This judgment from Hon’ble Supreme Court has confirmed the order of Bombay High Court which held that “The book (written by the first respondent) was in no way prejudicial to the defence of India etc., and allowed the petition.”
https://drive.google.com/open?id=1rFVTHkmEvwPheI6NB-JcR89ris6cj54Y
Citation: 1966 AIR 424, 1966 SCR (1) 702
Indiankanoon link: https://indiankanoon.org/doc/850821/
The index page is here.
Hon’ble Supreme Court has in this judgment held that “a civil servant under suspension is entitled to the normal subsistence allowance even after his conviction by the Trial Court pending consideration of his appeal filed against his conviction until the appeal is disposed of finally one way or the other, whether he is on bail or lodged in prison on conviction by the Trial Court.”
[related_posts_by_tax title=”5 Recently Updated Posts, Similar or Related To Above Post” orderby=”post_modified” posts_per_page=”5″ show_date=”true”]
This is the landmark judgment from Hon’ble Apex Court, regarding free legal aid and Right to Speedy Trial.
Citation: 1979 AIR 1360, 1979 SCR (3) 169
Indiankanoon link: https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1007347/
Citation: 1979 AIR 1369, 1979 SCR (3) 532
Indiankanoon link: https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1373215/
Citation: 1979 AIR 1819, 1979 SCR (3)1276
Indiankanoon link: https://indiankanoon.org/doc/384639/
Citation: 1995 SCC (5) 326, 1995 SCALE (4)633
Indiankanoon link: https://indiankanoon.org/doc/68294832/
Some background about the advocate who fought this case.
https://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-others/in-public-interest/
Reproduced in accordance with Section 52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, lobis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court and District Court Websites such as ecourts.gov.in
[related_posts_by_tax title=”5 Recently Updated Posts, Similar or Related To Above Post” orderby=”post_modified” posts_per_page=”5″ show_date=”true”]
[related_posts_by_tax title=”5 Recently Updated Posts, Similar or Related To Above Post” orderby=”post_modified” posts_per_page=”5″ show_date=”true”]
[related_posts_by_tax title=”5 Recently Updated Posts, Similar or Related To Above Post” orderby=”post_modified” posts_per_page=”5″ show_date=”true”]
[related_posts_by_tax title=”5 Recently Updated Posts, Similar or Related To Above Post” orderby=”post_modified” posts_per_page=”5″ show_date=”true”]
In this landmark judgment from Hon’ble Supreme Court, it has given a statutory shape to the CVC and to endow it with wider powers including supervision over Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) and the Enforcement Directorate (ED). Indeed the Supreme Court, while giving the said directions had relied upon the report of the Independent Review Committee (IRC) comprising Shri B. G. Deshmukh, former Cabinet Secretary, Shri N. N. Vohra, Principal Secretary to the PM and Shri S. V. Giri, Central Vigilance Commissioner, which Committee was constituted under the Government Order dated 8th September, 1997. The directions of the Supreme Court are quite elaborate and they extend to the appointment, powers and functioning of CVC, CBI and ED all designed to insulate the said institutions from political control and to invest them with good amount of independence coupled with accountability.
Citation: [1998 CRI LJ 1208], [1997 SUPREME 10 476], [1998 SLT 1 518], [1997 SCALE 7 656], [1996 AWC SC 1 465], [1998 CRLJ 104 1208], [1998 CCR 1 190], [1998 AIR SC 889], [1998 AIR SC 645], [1998 SCC CR 307], [1998 SCC 1 226], [1997 JT SC 10 247], [1998 CRIMES 1 12], [1997 SUPP SCR 6 595], [1998 GLT 1 11], [1998 RCR CRIMINAL 1 357], [1998 SCC CRI 307]
Other Source links:
https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1203995/
https://www.casemine.com/judgement/in/5609ad17e4b0149711410838#7
Hon’ble Supreme Court held that “Pertinent to the point in the case are two requirements: (i) service of a copy of the judgment to the prisoner in time to file an appeal and (ii) provision of free legal services to a prisoner who is indigent or otherwise disabled from securing legal assistance where the ends of justice call for such service. Both these are. State responsibilities under Art. 21 and apply where procedural law provides. for further appeals as well.“.
[related_posts_by_tax title=”5 Recently Updated Posts, Similar or Related To Above Post” orderby=”post_modified” posts_per_page=”5″ show_date=”true”]
Bad Behavior has blocked 1458 access attempts in the last 7 days.
