Rani Bibi Vs Sk Nurullah and Ors on 8 Dec 2025 – Judgement Summary

Posted on April 8 by Suprajaa Rajan

In Rani Bibi vs Sk. Nurullah & Ors. (2026), the Calcutta High Court dealt with a crucial issue concerning territorial jurisdiction under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 and the maintainability of a petition under Section 482 CrPC [Section 528 BNSS].

The petitioner-wife, after being allegedly subjected to cruelty and dowry harassment, shifted to a rented accommodation in Kolkata and initiated proceedings under Section 12 of the DV Act. While the Magistrate upheld jurisdiction, the appellate court reversed the decision, directing return of the application for lack of territorial jurisdiction.

“25. Since in the instant case, the question which has been dealt herein by the court below as to the maintainability of the Application under section 12 of the D.V. Act before the said Trial court is on the ground of territoriality principle of jurisdiction, I am of the firm view that the order impugned attracts the second part of section 482 of the Cr.P.C. and therefore instant application under section 482 of the Code against the impugned order is maintainable.”
“29. In the light of said judgment the temporary residence as envisaged under the Act is such residence where an aggrieved person compelled to take shelter in view of domestic violence perpetrated on her or she either been turned out of the matrimonial home or has to leave the matrimonial home. Of course the temporary residence does not include residence in a lodge or hotel or an inn or residence at a place only for the purpose of filing a domestic violence case, but the temporary residence must also be a continuing residence from the date of acquiring residence till the Application under section 12 disposed of and it must not be a fleeing residence where a woman comes only for the purpose of contesting the case and otherwise does not reside there.”
“30. In the instant case the document which has been relied by the petitioner and also considering the fact that the petitioner had received court notices from the Taltala Address it does not indicate that it is not her continuing residence nor there is anything to suggest that the petitioner comes to that residence only for the purpose of contesting the said cases and otherwise does not reside therein.”
“34. “Economic abuse” interalia includes deprivation of financial or economic resources to which an aggrieved person is entitled to under the law or custom and such claim is a continuing one which continues from day to day. It is settled law that continuity of joint residence in a shared house hold or domestic relationship inter se is not a sine qua non for the perpetration of domestic violence to an aggrieved person in the form “economic abuse” under the Act.”

Decision

The Court, after detailed analysis, thus, held that:

A woman can initiate DV proceedings where she temporarily resides.
Temporary residence must be genuine and not merely a “fleeting” arrangement.
Economic abuse constitutes a continuing cause of action, thereby conferring jurisdiction.

Therefore, the High Court set aside the appellate court’s order and restored the Magistrate’s decision.

Rani Bibi Vs Sk Nurullah and Ors on 8 Dec 2025

Citation : 2026:CHC-AS:289

Other Sources :

Index of Domestic Violence judgements is here.

Related Legal Concepts

Inherent powers of High Court
Temporary vs Permanent Residence
Economic Abuse under DV Act
Maintainability of Criminal Revision
Abuse of Process of Law

Key Contributor :
Mrs. Suprajaa Rajan B.Com., LL.B., LL.M.
+91-9606345150

Post Views: 47

Appeal, Revision and Review Explained

Posted on April 7 by Suprajaa Rajan

After a criminal court delivers a judgment, the legal system provides remedies to challenge or correct that decision. These remedies include appeal, revision, and review, each serving a distinct purpose within the framework of criminal procedure.

The law governing these remedies is contained in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and the corresponding provisions under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. These mechanisms ensure that judicial decisions remain fair, legally sound, and subject to scrutiny.

Meaning of Appeal

An appeal is a statutory right that allows a party to challenge a judgment before a higher court. The appellate court re-examines the case on both facts and law, depending on the nature of the appeal.

Key provisions include:

Section 372 CrPC (Section 413 BNSS) – No appeal unless provided by law
Section 374 CrPC (Section 415 BNSS) – Appeals from convictions
Section 378 CrPC (Section 419 BNSS) – Appeal against acquittal

Through an appeal, the higher court may:

Confirm the judgment
Reverse the decision
Modify the sentence
Order a retrial

Thus, an appeal provides a comprehensive re-evaluation of the case.

Types of Appeals in Criminal Law

The law recognises different types of appeals depending on the nature of the case.

Appeal Against Conviction

Filed by the accused challenging conviction and sentence.

Appeal Against Acquittal

Filed by the State or complainant challenging acquittal.

Appeal for Enhancement of Sentence

Filed by the State seeking stricter punishment.

Victim’s Appeal

Recognised under Section 372 CrPC (Section 413 BNSS), allowing victims to challenge acquittal or inadequate compensation.

These categories ensure that all affected parties have access to appellate remedies.

Meaning of Revision

A revision is a supervisory power exercised by higher courts to examine the correctness, legality, or propriety of an order passed by a lower court.

