<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>High Court of Delhi Judgment or Order or Notification Archives - Shades of Knife</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/category/delhi-high-court/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/category/delhi-high-court/</link>
	<description>True Colors of a Vile Wife</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 17:30:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Dinesh Kumar Vs Neeti and Ors on 4 Apr 2026 &#8211; Judgment Summary</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/dinesh-kumar-vs-neeti-and-ors-on-4-apr-2026-judgment-summary/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/dinesh-kumar-vs-neeti-and-ors-on-4-apr-2026-judgment-summary/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Suprajaa Rajan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 16:58:19 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[High Court of Delhi Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1-Judge Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC Sec 125 or BNSS Sec 144 - Interim Maintenance Granted]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dinesh kumar Vs Neeti and Ors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matrimonial Criminal Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matrimonial dispute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PWDV Act Sec 20 - Maintenance Granted]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=23261</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In a significant ruling on interim maintenance, the Delhi High Court dealt with cross-petitions filed by both husband and wife challenging the quantum of maintenance awarded under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. While the husband argued that the amount was excessive, the wife contended that it was inadequate considering his actual [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/dinesh-kumar-vs-neeti-and-ors-on-4-apr-2026-judgment-summary/">Dinesh Kumar Vs Neeti and Ors on 4 Apr 2026 &#8211; Judgment Summary</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/dinesh-kumar-vs-neeti-and-ors-on-4-apr-2026-judgment-summary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vinod Kumar Vs Seema Devi and Anr on 16 Mar 2026 &#8211; Judgement Summary</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/vinod-kumar-vs-seema-devi-and-anr-on-16-mar-2026-judgement-summary/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/vinod-kumar-vs-seema-devi-and-anr-on-16-mar-2026-judgement-summary/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Suprajaa Rajan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 15:11:36 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[High Court of Delhi Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1-Judge Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 125 or BNSS 144 - Order for Maintenance of Wives Children and Parents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cruelty under IPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matrimonial Criminal Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matrimonial dispute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vinod Kumar Vs Seema Devi and Anr]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=23208</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In Vinod Kumar Vs Seema Devi and Anr, the Delhi High Court examined whether the maintenance awarded by the Family Court under Section 125 CrPC (now Section 144 BNSS) required interference. The <a class="glossaryLink"  aria-describedby="tt"  data-cmtooltip="&#60;div class=glossaryItemTitle&#62;Petitioner&#60;/div&#62;&#60;div class=glossaryItemBody&#62;A person who files a petition in court.&#60;/div&#62;"  href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/glossary/petitioner/"  data-gt-translate-attributes='[{"attribute":"data-cmtooltip", "format":"html"}]'  tabindex='0' role='link'>petitioner</a> (husband) challenged the maintenance granted to his wife and daughter, arguing that: The wife lived separately without justification She had rental income [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/vinod-kumar-vs-seema-devi-and-anr-on-16-mar-2026-judgement-summary/">Vinod Kumar Vs Seema Devi and Anr on 16 Mar 2026 &#8211; Judgement Summary</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/vinod-kumar-vs-seema-devi-and-anr-on-16-mar-2026-judgement-summary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vikaramjeet Rana Vs The State of NCT of Delhi and Anr on 6 Nov 2025 &#8211; Judgment Summary</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/vikaramjeet-rana-vs-the-state-of-nct-of-delhi-and-anr-on-6-nov-2025-judgment-summary/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/vikaramjeet-rana-vs-the-state-of-nct-of-delhi-and-anr-on-6-nov-2025-judgment-summary/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Suprajaa Rajan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2026 09:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[High Court of Delhi Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1-Judge Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC Sec 125 or BNSS Sec 144 - Interim Maintenance Reduced]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act 2005]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PWDV Act Sec 20 - Maintenance Granted]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PWDV Act Sec 25 - Change in Circumstances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vikaramjeet Rana Vs The State of NCT of Delhi and Anr]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=23077</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Delhi High Court held that interim rent maintenance under the DV Act cannot continue after the wife acquires her own residence. The Court observed that the purpose of rent is to provide immediate shelter. Once the wife purchases a house, that need ends. Therefore, continuation of rent becomes unjust enrichment.Further, the Court recognised that [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/vikaramjeet-rana-vs-the-state-of-nct-of-delhi-and-anr-on-6-nov-2025-judgment-summary/">Vikaramjeet Rana Vs The State of NCT of Delhi and Anr on 6 Nov 2025 &#8211; Judgment Summary</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/vikaramjeet-rana-vs-the-state-of-nct-of-delhi-and-anr-on-6-nov-2025-judgment-summary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sandeep Pathak and Ors Vs Lalitha Tiwari on 10 Mar 2026 &#8211; Judgment Summary</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/sandeep-pathak-and-ors-vs-lalitha-tiwari-on-10-mar-2026-judgment-summary/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/sandeep-pathak-and-ors-vs-lalitha-tiwari-on-10-mar-2026-judgment-summary/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Suprajaa