Interesting act of counsel !!
Shalu Ojha vs Prashant Ojha on 18 September, 2014
In Para 14,
Strangely, when the appellant’s application for the payment of current maintenance in C.M. No.18869 of 2013 was listed on 27.5.2014 before the High Court along with other connected matters in Appeal (Crl. Misc. Case No.1975 of 2013) preferred by the respondent, the application of the appellant was dismissed as “not pressed” on representation made by the counsel appearing for the appellant. The
appellant appeared in person before us and made a statement that such instructions not to press the application were never given to the counsel who appeared in the High Court and hence the present appeal.
The same parties have been fighting DVC case still and the case number at Apex Court is “Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 3935/2016“.
Search for latest daily orders here.
Search link on Indiankanoon.org here.
The Case Index is available here.
Reproduced in accordance with Section 52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, lobis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court and District Court Websites such as ecourts.gov.in