web analytics

Menu

Skip to content
Shades of Knife
  • Home
  • True Colors of a Vile Wife
  • Need Inspiration?
  • Blog Updates
  • SOK Gallery
  • Vile News Reporter
  • About Me
  • Contact Me

Shades of Knife

True Colors of a Vile Wife

Exemption from Personal Appearance (u/s 205 CrPC) in Court Judgments

Posted on August 16, 2020 by ShadesOfKnife

The following are list of judgments that you can cite while seeking Exemption from Personal Appearance in Court proceedings.

  1. In MS. Bhaskar Industries Ltd Vs MS. Bhiwani Denim and Apparels Ltd and Ors on 27 August 2001, Supreme Court says,
    • 17. Thus, in appropriate cases the magistrate can allow an accused to make even the first appearance through a counsel. The magistrate is empowered to record the plea of the accused even when his counsel makes such plea on behalf of the accused in a case where the personal appearance of the accused is dispensed with. Section 317 of the Code has to be viewed in the above perspective as it empowers the court to dispense with the personal attendance of the accused (provided he is represented by a counsel in that case) even for proceeding with the further steps in the case. However, one precaution which the court should take in such a situation is that the said benefit need be granted only to an accused who gives an undertaking to the satisfaction of the court that he would not dispute his identity as the particular accused in the case, and that a counsel on his behalf would be present in court and that he has no objection in taking evidence in his absence. This precaution is necessary for the further progress of the proceedings including examination of the witnesses.
  2. In the landmark Rajesh Sharma & ors. Vs State of UP and Anr on 27 July 2017 judgment, Supreme Court held that personal exemption to be granted to accused who are residing in outstation locations.
  3. In Sri Rameshwar Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar on 16 March, 2018, Supreme Court granted Exemption from Personal Appearance to parents of Arnesh kumar.
  4. In Ajay Kumar Bisnoi and Anr Vs MS KEI Industries Limited on 25 September 2015, Madras High Court says, “a Magistrate can dispense with appearance of accused in a criminal case on first appearance itself, if accused is represented by an Advocate and supported by reasonable excuse.”
  5. In Sri Pritam Sen Vs The State Of West Bengal on 18 October, 2001, Calcutta High Court says, “the learned Magistrate, in the fitness of the things, should not have Issued warrant against the petitioner at the first Instance without assigning any reason in compliance with provisions laid down in Clauses (a) and (b) of Section 87 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.”
  6. Puneet Dalmia Vs CBI Hyderabad on 16 December 2019

Shades of Knife


Disclaimer:

Curated, Reproduced from main.sci.gov.in, judis.nic.in, lobis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court and District Court Websites such as ecourts.gov.in or any other Government websites such as Gazettes and repositories of Government Orders and Commented in accordance with Section 52(1)(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) and any other applicable public disclosure laws/provisions in India and in various other countries.

I neither have control to remove copies of this document(s) that may be available on websites of High Courts or Supreme Court of India or any of the many other sites, law journal or reporters which carry the same judgment in entire form, nor I can remove references/links to this document(s) from the results of Search Engines such as Google.com.

Read more gyan here.

Though, I can remove content from my site, on request for any parties to a case, even though, I am not legally obligated to do so, except for express bar from a Competent Court.

Om Shanthi !!!


Oh, by the way, my competent Legal team delivers time-bound legal reliefs to victims of false family and matrimonial cases at

AnaghaLegalReliefs.in !!! (work-in-progress)

We are on social media too.
Just google for: Anagha Legal Reliefs

Posted in LLB Study Material | Tagged CrPC 205 – Magistrate may dispense with personal attendance of accused | Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

Search within entire Content of “Shades of Knife”

My Twitter Timeline

Tweets by @Shadesofknife

Recent Posts

  • Anil Kumar and 2 Ors Vs State of A.P. and Anr on 3 Apr 2019 March 9, 2021
  • U.Surekha Vs State of AP on 04 Mar 2021 March 6, 2021
  • CrPC 406 – Power of Supreme Court to transfer cases and appeals March 5, 2021
  • CrPC 358 – Compensation to persons groundlessly arrested March 5, 2021
  • CrPC 250 – Compensation for accusation without reasonable cause March 5, 2021

Most Read Posts

  • Satish Chander Ahuja Vs Sneha Ahuja on 15 Oct 2020 (610 views)
  • Rani Narasimha Sastry Vs Rani Suneela Rani on 05 Jan 2017 (419 views)
  • Government Guesthouse at Kapuluppada, Visakhapatnam (335 views)
  • Dr Nallapareddy Sridhar Reddy Vs State of AP and Ors (308 views)
  • Kapil Gupta Vs State on 23 Sep 2020 (280 views)
  • In Re To issues certain guidelines regarding inadequacies and deficiencies in criminal trials (265 views)
  • Prof. S. K. Bhalla Vs State of JnK and Ors on 09 Oct 2020 (262 views)
  • Rajnesh Pal Naidu Vs Neha Naidu Joshi and Anr on 04 Nov 2020 (251 views)
  • CrPC 309 - Power to Postpone or Adjourn Proceedings (246 views)
  • IPC 498A is a Compoundable Case in Andhra Pradesh (237 views)

Tags

Landmark Case (219)Legal Procedure Explained (218)Work-In-Progress Article (190)Reportable Judgement (171)Catena of Landmark Judgments (129)2-Judge (Division) Bench Decision (108)Sandeep Pamarati (81)Article 21 of The Constitution of India (62)Absurd Or After Thought Or Baseless Or False Or General Or Inherently Improbable Or Improved Or UnSpecific Or Omnibus Or Vague Allegations (47)Perjury Under 340 CrPC (46)Summary Post (46)Reprimands or Setbacks to YCP Govt of Andhra Pradesh (44)3-Judge Bench Decision (39)1-Judge Bench Decision (37)IPC 498a Not Made Out (32)CrPC 482 - Quash (32)Rules of the Act/Ordinance/Notification/Circular (32)PWDV Act 20 - Maintenance Granted (31)PIL - CrPC 125 Must Go From Statute Book (28)LLB Subjects and Previous Year Exam Papers and Answers (27)

