Since the prosecution wasted years in bringing in the prosecution witnesses to Court for examination, Trial Court denied to provide any adjournments. High Court held it correct.
Delhi Administration Vs Vishwanath Lugnani and Ors on 30 Jul 1980
Citations : [1981 AIR SC 1239], [1981 SUPP SCC 1 64], [1982 SCC CRI 139], [1980 CAR 343], [1980 CRLR 470], [1980 UJ SC 832], [1981 CRLJ SC 745]
Shades of Knife
Curated, Reproduced from main.sci.gov.in, judis.nic.in, lobis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court and District Court Websites such as ecourts.gov.in or any other Government websites such as Gazettes and repositories of Government Orders and Commented in accordance with Section 52(1)(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) and any other applicable public disclosure laws/provisions in India and in various other countries.
I neither have control to remove copies of this document(s) that may be available on websites of High Courts or Supreme Court of India or any of the many other sites, law journal or reporters which carry the same judgment in entire form, nor I can remove references/links to this document(s) from the results of Search Engines such as Google.com.
Read more gyan here.
Though, I can remove content from my site, on request for any parties to a case, even though, I am not legally obligated to do so, except for express bar from a Competent Court.
Om Shanthi !!!
Oh, by the way, my competent Legal team delivers time-bound legal reliefs to victims of false family and matrimonial cases at
AnaghaLegalReliefs.in !!! (work-in-progress)
We are on social media too.
Just google for: Anagha Legal Reliefs