In this case, Knife obtained reliefs of Protection order, Residence order and return of cash and gold ornaments from the mother-in-law.
From Para 13,
However, in the instant case it has been brought on the record of the case during the course of cross-examination of the respondent that the said two portioned house was constructed with the earnings of the husband of the respondent. PW2 is the only son of her parents. When the said two portioned house has been constructed out of the earnings of the husband of the respondent and father of PW2 then certainly the said house cannot be said to a self acquired property of the respondent, and that the said house acquires the status of the joint family property in which PW2 is a member. The said admission by the respondent regarding the nature of the said house is the best evidence to conclude that the said house is a joint family property and it a shared house holds. The readiness expressed by RW1 during the course of her cross-examination to give one of the portions of the house to PW1 and PW2 for their residence implies that the respondent is also acknowledgment the right of residence of PW1 in the said house.
Chavala Kalpana Vs Chavala Audilakshmi on 5 May, 2015
Shades of Knife
Disclaimer:
The materials provided herein are solely for information purposes. No attorney-client relationship is created when you access or use the site or the materials. The information presented on this site does not constitute legal or professional advice and should not be relied upon for such purposes or used as a substitute for legal advice from an attorney licensed in your state.
Judgments curated, reproduced from sci.gov.in, judis.nic.in, lobis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other similar Indian High Court and District Court Websites such as ecourts.gov.in, dcourts.gov.in or any other Government websites such as Gazettes and repositories of Government Orders and Commented in accordance with Section 52(1)(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) and any other applicable public disclosure laws/provisions in India and in various other countries.
I neither have control to remove copies of this document(s) that may be available on websites of High Courts or Supreme Court of India or any of the many other sites, law journal or reporters which carry the same judgment in entire form, nor I can remove references/links to this document(s) from the results of Search Engines such as Google.com.
Read more gyan here.
Though, I can mask/redacts content (like names of parties from cause title!) from my site, on request for any parties to a case, even though, I am not legally obligated to do so, except for express bar from a Competent Court.
Om Shanthi !!!
Oh, by the way, my competent Legal team delivers time-bound legal reliefs to victims of false family and matrimonial cases at
AnaghaLegalReliefs.in !!! (work-in-progress)
We are on social media too.
Just google for: Anagha Legal Reliefs