Relevant provisions include:

Section 397 CrPC (Section 438 BNSS) – Calling for records
Section 401 CrPC (Section 442 BNSS) – Powers of High Court in revision

Unlike an appeal, revision is not a matter of right. Instead, it is a discretionary remedy.

Courts exercise revision jurisdiction to:

Correct jurisdictional errors
Prevent miscarriage of justice
Ensure proper application of law

Thus, revision acts as a corrective mechanism rather than a full rehearing.

Scope of Revision

In revision proceedings, courts generally do not re-evaluate evidence in detail. Instead, they focus on:

Legality of the order
Procedural correctness
Jurisdictional issues

Therefore, revision ensures that lower courts act within the bounds of law and procedure.

Meaning of Review in Criminal Law

Unlike civil proceedings, review is not generally recognised under criminal procedure.

The
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 does not provide a substantive provision for review of criminal judgments by the same court.

However, limited powers exist:

Section 362 CrPC (Section 401 BNSS) – Court cannot alter judgment after signing, except for clerical errors

Thus, once a judgment is delivered, the court becomes functus officio, meaning it cannot revisit its decision except in limited circumstances.

Key Differences: Appeal vs Revision vs Review

Understanding the distinction between these remedies is essential.

Appeal

Statutory right
Re-examination of facts and law
Filed before higher court

Revision

Discretionary power
Limited to legality and propriety
Supervisory jurisdiction

Review

Generally not permitted in criminal law
Limited to correction of clerical errors

This distinction ensures that the legal system maintains a structured hierarchy of remedies.

Importance in Criminal Justice System

These remedies play a vital role in ensuring justice.

They:

Prevent wrongful convictions
Correct judicial errors
Maintain consistency in legal interpretation
Strengthen public confidence in courts

Therefore, appeal, revision, and limited review powers act as safeguards against injustice.

Conclusion

Appeal, revision, and review form an essential part of the criminal justice framework. While appeal provides a full re-examination, revision ensures legal correctness, and review remains limited in scope.

Together, these remedies ensure that judicial decisions are fair, accurate, and subject to appropriate oversight, thereby upholding the rule of law.

Related Legal Concepts

Explore the stages before and after judgment in criminal cases:

Index of Law Concepts explained here.

Key Contributor :

Mrs. Suprajaa Rajan B.Com., LL.B., LL.M.

+91-9606345150

Post Views: 1,062

Charul Shukla Vs State of UP and Ors on 25 Mar 2026 – Judgment Summary

Posted on April 5 by Suprajaa Rajan

In Charul Shukla vs State of U.P. & Others (2026), the Supreme Court set aside the Allahabad High Court’s refusal to quash criminal proceedings against the complainant’s sister-in-law and parents-in-law. The case alleged offences under Sections 498A, 323, 354 IPC and Sections 3 & 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

The Court carefully examined whether the allegations—filed after a delay of over six years—were supported by material evidence. It found that the accusations were largely vague, omnibus, and unsubstantiated, particularly against relatives who were either living separately or were senior citizens.

“21. At the same time, the said allegations also have to be juxtaposed with the fact that the complaint was registered by the complainant only on 15.11.2023 i.e. after a delay of more than six years and seven months from the alleged dowry demand. The prosecution has failed to put forth any sufficient cause for such delay and this casts aspersions on their story. At this juncture, we find it apposite to underline the importance of taking an early recourse to pursue and prosecute criminal complaints.”
“22. Time and again, this Court has observed that merely stating certain vague and omnibus allegations without any cogent material evidence to support the same should not become a fillip to jump-start the criminal machinery of the State.”
“23. Upon bare perusal of the Chargesheet No.01/2024 and the medical examination report annexed thereto, no offence under Section 313 of IPC has been made out. The attached medical examination report fails to ascribe or delineate any particular injury that relates to or supports the claim of the complainant either. We must hasten to add that upon completion of the investigation, the investigating officer also deemed it fit to drop the charges under Section 313 of IPC against the accused/appellants.”
“24. It would not be out of place to mention that the delay of almost seven years between the alleged incident and lodgment of the FIR has not been explained sufficiently by the complainant.”
“25. It is merely stated that the father- in-law held her hands and tried to commit obscene acts with her. The complainant has failed to elaborate upon said ‘obscene acts’ allegedly committed by him. It is trite that the FIR cannot be an encyclopaedia of the events but even upon the perusal of the chargesheet as presented by the investigation officer, the counsel for prosecution/State has not been able to substantiate or discern any substantive material in support of the allegation under Section 354 of IPC. At this juncture, it would not be out of place to mention that the complainant herself has failed to enter appearance in the present proceedings despite service of notice upon her. The said non-appearance, despite the service of notice being complete upon her, inevitably draws our attention towards an adverse inference that the complainant herself is indifferent and uninterested in contesting the said appeals.”