Categories

Supreme Court of India Judgment or Order or Notification (501)Bare Acts or State Amendments or Statutes or GOs or Notifications issued by Central or State Governments (253)High Court of Andhra Pradesh Judgment or Order or Notification (132)High Court of Delhi Judgment or Order or Notification (82)High Court of Bombay Judgment or Order or Notification (77)General Study Material (53)Prakasam DV Cases (46)High Court of Karnataka Judgment or Order or Notification (45)LLB Study Material (45)Assorted Court Judgments or Orders or Notifications (40)High Court of Madras Judgment or Order or Notification (37)Judicial Activism (for Public Benefit) (35)High Court of Punjab & Haryana Judgment or Order or Notification (33)District or Sessions or Magistrate Court Judgment or Order or Notification (27)High Court of Allahabad Judgment or Order or Notification (27)High Court of Gujarat Judgment or Order or Notification (21)High Court of Madhya Pradesh Judgment or Order or Notification (18)High Court of Kerala Judgment or Order or Notification (13)High Court of Calcutta Judgment or Order or Notification (11)Chittor DV Cases (11)

Recent Comments

  • ShadesOfKnife on Sirangai Shoba @ Shoba Munnuri Vs Sirangi Muralidhar Rao on 19 October, 2016
  • muralidhar Rao Sirangi on Sirangai Shoba @ Shoba Munnuri Vs Sirangi Muralidhar Rao on 19 October, 2016
  • ShadesOfKnife on J.Shyam Babu Vs The State Of Telangana on 9 February, 2017
  • anuj on J.Shyam Babu Vs The State Of Telangana on 9 February, 2017
  • ShadesOfKnife on Syed Nazim Husain Vs Additional Principal Judge Family Court & Anr on 9 January, 2003

Archives of SoK

  • March 2021 (7)
  • February 2021 (14)
  • January 2021 (50)
  • December 2020 (35)
  • November 2020 (68)
  • October 2020 (67)
  • September 2020 (29)
  • August 2020 (42)
  • July 2020 (20)
  • June 2020 (36)
  • May 2020 (40)
  • April 2020 (38)
  • March 2020 (26)
  • February 2020 (43)
  • January 2020 (36)
  • December 2019 (35)
  • November 2019 (4)
  • October 2019 (18)
  • September 2019 (58)
  • August 2019 (33)
  • July 2019 (12)
  • June 2019 (19)
  • May 2019 (5)
  • April 2019 (19)
  • March 2019 (58)
  • February 2019 (11)
  • January 2019 (90)
  • December 2018 (97)
  • November 2018 (43)
  • October 2018 (31)
  • September 2018 (74)
  • August 2018 (47)
  • July 2018 (143)
  • June 2018 (92)
  • May 2018 (102)
  • April 2018 (59)
  • March 2018 (8)

Blogroll

  • Daaman Promoting Harmony 0
  • Fight against Legal Terrorism Fight against Legal Terrorism along with MyNation Foundation 0
  • Good Morning Good Morning News 0
  • Insaaf India Insaaf Awareness Movement 0
  • MyNation Hope Foundation Wiki 0
  • MyNation.net Equality, Justice and Harmony 0
  • Sarvepalli Legal 0
  • Save Indian Family Save Indian Family Movement 0
  • SIF Chandigarh SIF Chandigarh 0
  • The Male Factor The Male Factor 0
  • Vaastav Foundation The Social Reality 0
  • Voice4india Indian Laws, Non-profits, Environment 0
  • Writing Law Writing Law by Ankur 0

RSS Cloudflare Status

  • Cloudflare Billing Issues March 6, 2021
    Mar 6, 17:52 UTCResolved - The Billing issue was identified and has been resolved.Mar 6, 17:16 UTCIdentified - The Billing issue has been identified and resolution is in progress.Mar 6, 16:09 UTCInvestigating - Cloudflare is experiencing problems in processing changes through our billing subscription service with credit-card or paypal. Purchasing might be affected with these […]
  • Wrong WAF nomenclature March 5, 2021
    Mar 5, 23:32 UTCResolved - This incident has been resolved.Mar 5, 23:02 UTCMonitoring - A fix has been implemented and we are monitoring the results.Mar 5, 19:19 UTCIdentified - WAF actions will appear incorrectly as 'Unknown' for some events.No customer traffic is affected and the WAF is still functioning properly.
  • Elevated number of 403/1000 errors March 5, 2021
    Mar 5, 17:17 UTCResolved - This incident has been resolved.Mar 5, 16:32 UTCIdentified - Cloudflare is investigating an increased level of HTTP 403 /1000 errors for customers using the Orange to Orange feature.We are working to analyse and mitigate this problem. More updates to follow shortly.

RSS List of Spam Server IPs from Project Honeypot

  • 103.7.155.8 | SD March 7, 2021
    Event: Bad Event | Total: 2,737 | First: 2021-02-14 | Last: 2021-03-07
  • 103.50.85.131 | SD March 7, 2021
    Event: Bad Event | Total: 1,508 | First: 2017-12-19 | Last: 2021-03-07
  • 103.7.155.6 | SD March 7, 2021
    Event: Bad Event | Total: 2,785 | First: 2021-02-14 | Last: 2021-03-07
Proudly powered by WordPress
Theme: Flint by Star Verte LLC
pixel