<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>All India Judges’ Association and Ors Vs Union of India and Ors Archives - Shades of Knife</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/tag/all-india-judges-association-and-ors-vs-union-of-india-and-ors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/tag/all-india-judges-association-and-ors-vs-union-of-india-and-ors/</link>
	<description>True Colors of a Vile Wife</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2021 14:13:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.1</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>U.Surekha Vs State of AP on 04 Mar 2021</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/u-surekha-vs-state-of-ap-on-04-mar-2021/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/u-surekha-vs-state-of-ap-on-04-mar-2021/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2021 08:27:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[High Court of Andhra Pradesh Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2-Judge (Division) Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3 years Practice Experience as a Qualification for JCJ Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All India Judges’ Association and Ors Vs Union of India and Ors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Catena of Landmark Judgments Referred/Cited to]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Landmark Case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law or Provision is Alleged as Unconstitutional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.Surekha Vs State of AP]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=13166</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Relying on landmark judgment of Apex Court here, a Division bench of AP High Court comprising the Chief Justice held that the rule [Rule 5(2)(a)(i) of Andhra Pradesh State Judicial Service Rules, 2007] which mandates 3 years of practice as requirement from Junior Civil Judge positions in State of AP was unconstitutional and the Notification [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/u-surekha-vs-state-of-ap-on-04-mar-2021/">U.Surekha Vs State of AP on 04 Mar 2021</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/u-surekha-vs-state-of-ap-on-04-mar-2021/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>All India Judges’ Association and Ors Vs Union of India and Ors on 21 Mar 2002</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/all-india-judges-association-and-ors-vs-union-of-india-and-ors-on-21-mar-2002/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/all-india-judges-association-and-ors-vs-union-of-india-and-ors-on-21-mar-2002/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2020 16:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3 years Practice Experience as a Qualification for JCJ Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3-Judge (Full) Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advocate Antics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All India Judges’ Association and Ors Vs Union of India and Ors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Landmark Case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reportable Judgement or Order]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=12494</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A 3-judge bench of Supreme Court held that, Law graduates can be eligible for practicing law without having any experience but recommended that the newly hired judges under training for a period not less than 1 year and preferably two years. In the All India Judges&#8217;s case [1993] 4 SCC 288 at p. 314; this [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/all-india-judges-association-and-ors-vs-union-of-india-and-ors-on-21-mar-2002/">All India Judges’ Association and Ors Vs Union of India and Ors on 21 Mar 2002</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/all-india-judges-association-and-ors-vs-union-of-india-and-ors-on-21-mar-2002/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Regalagadda Venkatesh Vs State of Andhra Pradesh and Anr</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/regalagadda-venkatesh-vs-state-of-andhra-pradesh-and-anr/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/regalagadda-venkatesh-vs-state-of-andhra-pradesh-and-anr/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2020 10:21:21 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2-Judge (Division) Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3 years Practice Experience as a Qualification for JCJ Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advocate Antics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All India Judges’ Association and Ors Vs Union of India and Ors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regalagadda Venkatesh Vs State of Andhra Pradesh and Anr]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=12490</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Challenging the &#8216;3 years Practice Experience as a Qualification for JCJ Post&#8217;, an advocate from Andhra Pradesh filed this Writ at Supreme Court. On 2020-12-30, Supreme Court issued <a class="glossaryLink"  aria-describedby="tt"  data-cmtooltip="&#60;div class=glossaryItemTitle&#62;Notice&#60;/div&#62;&#60;div class=glossaryItemBody&#62;Information given officially regarding legal proceedings.&#60;/div&#62;"  href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/glossary/notice/"  data-gt-translate-attributes='[{"attribute":"data-cmtooltip", "format":"html"}]'  tabindex='0' role='link'>Notice</a> to the respondents in the meanwhile. Did not stay the operation of the Notification though. On 2021-01-05, BCI impleaded itself into the Writ. On 2021-02-17, The [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/regalagadda-venkatesh-vs-state-of-andhra-pradesh-and-anr/">Regalagadda Venkatesh Vs State of Andhra Pradesh and Anr</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/regalagadda-venkatesh-vs-state-of-andhra-pradesh-and-anr/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 
Lazy Loading (feed)
Minified using Disk

Served from: www.shadesofknife.in @ 2026-07-15 16:59:58 by W3 Total Cache
-->