Decision

Importantly, the Court emphasized that:

Mere allegations without supporting evidence cannot justify criminal prosecution.
Delay in lodging FIR, especially in matrimonial disputes, must be satisfactorily explained.
Courts must guard against misuse of criminal law to harass family members.

Applying the principles laid down in Bhajan Lal, the Court concluded that continuing the proceedings would amount to abuse of process of law and quashed the FIR and all consequential proceedings against the appellants.

Charul Shukla Vs State of UP and Ors on 25 Mar 2026

Citation : 2026 INSC 297

Other Sources :

Index of Quash Judgements is here.

Related Legal Concepts

Explore the relevant concepts;

Abuse of process of Law
Cruelty under IPC
Cognizable and Non-cognizable offences
Quashing of Fir

Key Contributor :
Mrs. Suprajaa Rajan B.Com., LL.B., LL.M.
+91-9606345150

Post Views: 392

Judgment in Criminal Cases Explained

Posted on April 5 by Suprajaa Rajan

A judgment in a criminal case represents the final decision of the court after evaluating the evidence, hearing arguments, and applying the law. It determines whether the accused is convicted or acquitted, thereby bringing the trial to a conclusion.

The law governing criminal judgments is contained in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and corresponding provisions under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

The delivery of judgment ensures that the judicial process culminates in a reasoned and legally sound outcome.

Statutory Framework

The provisions relating to judgment are primarily contained in:

Section 353 CrPC (Section 392 BNSS) – Pronouncement of judgment
Section 354 CrPC (Section 393 BNSS) – Language and contents of judgment
Section 355 CrPC (Section 394 BNSS) – Judgment in summons cases
Section 357 CrPC (Section 395 BNSS) – Compensation to victims

These provisions ensure that judgments are structured, reasoned, and transparent.

Meaning and Nature of Judgment

A judgment is a formal expression of the court’s decision after trial. It reflects the court’s analysis of:

Facts presented during trial
Evidence on record
Legal provisions applicable to the case

The court must deliver a reasoned judgment, which explains how it arrived at its conclusion.

Essential Elements of a Criminal Judgment

Under Section 354 CrPC (Section 393 BNSS), every judgment must contain certain essential elements.

These include:

Points for determination
Decision on each point
Reasons for the decision
Relevant legal provisions
Final order (conviction or acquittal)

A well-reasoned judgment ensures clarity, accountability, and fairness.

Pronouncement of Judgment

The court delivers the judgment under Section 353 CrPC (Section 392 BNSS).

The court may:

Pronounce judgment in open court
Read out the operative portion
Provide a copy to the parties

Pronouncement in open court ensures transparency in judicial proceedings.

Types of Judgments in Criminal Cases

A criminal court may deliver different types of judgments based on the outcome of the trial.

Conviction

The court convicts the accused when the prosecution proves guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

Acquittal

The court acquits the accused when the prosecution fails to prove its case or when reasonable doubt exists.

Benefit of Doubt

If the evidence creates uncertainty, the court gives the benefit of doubt to the accused and acquits them.

Standard Applied by Courts

While delivering judgment, courts apply the principle of proof beyond reasonable doubt.

This means:

The prosecution must establish guilt with certainty
Any reasonable doubt must favour the accused

This high standard protects individuals from wrongful conviction.

Compensation to Victims

The court may award compensation to victims under:

Section 357 CrPC (Section 395 BNSS)

This provision enables courts to:

Direct payment of compensation
Address the harm suffered by victims

Thus, the judgment not only determines guilt but also addresses victim rights.

Importance of Reasoned Judgments

Courts must provide clear and detailed reasons in their judgments.

Reasoned judgments:

Enable appellate courts to review decisions
Ensure transparency
Build public confidence in the judiciary
Prevent arbitrary decision-making

Therefore, reasoning forms the core of judicial decision-making.

Post-Judgment Remedies

After the judgment, parties may avail legal remedies such as:

Appeal
Revision
Review (in limited cases)

These remedies ensure that errors can be corrected and justice is effectively administered.

Conclusion

A judgment in a criminal case, thus, represents the culmination of the entire trial process. It determines the rights and liabilities of the accused based on evidence and law.

By requiring courts to deliver reasoned and transparent decisions, the law, therefore, ensures that justice is not only done but is also seen to be done.

Related Legal Concepts

Understand the stages leading up to judgment in a criminal case:

Index of Law Concepts explained here.

Key Contributor :

Mrs. Suprajaa Rajan B.Com., LL.B., LL.M.

+91-9606345150

Post Views: 317

Life Cycle Stages of a Child Custody / Visitation Case

Posted on April 4 by Suprajaa Rajan

A Step-by-Step Guide to Custody Proceedings Under Indian Law

Understanding the procedural journey of a child custody or visitation case helps parents protect the best interests of the child while navigating court proceedings effectively.

