesh Judgment or Order or Notification (154)High Court of Delhi Judgment or Order or Notification (107)High Court of Bombay Judgment or Order or Notification (88)High Court of Karnataka Judgment or Order or Notification (65)General Study Material (55)High Court of Madras Judgment or Order or Notification (51)Assorted Court Judgments or Orders or Notifications (48)Prakasam DV Cases (46)LLB Study Material (45)Judicial Activism (for Public Benefit) (39)High Court of Punjab & Haryana Judgment or Order or Notification (39)High Court of Allahabad Judgment or Order or Notification (36)District or Sessions or Magistrate Court Judgment or Order or Notification (34)High Court of Kerala Judgment or Order or Notification (27)High Court of Gujarat Judgment or Order or Notification (25)High Court of Madhya Pradesh Judgment or Order or Notification (24)High Court of Calcutta Judgment or Order or Notification (18)High Court of Patna Judgment or Order or Notification (15)

Recent Comments

  • ShadesOfKnife on Sirangai Shoba @ Shoba Munnuri Vs Sirangi Muralidhar Rao on 19 October, 2016
  • muralidhar Rao Sirangi on Sirangai Shoba @ Shoba Munnuri Vs Sirangi Muralidhar Rao on 19 October, 2016
  • ShadesOfKnife on J.Shyam Babu Vs The State Of Telangana on 9 February, 2017
  • anuj on J.Shyam Babu Vs The State Of Telangana on 9 February, 2017
  • ShadesOfKnife on Syed Nazim Husain Vs Additional Principal Judge Family Court & Anr on 9 January, 2003

Archives of SoK

  • August 2022 (5)
  • July 2022 (21)
  • June 2022 (28)
  • May 2022 (23)
  • April 2022 (32)
  • March 2022 (17)
  • February 2022 (6)
  • January 2022 (2)
  • December 2021 (7)
  • November 2021 (7)
  • October 2021 (6)
  • September 2021 (10)
  • August 2021 (31)
  • July 2021 (45)
  • June 2021 (17)
  • May 2021 (17)
  • April 2021 (18)
  • March 2021 (58)
  • February 2021 (14)
  • January 2021 (50)
  • December 2020 (35)
  • November 2020 (68)
  • October 2020 (67)
  • September 2020 (29)
  • August 2020 (41)
  • July 2020 (20)
  • June 2020 (36)
  • May 2020 (40)
  • April 2020 (38)
  • March 2020 (26)
  • February 2020 (43)
  • January 2020 (35)
  • December 2019 (35)
  • November 2019 (4)
  • October 2019 (18)
  • September 2019 (58)
  • August 2019 (33)
  • July 2019 (12)
  • June 2019 (19)
  • May 2019 (5)
  • April 2019 (19)
  • March 2019 (58)
  • February 2019 (11)
  • January 2019 (90)
  • December 2018 (97)
  • November 2018 (43)
  • October 2018 (31)
  • September 2018 (73)
  • August 2018 (47)
  • July 2018 (143)
  • June 2018 (92)
  • May 2018 (102)
  • April 2018 (59)
  • March 2018 (8)

Blogroll

  • Daaman Promoting Harmony 0
  • Fight against Legal Terrorism Fight against Legal Terrorism along with MyNation Foundation 0
  • Good Morning Good Morning News 0
  • Insaaf India Insaaf Awareness Movement 0
  • MyNation Hope Foundation Wiki 0
  • MyNation.net Equality, Justice and Harmony 0
  • Sarvepalli Legal 0
  • Save Indian Family Save Indian Family Movement 0
  • SIF Chandigarh SIF Chandigarh 0
  • The Male Factor The Male Factor 0
  • Vaastav Foundation The Social Reality 0
  • Voice4india Indian Laws, Non-profits, Environment 0
  • Writing Law Writing Law by Ankur 0

RSS Cloudflare Status

  • Increased API Error rate August 12, 2022
    Aug 12, 00:49 UTCResolved - This incident has been resolved.Aug 12, 00:40 UTCMonitoring - A fix has been implemented and we are monitoring the results.Aug 11, 23:00 UTCIdentified - The issue has been identified and a fix is being implemented.Aug 11, 23:00 UTCInvestigating - Some customers might see increased API error rates
  • Elevated number of 5xx errors in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia (KUL) August 11, 2022
    Aug 11, 07:30 UTCResolved - Between 08:45-09:45 UTC customers reaching our datacenter Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia (KUL) would have experienced an elevated number of 5xx errors.
  • Increased 503 Responses for R2 August 10, 2022
    Aug 10, 22:50 UTCResolved - This incident has been resolved.Aug 10, 21:59 UTCMonitoring - A fix has been implemented and we are monitoring the results.Aug 10, 19:28 UTCIdentified - The issue has been identified and a fix is being implemented.Aug 10, 18:02 UTCInvestigating - Customers performing GetObject operations from R2 may receive elevated 503 HTTP […]

RSS List of Spam Server IPs from Project Honeypot

  • 139.5.89.18 | S August 11, 2022
    Event: Bad Event | Total: 801 | First: 2017-01-08 | Last: 2022-08-11
  • 139.5.88.17 | SD August 11, 2022
    Event: Bad Event | Total: 6,431 | First: 2019-02-01 | Last: 2022-08-11
  • 139.5.88.131 | SD August 11, 2022
    Event: Bad Event | Total: 5,905 | First: 2019-03-08 | Last: 2022-08-11
Proudly powered by WordPress
Theme: Flint by Star Verte LLC

Bad Behavior has blocked 689 access attempts in the last 7 days.

pixel