Rajan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2026 16:57:03 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[High Court of Delhi Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1-Judge Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 482 – IPC 498A Quashed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPC 498A - Cruelty Not Proved]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PWDV act]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=23073</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Delhi High Court in Sandeep Pathak and Ors Vs Lalitha Tiwari quashed criminal proceedings under Section 498A IPC (Section 85 BNS), Section 406 IPC (Section 316 BNS), and the DV Act. The Court held that vague and omnibus allegations cannot establish cruelty or criminal breach of trust. It also ruled that DV Act proceedings [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/sandeep-pathak-and-ors-vs-lalitha-tiwari-on-10-mar-2026-judgment-summary/">Sandeep Pathak and Ors Vs Lalitha Tiwari on 10 Mar 2026 &#8211; Judgment Summary</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/sandeep-pathak-and-ors-vs-lalitha-tiwari-on-10-mar-2026-judgment-summary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>M/s Jindal Polyster Ltd Vs Rahul Jaura on 18 Oct 2005 &#8211; Judgment Summary</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/m-s-jindal-polyster-ltd-vs-rahul-jaura-on-18-oct-2005/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/m-s-jindal-polyster-ltd-vs-rahul-jaura-on-18-oct-2005/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Suprajaa Rajan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2026 17:23:04 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[High Court of Calcutta Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High Court of Delhi Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1-Judge Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BNSS 379 - Procedure in cases mentioned in section 215]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cases where Perjury Proceedings were initated]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 340 - Dispose Perjury first]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M/s Jindal Polyster Ltd Vs Rahul Jaura]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=22949</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Delhi High Court examined a petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging a trial court <a class="glossaryLink"  aria-describedby="tt"  data-cmtooltip="&#60;div class=glossaryItemTitle&#62;Order&#60;/div&#62;&#60;div class=glossaryItemBody&#62;A direction given by a court or judge.&#60;/div&#62;"  href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/glossary/order/"  data-gt-translate-attributes='[{"attribute":"data-cmtooltip", "format":"html"}]'  tabindex='0' role='link'>order</a>.&#160;The dispute arose in a recovery suit where the defendant denied appointing the plaintiff as an insurance consultant. Later, the defendant realised that the denial resulted from confusion regarding the company&#8217;s earlier name. The defendant [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/m-s-jindal-polyster-ltd-vs-rahul-jaura-on-18-oct-2005/">M/s Jindal Polyster Ltd Vs Rahul Jaura on 18 Oct 2005 &#8211; Judgment Summary</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/m-s-jindal-polyster-ltd-vs-rahul-jaura-on-18-oct-2005/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Punjab Tractors Ltd Vs M/s International Traders Ltd and Ors on 18 Sep 2009 &#8211; Judgment Summary</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/punjab-tractors-ltd-vs-m-s-international-traders-ltd-and-ors-on-18-sep-2009/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/punjab-tractors-ltd-vs-m-s-international-traders-ltd-and-ors-on-18-sep-2009/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Suprajaa Rajan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2026 15:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[High Court of Delhi Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BNSS 379 - Procedure in cases mentioned in section 215]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cases where Perjury Proceedings were initated]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPC 191 - Giving false evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Punjab tractors ltd Vs M/s International Traders ltd and Ors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 340 CrPC]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=22944</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Delhi High Court decided an important issue on perjury proceedings under Section 340 CrP (Section 379 BNSS). The defendants sought prosecution of the plaintiff&#8217;s officials for allegedly filing fabricated drawings and false statements. The court examined whether the circumstances justified criminal prosecution for perjury during civil proceedings. The judgment clarifies that courts must exercise [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/punjab-tractors-ltd-vs-m-s-international-traders-ltd-and-ors-on-18-sep-2009/">Punjab Tractors Ltd Vs M/s International Traders Ltd and Ors on 18 Sep 2009 &#8211; Judgment Summary</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/punjab-tractors-ltd-vs-m-s-international-traders-ltd-and-ors-on-18-sep-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rashmi Raikhy and Anr Vs The State of NCT Delhi and Ors on 1 Feb 2018</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/rashmi-raikhy-anr-vs-the-state-of-nct-delhi-ors-on-1-feb-2018/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/rashmi-raikhy-anr-vs-the-state-of-nct-delhi-ors-on-1-feb-2018/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2026 15:37:23 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[High Court of Delhi Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1-Judge Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Article 226 Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal Procedure Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dowry Case Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LOC in Matrimonial Dispute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Look Out Circular]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matrimonial Litigation India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quashing of LOC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rashmi Raikhy & Anr Vs The State of NCR Delhi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reportable Judgement or Order]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 406 IPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 498A IPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writ Petition]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=22702</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The High Court of Delhi,&#160;quashed the Look Out Circular (LOC) issued against the petitioners&#160;registered under Sections 406/498-A/34 IPC. The Court held that issuance and continuation of an LOC in a matrimonial dispute involving Section 406 IPC was neither reasonable nor justified, especially when the petitioners had regularly appeared before the trial court, complied with <a class="glossaryLink"  aria-describedby="tt"  data-cmtooltip="&#60;div class=glossaryItemTitle&#62;Bail&#60;/div&#62;&#60;div class=glossaryItemBody&#62;Temporary release of an accused person awaiting trial.