Child custody disputes arise when parents disagree on the care, control, and upbringing of a minor child. Indian courts decide such matters based on the welfare and best interests of the child, which remains the paramount consideration.

Custody and visitation matters are governed primarily by the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956, the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890, and relevant provisions of procedural law under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, along with certain applicable provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) and the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS).

The following stages explain the complete life cycle of a child custody or visitation case.

1. Legal Foundation of Child Custody Law

First, it is important to understand the legal framework governing custody disputes.

Courts decide custody matters under the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890, and personal laws applicable to the parties. However, the court always prioritises the welfare of the child over the rights of the parents.

Additionally, in urgent situations, a parent may seek interim protection or custody through procedural provisions. For instance, a party may invoke interim relief mechanisms similar to those under Section 97 CrPC / Section 104 BNSS, where applicable.

Therefore, courts adopt a child-centric approach while deciding custody and visitation matters.

2. Stage One: Dispute Between Parents Regarding Custody

Typically, a custody dispute arises when parents separate or initiate matrimonial proceedings.

For example, disputes often arise during divorce, judicial separation, or domestic conflicts. One parent may retain custody of the child, while the other parent may seek custody or visitation rights.

At this stage, the parties may attempt informal resolution or family mediation. However, if the dispute continues, the aggrieved parent may approach the court.

3. Stage Two: Filing of Custody Petition Before Court

If the dispute remains unresolved, the aggrieved parent files a custody or guardianship petition before the competent Family Court or District Court.

The petition includes details of the child, relationship between parties, and the relief sought. The petitioner may seek permanent custody, joint custody, or visitation rights.

Additionally, the petitioner may file an application for interim custody or visitation.

After filing, the court registers the case and issues notice to the respondent parent.

4. Stage Three: Service of Notice and Appearance of Respondent

Next, the court ensures that the respondent receives proper notice of the proceedings.

The notice specifies the date of hearing and directs the respondent to appear before the court.

The respondent may appear personally or through legal counsel. If the respondent fails to appear, the court may proceed ex parte.

Proper service of notice ensures compliance with principles of natural justice.

5. Stage Four: Filing of Reply and Counter-Claims

After receiving notice, the respondent files a written statement or reply to the petition.

The respondent may oppose the claim for custody or propose alternative arrangements such as shared custody or limited visitation.

In some cases, the respondent may also file counter-claims seeking custody or enhanced visitation rights.

This stage helps the court identify the issues in dispute.

6. Stage Five: Interim Custody and Visitation Orders

Since custody matters involve immediate welfare concerns, courts often pass interim orders at an early stage.

For instance, the court may grant temporary custody to one parent and visitation rights to the other parent.

In urgent situations, a parent may also seek immediate production of the child through remedies similar to Section 97 CrPC / Section 104 BNSS, where unlawful detention is alleged.

The court considers factors such as age of the child, emotional needs, and stability before granting interim relief.

These interim orders remain effective during the pendency of the case.

7. Stage Six: Mediation and Counseling

Subsequently, the court may refer the parties to mediation or counseling.

Family Courts actively encourage amicable settlement in custody disputes. Mediation helps parents arrive at mutually acceptable arrangements for custody and visitation.

Additionally, courts may interact with the child to understand the child’s preferences.

If mediation succeeds, the parties record a settlement before the court. If mediation fails, the case proceeds to trial.

8. Stage Seven: Framing of Issues

If disputes persist, the court frames issues for determination.

These issues may include questions such as which parent can better ensure the welfare of the child and whether visitation rights should be granted.

Framing of issues helps structure the trial and focus on relevant questions.

9. Stage Eight: Evidence and Examination

At this stage, both parties present evidence to support their claims.

For example, parties may produce documents relating to income, living conditions, and educational background. Witnesses may testify regarding the child’s upbringing and parental conduct.

The court may also consider expert reports from child psychologists or welfare officers.

Additionally, the court may interact with the child, depending on the child’s age and maturity.

The opposing party has the right to cross-examine witnesses.

10. Stage Nine: Final Arguments

After completion of evidence, both parties present final arguments before the court.

Each party attempts to demonstrate that their custody arrangement serves the best interests of the child.

The court carefully evaluates all evidence, statutory provisions, and judicial precedents.

The welfare of the child remains the overriding consideration at this stage.

11. Stage Ten: Judgment and Final Custody Order

Finally, the court delivers its judgment after considering all aspects of the case.

The court may grant sole custody, joint custody, or structured visitation rights.

The order may also include directions regarding education, healthcare, and overall welfare of the child.

The court ensures that the final order promotes the child’s physical, emotional, and psychological well-being.

12. Enforcement of Custody and Visitation Orders

After passing the order, both parties must comply with the court’s directions.

