This is the Andhra Pradesh Decentralization and Inclusive Development of All Regions Bill, 2020 that got passed in Legislative Assembly of A.P. but fortunately got stalled in the Legislative Council (Upper House of AP Legislature).
The twin for the above Bill is here.
After passing the AP Panchayat Raj Rules 2020 here, the following steps were taken by incumbent AP Govt.
GO for Cessation of Tenure due to Promulgation of Ordinance No. 5 of 2020
Corresponding Gazette
GO for Sri Justice V.Kanagaraj, Retired High Court Judge, appointed as SEC of A.P State Election Commission
Corresponding Gazette
A complete indexed and mess-wise segregated collection of reprimands received by this incumbent State Government of YSRC Party are here.
After getting the Andhra Pradesh Ordinance No. 5 of 2020 Promulgated here, on 10 April 2020 by AP Governor Shri. Biswabhusan Harichandan, the following Rules were framed via GO and Gazette (G.O. Ms. 617).
GO
Corresponding Gazette
Once these Rules 2020 were framed, the next steps taken are here.
A complete indexed and mess-wise segregated collection of reprimands received by this incumbent State Government of YSRC Party are here.
After the nonsensical and futile legal squirmish with AP SEC here, incumbent AP Govt took the following legal step. The Andhra Pradesh Ordinance No. 5 of 2020 Promulgated on 10 April 2020 was first marked as confidential soon after its approval, but placed it in the public domain later in the evening as reported here.
Government Order: Announcing the Andhra Pradesh Panchayat-Raj (Second Amendment) Ordinance, 2020
Even though, I could not find the gazette version of Andhra Pradesh Ordinance No. 5 of 2020, promulgated on 10 April 2020, the following are the various Government Orders (GOs) and the Gazatte notifications of the said GOs.
As a consequence to this GO (Gazette still not found), the following three legislative steps were taken.
A complete indexed and mess-wise segregated collection of reprimands received by this incumbent State Government of YSRC Party are here.
(1) The Court issuing a proclamation under section 82 may, for reasons to be recorded in writing, at any time after the issue of the proclamation, order the attachment of any property, movable or immovable, or both, belonging to the proclaimed person:
Provided that where at the time of the issue of the proclamation the Court is satisfied, by affidavit or otherwise, that the person in relation to whom the proclamation is to be issued,—
(a) is about to dispose of the whole or any part of his property, or
(b) is about to remove the whole or any part of his property from the local jurisdiction of the Court, it may order the attachment simultaneously with the issue of the proclamation.
(2) Such order shall authorise the attachment of any property belonging to such person within the district in which it is made; and it shall authorise the attachment of any property belonging to such person without such district when endorsed by the District Magistrate within whose district such property is situate.
(3) If the property ordered to be attached is a debt or other movable property, the attachment under this section shall be made—
(a) by seizure; or
(b) by the appointment of a receiver; or
(c) by an order in writing prohibiting the delivery of such property to the proclaimed person or to any one on his behalf; or
(d) by all or any two of such methods, as the Court thinks fit.
(4) If the property ordered to be attached is immovable, the attachment under this section shall, in the case of land paying revenue to the State Government, be made through the Collector of the district in which the land is situate, and in all other cases—
(a) by taking possession; or
(b) by the appointment of a receiver; or
(c) by an order in writing prohibiting the payment of rent on delivery of property to the proclaimed person or to any one on his behalf; or
(d) by all or any two of such methods, as the Court thinks fit.
(5) If the property ordered to be attached consists of live-stock or is of a perishable nature, the Court may, if it thinks it expedient, order immediate sale thereof, and in such case the proceeds of the sale shall abide the order of the Court.
(6) The powers, duties and liabilities of a receiver appointed under this section shall be the same as those of a receiver appointed under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908).
(1) If any Court has reason to believe (whether after taking evidence or not) that any person against whom a warrant has been issued by it has absconded or is concealing himself so that such warrant cannot be executed, such Court may publish a written proclamation requiring him to appear at a specified place and at a specified time not less than thirty days from the date of publishing such proclamation.
(2) The proclamation shall be published as follows:—
(i) (a) it shall be publicly read in some conspicuous place of the town or village in which such person ordinarily resides;
(b) it shall be affixed to some conspicuous part of the house or homestead in which such person ordinarily resides or to some conspicuous place of such town or village;
(c) a copy thereof shall be affixed to some conspicuous part of the Court-house;
(ii) the Court may also, if it thinks fit, direct a copy of the proclamation to be published in a daily newspaper circulating in the place in which such person ordinarily resides.
(3) A statement in writing by the Court issuing the proclamation to the effect that the proclamation was duly published on a specified day, in the manner specified in clause (i) of sub-section (2), shall be conclusive evidence that the requirements of this section have been complied with, and that the proclamation was published on such day.
(4) Where a proclamation published under sub-section (1) is in respect of a person accused of an offence punishable under section 302, 304, 364, 367, 382, 392, 393, 394, 395, 396, 397, 398, 399, 400, 402, 436, 449, 459 or 460 of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860), and such person fails to appear at the specified place and time required by the proclamation, the Court may, after making such inquiry as it thinks fit, pronounce him a proclaimed offender and make a declaration to that effect.
(5) The provisions of sub-sections (2) and (3) shall apply to a declaration made by the Court under sub-section (4) as they apply to the proclamation published under sub-section (1).
(1) The Chief Judicial Magistrate or a Magistrate of the first class may direct a warrant to any person within his local jurisdiction for the arrest of any escaped convict, proclaimed offender or of any person who is accused of a non-bailable offence and is evading arrest.
(2) Such person shall acknowledge in writing the receipt of the warrant, and shall execute it if the person for whose arrest it was issued, is in, or enters on, any land or other property under his charge.
(3) When the person against whom such warrant is issued is arrested, he shall be made over with the warrant to the nearest police officer, who shall cause him to be taken before a Magistrate having jurisdiction in the case, unless security is taken under section 71.
The High Court of AP had dismissed the Govt Order to color all the Government building to YSRCP Colours in the State of AP here. State Government failed at Supreme Court too. Judgment is here.
The AP Govt had the following Order passed (2020PR_MS623) to obtain the very same colors to paint Government Buildings in the State of AP this time via the namesake committee to submit recommendations to exactly match the YSRCP colours to meet their party agenda item.
The High Court of AP had dismissed the Govt Order to change the medium of instruction to English in all Government run schools in the State of AP here.
The AP Govt had the following Order passed (21042020SE_MS20) to obtain the preferred Medium of Instruction in all Government schools in the State via the Parents committee resolutions to get the mandated English Medium schools for all agenda item.
The following are the Rules made under the Family Courts Act 1984, last amended in 2005.
The Family Courts Act is available here.
Disclaimer:
Reproduced in accordance with Section 52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from main.sci.gov.in/judgments, judis.nic.in, lobis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court and District Court Websites such as ecourts.gov.in
I have no control to remove copies of this document(s) that may be available on websites of High Courts or Supreme Court of India or any of the many other sites, law journal or reporters which carry the same judgment in it’s entirety, not I can remove references/links to this document(s) from the results of Search Engines such as Google.com.
Bad Behavior has blocked 598 access attempts in the last 7 days.
