This PIL was filed with the following prayers:
- 1 the action of the respondents in proposing to allot lands to an extent of Ac 1251 51 Cents in the villages of Nowluru Krishnayapalem Nidamarru Inavolu Kuragallu and Mandadam to Economically Weaker Sections of Vijayawada Municipal Corporation Tadepalli Municipality Mangalagiri Municipality and selected Gram Panchayats of Tadepalli Duggirala Mangalagiri and Pedakakani Mandals under Pedalakandariki Illu program under G O Ms No 107 Municipal Administration and Urban Development CRDA 2 Department dated 25 02 2020 ii G O Ms No 367 Revenue Assignment Department dated 19 08 2019 and iii G O Ms No 488 Revenue Assignment Department dated 02 12 2019asarbitrary illegal mala fide colorable exercise of power and in violation of provisions of A P Assigned Lands Prohibition of Transfer Act 1977 A P Capital Region Development Authority Act 2014 and unconstitutional and to consequentially set aside 1 G O Ms No 107 Municipal Administration and Urban Development CRDA 2 Department dated 25 02 2020 ii G O Ms No 367 Revenue Assignment Department dated 19 08 2019 and iii G O Ms No 488 Revenue Assignment Department dated 02 12 2019
On 2020-03-23:
AP High Court suspended the impugned GOs.
G.Hari Govinda Prasad Vs State of AP on 23 March 2020
As usual the bozo team goes to Supreme Court and fails face down here.
Shades of Knife
Disclaimer:
The materials provided herein are solely for information purposes. No attorney-client relationship is created when you access or use the site or the materials. The information presented on this site does not constitute legal or professional advice and should not be relied upon for such purposes or used as a substitute for legal advice from an attorney licensed in your state.
Judgments curated, reproduced from sci.gov.in, judis.nic.in, lobis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other similar Indian High Court and District Court Websites such as ecourts.gov.in, dcourts.gov.in or any other Government websites such as Gazettes and repositories of Government Orders and Commented in accordance with Section 52(1)(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) and any other applicable public disclosure laws/provisions in India and in various other countries.
I neither have control to remove copies of this document(s) that may be available on websites of High Courts or Supreme Court of India or any of the many other sites, law journal or reporters which carry the same judgment in entire form, nor I can remove references/links to this document(s) from the results of Search Engines such as Google.com.
Read more gyan here.
Though, I can mask/redacts content (like names of parties from cause title!) from my site, on request for any parties to a case, even though, I am not legally obligated to do so, except for express bar from a Competent Court.
Om Shanthi !!!
Oh, by the way, my competent Legal team delivers time-bound legal reliefs to victims of false family and matrimonial cases at
AnaghaLegalReliefs.in !!! (work-in-progress)
We are on social media too.
Just google for: Anagha Legal Reliefs
