<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>High Court of Patna Judgment or Order or Notification Archives - Shades of Knife</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/category/patna-high-court-judgment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/category/patna-high-court-judgment/</link>
	<description>True Colors of a Vile Wife</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2026 15:38:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Manoj Kumar Vs Nita Bharti on 17 Mar 2026</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/manoj-kumar-vs-nita-bharti-on-17-mar-2026/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/manoj-kumar-vs-nita-bharti-on-17-mar-2026/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2026 14:28:02 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[High Court of Patna Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2-Judge (Division) Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Article 142 - Enforcement of decrees and orders of Supreme Court and orders as to discovery etc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Divorce granted on Cruelty ground]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Divorce Granted to Husband]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doctrine of Frustration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Irretrievable Breakdown of Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Procedure Explained - Interpretation of Statutes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manoj Kumar Vs Nita Bharti]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=23555</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A division bench of Patna High Court, used &#8220;Doctrine of frustration&#8221;&#160;in addition to Cruelty to dissolve a marriage registered under the Special Marriage Act, 1954. From Paras 39, 39. But, at same time, we are also mindful of the legal position that we cannot exercise power under Article 142 of the Constitution of India for [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/manoj-kumar-vs-nita-bharti-on-17-mar-2026/">Manoj Kumar Vs Nita Bharti on 17 Mar 2026</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/manoj-kumar-vs-nita-bharti-on-17-mar-2026/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ravi Prakash Saxena Vs Priyanka Rani on 04 Sep 2025</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/ravi-prakash-saxena-vs-priyanka-rani-on-04-sep-2025/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/ravi-prakash-saxena-vs-priyanka-rani-on-04-sep-2025/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2026 18:40:51 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[High Court of Patna Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1-Judge Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 125 or BNSS 144 - Remanded for Fresh Determination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Perjury - Wilful Omission or Supression of Material Information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ravi Prakash Saxena Vs Priyanka Rani]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=22670</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A single judge of Patna High Court held as follows, From Para 3, (Gold Digger looking for next bakra) 3. The <a class="glossaryLink"  aria-describedby="tt"  data-cmtooltip="&#60;div class=glossaryItemTitle&#62;Petitioner&#60;/div&#62;&#60;div class=glossaryItemBody&#62;A person who files a petition in court.&#60;/div&#62;"  href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/glossary/petitioner/"  data-gt-translate-attributes='[{"attribute":"data-cmtooltip", "format":"html"}]'  tabindex='0' role='link'>petitioner</a> has alleged that the opposite party/wife is in the habit of duping different young men with the sole motive of earning huge amounts of money after marriage, either by way of alimony or [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/ravi-prakash-saxena-vs-priyanka-rani-on-04-sep-2025/">Ravi Prakash Saxena Vs Priyanka Rani on 04 Sep 2025</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/ravi-prakash-saxena-vs-priyanka-rani-on-04-sep-2025/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vivek Kumar Singh Vs Pallawi Kumari on 11 Mar 2025</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/vivek-kumar-singh-vs-pallawi-kumari-on-11-mar-2025/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/vivek-kumar-singh-vs-pallawi-kumari-on-11-mar-2025/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2026 17:16:14 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[High Court of Patna Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1-Judge Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family Court orders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rajnesh Vs Neha]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 125 CrPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vivek kumar Singh Vs Pallawi Kumari]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wife maintenance]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=22610</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A single-judge Bench of the Patna High Court upheld an <a class="glossaryLink"  aria-describedby="tt"  data-cmtooltip="&#60;div class=glossaryItemTitle&#62;Order&#60;/div&#62;&#60;div class=glossaryItemBody&#62;A direction given by a court or judge.