Single-judge bench held that husband has to pay maintenance even if wife is earning salary and he does not have salary. Just 15 pages. Read yourself.
Vipul Lakhanpal Vs Pooja Sharma on 01 June 2015Category: High Court of Himachal Pradesh Judgment or Order or Notification
Narinder Awasthy alias Nand Lal Vs State of Himachal Pradesh on 15 November, 2018
High Court of Himachal Pradesh has granted anticipatory bail to the accused in this 420 case
Narinder Awasthy alias Nand Lal Vs State of Himachal Pradesh on 15 November, 2018[related_posts_by_tax title=”5 Recently Updated Posts, Similar or Related To Above Post” orderby=”post_modified” posts_per_page=”5″ show_date=”true”]
Yadwinder Singh & Others vs State Of H.P. & Others on 10 August, 2018
A detailed judgment from Hon’ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh, categorically held that police at Nalagarh had no jurisdiction, as has/had been held hereinabove, proceedings if any pending before Courts at Nalagarh cannot be allowed to sustain and thereby the FIR dated 7.10.2014 as well as consequent proceedings are quashed and set aside
And the knife is at liberty to initiate action, if any, against the petitioners, on account of allegations contained in impugned FIR but at Jallandhar(Pb), either by lodging fresh FIR or by pursuing complaint filed by her at Women Cell Jallandhar.
Yadwinder Singh & Others Vs State Of H.P. & Others on 10 August, 2018Ashmin Kashmiri Vs Pushkar Kashmiri on 4 July, 2018
In this judgment Justice Dharam Chand Choudhary has affirmed that under section 23 of DV Act, the Magistrate should be satisfied that the DV application prima facie discloses that the respondent is committing, or has committed and act of domestic violence, he may grant an ex parte order on the basis of the affidavit.
As such the case is returned back to trial court to proceed in according to law.
Ashmin Kashmiri Vs Pushkar Kashmiri on 4 July, 2018Citations: [2
Other Source links:
Ramesh Chand Vs State of Himachal Pradesh on 11 April, 2017
Wonderful judgment from High Court of Himachal Pradesh where the Husband was acquitted from IPC 498A for following reasons
- 9 months of delay in filing complaint
- No specific allegation attracting IPC 498A
- Co-accused were acquitted on same set of evidence by lower courts
Ramesh Chand vs State Of Himachal Pradesh on 11 April, 2017
