This DV is settled out of court and the couple started living together.
G.Hari Chandana Vs G.Arun Kumar on 10 July, 2015
This DVC was withdrawn by the knife under CrPC 257.
A.Sujatha Vs C.Nagaraju on 29 January, 2016
A well-reasoned judgment from Hon’ble First Class Magistrate ably supported by a catena of judgments held that this DVC was an attempt by the knife to usurp the property and nothing to do with domestic violence.
Last nail in the coffin on the money-hungry, gold-digging knife:
When she is having capacity to maintain herself then extending her palm for the alms of the respondent is highly un-acceptable. So as per the Domestic Violence Act, though it is a beneficial legislation but the basic principles cannot be deviated under the facts and circumstances of this case and the petitioner is not entitled to claim any maintenance and for residence.
Harijana Thodugu Mannala Savithramma Vs Harijana Thodugu Mannala Vijaya Simha on 17 February, 2012
Economic abuse is established in this DV case from Anantapur DV Cases Series. Gross misuse of power or glorified ineptness towards differentiating between a Civil Suit for property and giving Residence (not property) Order under DV Act.
3 years LLB (General) – Second Semester Subjects and Previous Years Question Papers
These are the 5 subjects in second semester of 3 years LLB (General) of Sri Krishna Devaraya University, Anantapur, Andhra Pradesh, India.
1. Family Law – 1
2. Family Law – 2
3. Environment Law
4. Jurisprudence
5. Legal Writing
Here are the pdfs for the previous years question papers for second semester.
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
Click here for Home Page which contains answers
3 years LLB (General) – First Semester Subjects and Previous Years Question Papers
These are the 5 subjects in first semester of 3 years LLB (General) of Sri Krishna Devaraya University, Anantapur, Andhra Pradesh, India.
1. Indian Penal Code
2. Law of Torts
3. Constitution Law
4. General Contract
5. Special Contract
Here are the pdfs for the previous years question papers for first semester.
2011
2012
2014
2015
2016
2017
Click here for Home Page which contains answers
Shital Krushna Dhake Vs Krushna Dagdu Dhake on 06 Oct 2018
The cunning knife who is begging maintenance under HMA 24, cannot travel 125 KMs to attend Court and requires the assistance of an adult member of the family to travel, petitioned for Transfer of cases to her den location.
Just for some ‘utensils, Bed and Rukhwat items’ she denied to settle the matter even when the hubby dear is willing to dole out, an amount of Rs.10.50 lac as a One Time Comprehensive Settlement and part ways with the Applicant/ wife before it became more painful.
From Para 8 and 9,
At this juncture, the learned Advocate for the husband submits that though it was beyond his means, he has somehow accumulated Rs.10.50 lac so as to resolve this entire issue once and for all and part ways. If the wife wants to agitate on the utensils and Rukhwat, the husband is withdrawing his offer of depositing Rs.10.50 lac in this Court.
I see reason in the submissions of the learned Advocate for the husband and therefore, the offer that the Respondent/ Husband had made earlier, is permitted to be withdrawn and the amount of Rs.10.50 lac need not be deposited in this Court.
TRIVIA
The name of the knife is a little… Shit’al… LOL
Shital Krushna Dhake Vs Krushna Dagdu Dhake on 02 Feb 2018
High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) has held that, there is no harm if such a print out from the official website is placed before this Court.
From Para 2 and 3,
2. I am of the view that this apprehension is misplaced since the print out of the orders of this Court from the official website has sanctity and the trial Courts are expected to consider the said orders, if they are cited after taking a print out from the official website. The said orders are also available before the trial Court from the official website and there can be a counter verification to find out whether such an order is actually uploaded to the official website or not. In this backdrop, there is no harm if such a print out from the official website is placed before this Court.
3. It is informed by the learned Advocates that, in several cases before various trial Courts, the learned Judges insist on production of the certified copy of the order and they are not inclined to consider the print out of an order from the official website of the Bombay High Court, as being a reliable document. As observed in the foregoing paragraphs, in the event of any doubt in the mind of the learned Judge, it can be checked from the official website of the Bombay High Court as to whether such an order has been uploaded or not? Once the order is uploaded on the official website, it is a reliable document to be considered by the Court before whom it is cited.
4. Since several lawyers in the Court room have addressed this Court on this common issue, the learned Registrar (Judicial) of this Court is directed to circulate this order to all the learned Principal District Judges of the District Courts in Maharashtra, so as to bring this aspect to the notice of all the learned Judges working in the judicial districts in this state.
Citations:
Indiankanoon.org or Casemine link:
Added to this Index here.
Capt. Anila Bhatia Vs State of Haryana on 09 October, 2018
Now Hon’ble High of Punjab and Haryana also held that Courts/Police cannot impound anyone’s passport in India. Only Passport Authority can impound/revoke a passport in India.
[related_posts_by_tax title=”5 Recently Updated Posts, Similar or Related To Above Post” orderby=”post_modified” posts_per_page=”5″ show_date=”true”]
Md.Ajmal Md.Amir Kasab @Abu Mujahid Vs State Of Maharashtra on 29 August, 2012
This is the appeal made by the Pakistan terrorist Kasab which was dismissed by Hon’ble Supreme Court.
Citations :
Other Sources :