&#60;/div&#62;"  href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/glossary/order/"  data-gt-translate-attributes='[{"attribute":"data-cmtooltip", "format":"html"}]'  tabindex='0' role='link'>order</a> granting maintenance to the wife under Section 125 CrPC. The husband challenged the order in revision. He argued that the wife had deserted him. The Court held that a plea of desertion cannot defeat a maintenance claim by itself. The husband must first obtain [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/vivek-kumar-singh-vs-pallawi-kumari-on-11-mar-2025/">Vivek Kumar Singh Vs Pallawi Kumari on 11 Mar 2025</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/vivek-kumar-singh-vs-pallawi-kumari-on-11-mar-2025/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rajesh Kumar Vs Nutan Devi on 18 Feb 2025</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/rajesh-kumar-vs-nutan-devi-on-18-feb-2025/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/rajesh-kumar-vs-nutan-devi-on-18-feb-2025/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2025 17:59:44 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[High Court of Patna Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1-Judge Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BNSS Sec 144 - Order for maintenance of wives children and parents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judiciary Antics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Misinterpretation of Earlier Judgment or Settle Principle of Law or Per Incuriam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rajesh Kumar Vs Nutan Devi]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=22049</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A single judge of Patna High Court directed to enhance Maintenance amount at 5% annually. From Paras 16-20, 16. However, I find that undisputedly the petitioner-husband was getting monthly salary of Rs. 30,000/- at the time of filing the maintenance petition and out of Rs. 30,000/-, award of Rs. 15,000/- per month towards maintenance is [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/rajesh-kumar-vs-nutan-devi-on-18-feb-2025/">Rajesh Kumar Vs Nutan Devi on 18 Feb 2025</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/rajesh-kumar-vs-nutan-devi-on-18-feb-2025/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sanjay Kumar Shaw Vs Anjali Kumari Shaw on 07 Apr 2025</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/sanjay-kumar-shaw-vs-anjali-kumari-shaw-on-07-apr-2025/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/sanjay-kumar-shaw-vs-anjali-kumari-shaw-on-07-apr-2025/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2025 04:44:06 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[High Court of Patna Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2-Judge (Division) Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Catena of Landmark Judgments Referred/Cited to]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Divorce Denied to Husband]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HM Act 13 - Divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Non-Reportable Judgement or Order]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sanjay Kumar Shaw Vs Anjali Kumari Shaw]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=21331</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A division bench of Patna High Court held as follows, From Para 13, 13. It appears from the petition that application for divorce has been filed by the appellant under Section 13 (1) (ia) &#38; (ib) of the Act i.e. on the ground of cruelty and desertion. However, the main ground taken for divorce is [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/sanjay-kumar-shaw-vs-anjali-kumari-shaw-on-07-apr-2025/">Sanjay Kumar Shaw Vs Anjali Kumari Shaw on 07 Apr 2025</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/sanjay-kumar-shaw-vs-anjali-kumari-shaw-on-07-apr-2025/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ram Prasad Sahni Vs Punita Devi and Ors on 22 Jun 2017</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/ram-prasad-sahni-vs-punita-devi-and-ors-on-22-jun-2017/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/ram-prasad-sahni-vs-punita-devi-and-ors-on-22-jun-2017/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2024 03:38:43 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[High Court of Patna Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2-Judge (Division) Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HAM Act 19 - Maintenance of Widowed Daughter-in-law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ram Prasad Sahni Vs Punita Devi and Ors]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=19169</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A division bench of Patna High Court held as follows, Now, the question arises as to whether the applicant has been able to prove that her husband left behind the estate which she has inherited but is not in possession and whether the father-in-law is in possession of such estate? For better appreciation of this, [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/ram-prasad-sahni-vs-punita-devi-and-ors-on-22-jun-2017/">Ram Prasad Sahni Vs Punita Devi and Ors on 22 Jun 2017</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/ram-prasad-sahni-vs-punita-devi-and-ors-on-22-jun-2017/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gitanjali Devi Vs State of Bihar and Anr on 02 Dec 2023</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/gitanjali-devi-vs-state-of-bihar-and-anr-on-02-dec-2023/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/gitanjali-devi-vs-state-of-bihar-and-anr-on-02-dec-2023/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2024 08:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[High Court of Patna Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1-Judge Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gitanjali Devi Vs State of Bihar and Anr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Not followed Guidelines in Rajnesh Vs Neha Judgment]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=18928</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A single judge of Patna