If one parent violates the custody or visitation order, the aggrieved parent may approach the court for enforcement.

In appropriate cases, courts may invoke coercive measures. For instance, the court may direct production of the child through mechanisms similar to Section 97 CrPC / Section 104 BNSS, where applicable.

Courts may also modify orders to ensure compliance and protect the child’s welfare.

13. Modification and Appeal

Child custody orders are not final in the strict sense because circumstances may change over time.

Therefore, either parent may seek modification of custody or visitation arrangements if circumstances materially change.

Additionally, an aggrieved party may file an appeal before a higher court challenging the custody order.

The appellate court reviews whether the lower court correctly applied the principle of welfare of the child.

Conclusion

Child custody and visitation cases require careful judicial balancing of parental rights and the welfare of the child. Therefore, courts follow a structured process that includes interim relief, mediation, evidence, and final adjudication.

Understanding the life cycle of a custody case helps parents approach the process with clarity and responsibility. Ultimately, the law ensures that every decision prioritises the best interests and well-being of the child.

Other Life Cycles: DV Case Lifecycle || Maintenance Case u/s 125 CrPC Lifecycle. Index is here.

Key Contributor :
Mrs. Suprajaa Rajan B.Com., LL.B., LL.M.
+91-9606345150

Post Views: 205

Vinod Kumar Vs Seema Devi and Anr on 16 Mar 2026 – Judgement Summary

Posted on April 4 by Suprajaa Rajan

In Vinod Kumar Vs Seema Devi and Anr, the Delhi High Court examined whether the maintenance awarded by the Family Court under Section 125 CrPC (now Section 144 BNSS) required interference.

The petitioner (husband) challenged the maintenance granted to his wife and daughter, arguing that:

The wife lived separately without justification
She had rental income
His own income was wrongly assessed

However, the Court found that the wife had consistently alleged cruelty, which justified her separate residence. Moreover, the Court emphasized that an able-bodied husband cannot evade maintenance liability by understating income or taking voluntary retirement.

After analysing income, evidence, and legal principles, the Court upheld the Family Court’s order and dismissed the revision petition.

“9. It is well settled that the object of granting maintenance is to prevent vagrancy by compelling those who can provide support to those who are unable to support themselves and who have a moral claim to support.”

“10. Section 125 of the CrPC elucidates conditions under which a wife may be deemed ineligible for maintenance. These conditions include instances where the wife is engaged in adulterous activities, where she, without any justifiable cause, refuse to cohabit with her husband, or where both parties have agreed to live apart through mutual consent. These provisions delineate clear legal parameters that govern the entitlement or disentitlement of maintenance to ensure that the support is granted only under circumstances that warrant such financial assistance.”

“13. Merely because Respondent No.1 remained in possession of the matrimonial house, the same does not signify that the petitioner did not neglect to maintain the respondents. Even if the contention of the petitioner is taken as correct, the case of the respondents is not helmed on Respondent No.1 leaving the company of the petitioner due to neglect, so as to disentitle her from grant of maintenance. Rather, Respondent No.1 has made categorical allegations of cruelty, which is sufficient to satisfy the threshold of balance of probabilities.”
“18. It appears to be implausible that the petitioner would have taken retirement from his stable well-paying job without securing any other mode of income. As it is a normal tendency of the parties to not disclose their true income in matrimonial disputes, the Courts are permitted to make some guess work and arrive at a figure that a party may reasonably be earning.”
“19. The petitioner is a well- bodied man capable of earning, he cannot shirk his sacrosanct duty to financially support his wife and children by claiming that he has no income after retirement apart from his pension. The petitioner is thus obliged to earn and maintain his family, and the purported lower MSP prices for his land would thus not help his case.”

Decision

The Delhi High Court held that:

The maintenance awarded by the Family Court was justified and reasonable
The wife’s allegations of cruelty justified her separate residence
The husband’s claim of low income was not credible

Accordingly:

The Court refused to interfere with the maintenance order
The revision petition was dismissed
Maintenance (₹10,000 per month each after majority, with 10% increase every two years) was upheld

Vinod Kumar Vs Seema Devi and Anr on 16 Mar 2026

Citation :

Other Sources :

Index of Maintenance Judgements under Sec 125 CrPC is here.

Related Legal Concepts

Maintenance under Section 125 CrPC (Section 144 BNSS)
Cruelty as Ground for Separate Residence
Assessment of Income in Maintenance Cases
Doctrine of Social Justice in Family Law
Adverse Inference for Non-Disclosure of Income

Key Contributor :
Mrs. Suprajaa Rajan B.Com., LL.B., LL.M.
+91-9606345150

Post Views: 77

Anju Garg and Anr Vs Deepak Kumar Garg on 28 Sep 2022 – Judgement Summary

Posted on April 4 by Suprajaa Rajan

In Anju Garg and Anr Vs Deepak Kumar Garg, the Supreme Court of India examined whether a wife is entitled to maintenance under Section 125 CrPC (now Section 144 BNSS) despite adverse findings by lower courts.