&#60;/div&#62;"  href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/glossary/bail/"  data-gt-translate-attributes='[{"attribute":"data-cmtooltip", "format":"html"}]'  tabindex='0' role='link'>bail</a> [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/rashmi-raikhy-anr-vs-the-state-of-nct-delhi-ors-on-1-feb-2018/">Rashmi Raikhy and Anr Vs The State of NCT Delhi and Ors on 1 Feb 2018</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/rashmi-raikhy-anr-vs-the-state-of-nct-delhi-ors-on-1-feb-2018/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tasmeer Qureshi Vs Asfia Mazaffar on 29 Oct 2025</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/tasmeer-qureshi-vs-asfia-mazaffar-on-29-oct-2025/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/tasmeer-qureshi-vs-asfia-mazaffar-on-29-oct-2025/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2026 18:04:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[High Court of Delhi Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 125 or BNSS 144 - Maintenance Order Set Aside]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 125 or BNSS 144 - Remanded for Fresh Determination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Income assessment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rajnesh Vs Neha]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tasmeer Qureshi Vs Asfia Mussafar]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=22637</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In Tasmeer Qureshi v. Asfia Muzaffar, the Delhi High Court held that a Family Court cannot fix interim maintenance without recording a clear assessment of the husband&#8217;s income. While concealment of income permits an adverse inference, the Court must still determine actual or notional monthly income before fixing the quantum. Since the Family Court failed [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/tasmeer-qureshi-vs-asfia-mazaffar-on-29-oct-2025/">Tasmeer Qureshi Vs Asfia Mazaffar on 29 Oct 2025</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/tasmeer-qureshi-vs-asfia-mazaffar-on-29-oct-2025/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sahiba Sodhi Vs State (NCT of Delhi) and Anr on 09 Dec 2025</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/sahiba-sodhi-vs-state-nct-of-delhi-and-anr-on-09-dec-2025/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/sahiba-sodhi-vs-state-nct-of-delhi-and-anr-on-09-dec-2025/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2026 06:57:34 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[High Court of Delhi Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1-Judge Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Perjury - Not Initiated Suo Moto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PWDV Act Sec 19 - Residential Order (Rent) Granted]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PWDV Act Sec 23 - Interim Maintenance Denied]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reportable Judgement or Order]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sahiba Sodhi Vs State (NCT of Delhi) and Anr]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=22628</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>&#160; From Paras from 13 to 17, 13. From the <a class="glossaryLink"  aria-describedby="tt"  data-cmtooltip="&#60;div class=glossaryItemTitle&#62;Affidavit&#60;/div&#62;&#60;div class=glossaryItemBody&#62;A written statement confirmed by oath or affirmation.&#60;/div&#62;"  href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/glossary/affidavit/"  data-gt-translate-attributes='[{"attribute":"data-cmtooltip", "format":"html"}]'  tabindex='0' role='link'>affidavit</a> of income, assets and liabilities filed by the petitioner-wife before the learned Trial Court in November 2020, it is evident that she did not disclose the income earned during her period of employment between April 2020 and July 2020. In the said affidavit, she [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/sahiba-sodhi-vs-state-nct-of-delhi-and-anr-on-09-dec-2025/">Sahiba Sodhi Vs State (NCT of Delhi) and Anr on 09 Dec 2025</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/sahiba-sodhi-vs-state-nct-of-delhi-and-anr-on-09-dec-2025/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Arshi Parveen Vs Maqsood on 5 Jan 2026</title>
		<link>https://www.shadesofknife.in/arshi-parveen-vs-maqsood-on-5-jan-2026/</link>
					<comments>https://www.shadesofknife.in/arshi-parveen-vs-maqsood-on-5-jan-2026/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ShadesOfKnife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2026 17:28:04 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[High Court of Delhi Judgment or Order or Notification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1-Judge Bench Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arshi Parveen Vs Maqsood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC 125 or BNSS 144 - Maintenance From Date of Application Or Petition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrPC Sec 125 or BNSS Sec 144 - Interim Maintenance Enhanced]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minimum Wages Assessment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rajnesh Vs Neha]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shadesofknife.in/?p=22622</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In Arshi Parveen v. Maqsood, the Delhi High Court enhanced interim maintenance awarded under Section 125 Cr.P.C. The Court held that when a husband suppresses income details or provides incomplete, the Court can assess income on the basis of minimum wages applicable in the concerned State. The Court held that the wife cannot be presumed [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in/arshi-parveen-vs-maqsood-on-5-jan-2026/">Arshi Parveen Vs Maqsood on 5 Jan 2026</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.shadesofknife.in">Shades of Knife</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shadesofknife.in/arshi-parveen-vs-maqsood-on-5-jan-2026/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 
Lazy Loading (feed)
Minified using Disk

Served from: www.shadesofknife.in @ 2026-06-23 14:49:06 by W3 Total Cache
-->