High Court held as follow: From Paras 6-10, 6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and on perusal of the records, this Court finds that in the court below the applicant-petitioner did not submit any proof of income of her husband. Her husband (opposite party no.2) filed his salary [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/gitanjali-devi-vs-state-of-bihar-and-anr-on-02-dec-2023/">Gitanjali Devi Vs State of Bihar and Anr on 02 Dec 2023</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/gitanjali-devi-vs-state-of-bihar-and-anr-on-02-dec-2023/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sandeep Kumar Tekriwal Vs State of Bihar and Anr on 09 Sep 2008</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/sandeep-kumar-tekriwal-vs-state-of-bihar-and-anr-on-09-sep-2008/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/sandeep-kumar-tekriwal-vs-state-of-bihar-and-anr-on-09-sep-2008/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2022 06:56:43 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[High Court of Patna Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1-Judge Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Catena of Landmark Judgments Referred/Cited to]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 317 - Provision for inquiries and trial being held in the absence of accused in certain cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Procedure Explained - Interpretation of Statutes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reportable Judgement or Order]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandeep Kumar Tekriwal Vs State of Bihar and Anr]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=17151</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A single judge of Patna High Court held as follows, From Para 15, 15. Section 317, Cr. P.C provides for inquiries and trial being held in the absence of accused in certain cases. However, if the Magistrate finds that personal appearance of the accused is necessary, he would direct that accused would no longer be [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/sandeep-kumar-tekriwal-vs-state-of-bihar-and-anr-on-09-sep-2008/">Sandeep Kumar Tekriwal Vs State of Bihar and Anr on 09 Sep 2008</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/sandeep-kumar-tekriwal-vs-state-of-bihar-and-anr-on-09-sep-2008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tillottama Kumari Vs State of Bihar and Ors on 16 May 2019</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/tillottama-kumari-vs-state-of-bihar-and-ors-on-16-may-2019/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/tillottama-kumari-vs-state-of-bihar-and-ors-on-16-may-2019/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Sep 2022 19:44:23 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[High Court of Patna Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1-Judge Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PWDV Act Sec 12(5) - Dispose In 60 Days]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tillottama Kumari Vs State of Bihar and Ors]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=16657</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A Single judge of Patna High Court held as follows, In my previous order dated 10.04.2019 while calling for a report from the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Katihar as to why any effective order has not been passed till date despite hearing the case on behalf of the parties on several dates, I had already [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/tillottama-kumari-vs-state-of-bihar-and-ors-on-16-may-2019/">Tillottama Kumari Vs State of Bihar and Ors on 16 May 2019</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/tillottama-kumari-vs-state-of-bihar-and-ors-on-16-may-2019/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The National Highway Projects in the State of Bihar Vs State of Bihar on 10 May 2022</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/the-national-highway-projects-in-the-state-of-bihar-vs-state-of-bihar-on-10-may-2022/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/the-national-highway-projects-in-the-state-of-bihar-vs-state-of-bihar-on-10-may-2022/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2022 13:27:41 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[High Court of Patna Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2-Judge (Division) Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Article 21 - Protection of life and personal liberty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Interest Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reportable Judgement or Order]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The National Highway Projects in the State of Bihar Vs State of Bihar]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=15586</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Court-1 of Patna High Court passed the following guidelines to the State and Oil Companies&#8230; 69. In furtherance of the above discussions, we find it necessary to issue the following directions:- i) The Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, to convene a meeting of all stakeholders to examine the best and most efficient way to [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/the-national-highway-projects-in-the-state-of-bihar-vs-state-of-bihar-on-10-may-2022/">The National Highway Projects in the State of Bihar Vs State of Bihar on 10 May 2022</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/the-national-highway-projects-in-the-state-of-bihar-vs-state-of-bihar-on-10-may-2022/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 
Lazy Loading (feed)
Minified using Disk

Served from: www.shadesofknife.in @ 2026-06-23 15:55:35 by W3 Total Cache
-->