The appellants (wife and son) challenged the denial of maintenance to the wife by the Family Court and the High Court. The Court observed that the husband not only neglected his duty but also made baseless allegations regarding the wife’s character, which justified her living separately.

Moreover, the Court emphasised that maintenance provisions serve a social justice function. Therefore, once neglect and inability to maintain oneself are established, courts must grant relief.

Accordingly, the Court set aside the erroneous findings of lower courts and granted maintenance to the wife.

“9. Section 125 of Cr.P.C. was conceived to ameliorate the agony, anguish and financial suffering of a woman who is required to leave the matrimonial home, so that some suitable arrangements could be made to enable her to sustain herself and the children.”
“10. It is the sacrosanct duty of the husband to provide financial support to the wife and to the minor children. The husband is required to earn money even by physical labour, if he is an able-bodied, and could not avoid his obligation, except on the legally permissible grounds mentioned in the statute.”
“11. She had clearly stated as to how she was harassed and subjected to cruelty by the respondent, which had constrained her to leave the matrimonial home along with her children, and as to how the respondent had failed and neglected to maintain her and her children. She had also proved by producing the documentary evidence that her father had paid money to the respondent from time to time to help the respondent for his business. Even if the allegations of demand of dowry by the respondent were not believed, there was enough evidence to believe that money was being paid to the respondent by the father of the appellant-wife, which substantiated her allegation that the respondent was demanding money from her father and was subjecting her to harassment.”
“13. The respondent being an able- bodied, he is obliged to earn by legitimate means and maintain his wife and the minor child. Having regard to the evidence of the appellant-wife before the Family Court, and having regard to the other evidence on record, the Court has no hesitation in holding that though the respondent had sufficient source of income and was able-bodied, had failed and neglected to maintain the appellants.”

Decision

The Supreme Court of India allowed the appeal and held that the wife was entitled to maintenance.

Accordingly:

The Court awarded ₹10,000 per month as maintenance to the wife.
This amount was in addition to ₹6,000 per month already granted to the son.
The maintenance was made payable from the date of filing of the petition.
The Court also directed the husband to clear arrears within 8 weeks.

Thus, the Court corrected the perverse findings of the Family Court and High Court and reinforced the protective intent of maintenance law.

Anju Garg and Anr Vs Deepak Kumar Garg on 28 Sep 2022

Citation :

Other Sources :

Index of Maintenance Judgements under Sec 125 CrPC is here.

Related Legal Concepts

Explore related stages and concepts in criminal procedure:

Maintenance under Section 125 CrPC (Section 144 BNSS)
Social Justice Jurisprudence in Family Law
Cruelty as Ground for Separate Residence
Burden of Proof in Maintenance Cases
Obligation of Able-Bodied Husband to Maintain Wife

Key Contributor :

Mrs. Suprajaa Rajan B.Com., LL.B., LL.M.

+91-9606345150

Post Views: 1,188

Defence Strategy When Elderly Parents Are Named in FIR

Posted on April 3 by Suprajaa Rajan

In matrimonial and family disputes, complainants often name multiple family members, including elderly parents, in a First Information Report (FIR). However, courts have consistently cautioned against the mechanical implication of relatives without specific allegations.

Therefore, when an FIR includes elderly parents, you must adopt a focused legal defence strategy. You should highlight the absence of direct involvement, lack of evidence, and misuse of criminal law provisions.

This article explains the legal remedies and defence strategies available when elderly parents are falsely implicated, along with relevant provisions under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) and the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS).

Understanding the Legal Position

The police register an FIR under Section 154 CrPC (Section 173 BNSS) when they receive information about a cognizable offence. After registration, the investigation begins, and all named persons may face legal scrutiny.

However, courts do not rely solely on allegations. Instead, they examine:

Specific acts attributed to each accused
Supporting evidence
The individual role of each person

In many cases, complaints contain general and vague allegations against elderly parents, which you can challenge at an early stage.

Step 1: Analyse the FIR Carefully

First, you must carefully examine the FIR. A strong defence always begins with identifying weaknesses in the complaint.

You should check:

Whether the FIR contains specific allegations
Whether it mentions dates, events, or overt acts
Whether allegations appear vague or omnibus

If the complaint lacks specificity, you can argue that it fails to disclose a prima facie case against elderly parents.

Step 2: Seek Protection from Arrest

Next, you should promptly seek protection from arrest by filing an anticipatory bail application.

You can file this application under:

Section 438 CrPC (Section 482 BNSS)

Courts generally adopt a lenient approach toward elderly parents, especially when:

They reside separately
They have no direct involvement
The allegations appear exaggerated

Additionally, courts consider age, health, and dependency factors while granting relief.

