In another judgment, Delhi High Court has turned down the overt act of the Knife to grab hold of the property belonging to her father-in-law via permanent injunction.
Category: High Court of Delhi Judgment or Order or Notification
Shumita Didi Sandhu Vs Sanjay Singh Sandhu & Others on 26 October, 2010
The Division Bench of Hon’ble Delhi High Court has produced this judgment which held that the right of residence of a woman in the property on which her husband has right, title or interest that the wife can claim residence and that, too, if no commensurate alternative is provided by the husband.
K.R Chitra Vs Supreme Court Legal Services Committee on 30 September, 2015
High Court of Delhi has given this judgment, where in a advocate was not selected for Supreme Court Legal Services Committee and she filed this interesting case.
D-Block Pandav Nagar Residents Vs Amit Yadav And Ors on 13 October, 2015
A society which has earlier given NOC for Raam Leela in a park later on made a U turn and filed a Contempt of Court proceeding which was duly stuck down by Hon’ble High Court of Delhi
Reproduced in accordance with Section 52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, lobis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court and District Court Websites such as ecourts.gov.in
HS Bedi Vs National Highway Authority Of India on 14 May, 2015
Lot of Perjury Judgments are cited in this Delhi High Court Order.
Reproduced in accordance with Section 52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, lobis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court and District Court Websites such as ecourts.gov.in
Hans Raj Sharma & Ors. Vs State Govt. Of N.C.T. Of Delhi on 2 March, 2010
In this Delhi High Court judgment, Justice V.K.Jain has held that Money Demanded after marriage are not in connection of Marriage.
Sanjeev Kumar Mittal Vs The State on 18 November, 2010
Citing many landmark Perjury precedents, Justice J.R.Midha of Delhi High Court has rendered this judgment. This CrPC 340 judgment is under Sections 193, 196, 199 and 200 of the Indian Penal Code. Since there was ample evidence for fraud on court, Police were directed to conduct preliminary inquiry.
A precedent from Supreme Court of India is available here, which is also relied upon in this instant judgment.
Citations: [2011 DRJ 121 328], [2010 CCR 4 442], [2010 DLT 174 214], [2011 RCR CRI 7 2111], [2010 SCC ONLINE DEL 4006]
Other Sources:
https://indiankanoon.org/doc/83621866/
https://www.casemine.com/judgement/in/56090d95e4b014971117a12d
A Vs T on 28 May, 2018
Wonderful settled principle of law clarified in this judgment of Hon’ble Delhi High Court.
Summary: Condone delay in filing of written statement due to such settlement talks.
Key Quotes
… parties are negotiating settlement during the pendency of a matter, then the Court will condone the delay in filing of written statement due to such settlement talks
And emphasized that …
… it is the duty of the Courts to search the truth and then do justice; this is the very object for which Courts are created. The Courts have to remove chaff from the grain to separate falsehood from truth.
And declared…
Therefore, in matrimonial litigations, the Family Courts should take due care and caution in closing the valuable right to file the written statement or to lead the evidence or the right of cross-examination of any witness.
Damanpreet Kaur Vs Indermeet Juneja & Anr. on 14 May, 2012
Very good and straight-forward judgment from Justice Pratibha Rani of Delhi High Court in a case under PWDV Act.
If the Knife had good academics, had worked in past and sitting idle now just awaiting dole outs into her begging bowl, that proves two things
- Capability to work
- Malafide Intention to harass husband
Rupali Gupta Vs Rajat Gupta on 5 September, 2016
Interim maintenance itself is denied to qualified knife. Awesome !!!