Step 3: Rely on Safeguards Against Arbitrary Arrest

You should also rely on statutory safeguards that prevent unnecessary arrests.

The police must issue a notice of appearance under:

Section 41A CrPC (Section 35 BNSS)

instead of making immediate arrests when the accused cooperates with the investigation.

Further, the Supreme Court in
Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar
directed authorities to avoid automatic arrests in matrimonial offences.

Therefore, elderly parents can use these safeguards to prevent unjustified detention and harassment.

Step 4: Gather Evidence Showing Lack of Involvement

After securing protection, you should collect evidence that demonstrates the absence of involvement.

You should gather:

Proof of separate residence
Medical records indicating age-related limitations
Travel records
Independent witness statements

This evidence helps establish that the allegations are false, exaggerated, or legally unsustainable.

Step 5: File for Quashing of FIR

If the FIR clearly lacks specific allegations, you should approach the High Court to quash the proceedings.

You can invoke:

Section 482 CrPC (Section 528 BNSS)

The High Court may quash proceedings when:

Allegations are vague or omnibus
No specific role is attributed
Continuation of proceedings amounts to abuse of process

Courts frequently grant relief to elderly parents in such circumstances.

Step 6: Seek Discharge at Chargesheet Stage

If the police file a chargesheet, you should consider filing a discharge application.

Relevant provisions include:

Section 239 CrPC (Section 263 BNSS) – Warrant cases
Section 227 CrPC (Section 250 BNSS) – Sessions cases

You can argue that:

No evidence exists against elderly parents
The chargesheet fails to establish involvement
The case relies on assumptions rather than proof

If the court agrees, it may discharge the accused at this stage.

Step 7: Challenge Mechanical Implication of Relatives

Courts consistently discourage the practice of implicating all family members without distinction.

Therefore, you should emphasize:

Absence of specific allegations
Lack of direct interaction with the complainant
No supporting evidence

This approach aligns with judicial principles that prevent misuse of criminal law in matrimonial disputes.

Step 8: Maintain a Consistent Defence Strategy

Finally, you must maintain a consistent and structured defence throughout the proceedings.

You should:

Avoid contradictory statements
Cooperate with the investigation
Present documentary evidence at each stage

A consistent defence strengthens credibility and improves the chances of relief.

Judicial Approach

Courts recognise that false implication of elderly parents can lead to serious injustice and misuse of the legal process.

Therefore, courts often:

Grant anticipatory bail
Quash proceedings where appropriate
Discharge accused in absence of evidence

This balanced approach ensures that only genuine cases proceed to trial.

Conclusion

When elderly parents are named in an FIR, the law provides multiple safeguards to protect them from unjust prosecution.

You should:

Analyse the FIR thoroughly
Seek anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC (Section 482 BNSS)
Invoke High Court powers under Section 482 CrPC (Section 528 BNSS)
File for discharge under Section 239/227 CrPC (Section 263/250 BNSS)

By adopting a structured legal strategy, you can effectively challenge false allegations and protect innocent family members.

Index of Legal Strategies and Defence is here.

Related Legal Concepts

Explore related stages and concepts in criminal procedure:

First Information Report
Anticipatory Bail
Quashing of FIR
Discharge of an accused
Inherent powers of High Court

Key Contributor :
Mrs. Suprajaa Rajan B.Com., LL.B., LL.M.
+91-9606345150

Post Views: 172

Ankit Saha Vs State of UP and Anr on 03 Dec 2025

Posted on April 3 by ShadesOfKnife

A single judge of Allahabad bench of Allahabad High Court held as follows on two aspects,

From Paras 9 to 11, (Failed to prove that Wife was ‘unable to maintain herself‘)

9. From the perusal of Section 125 Cr.P.C., it is clear that maintenance can be awarded to the wife, when she is unable to maintain herself.
10. A perusal of the paragraph 23 of the impugned judgment which is at internal page no. 12 of the impugned indicates that in the affidavit filed before the trial court, the opposite party no. 2 herself admitted that she is a Post-Graduate, Web Designer by qualification, and is working as a Senior Sales Coordinator in Keiath Telecom Pvt. Ltd., getting salary of Rs. 34,000/- per month but in her cross-examination she has further admitted that she is earning of Rs. 36,000/- per month and such amount, for a wife who has no other liability, cannot be said to be meagre, whereas the revisionist has the responsibility of maintaining his aged parents and other social obligations.
11. Thus, this Court is of the view that as per the provision of Section 125(1) (a), the opposite party no. 2 is not entitled to get any maintenance from her husband/revisionist as she is an earning lady and able to maintain herself.

From Paras 12 to 15,

12. On the second issue, learned counsel for the revisionist has alleged that she did not came before the trial court with clean hands. A perusal of the affidavit filed by the opposite party no.2 at page no. 67-70 clearly reflects that she has not mentioned that she is an earning lady as well as a perusal of application under Section 125 Cr. P.C. paper no. 33 to 38 at paragraph no. 16 reflects that she has claimed herself as an illiterate and unemployed woman but when the document filed by the revisionist was shown to her before the trial court, she has admitted her aforesaid income during her cross-examination. Thus, it is clear that she did not came before the trial court with clean hands.
13. It is settled law that when a person approaches a Court, he should approach the Court not only with clean hands but also with clean mind, clean heart and clean objective. It is a law of nature that one should not be enriched by the loss or injury to another. The judicial process should never become an instrument of appreciation or abuse or a means in the process of the Court to subvert justice. No litigant has a right to unlimited drought on the Court time and public money in order to get his affairs settled in the manner he wishes. Easy, access to justice should not be misused as a licence to file misconceived and frivolous petitions. If a petitioner is guilty of suppression of very important fact his case cannot be considered on merits. Thus, a litigant is bound to make “full and true disclosure of facts”.
14. The Hon’ble Apex Court in Rekha Sharad Ushir Vs. Saptashrungi Mahila Nagari Sahkari Patsansta Ltd. reported in 2025 SCC OnLine SC641, para no. 11 is reproduced herein below:
“11. It is settled law that a litigant who, while filing proceedings in the court, suppresses material facts or makes a false statement, cannot seek justice from the court. The facts suppressed must be material and relevant to the controversy, which may have a bearing on the decision making. Cases of those litigants who have no regard for the truth and those who indulge in suppressing material facts need to be thrown out of the court.”
15. In view of the said judgment of Hon’ble Apex Court, the opposite party no. 2 does not deserve any sympathy and is not entitled to receive maintenance from the revisionist.

Ankit Saha Vs State of UP and Anr on 03 Dec 2025

Index of Maintenance Judgements under Section 144 BNSS here.

Post Views: 201

Mariya Zafar and Anr Vs State of UP and Anr on 31 Mar 2026

Posted on April 3 by Suprajaa Rajan

In Mariya Zafar v. State of U.P., the Allahabad High Court (Lucknow Bench) addressed whether a Magistrate can reject an application seeking production of financial documents under Section 91 CrPC (now Section 94 BNSS) in a domestic violence proceeding.

The petitioner-wife alleged domestic violence, dowry harassment, and financial suppression by her husband. She sought disclosure of his bank accounts, Income Tax Returns (ITRs), and GST records to determine his actual income for maintenance proceedings under the Domestic Violence Act.

However, the trial court rejected her application, stating that concealment could instead be dealt with under Section 340 CrPC (now Section 379 BNSS). Challenging this, the petitioner approached the High Court.

The High Court emphasized compliance with the Supreme Court’s ruling in Rajnesh v. Neha, which mandates full financial disclosure in maintenance matters. After examining the husband’s ITRs (produced in sealed cover), the Court found that he had misrepresented his occupation and income. Consequently, the High Court set aside the Magistrate’s order and directed reconsideration.

“11.“…the court below has observed that there is no need to summon the Income Tax Returns of opposite party No. 2 to ascertain the income and the reason has been recorded that in case the opposite party is concealing the material fact, then he will be prosecuted under Section 340 Cr.P.C.”
“14….the opposite party No. 3 is directed to bring the income tax return of the last two years filed by the opposite party No. 2…”
“15.ITRs of opp. party No. 2… indicate that the opposite party No. 2 is an Architect… in the AY 2023-24 his total income was Rs. 4,85,290.00 and in the AY 2024-25 his income was Rs. 5,07,680.00.”
“17. ..the order dated 19-01-2026… is hereby set aside and the said court is directed to take fresh decision in the matter in the light of judgment… within 6 weeks…”

Decision

The Allahabad High Court:

Set aside the Magistrate’s order dated 19.01.2026.
Directed the trial court to reconsider the application under Section 91 CrPC (Section 94 BNSS) in light of Rajnesh v. Neha.
Ordered that the matter be decided within 6 weeks.
Allowed the petitioner access to the respondent’s ITRs.
Emphasised the importance of truthful financial disclosure in maintenance proceedings.

Mariya Zafar and Anr Vs State of UP and Anr on 31 Mar 2026

Citation :

Other Sources :

Index of Domestic Violence judgments is here.

Related Legal Concepts

Explore related stages and concepts in criminal procedure:

Financial Disclosure in Maintenance Proceedings
Summoning of Documents
Burden of Proof
Judicial Duty to Ensure Fair Maintenance Adjudication
Enforcement of Supreme Court Guidelines (Rajnesh v. Neha)

Key Contributor :

Mrs. Suprajaa Rajan B.Com., LL.B., LL.M.

+91-9606345150

Post Views: 121